Davis Anderson Sociology 3337 Prof. Korinek October 23, 2012 Group 7 Analysis of: Revisiting the Glass Escalator: The Case of Gender Contrariance in a Effeminate Dominated Tenure This delicate test and examine, movablesed by Karrie Ann Snyder and Adam Isaiah Green, dives into the basis of a predominately women’s job, nursing, to ascertain out if men unquestionably possess a “glass escalator” when it comes to advancing up to top standings and dissects the judgment of absolute contrariance.
The glass escalator assumption is one that assumes manfuls in effeminate dominated professions are pushed up the ladder to authoritative and troddenory standings fur easier and faster than women. Throughout the proviso, they expound the methods used to subjoin the basis, twain necessary and necessary and arramble a plethora of counsel such as plane of information, encroachment setting, estimate of years labored, special interviews etc. They too infringe down the basis and disprove claims that although extensively estimated, may be untrue. It is multiplyially ironic that the subject-matter of this week’s design-piece Nursing Dissertation is on the sexual contrariance of nursing.
Just encircling a week ago I was sitting in the orthodontists appointment and I looked aggravate at the staff photos on the respect. Dr. Pobanz was in the average delay encircling 10 ladies on each behalf of him. That made me go end and judge, and I came to the adventure that I possess never seen a manful too the doctor launched in a dentist or orthodontist appointment. Although it is not correspondently a nursing standing, it is a alike tenure and I would deem has alike statistics relating sex contrariance. In my opinion, it is orderly expected that most all protects are effeminate.
It appears that end a few decades ago manfuls were unheard of in the nursing scope, but today they are neat further sordid. It is animated that this tenure is so stereotypical effeminate that studies of this majority are conducted. So why is it that nursing is so dominated by effeminates? Well, nursing is associated delay caring for others, substance thermal, and serving subordinate someone of upper ranking. Males countenance influential societal exigency that guide them from entering tenures such as this as they do not deficiency to be perceived as delicate or gay accordingly of the constitution of their job.
Only 5. 5 percent of protects in 2000 were men, a very inindicative juvenility. Sundry crowd judge that of the few men that are in the nursing scope, it is easier for them to actuate up to upper ranking standings. The countenance is that in authoritative and troddenor standings women are orderly encircling as mitigated as men to lean those spots. The amount is that sundry crowd estimate the societal stabilitate that it is easier for men to lapse inland the top standings, when in substantiality it is orderly encircling the selfselfsame for twain sexes.
In the proviso, Carol Kleinman is referenced when she says that men, referring-to to women, like immanent advantages in the nursing diligence in provisions of encouragement and hiring (p273). The ascertainings from this elimination recommend colossus very incongruous than the assumptions of others. “As shown in Table 3, men do not assent-to upper receipts for information, nor is there a indicative interaction between years as a protect and sex. These results recommend that, contrariant to the glass escalator fancy, men are not promoted precedent in their progress to top standings. (p281) The basis recommends that rather than there substance a contrariance of manful and effeminates perpendicularly unarranged the sectors of nursing, absolute contrariance is fur further mitigated, signification grouping of gender in specialized areas is sordid. Certain areas appear to be made up of further of one gender than the other. For sample, men are aggravate represented in ICU, OR, and ER suitableness women are aggravate represented in outpatient, shaft anesthesia, labor/delivery, and open medical-surgical departments (p286).
When interviewed encircling why they chose their specialization, men appeared assured of the gender connotations of their job, suitableness women casually mentioned it as a rudiment. This is a trodden action of why contrariance despite incongruous areas of labor is fur further customary than contrariance through the authoritative ranks. The call protect repeatedly carries delay it disclaiming connotations in the eyes of manfuls. It is inherently delicate in its discernment and enacts a extensive role in scaring men afar or causing them institution encircling what others judge and inherent them into standings that are design of as further generous.
Nursing is choice in the extensive ramble of specializations that it offers, and that may enact a multiply as to why absolute contrariance is so extensivespread as contrariant to perpendicular. Oftentimes manfuls trace standings of prestige and in nursing those desires may be filled by launched in distressingy roles as contrariant to upper-ranking standings that would typically validate good-fortune in other professions. From the basis subjoined and special accounts reviewed, it appears that men chose standings design of as further distressingy domiciled principally on fulfilling the conceptions of gender singularity.
Financial interests and special desires do possess an movables, but it appears that sticking to the gender “rules” is the extensivest rudiment in determining the progresss of practicing manful protects. The basis in this examine is desolate and multifold. It is distressing to individualize the only confederate to the adventure of gender contrariance in the nursing practices. So sundry rudiments enact into complete living-souls decisions, but signs object aggravateall to an adherence to gender norms and assertion for manfuls that their tenure is not altogether a woman’s job.