Week 4 Project
Downsizing became popular in the 1990s and it resurfaced aggressively following the global financial crisis in 2008. Historic growth strategies and talent wars increased the size of the workforce. Today, expensive human capital is being eliminated again with downsizing.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Week 4 Project
Just from $13/Page
Tasks
- Evaluate reasons for downsizing.
- Analyze if downsizing allows organizations to meet their goals.
- Evaluate if downsizing is legal but can it still be unethical.
- Summarize what you have learned from your research about downsizing and the overall effects.
Submission Details
- Present a 2- to 3-page paper in a Microsoft Word document formatted in APA style. Cite any sources using the APA guidelines.
- Name your file as SU_HRM5010_W4_Project_LastName_FirstName.
CRITERIA
Evaluated reasons for downsizing
Emerging (F through D Range)
(1-13)
Evaluated reasons for downsizing.
Lacks credible research support.
13 points
Satisfactory (C Range)
(14-15)
Evaluated reasons for downsizing.
Weakly supported with research.
15 points
Proficient (B Range)
(16-17)
Evaluated reasons for downsizing.
Sufficiently supported with research.
17 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(18-20)
Evaluation of reasons for downsizing was compelling and showed well-developed logical progression.
Well-supported with research.
20 points
CRITERIA
Analyzed if downsizing allows organizations to meet their goals.
Emerging (F through D Range) (1-13)
Analyzed if downsizing allows organizations to meet their goals.
Lacks credible research support.
13 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-15)
Analyzed if downsizing allows organizations to meet their goals..
Weakly supported with research.
15 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-17)
Analyzed if downsizing allows organizations to meet their goals.
Sufficiently supported with research.
17 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20)
Analysis of downsizing allows organizations to meet their goals was compelling and showed well-developed logical progression.
Well-supported with research
20 points
CRITERIA
Evaluated if downsizing is legal but can it still be unethical.
Emerging (F through D Range) (1-13)
Evaluated if downsizing is legal but can it still be unethical.
Lacks credible research support.
13 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-15)
Evaluated if downsizing is legal but can it still be unethical.
Weakly supported with research.
15 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-17)
Evaluated if downsizing is legal but can it still be unethical.
Sufficiently supported with research.
17 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20)
Evaluation if downsizing is legal but can it still be unethical was compelling and showed well-developed logical progression.
Well-supported with research.
20 points
CRITERIA
Summarized what you have learned from your research about downsizing and the overall effects.
Emerging (F through D Range) (1-13)
Summarized what you have learned from your research about downsizing and the overall effects.
Lacks credible research support.
13 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-15)
Summarized what you have learned from your research about downsizing and the overall effects.
Weakly supported with research.
15 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-17)
Summarized what you have learned from your research about downsizing and the overall effects.
Sufficiently supported with research.
17 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20)
Summary of what you have learned from your research about downsizing and the overall effects was compelling and showed well-developed logical progression.
Well-supported with research
20 points
CRITERIA
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Communication: Use of tone, word choice, and audience.
Emerging (F through D Range) (1-13)
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Communication: Use of tone, word choice, and audience.
Lacks credible research support.
13 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-15)
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Communication: Use of tone, word choice, and audience.
Weakly supported with research.
15 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-17)
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Communication: Use of tone, word choice, and audience.
Sufficiently supported with research.
17 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20)
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Communication: Use of tone, word choice, and audience.
Well-supported with research
20 points
OVERALL SCORE
Emerging (F through D Range)
1 point minimum
Satisfactory (C Range)
70 points minimum
Proficient (B Range)
80 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range)
90 points minimum
