NR 534 week 1 IP

 

Week 1: Creating a Philosophy of Leadership

44 unread replies.44 replies.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NR 534 week 1 IP
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Please note, all NR534 discussions occur in small groups. For this reason, please review the

Small Group Discussion Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)

Part 1: Individual

Whether or not it is written or verbally articulated, everyone has an idea or belief system about leadership that influences their behavior as a leader and a follower. Many factors combine that inform your leaderhip philosophy.

  • Discuss your personal beliefs, values, experiences, and current leadership principles and trends that influence your leadership philosophy.
  • In 3-5 sentences clearly articulate your personal leadership philosophy. This should begin with, “My philosophy of leadership is…..”
  • Describe how your leadership philosophy relates to the position and the organization within which you currently work. How does it affect the work you do, how you make decisions, and the culture you promote.

Part 2: With Your Group

  • Discuss the commonalities and differences among the statements from the group.
  • How does your personal philosophy compare to the philosophy of your organization? How do you reconcile discrepancies between them?
  • What impact does congruency between your personal leadership and the organization’s philosophy have on creating a person-centered, caring healthcare organization?

SmallGroup Discussion Grading Rubric

Participation for MSN

Small Group Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the small group discussions (GDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of GDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The GD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the GDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. GDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly group discussion is worth a maximum of 50 points. Students must post a minimum of four times in each discussion. One of these posts must be a summary of learning for the week. The initial response to the discussion prompt must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. Each of the subsequent posts must occur on days following the initial response. The final posting deadline for all subsequent posts is by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. For week 8 only, subsequent posts must occur by the Saturday deadline-11:59 pm MT. If the student does not meet the Wednesday posting deadline for the initial posting, a late penalty is applied of 5 points. Not meeting the requirements for subsequent postings, either in number or deadline, will result in a loss of 5 points.

Group Discussion Responses

Small group discussions provide the opportunity for deep exploration and new knowledge discovery of course topics. This type of exploration requires synthesis of various sources of information. Responses in group discussions should be substantive, reflect the student’s personal position on the topic, thoroughly address the information being asked for by the prompt, and include insights based on others’ postings. Direct quotes in group discussions should be a rare occurrence. These are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under Scholarliness and/or

Course Knowledge

rubric categories.

MSNST_GroupDiscussionGradingRubric_Final_2019.02.21 Executive Track

MSNST_GroupDiscussionGradingRubric_Final_2019.02.21 Executive Track

MSN-ST Executive Track

Small Group Discussion Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category

15

14

13

9

0

Performance Category

14

Point Values

Exceptional

Exceeds

Meets

Needs Improvement

Developing

Performance Category

15

14

13

9

0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

All three elements are addressed and clearly accurately articulated

• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information on required topic

• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced by review of scholarly literature

• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on required topic

Two(2) of three (3) elements addressed and accurately articulated; remaining element vaguely addressed or is missing

• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information on required topic

• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced by review of scholarly literature

• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on required topic

All elements are present but lack clarity and are generally addressed; Little evidence of understanding of topic is present

• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information on required topic
• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced by review of scholarly literature
• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on required topic

2 or less elements are superficially addressed with little supportive evidence of understanding of topic is present

• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information on required topic
• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced by review of scholarly literature
• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on required topic

All three elements are missing or not discernible

• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information on required topic
• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced by review of scholarly literature
• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on required topic

Course Knowledge

15.0 pts

All four (4) required elements are addressed and clearly articulated

• Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt

•Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage further exploration and discovery

•Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to discussion topic

• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life.

Two of three elements addressed and clearly articulated, remaining element vaguely addressed or missing

•Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt

•Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage further exploration and discovery

• Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to discussion topic

• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life

All elements are present but lack clarity and are generally addressed; Little evidence of understanding of topic present

• Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt

• Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage further exploration and discovery

• Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to discussion topic

• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life.

Three or less elements are superficially addressed with little supportive evidence of understanding of topic present

• Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt

• Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage further exploration and discovery
• Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to discussion topic
• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life.

All elements are missing, not discernible, or irrelevant to topic

• Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt

• Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage further exploration and discovery
• Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to discussion topic
• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life.

20

18

16

0

Interactive Dialogue

Posts accurately address all five(5) elements, clearly articulated; specific connections are made to topic and discussion

· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @ 11:59pm MT

· Responds to discussion group at least four times

· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and readings

· Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2 scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage group in further discussion

· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by content and group discussion

Posts accurately address four(4) of five(5) elements, clearly articulated; specific connections are made to topic and discussion

· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @ 11:59pm MT

· Responds to discussion group at least four times

· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and readings
· Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2 scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage group in further discussion
· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by content and group discussion

Posts generally address three (3) of five(5) required elements; limited connections are made to topic and discussion

· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @ 11:59pm MT
· Responds to discussion group at least four times
· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and readings
· Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2 scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage group in further discussion

· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by content and group discussion

Posts generally address required elements; limited connections made to topic and discussion; fails to meet posting time and number requirement

· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @ 11:59pm MT
· Responds to discussion group at least four times
· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and readings

· •Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2 scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage group in further discussion

· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by content and group discussion

Does not respond to group discussion; No connections made to topic; Superficial posts lacking substance and scholarly support

· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @ 11:59pm MT
· Responds to discussion group at least four times
· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and readings
· Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2 scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage group in further discussion
· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by content and group discussion

 

Minus 1 Points

Minus 3 Points

Minus 5 Points

Minus 7 Points

Minus 9 Points

Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual Current Edition

· 2-3 errors in APA format.

· Written responses

have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.

· Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.

· 4-5 errors in APA format.

· Writing responses

have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.

· Writing style is somewhat focused.

· 6-7 errors in APA format.

· Writing responses

have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.

· Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.

· 8-10 errors in APA format.

· Writing responses

have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.

· Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.

· Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.

· Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.

· Writing style does not facilitate communication.

· The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor

0 points lost

-5 points lost

Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.

The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days

Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday of the eighth week.

*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and group discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.

What Will You Get?

We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.

Premium Quality

Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.

Experienced Writers

Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.

On-Time Delivery

Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.

24/7 Customer Support

Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.

Complete Confidentiality

Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.

Authentic Sources

We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.

Moneyback Guarantee

Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.

Order Tracking

You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.

image

Areas of Expertise

Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.

Areas of Expertise

Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.

image

Trusted Partner of 9650+ Students for Writing

From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.

Preferred Writer

Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.

Grammar Check Report

Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.

One Page Summary

You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.

Plagiarism Report

You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.

Free Features $66FREE

  • Most Qualified Writer $10FREE
  • Plagiarism Scan Report $10FREE
  • Unlimited Revisions $08FREE
  • Paper Formatting $05FREE
  • Cover Page $05FREE
  • Referencing & Bibliography $10FREE
  • Dedicated User Area $08FREE
  • 24/7 Order Tracking $05FREE
  • Periodic Email Alerts $05FREE
image

Our Services

Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.

  • On-time Delivery
  • 24/7 Order Tracking
  • Access to Authentic Sources
Academic Writing

We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.

Professional Editing

We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.

Thorough Proofreading

We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.

image

Delegate Your Challenging Writing Tasks to Experienced Professionals

Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!

Check Out Our Sample Work

Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality

Categories
All samples
Essay (any type)
Essay (any type)
The Value of a Nursing Degree
Undergrad. (yrs 3-4)
Nursing
2
View this sample

It May Not Be Much, but It’s Honest Work!

Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.

0+

Happy Clients

0+

Words Written This Week

0+

Ongoing Orders

0%

Customer Satisfaction Rate
image

Process as Fine as Brewed Coffee

We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.

See How We Helped 9000+ Students Achieve Success

image

We Analyze Your Problem and Offer Customized Writing

We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.

  • Clear elicitation of your requirements.
  • Customized writing as per your needs.

We Mirror Your Guidelines to Deliver Quality Services

We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.

  • Proactive analysis of your writing.
  • Active communication to understand requirements.
image
image

We Handle Your Writing Tasks to Ensure Excellent Grades

We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.

  • Thorough research and analysis for every order.
  • Deliverance of reliable writing service to improve your grades.
Place an Order Start Chat Now
image

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code Happy