1.  This assignment is intended for you to put all of your hard work this semester into a final program plan.  Please take the time to revise the various components of your program (see attached document for a detailed list) based on the feedback provided during the semester.  For your final document, you will take those revised components and compile them into a full, logical, professional program plan.  As you will see in the length requirements for each section of the plan, some of your original components will need to be streamlined.  

2.  

There are hundreds of sites with information on how to create and present an effective PowerPoint presentation (please review the grading rubric and helpful link).  Please pay special attention to the “6×6 rule” to avoid putting too much text on your slides.  Using too much text is a common error that many students (and faculty) make.  With this rule, you limit each of your slides to just six bullets, with only approximately six words per bullet.  The focus of any presentation should be on you, the presenter, verbally explaining/delivering the content.  The slides should not contain the full content of the presentation, rather they are simply meant to represent brief prompts for the key points of the presentation, much like an outline.

• http://www.techrepublic.com/article/10-slide-design-tips-for-producing-powerful-and-effective-presentations/

Please both both assignments in separate documents

1
Power Point Presentation Grading Rubric

AHS 619: Spring 2020
Power Point Presentation Grading
Rubric 60 total possible points

Power Point Presentation
Exceptional Acceptable Fair Poor

1. Content (50%)

Score: ______
Out of 40 pts.

(37-40pts)
Abundance of points
presented. Content
relevant & excellent.
Emphasis appropriate
for target audience.
Convincing for
audience. Evidence of
critical thinking.

(35-36 pts)
Sufficient info
given, many good
points, but not in-
depth. Somewhat
convincing argument
for stakeholders.
Good amt of insight.
Uses some critical
thinking.

(22-34 pts)
Adequate info
given. Couple
good points
addressed. Avg.
insight. Only
fairly convincing.
May lack some
required elements.
Uses little critical
thinking.

(21 pts. or less)
Inadequate amount
of info. No
additional points
made. No insight
given. Not
convincing for
stakeholders. Lacks
required elements of
content.

2. Creativity/Style
(20%)

Score: ______
Out of 8 pts.

(8 pts)
Highly interesting &
engaging. Excellent
use of color & style.
Appropriate for
target audience.

(7 pts)
Interesting &
engaging. Some use
of color & style.
Appropriate for
target audience.

(6 pts)
Adequately
interesting &
engaging. Mostly
appropriate for
target audience.

(5 pts. or less)
Lacks creative focus.
Not entirely
appropriate for target
audience.

3. APA Format and
Organization
(15%)

Score: _______
Out of 6 pts.

(6 pts)
Proper APA
throughout. Required
length (15 slides
minimum). Title
slide & reference
slide included.
Unified, focused,
organized. Flows
logically.

(5 pts)
1-3 APA errors in
citation or reference
list. Required length
(15 min.). Title slide
& reference slide
included. Mostly
organized & flows
logically.

(4 pts)
APA format, but
with > 3 errors;
Required length
(15 min.) & title &
reference slide
might have
problems. Some
organization &
flow issues.

(3 pts. or less)
APA format not used
or > 5 errors. Under
length required; no
title &/or reference
slide; Poor
organization & flow.
Not unified.

4. Overall
Impression
(15%)

Score: ______
Out of 6 pts.

(6 pts)
True reflection of
project. All directions
followed.

(5 pts)
Some reflection of
project, with some
degree of
problems. Most or
all directions
followed.

(4 pts)
Limited
reflection of
project. Some
directions
followed.

(3 pts. or less)
No reflection of
project. Many
directions not
followed.

TOTAL SCORE: ______/40

AHS

619 Seminar: Spring 2020
Program Planning & Coordination Intervention – Final Program Plan

Assignment Rubric, Content & Formatting
50 total possible points

Final Program Plan: Grading Rubric
Excellent Good Fair Poor

1. Content

Score:
Out of 30 pts.

(27-30 pts.)
Includes ALL required
elements listed in the
guidelines with sufficient
detail provided.
Information is supported
with relevant, accurate &
appropriate sources. Clear
focus. Good evidence of
insight & critical thinking
apparent.

(24-26 pts.)
Includes all required
elements listed in the
guidelines. Adequate
information given with
many relevant points
but not in-depth.
Information is mostly
supported, although 1-2
sources not optimal or
inappropriate. Some
evidence of critical
thinking apparent.

(21-23 pts.)
Some required element(s)
listed in the guidelines
missing. Adequate
information given, but few
relevant points addressed
or not supported with
details. More than 1
source not optimal or
inappropriate. Some or
little evidence of critical
thinking.

(20 pts. or less)
Elements are missing.
Insufficient detail
provided. Sources
generally not appropriate.
No evidence of critical
thinking.

2. Quality of
Writing &
Organization

Score:
Out of 10 pts.

(9-10 pts.)
Focused, well-organized.
Unified & paper flows.
Clear, direct, excellent
logical structure, great
transitions. Contains no
major grammatical or
spelling errors. Minimal or
no quotes. Paper is
required length.

(8 pts.)
Good portion was
focused & organized,
most flows easily. Clear,
direct sentences.
Contains no more than
1-2 major grammatical
or spelling errors.
Minimal or no quotes.
Required length.

(7 pts.)
Adequately focused &
organized. Limited flow-
not very clear. Average
logical structure. More
than 2 major grammatical
or spelling errors. Used
quotes, but less than 10%
of section. Required
length.

(6 pts. or less)
Little or no focus/
organization.
Does not flow—poor
logical structure, not clear.
Contains more than 3
major in grammar or
spelling. Excessive use of
quotes; > 10%. Less than
required length.

3. Format &
Following
Direction

Score:
Out of 7 pts.

(7 pts.)
Proper APA format used
in-text & reference list.
Required length of 10-12
pages of content (not
including title or reference
pages). At least 10
credible sources used.
Titles & other formatting
elements corrected. All
directions followed.

(6 pts.)
Only 1-2 errors in APA
in-text citation &
reference list. Required
length. At least 10
credible sources used.
Only 1-2 errors in titles
& other formatting
elements. Most
directions followed.

(5 pts.)
APA format used, but >3
errors in-text or reference
list. Ten sources used, but
1 or more not credible or
appropriate. More than 3
errors in titles or other
formatting elements. Only
some directions followed.

(4 pts. or less)
APA format not
consistently used in-text;
reference list is a mess.
Less than 10 sources used
or >2 not credible or
appropriate. More than 5
errors in titles or other
formatting elements.
Many directions not
followed.

4. Overall
Impression

Score:
Out of 3 pts.

(3 pts.)
True reflection of project.
Demonstrated insight,
knowledge, writing skill &
critical thinking. Well
done.

(3.5 pts.)
Some reflection of
project. Demonstrated
some insight, adequate
knowledge & writing
skills, some critical
thinking. Overall good
effort.

(2 pts.)
Limited reflection of
project. Demonstrated
little insight or knowledge,
problems with writing
skills, little critical thinking.
Overall only adequate
effort.

(0-1 points)
No or very little reflection
of project. Demonstrated
no insight & poor
knowledge. Poor writing
skills, no critical thinking.
Overall unsatisfactory

Total Score (50 points possible):
NOTE: Please refer to the feedback on your original assignments, and make the appropriate edits for this final
program plan.

Final Program Plan: Content

Report Section Approx. Length

Title Page
A) Introduction to health topic/disparity, target population, and geographic location 1 paragraph
B) Description of key stakeholders 1/2 page
C) Needs Assessment – including primary (from key informant interview) and secondary

data 2 pages
D) Mission Statement, Goals and Objectives < 1 page E) Description of Collaborators 1 paragraph F) Logic Model 1 page G)

Program Sequence, Strategies and Marketing Plan. Be sure to include how you will
use your selected health behavior theory as a guide for your program (including
rationale for this theory) and your key collaborators who will work with you on these
interventions. 2.5 – 3 pages

H) Budget. Be sure to use the table format and include a justification column 1 page
I) Potential Barriers to Program Success – include steps to address these barriers 1/2 – 1 page

References (minimum of ten credible sources)

Total content
length = 10-12 pgs

Final Program Plan: Formatting, etc.

General Directions & Document Format

All papers must be submitted as a ONE SINGLE document (MS Word), using :

• Times New Roman, 12-point font
• double-spaced
• margins must be 1-inch on all sides
• page numbers centered at the bottom of each page

Your report must have an APA-style title page. Be sure to review APA-style title page requirements.

Use proper grammar and spelling.

All papers must be written in a scholarly manner using proper APA format (6th edition).

Credible sources appropriate for academic writing used to support your narrative. A minimum of 10
sources must be used (revise based on annotated bibliography feedback), and included in a properly
formatted APA-style references page at the end of the report.

Report content is 10-12 pages long (the title and reference pages do not count toward this length).