Ethics


 

Required Resources
Read/repurpose the subjoined resources for this air:

  • Textbook: Chapter 5, 6
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 2 literary fountains (in conjunction to the round citationbook)

Instructions
This assignment is the foremost plod in a three-multiply plan. You simply insufficiency to rendezvous on multiply one at this subject-matter. Each plod obtain institute on prior plods. However, it is not a subject of providing a scabrous drain of all or flush multiply of the complete plan near in week three. That is, aid plods effectiveness demand thoroughly new and peculiar citation.  At the similar age, completing each plod obtain aid you in completing a coming plod or coming plods. And, you should use the similar theme in all plods.

First, plucked a theme of virtuous wrangle, deliberate, disagreement, and quarrel, Examples of such themes are euthanasia, the departure forfeiture, pigmy, cloning, etc. You can pluck any such theme. It insufficiency not be listed near.

Next, specialty the standings of each cause of the ghostly deliberate. Still n ess at lowest two virtuous infers each cause presents to pretext their purpose on the theme is punish.

Now, we neglect to evaluate these standings using the virtuous theories we thought-out this week:

  • What would an Ghostly Egoist say environing this theme? What cause would the Ghostly Egoist admit? What would the Ghostly Egoist say to excuse their virtuous standing? Is tnear a engagement among fidelity to wilful and to commonwealth proper to your theme? If so, how so? Still n ess what you move is the best round of operation.
  • What would a Social Contract Ethicist say environing this theme? What cause would the Social Contract Ethicist admit? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to excuse their virtuous standing? Does your theme entangle a encounter among indivisible obligations and general ones? If so, how so? Still n ess what you move is the best round of operation.

Finally, allusion and sift-canvass any authoritative edict of ethics proper to your theme such as the AMA edict for doctors, the ANA edict for nurses, or any other proper authoritative edict. State whether and how your clarified theme entangles any engagements among authoritative and familial duties.

Cite the citationbook and incorporate outcause fountains, including citations.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 3-4pages (not including mode page or allusions page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-subject-subject Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 2 literary fountains in conjunction to the round citationbook)

Grading
This air obtain be graded fixed on the rubric supposing.

Rubric

ETHC445 Week 3 Assignment Rubric - 100 pts.ETHC445 Week 3 Assignment Rubric - 100 pts.CriteriaRatingsPtsThis measure is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails standings of ghostly deliberate20 ptsThoroughly still n esss two virtuous infers each cause presents.17 ptsNo 

 

ETHC445 Week 3 Assignment Rubric - 100 pts.

ETHC445 Week 3 Assignment Rubric - 100 pts.

CriteriaRatingsPts

This measure is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails standings of ghostly deliberate

20 ptsThoroughly still n esss two virtuous infers each cause presents.

17 ptsNotes two virtuous infers each cause presents

15 ptsThoroughly still n esss one virtuous infer each cause presents.

12 ptsNotes simply one virtuous infer each cause presents.

0 ptsThe scholar does not still n ess virtuous infers.

20 pts

This measure is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content

50 ptsAddresses all aspects of the questions, applying authoritative comprehension, and elaboration concerning weekly concepts.

42.5 ptsAddresses most aspects of the questions, applying authoritative comprehension, , and elaboration concerning weekly concepts.

37.5 ptsAddresses some aspects of the questions, applying authoritative comprehension, and elaboration concerning weekly concepts.

30 ptsMinimally addresses the questions, applying authoritative comprehension, and elaboration concerning weekly concepts.

0 ptsNo effort

50 pts

This measure is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication

10 ptsPresents notice using apparent and terse conversation in an unembarrassed fashion (minimal errors in English dialect, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

8.5 ptsPresents notice in an unembarrassed fashion (some errors in English dialect, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

7.5 ptsPresents notice using understandable conversation but is slightly disunembarrassed (some errors in English dialect, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

6 ptsPresents notice that is not apparent, close, authoritative or unembarrassed to the subject-subject that the reader has difficulty sense the notice (confused errors in English dialect, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

0 ptsNo effort

10 pts

This measure is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration

10 ptsPaper includes allusion to 2 literary fountains and appropriately incorporates the fountains.

7 ptsPaper includes allusion to 2 literary fountains but does not appropriately incorporate the fountains.

0 ptsPaper does not construct allusion to a literary fountains.

10 pts

This measure is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

10 ptsPaper coalesces all fountain demandments, and is appropriately formatted in APA mode throughout (i.e. mode page, spacing, font, in-citation citations and allusions.)

8.5 ptsPaper coalesces all fountain demandments, and is in-great-measure appropriately formatted in APA mode (i.e. mode page, spacing, font, in-citation citations and allusions.)

7.5 ptsPaper coalesces all fountain demandments, and is slightly appropriately formatted in APA mode (i.e. mode page, spacing, font, in-citation citations and allusions.)

6 ptsPaper fails to coalesce fountain demandments and/or is imappropriately formatted in APA mode throughout

0 ptsNo ef