| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| CYB-630 |
CYB-630-O500 |
| IoT and Social Media |
120.0 |
| Criteria |
Percentage |
Unsatisfactory (0.00%) |
Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) |
Satisfactory (75.00%) |
Good (85.00%) |
Excellent (100.00%) |
Comments |
Points Earned |
| Content |
100.0% |
IoT and Social Media
|
| 20.0% |
The student provides an incomplete description of how IoT and social media have been affected by cybersecurity over time. Subject knowledge is not evident. |
The student outlines a few components of how IoT and social media have been affected by cybersecurity over time, but element details are lacking. Little subject knowledge is evident. |
The student appropriately describes how IoT and social media have been affected by cybersecurity over time; some element justifications are included. Subject knowledge appears to be good. |
The student provides a detailed description of how IoT and social media have been affected by cybersecurity over time; justifications are accurate. Subject knowledge is good. |
The student comprehensively describes how IoT and social media have been affected by cybersecurity over time; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. Subject knowledge is excellent. |
| Acceptable Use Policy Data |
| 1
|
| 5.0% |
The student provides an incomplete description of the usage of the Acceptable Use Policy data by organizations. Subject knowledge is not evident. |
The student outlines a few components of usage of the Acceptable Use Policy data by organizations, but element details are lacking. Little subject knowledge is evident. |
The student appropriately describes the usage of the Acceptable Use Policy data by organizations; some element justifications are included. Subject knowledge appears to be good. |
The student provides a detailed description of the usage of the Acceptable Use Policy data by organizations; justifications are accurate. Subject knowledge appears is good. |
The student comprehensively describes the usage of the Acceptable Use Policy data by organizations; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. Subject knowledge is excellent. |
| User Agreement |
15.0%
The student provides an incomplete description of how free products and services are monetized by organizations, specifically in relation to the User Agreement. Subject knowledge is not evident. |
The student outlines a few components of how free products and services are monetized by organizations, specifically in relation to the User Agreement, but element details are lacking. Little subject knowledge is evident. |
The student appropriately describes how free products and services are monetized by organizations, specifically in relation to the User Agreement; some element justifications are included. Subject knowledge appears to be good. |
The student provides a detailed description of how free products and services are monetized by organizations, specifically in relation to the User Agreement; justifications are accurate. Subject knowledge appears is good. |
The student comprehensively describes how free products and services are monetized by organizations, specifically in relation to the User Agreement; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. Subject knowledge is excellent. |
| Analyze Ethical Decisions Made From the Christian Worldview |
20.0%
The student does not provide rationale of the decision in light of the Christian worldview. |
The student tries to provide rationale of the decision in light of the Christian worldview, but shows inconsistency. |
The student provides rationale of the decision in light of the Christian worldview. |
The student provides rationale of the decision in light of the Christian worldview. The idea of boosting the common good is present. |
The student provides rationale of the decision in light of the Christian worldview with the idea of enriching the common good. |
| Sources |
| 10.0% |
No outside academic sources are used to support major points. |
Few relevant sources beyond assigned readings are used to support major points. Important relevant sources are neglected. Quoted material and paraphrasing are overused. |
Sources are adequate, relevant, and extend beyond assigned readings. Quoted material and paraphrasing are included to support major points and writer’s idea development. |
Sources are academic, current, and/or relevant to support major points. Quoted material and paraphrasing is used effectively and consistently to support the major points and writer’s idea development. |
Sources are academic, comprehensive, current, and/or relevant. Quoted material and paraphrasing expertly support, extend, and inform ideas but do not substitute for the writer’s own idea development. Sources are well synthesized to support major points. |
| Argument Logic and Construction |
10.0%
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) |
5.0%
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. |
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. |
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. |
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. |
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) |
5.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. |
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. |
| Total Weightage |
100% |
