|
|
|
Criteria Maximum # points: 100
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Fair
|
Poor
|
|
Content
Introduction to the Health People 2030 Objective
15 points
|
15 points
Identifies the issue and why the Healthy People 2030 Objective is important to explore. Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction.
Issue or concern that triggered need for the Healthy People Objective 2030 covered in detail and supported by research.
|
12 points
Identifies the issue and why the Healthy People 2030 Objective is important to explore but lacking in depth or comp–
Organization, transitions,
introduction slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Issue or concern that triggered need for the Healthy People Objective 2030 addressed and supported by research but slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
|
10-points
Minimal discussion of the issue and why the Healthy People 2030 objective is important to explore.
Organization, transitions, introduction are slightly inconsistent, lacking clarity.
Issue or concern that triggered need for the Healthy People Objective 2030 minimally addressed and/or minimally supported by research.
|
5 points
Minimal discussion of the issue and why the Healthy People 2030 objective is important to explore.
Organization, transitions,
introduction inconsistent and lacking significant amount clarity and/or appropriateness. Poor transitions, introduction
Issue or concern that triggered need for the Healthy People Objective 2030 not addressed or not supported by research.
|
|
Quality of Research/Review of Literature
30 points
|
30 points
Research evidenced-based and in depth and beyond the obvious revealing new insights and includes more than 5 scholarly journal articles /references
|
25 points
Research is evidenced based but reveals few new insights. And includes 5 scholarly journal articles/references
|
10 points. Majority of research is not evidenced based even if it includes 5 scholarly journal articles/references
|
5 points
Review of literature does not directly address research
topic. No depth or breadth to the review of literature. Less than 5 scholarly journal articles/references
|
|
Participants
15 points
|
15 points
Target group and rationale for selecting target group well-defined. Detailed discussion of how age/gender/cultural variables impact the presentation of the information and supported by research.
|
12 points
Target group and rationale for selecting target group well-defined. Discussion of how age/gender/cultural variables impact the presentation of the information supported by research but missing 1-2 key elements
|
10 points
Target group and rationale for selecting target group and discussion of how age/gender/cultural variables impact the presentation of the information supported by research but minimally defined.
|
5 points
Target group and rationale for selecting target group and discussion of how age/gender/cultural variables impact the presentation of the information either not included or not defined and/or not supported by research.
|
|
Objectives/Content/Materials/Evaluation
20 points
|
20 points
Learning Objective, Content Outline, Strategies, materials, costs, and evaluation fully developed, and table included in the body of the paper. Includes more than 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms
|
15 points
Learning Objective, Content Outline, Strategies, materials costs, and evaluation fully developed but lacking insight. Table included in the body of the paper. Includes 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms
|
10 points
Learning Objective, Content Outline, Strategies, materials, costs, and evaluation minimally developed. Table included in the body of the paper. Includes 2 objectives instated in clear and measurable terms
|
5 points
Learning Objective, Content Outline, Strategies, materials, costs, and evaluation not developed and/or table not included in the body of the paper. Less than 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms
|
|
Publicity/Marketing
10 points
|
10 points
Marketing strategies well defined including who will assist in the marketing and supported by research.
|
8 points
Marketing strategies defined and includes who will assist in the marketing slightly inconsistent and lacking in clarity but supported by research.
|
6 points
Marketing strategies minimally defined with minimal discussion of who will assist in the marketing but supported by research.
|
2 points
Marketing strategies and who will assist in the marketing not defined and not supported by research.
|
|
Grammar/ Mechanics
5 points
|
5 points
Paper does not exceed more than 10 pages not including the title and references pages; more than a5 scholarly journal articles current within the past 3years; No errors in format or punctuation or capitalization. –Consistent and appropriate voice. — Sophisticated and precise word choice. Paragraph size appropriate –No spelling errors. No slang. –No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
|
4 points
Paper does not exceed more than 10 pages not including the title and reference pages
4 or less errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. — Voice mostly consistent and appropriate. Lengthy paragraphs — Fairly effective word choice. –No more than 2 spelling errors. –Fewer than 1 error in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. —
|
3 points
Paper exceeds more than 10 pages not including the title and reference pages and/or
6 or less errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate. Lengthy paragraphs. More than 5 spelling errors. –More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
|
0 points
Paper exceeds more than 10 pages not including the title and reference pages and /or
Many errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization.
Paper fails to flow in a logical sequence. Errors distract from readability.
|
|
References
5 points
|
5 points
Sources reliable and properly cited. More than 5 scholar evidenced based journal articles references. All references correctly cited in the paper and on the reference page. All information relevant to topic.
|
4 points
Sources reliable and properly cited with 5 scholarly evidenced based journal articles
All references correctly cited in the paper and the bibliography. Information relevant to topic.
|
3 points
Sources reliable and properly cited. 5 scholarly evidenced-based journal articles. Articles do not substantially support the topic. .
|
0 points
Secondhand sources or sources incorrectly cited.
Does not have a minimum of 5 scholarly evidenced-based journal articles /references.
Articles/references minimally support the topic.
|
