The research contains details discussion about the Bio-sustainable Feeds (BSF) ltd which is listed under Australian Stock Exchange. The report also contains a description of various activities taken place in with its product description. It also contains the investment carried out during the year by BSF. The research contains various steps that need to taken before doing audit of the BSF and also rules applied for the process. The report also discusses and explains whether the firm should accept the role of doing auditing if we take Inherent Risk (IR), Credit Risk (CR) and Detection Risk (DR) (Ahmed Haji and Anifowose 2016). Further audit program should include general coverage plus the specific items mentioned above. The research also includes the concern that the auditor should also include full set of journal entries of the Research & Development transaction from 2013-2016  also explain the CSIRO is allowed as said. Please remember to check the Research and Development costs which are given between expense and capital. Then the triple-bottom line should be “General Parallel File System” requires being discussed. BSF Ltd. administration attested in an outline that the patent qualities were predicated on BSF Ltd. having elite control over the microscopic organisms based sustains innovation.

Bio- Sustainable Feeds Ltd is an Australian bioresearch company, which is listed in ASX- Australian Stock Exchange who is involved with Sustainable Aqua Culture feeds since twenty years. BSF is a plant that has its business operation in fish feeds. The company is involved in manufacturing canola, soya-bean, sunflower, corn, etc., meals that costs around 360 million AUD.  The company has incurred loss of 120 million AUD due to quality degradation of its fish varieties such as salmon, tuna etc. Moreover, CBC (2016) has noticed that, the plant-based fish food should resolve the quality issue.

Before accepting to perform an audit and deciding to apply it in BSF Ltd several necessary steps are needed to be considered (Jafari and Payani 2013). IFAC’S code of ethics stated that before accepting new audit clients, a professional accountant in public needs to determine whether acceptance could generate some threats to compliance with elementary principles (CBC 2016). Possible threats to integrity can be generated from questionable issues related to the client. This indicates before accepting to perform an audit, an investigation should be conducted on BSF ltd, its owners and business conducts for analyzing if there are any questions on the integrity of the potential client that generates unacceptable risk. Such investigation is generally performed as “consumer due diligence” process those are conducted for complying with regulations of anti-money laundering (Lothe 2013).

After accepting to conduct audit for BSF Ltd, the auditor needs to consider the suitability of particular engagement it has been asked to perform. More specifically, there can be ethical risks that indicate conduction of audit should not be accepted, especially whether there are any objectivity risks (Sarker et al. 2016). Potential risks should be checked that might arise such as if the members of audit firm holds shares in BSF Ltd or has any family relationship. Such threats need to be discovered and it might signify that the client should be turned down as safeguards can decrease the threats to an acceptance level (Jafari and Payani 2013).

Certain ethical matters should be checked before accepting an audit for BSF Ltd. It should be checked whether any interest conflict or confidentiality issues might take place and if this happens, whether suitable safeguards can be maintained (Rust et al. 2011). Additionally, BSF Ltd’s competence for performing the potential work needs to be analyzed, particularly if the company has a business operation in a specialized industry or the firm has a complex structure. Practical aspects namely the resources required to perform the work, the completion deadline and logistics such as locations and geographical spread should be taken into consideration as well (Bisogno 2016).

Before accepting to conduct any audit procedure, an auditor should acquire an agreement from management, which it acknowledges, and realizes its responsibility:

• For creation of financial statements based on the suitable financial reporting framework
• For internal controls that will enable generation of financial statements, those are devoid of material misstatement, whether because of error or fraud.
• For facilitating the auditor with access to all the necessary information for conducting audit process

IFAC’s code clarifies that the audit acceptance decisions should not be treated as one-off matter (Jafari and Payani 2013). The code also signifies that a professional accountant in public is recommended to constantly review the acceptance decisions for recurring engagement of clients (Hess 2014). Changes in any circumstances that is either the auditor or the client might signify that an engagement ceases to remain professionally or ethically acceptable or generates an increased level of risk exposure. For this reason, client regular assistance is vital and needs to be totally documented.

The audit program is intended to offer guidance to auditors on the steps involved in the audit of a company. The audit needs to be conducted by people who have adequate training, competence in auditing and experience (Letia and Groza 2013). Audit program for BSF Ltd should include obtaining pertinent financial information such as:

• Monthly financial reports
• Quarterly financial reports
• Charts of accounts listing
• Quarterly reports based on CARL system
• Annual fiscal trial balance reports

Internal control and compliance procedures including the documents and internal control assessment should be prepared for the issues faced by the company and the underlying eligible expenditure recording should be conducted (CBC 2016) The system of revenue and details of expenses and its correctness as per AS 9 should be examined (Kosseva and Kent 2013). For auditing, the issues present in the company and to offer appropriate recommendations following documents needs to be collected from BSF Ltd:

• Conformation certificate of bank balance
• Interest paid/received certificate during the financial year in the occasion of all term loans and fixed deposits with the closing balance
• Confirmation of balance from all the debtors/creditors
• Quantitative inventory details

Audit program should also include reviewing the pertinent financial information for any exceptional or unusual items based on the field. In case of BSF Ltd, the reason for collapse of high value piscavorian fish and its reasons for which it could not thrive. Moreover, reasons for increasing growing times and generation of smaller amount of mature fish should be revealed through the audit program (Jans et al. 2014).

Reviewing previous auditor’s reports and its findings should be evaluated based on the ways in which field’s finances are conducted, the audit firm that conducted the last audit, the time when last audit was conducted and was the audit adequate. Moreover, the whether the recommendations from the last audit were properly implemented or not also needs to be analyzed (Furnham and Gunter 2015).

Internal control of BSF Ltd should be evaluated that will include reviewing the company’s perceived internal control strengths and if there are any weaknesses that needs further audit testing. Moreover, a copy of National Staff Personnel Policy Manual and Field Accounting Policy Manual should be gathered if available (Jafari and Payani 2013).

The audit program should find out the reasons for increasing diversion of low-value fish into the production. Recommendations based on decreasing the risk of malnutrition for the poor should be provided in the auditing process. The audit process should determine the level of cash held by the company and reveal whether the cash held by the company is adequate (Kogan et al. 2014).

Before discussing the further, it is to identify, the role of the auditing firm in accepting BSG ltd. Audit Risk is also known as Residual Risk, it is the risk that an auditor will issue an unappropriated statement because of auditor failing in identifying material misstatement due to fraudulent or by mistake(Davis and Hay 2012). This risk deals in Inherent Risk (IR), Credit Risk (CR) and Detection Risk (DR). Audit risk will be calculated as (AR = IR * CR * DR). Inherent Risk means risk which occurs form the error or omission financial statement occurred due to failing of the control like transaction which involves circumstances that has high degree of the judgement. A credit risk is the risk of default on an obligation that may emerge from a borrower neglecting to make required installments. In the main resort, the danger is that of the moneylender and incorporates lost chief and premium, disturbance to money streams, and expanded accumulation costs (Desai et al. 2013). Detection Risk is the chance that an evaluator won’t discover material errors identifying with a declaration in an element’s monetary explanations through substantive tests and investigation. Therefore, the calculated auditors risk (AR) is 3.6 %. For engaging the firm in auditing the firm should engage in the following g issues: Inquisitive of administration and others to pick up a comprehension of the association itself, its operations, monetary reporting, and known extortion or mistake (Bedford et al.2014).  Doing logical methods on future or sudden changes in record adjusts or classes of exchanges. Examine documentation giving record adjusts or classes of exchanges. Viewing the stock tally, records receivable and different records with outsider were evaluated. Toward the finish of the review, the evaluator may likewise offer target guidance for enhancing budgetary reporting and inward controls to expand an organization’s execution and effectiveness (Ellis 2014). So finally it is included that if the company is fulfilling the above mentioned criteria the firms audit is liable to the 3.6% of the risk. It is critical for an organization’s administration to see precisely what a review is – and what a review does and does not do. The inspector’s duty is to express an autonomous, target supposition on the monetary proclamations of an organization. This assessment is given as per inspecting benchmarks that require the examiners to arrange certain methodology and report on the aftereffects of the review, while considering the representations, affirmations and obligation of administration for the money related articulations (Furnham and Gunter 2015).

The company has engaged in various rebates and by investing in CSIRO of Australia for having full settlement in the business an auditor should look into the following guidelines:

An inspector directing a review as per GAAS is responsible for getting sensible certification that the money related articulations overall are free from material misquote, whether brought about by extortion or mistake (Birkey et al. 2016). As depicted in area 200, the overall Objectives of the Independent Au-editorial manager and the Conduct of an Audit as per Generally Accepted Au-dating Standards were analyzed. The potential impacts of inalienable restrictions are especially noteworthy on account of misquote coming about because of fraud.2 The danger of not distinguishing a material error coming about because of extortion is higher than the danger of not recognizing one coming about because of mistake (Gaber and Lusk 2015). This is on account of extortion may include refined and painstakingly sorted out plans intended to cover it, for example, phony, planned inability to record exchanges, or deliberate deceptions being made to the reviewer. Moreover, the danger of the evaluator not identifying a material coming about because of administration misrepresentation is more noteworthy than for worker extortion since administration is habitually in a position to specifically or in a roundabout way manipulates bookkeeping records, present fake money related data, or supersede control techniques intended to avoid comparable cheats by different representatives. While getting sensible affirmation, the evaluator is in charge of keeping up proficient incredulity all through the review, considering the potential for administration supersede of controls, and perceiving the way that review techniques that are powerful to detect blunder may not be successful in distinguishing extortion (Gray et al. 2013). The prerequisites in this area are intended to help the inspector in recognizing and surveying the dangers of material misquote because of misrepresentation and in planning techniques to distinguish such error. While acquiring sensible certification, the inspector is in charge of keeping up proficient suspicion all through the review, considering the potential for administration supersede of controls, and perceiving the way that review techniques that are compelling for distinguishing mistake may not be powerful in identifying extortion. The prerequisites in this area are intended to help the evaluator in distinguishing and surveying the dangers of material misquote because of misrepresentation and in outlining methodology to recognize such error (Kend et al. 2014). Oversight by those accused of administration incorporates considering the potential for supersede of controls or other improper impact over the monetary reporting procedure, for example, endeavors by administration to oversee income keeping in mind the end goal to impact the impression of money related explanation clients with respect to the element’s execution and benefit.

• The expenses of materials (whether from the undertaking’s typical stock or gained extraordinarily for innovative work exercises) and hardware or offices that are obtained or built for innovative work exercises and that have elective future uses (in innovative work ventures or something else) should be promoted as substantial resources when procured or developed (Louwers et al. 2013).
• Pay rates – compensation, and other related expenses of faculty occupied with innovative work exercises should be incorporated into innovative work costs.
• Intangibles acquired from others – The expenses of intangibles that are acquired from others for use in innovative work exercises and that have elective future uses (in innovative work ventures or something else) should be promoted and amortized as impalpable resources (Messier 2016).
• Contract administrations – The expenses of administrations performed by others regarding the innovative work exercises of an undertaking, including innovative work directed by others for sake of the venture, should be incorporated into innovative work costs.
• All innovative work costs incorporated by this Statement should be charged to cost when brought about.

The CSR auditing procedure for BSF Ltd requires to consider the major points that will evaluate whether the company is maintaining the position of being socially responsible and environment friendly (Jafari and Payani 2013). To evaluate whether the corporate social responsibility statements provided by the company is accurate or not the flowing aspects are to be highlighted in the CSR auditing is necessary that includes whether BSF Ltd has:

• Efficient stakeholder management
• Effective corporate leadership
• Increased priority for CSR at a broad level
• Regulation at the domestic as well as international level
• Active involvement of strong coordination among the business of the government, civil society and NGO’s

CSR auditing should analyze whether the BSF Ltd fulfils the responsibility to offer quality goods through incurring expenditure on alternative aquaculture feed from the research done till date (Jafari and Payani 2013). It should be evaluated whether the company through such expenditure fulfills the responsibility to offer good quality affordable fish products to its consumers. In order to conduct the quality audit written documents that reports evaluation of consumer relations with the company within 12 months before the audit needs to be checked

CSR audit will also focus on checking the transparency of BSF Ltd’s information regarding expenses incurred in maintaining quality of its fish products along with price and specification of all its products (Pei and Pei 2012).  As per the CSR de of conduct, the company has to remain explicit to its consumers regarding the description, price and specifications of all its fish products. To check whether the company fulfils its social responsibilities or not certain evidence needs to be collected that will include:

A telephonic survey with its consumers, particularly the poor consumer segment those suffer from malnutrition, gathering information regarding the fact that whether the fish products are offered to them in appropriate standards (Rust et al. 2011). Moreover, several documentation regarding the organizations quality management reporting success rate in addressing the quality standards and certain measures should be identified to deal with the shortfalls.

Several steps should be followed by the auditor in conducting environmental audit of BSF Ltd mentioned under:

Situation analysis should be conducted that will reveal the reasons for violating the company’s corporate social responsibilities, for instance, the reasons for which the company is offering inferior quality fish products for the poor consumer segment. This analysis also considers evaluation of review provided by shareholders, users of the company’s products and community regarding the company (Lothe 2013).

Based on the evaluation of the company’s ranking in CSR compliance, various alternatives regarding investment in fish product’s quality maintain ace, increasing the fish production and offering products with reasonable prices to the poor segments should be provided to the company. CSR action plan should be prepared describing the ways in which the social responsibility maintenance procedures for the company (Rust et al. 2011).

BSF Ltd mentioned in its prospectus that the patent values were forecasted on the company maintaining exclusive control over the bacteria-based feed technology. The auditing procedure will focus on analyzing whether such statement provided by BSF Ltd is fair and true.

As per the auditing standards, the reliability of any statement provided by the company needs to be evaluated. Based on the accounting standard, the reliability and relevance of the company’s statement needs to be evaluated (Sarens 2013). Reliability of the statement can be ensured dependent on the evidence gathered and the research circumstances under which BSF Ltd provided such statement. Accuracy and completeness of the information is evaluated by analyzing whether the information on maintaining control on bacteria feed technology is adequately precise and detailed. This can be done through testing the effectiveness of such technology in increasing fish breeding and its quality (Tennant and Kruger 2013).

Inspection on documents maintained by BSF Ltd on maintenance of the control on such technology will be audited for testing the accuracy of the statement. Inspection will involve evaluating the documents maintained by the company regarding efficiency of the technology, either internal or external that is maintained in the form of paper, in electronic form or by physically monitoring the efficiency of the technology in improving fish production quality (Rust et al. 2011).

Inquiry can be another form of auditing the statement provided by the company. Such auditing procedure includes gaining information from the knowledgeable people involved within the field of bacteria-based technology development and inspection. Inquires can be done in the form of formal written inquires as well as through informal oral inquires (Rust et al. 2011). Through evaluating responses of the inquiry, it can be confirmed that the statement provided by the company is true and fair. This is because of the reason that from the auditing process it is revealed the company has incurred certain development costs to bring the technology in the market that is producing fish with high food value (Moroney et al. 2014).

The procedure that is used to pull in intrigued prospects to the business. It was gathered that five out of ten prospects who come into place of business wind up purchasing from the business. It can expand the quantity of individuals rolling in from ten to 15. The profit and build benefits by 50 percent. Enhancing the capacity to offer and change over intrigued prospects into paying clients is a standout amongst the most imperative things you can do. What’s more, there is no substitution for progressing deals preparing, either of the each individual who addresses clients, either live or on the telephone. Take a gander at each key result territory in your business procedure and look for approaches to enhance a tiny bit in every range (Zamboni and Litschig 2013). A little change in every key zone can prompt a huge change in general deals results. The amount of individual who deals in every client is the one who gains. By expanding the recurrence of procurement by ten percent, it deals and expands benefits by the same rate. The sum that is needed to pay and obtain each paying client. It should be consistently looking for inventive approaches to enhance the publicizing and advancement with the goal that it costs less to purchase every client. This can effect and expand benefits of the business significantly. The clients who come as consequence are considered as referral from the fulfilled clients. Creating one or more demonstrated referral frameworks for the business can ordinarily affect the deals and business will profit. Largely any organization can raise the costs by 5 or 10 percent without encountering any business sector resistance. In the event that items and administrations are of good quality and kin are amicable and supportive, a little increment in general costs won’t push clients away. The main thing that can be done to build benefits is to enhance the variables that eventually decide the level of gainfulness. When enhancement of these 10 variables about business will expand benefits and influence the primary concern.

Ahmed Haji, A. and Anifowose, M., 2016. Audit Committee and Integrated Reporting Practice: Does Internal Assurance Matter?. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8/9).

Bedford, J.L., Childs, P.J., Hansen, V.N., Mosleh-Shirazi, M.A., Verhaegen, F. and Warrington, A.P., 2014. Commissioning and quality assurance of the Pinnacle3 radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons. The British journal of radiology.

Birkey, R.N., Michelon, G., Patten, D.M. and Sankara, J., 2016, July. Does assurance on CSR reporting enhance environmental reputation? An examination in the US context. In Accounting Forum. Elsevier.

Bisogno, M., 2016. Auditing Principles. Technology and Science, 8(2), p. 89.

CBC. 2016. Shift to plant-based fish feed could hurt health, environment, CBCNews Technology & Science, (23 Mar/16), Retrieved on 11Jul/16 from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/aquaculture-feed-1.3262922

Christensen, B.E., Glover, S.M. and Wood, D.A., 2012. Extreme estimation uncertainty in fair value estimates: Implications for audit assurance.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(1), pp.127-146.

Davis, M. and Hay, D., 2012. An analysis of submissions on proposed regulations for audit and assurance in New Zealand. Australian Accounting Review, 22(3), pp.303-316.

Desai, M., Desai, S., Sullivan, A.K., Mohabeer, M., Mercey, D., Kingston, M.A., Thng, C., McCormack, S., Gill, O.N., Nardone, A. and McOwan, A., 2013. Audit of HIV testing frequency and behavioural interventions for men who have sex with men: policy and practice in sexual health clinics in England. Sexually transmitted infections, pp.sextrans-2012.

Ellis, R., 2014. Quality Assurance for University Teaching.

Furnham, A. and Gunter, B., 2015. Corporate Assessment (Routledge Revivals): Auditing a Company’s Personality. London: Routledge.

Gaber, M. and Lusk, E.J., 2015. Account Screening: Rationalizing The Extendedprocedures Decision in The Audit Context. EXCEL International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies, 5(9), pp.1-20.

Gray, N.A., Mahadevan, K., Campbell, V.K., Noble, E.P. and Anstey, C.M., 2013. Data quality of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry: a pilot audit. Nephrology, 18(10), pp.665-670.

Hess, D.W., 2014. The Framework for CSR Assessment, Measurement, and Reporting. In Christian Ethics and Corporate Culture, 6(7), pp. 177-192.

Jafari, A. and Payani, N., 2013. A systematic approach for knowledge auditing. African Journal of Business Management, 7(32), p.3159.

Jans, M., Alles, M.G. and Vasarhelyi, M.A., 2014. A field study on the use of process mining of event logs as an analytical procedure in auditing. The Accounting Review, 89(5), pp.1751-1773.

Kend, M., Houghton, K.A. & Jubb, C. 2014, “Competition Issues in the Market for Audit and Assurance Services: Are the Concerns Justified?: Competition Issues for Audit and Assurance Services”, Australian Accounting Review, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 313-320.

Kogan, A., Alles, M.G., Vasarhelyi, M.A. and Wu, J., 2014. Design and evaluation of a continuous data level auditing system. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), pp.221-245.

Kosseva, M.R. and Kent, C.A., 2013. Modeling, Monitoring, and Process Control for Intelligent Bioprocessing of Food Industry Wastes and Wastewater. Food Industry Wastes: Assessment and Recuperation of Commodities, 7(4), p.191.

Letia, I.A. and Groza, A., 2013. Compliance checking of integrated business processes. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 8(7), pp.1-18.

Lothe, R. 2013. Fish feed-research may help reduce world hunger, ScienceNordic, 17 Mar/13, Retrieved on 11, Jul/16 from: 20 https://sciencenordic.com/fish-feed-research-may-help-reduce-world-hunger.

Louwers, T.J., Ramsay, R.J., Sinason, D.H., Strawser, J.R. and Thibodeau, J.C., 2013. Auditing and assurance services. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Messier Jr, W., 2016. Auditing & assurance services: A systematic approach. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Moroney, R., Campbell, F., Hamilton, J. and Warren, V., 2014. Auditing: A Practical Approach. Wiley Global Education.

Pei, Z.B. and Pei, J.L., 2012. Study of Risk Control of Whole Process Tracking Audit on Construction Projects in Coal Mining Areas. Coal Technology, 18(4), pp.56-57.

Rust, M., Barrows, F., Hardy, R., Lazur, A.,Naughten, K. and Silverstein, J. 2011. The Future of Aquafeeds, NOAA/USDA Alternative Feeds Initiative, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-124, Retrieved on 11 Jul/16 from:https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/aquaculture/docs/feeds/the_future_of_aquafeeds_final.pdf.

Sarens, G., Christopher, J. and Zaman, M., 2013. A study of the informal interactions between audit committees and internal auditors in Australia.Australian Accounting Review, 23(4), pp.307-329.

Sarker, P.K., Kapuscinski, A.R., Lanois, A.J., Livesey, E.D., Bernhard, K.P. and Coley, M.L. 2016. Towards Sustainable Aquafeeds: Complete Substitution of Fish Oil with Marine Microalga Schizochytrium sp. Improves Growth and Fatty Acid Deposition in Juvenile Nile Tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus). PLOS ONE, 2016; 11(6), Retrieved on 11, Jul/16 from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156684.

Tennant, M. and Kruger, E., 2013. A national audit of Australian dental practice distribution: do all Australians get a fair deal?. International dental journal, 63(4), pp.177-182.

Zamboni, Y. and Litschig, S., 2013. Audit risk and rent extraction: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Brazil. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.