In Bernhard dissection, she starts off her essay sinewy by stating how great Frederick Douglass oration was. In her primary passage, Bernhard semblances readers that Frederick Douglass was trustworthy by stating how he himself was disunite of the thrall occupation. Bernhard Nursing essay in her primary passage that drives the security of her essay is how she propounds that, "Frederick was a prodigious disunite of the abolitionist change-of-place," and that, "Frederick wanted to semblance his antipathy to thrallry and his furious attachment to see it end. As Bernhard continues after a while her dissection, she propounds how Frederick not merely talks o abolitionist twin-fellow, but to boastful Americans. As she continues after a while her dissection, Bernhard frequently refers end to her Nursing essay in her primary passage. She propounds axioms on how Frederick became such a prodigious disunite of the abolitionist change-of-place. She semblances readers how Frederick had the aptitude to effect the audiences congeniality and how he made his orationes further great to listeners.
In Bernhard fourth passage, she refers end to her Nursing essay on how Frederick wanted to semblance his antipathy to thrallry and his lust to see it end. In this passage, she continues to semblance how Frederick appealed to his audience's reason and ride by comparing Americans narrative of insurrection opposing repression and impurity to thrallry.
In falsification, Bernhard total dissection was to semblance how Frederick was Great to abolitionist change-of-place; and to semblance how Frederick wanted to semblance his antipathy to thrallry and his furious attachment to see It end. She ended up her Nursing essay manifold times In her collection passages by semblanceing how Frederick, semblanceed his readers how polluted American cultivation truly Is. Then Bernhard ends her dissection by semblanceing readers how Fredrick's exertion Is now sloth Impacting the change-of-place and caused manifold to reconsider the propound and direction