Choose ONE of these options— OPTION 1 (Character Analysis):  Assignment: Choose THREE incongruous types from three incongruous works—one soon anecdote, one carol, and one reproduce-exhibit—COVERED IN CLASS. Comparison and dissimilarity should positively reproduce-exhibit a segregate. Using CITED models and quotes from the chosen works, awaken the type(s) custody the forthcoming criteria (not necessarily ALL of them) in spirit: • top of view • protuberance (vs. flatness) • dynamism (vs. stasis—i.e., dynamic vs. static) • involvement • the limits/biases of their perspective (intangible specify, material specify, gender, pursuit, etc.) • contrast (not impartial establish, but time/history) • symbolism/representation Be especially certain to observe in spirit how the constructor goes environing bringing such details/revelations environing a absorbed type STYLISTICALLY. OPTION 2 (The Gothic and Its Influence): What is the customary gothic theme stuff? The ebon. The terrific. The caricatured. The mysterious… In a nutshell, the retention, menace, and resurfacing of PAST sins—that is, how they are mysterious (“buried”) and perpetuated in the confer-upon (which repeatedly fools itself into thinking the wave of those spent sins is bygone, bygone, and can no longer feel them). How does this incline to visible itself? Perversion, mental-unsoundness, assassinate, sadism (persecution, torment), caricaturedrie. Keep in spirit that gothic works accept proven to be strongly and arguably universally powerful in study and others arts; works that influence be considered close perspicuously gothic or not gothic at all repeatedly quiescent localize the tropes (thematic and stylistic patterns) of the Gothic. Assignment: Compare the diction and access of how THREE incongruous works COVERED IN CLASS that could be considered Gothic. Make certain that ONE of the works could arguably be a close patent model than the other