Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis
Just from $13/Page
Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Hence research analysis skills are critical tools for your toolbox.
In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.
To Prepare:
- Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this week in support of locating and analyzing research.
- Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic of interest to you in your specialty field.
- Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts as described by the article
The Assignment:
Conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
- Clearly identify the topic of interest you have selected.
- Provide an accurate and complete APA formatted citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
- Clearly identify and describe in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
- Provide a clear and accurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
- Write a 1-paragraph justification that clearly and accurately explains in detail whether you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. Note: You can use the CARP method as presented in the Resources for this week on evaluating resources.
- Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
Clearly and accurately describe in detail your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
Provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
Integrate at least one outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support your summary.
Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Week 1 Assignment, which was built off the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.
2/3/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16800087_1&rubric_id=_2148341_1 1/6
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Using the Week 4
Part 4 section of
your Academic
Success and
Professional
Development Plan
Template
presented in the
Resources, conduct
an analysis of the
elements of the
research article
you identi�ed. Be
sure to include the
following:
· The topic of
interest you have
selected.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly
identi�es the topic
of interest selected.
The response
accurately and
completely provides
a citation of the
article selected,
including an
accurate and
complete link or
thorough search
details.
The response clearly
identi�es and
describes in detail a
professional
practice use of the
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response
partially identi�es
the topic of interest
selected.
The response
provides a partial
citation of the article
selected, including a
partial link or search
details.
The response
partially identi�es
and describes a
professional
practice use of the
theories/concepts
presented in the
article.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
vaguely identi�es
the topic of interest
selected.
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
provides a citation
of the article
selected, including
vague or inaccurate
search details.
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identi�es and
describes a
professional
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
identi�es the topic
of interest selected,
or is missing.
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
provides a citation
of the article
selected, including
vague and
inaccurate search
details, or is missing.
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
Name: NURS_6002_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric
EXIT
Grid View List View
2/3/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16800087_1&rubric_id=_2148341_1 2/6
Excellent Good Fair Poor
· Correctly
formatted APA
citation of the
article you
selected, along
with link or search
details.
· Identify a
professional
practice use of the
theories/concepts
presented in the
article.
theories/concepts
presented in the
article.
practice use of the
theories/concepts
presented in the
article.
identi�es and
describes a
professional
practice use of the
theories/concepts
presented in the
article, or is missing.
2/3/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16800087_1&rubric_id=_2148341_1 3/6
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Analysis of the
article using the
Research Analysis
Matrix section of
the template.
· Write a one-
paragraph
justi�cation
explaining whether
or not you would
recommend the
use of this article
to inform
professional
practice.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly
and accurately
provides a detailed
analysis of the
article using the
Research Analysis
Matrix section of the
template.
The response clearly
and accurately
explains in detail the
justi�cation of
whether to
recommend the use
of the article to
inform professional
practice.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response
provides a partial
analysis of the
article using the
Research Analysis
Matrix section of the
template.
The response
partially explains the
justi�cation of
whether or not to
recommend the use
of the article to
inform professional
practice.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
provides a vague or
inaccurate analysis
of the article using
the Research
Analysis Matrix
section of the
template.
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
explains the
justi�cation of
whether or not to
recommend the use
of the article to
inform professional
practice.
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response
provides a vague
and inaccurate
analysis of the
article using the
Research Analysis
Matrix section of the
template, or is
missing.
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
explains the
justi�cation of
whether or not to
recommend the use
of the article to
inform professional
practice, or is
missing.
Write a 2-3
paragraph
summary that you
will add to your
Academic Success
and Professional
Development Plan
that includes the
following:
41 (41%) – 45 (45%)
The response clearly
and accurately
describes in detail
the approach to
identifying and
analyzing peer-
reviewed research.
The response clearly
identi�es and
accurately describes
in detail at least two
36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The response
partially describes
the approach to
identifying and
analyzing peer-
reviewed research.
The response
partially identi�es
and describes at
least two strategies
used to be e�ective
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
describes the
approach to
identifying and
analyzing peer-
reviewed research.
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
0 (0%) – 31 (31%)
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
describes the
approach to
identifying and
analyzing peer-
reviewed research,
or is missing. The
response vaguely
and inaccurately
2/3/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16800087_1&rubric_id=_2148341_1 4/6
Excellent Good Fair Poor
· Describe your
approach to
identifying and
analyzing peer-
reviewed research
· Identify at least
two strategies that
you would use that
you found to be
e�ective in �nding
peer-reviewed
research.
· Identify at least
one resource you
intend to use in the
future to �nd peer-
reviewed research.
· Iintegrate at
least 1 outside
resource and 2-3
course speci�c
resources to fully
support summary.
strategies used to
be e�ective in
�nding peer-
reviewed research.
The response
provides a
complete, detailed,
and speci�c
synthesis of at least
one outside
resource that may
be used in the
future to �nd peer-
reviewed research.
The response fully
integrates at least 1
outside resource
and 2-3 course
speci�c resources
that fully supports
the summary
provided.
in �nding peer-
reviewed research.
The response
provides an
accurate synthesis
of at least one
outside resource
that may be used in
the future to �nd
peer-reviewed
research. The
response integrates
at least 1 outside
resource and 2-3
course speci�c
resources that
support the
summary provided.
identi�es and
describes at least
two strategies used
to be e�ective in
�nding peer-
reviewed research.
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
synthesizes at least
one outside
resource that may
be used in the
future to �nd peer-
reviewed research.
The response
minimally integrates
resources that may
support the
summary provided.
identi�es and
describes at least
two strategies used
to be e�ective in
�nding peer-
reviewed research,
or is missing.
The response fails to
integrate any
resources that may
be used in the
future to �nd peer-
reviewed research
to support the
summary provided,
or is missing.
2/3/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16800087_1&rubric_id=_2148341_1 5/6
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression
and Formatting –
Paragraph
Development and
Organization:
Paragraphs make
clear points that
support well
developed ideas,
�ow logically, and
demonstrate
continuity of ideas.
Sentences are
carefully focused–
neither long and
rambling nor short
and lacking
substance. A clear
and comprehensive
purpose statement
and introduction is
provided which
delineates all
required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for �ow, continuity,
and clarity.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion is
provided which
delineates all
required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for �ow, continuity,
and clarity 80% of
the time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is
stated, yet is brief
and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for �ow, continuity,
and clarity 60%- 79%
of the time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is vague
or o� topic.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for �ow, continuity,
and clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion was
provided.
Written Expression
and Formatting –
English writing
standards:
Correct grammar,
mechanics, and
proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2)
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-
4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5)
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
errors that interfere
with the reader’s
understanding.
2/3/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16800087_1&rubric_id=_2148341_1 6/6
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression
and Formatting –
The paper follows
correct APA format
for title page,
headings, font,
spacing, margins,
indentations, page
numbers, running
head,
parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA
format with no
errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2)
APA format errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-
4) APA format
errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5)
APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6002_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric
EXIT
