Organization citizenship behaviour (OCB) is characterize as an additional work or obligations perform workers of an company that are not an aspect of their responsibilities depiction and these exercises can’t gauge to assess the execution of individual in company formal assessment framework. Employees go past their center occupation or assignment part in company, all these are intentional demonstration of person that can’t be upheld and their nonattendance can’t be penalized. According to (Jung and Hong, 2008) effectiveness of an organization is subject to the deliberate endeavours of specialists that helps collaborators, subordinates, giving proposal and secure the company. If the level of OCB is high in company it gives an indication of eagerness of the employees to practice and embrace changes for executing new administration styles and new procedures.

The purpose of this literature review is to identify the dimensions and the antecedents of the organizational citizenship behaviour.

Dennis Organ is for the most part considered as a father of OCB. He characterizes OCB as “individual behaviour that is optional, not specifically or unequivocally perceived by the reward system, and that in the total advances the successful working of the association”. There are three angles in this definition. Firstly, OCB’s are considered optional behaviour. Secondly, OCB’s goes well beyond that which is enforceable necessity of the set of responsibilities. Thirdly, OCB’s contribute emphatically to general association viability.

OCB is aligned with both the individual and organizational outcomes. According to Neihoff and Yen (2004), at the point when more employees show OCB practices on work environment the firm execution have a tendency to increment and association begin developing.

Organ in the year 1988, have highlighted that there are five different dimensions of OCB that helps the organizations to improve its efficiency:

• Altruism
• Sportsmanship
• Courtesy
• Civic Virtue
• Conscientiousness

Altruism recognizes the behaviour coordinated at particular people. At the point when individual have particular issue; philanthropic individuals go the additional mile in helping them. The different class of OCB is summed up agreeability, which is more unoriginal good faith: doing things right and fitting for their own particular purpose instead of for any particular individual. Sportsmanship is behaviour of topping off negligible grievances and forgoing griping about insignificant matters. Regularly individuals think great sportsman is an individual who does not whine for burdened face by others. Anyhow be sure when other individuals are not taking after his proposals and eager to relinquish his/her personal enthusiasm for the wellbeing of work gathering and don’t take it individual (Wang et al., 2010). Courtesy allude such activities like counselling with others before choice have been taken, issuing suggestion to other individual, convey information and also giving development notices or we can say that in association modifying others about change which reason influence on their work. Civic Virtue is staying aware of matters that influence the association like investment in choice making, going to gatherings, cooperation in the political existence of the association exercises and occupied with association exercises that can help to enhance association and take a section in administration of association. Conscientiousness shows indifferent behaviour consistence with standards characterizing a decent labourer, it states specialists go past negligible prerequisites of their particular tasks (Lemmon and Wayne, 2014).

Today organizations, need to persistently discover better approaches to develop in light of continually evolving difficulties. In today’s dynamic work place, effective associations need employees who will accomplish more than their part prerequisites. At the point when workers oftentimes apply practices that surpass their formal part prerequisites, they enhance the in general working of the association. Generally, OCB incorporates a mixture of practices, for example, helping different workers, volunteering for additional work, or speaking to the association in a positive light. This section considers the different individual and organizational variables regularly found to influence a willingness of the employees and performance of the organization. There are five antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour (Ehigie and Otukoya, 2005):

• Motivation
• Employee Age
• Leadership Behaviour
• Personality
• Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction

Motivation measure an individual air has replenished enthusiasm for looking at Organs (1990) model suggesting that thought processes of an individuals may identify with his or her organizational citizenship practices. Penner, et al. (1997) investigated the effect of identity and motivation on OCB. Since no past examination had utilized motivation to foresee OCB, they build up their suggestions from the volunteerism research. The scientists proposed five wellsprings of motivation measured incorporate inborn methodology, instrumental, thought toward oneself outside, internal self-concept, and objective disguise. Barbuto.et.al (2001), contended that however the motivational speculations fill in as antecedents for OCB. Be that as it may the analysts advised that motivation source of an individual could have an effect on his/her level of OCB. As individual execution is going upward, motivational speculations have a tendency to be less appropriate as precursor. To keep the employee’s productivity level to its standard, motivation is a compelling apparatus that helps the workers to rouse the workforce. It is the key capacity that must be performed by every director in an association for activating the workers to perform the target of the association effectively (Fernandez and Pitts, 2011).

Employee age also plays a vital role in OCB. The proposition that older and younger employees may view work and self in a general sense distinctive routes in not new. Wagner and Rush (2000) pointed out that early years (20-34) are the years of foundation; later years (35-55) are solid feeling of self and area. Many authors contended that more employee who are younger coordinate their needs with the organizational needs. The more established workers have a tendency to be stricter in changing their needs with hierarchical needs. In this manner, more youthful and more established workers may be vary in their introductions towards self, others, and work, these distinctions may prompt distinctive striking intentions in OCB among more established and more youthful workers.

Leadership has an in number impact on a worker’s ability to participate in OCB. Then again, instead of being connected with a specific administration style, exploration observes that it is the quality if a representative association with his or her leaders that matters (podsakoff 2000). The relationship quality among the leaders and the members is generally termed as leader-member exchange (LMX). An alternate initiative variable emphatically identified with OCB is the leaders unforeseen prize conduct, such as communicating fulfilment or thankfulness for good execution (podsakoff 2000). Leadership practices might likewise impact OCB by implication by means of representative impression of reasonableness or equity in the working environment.

Personality suggests a couple of characteristics, qualities capacities and abilities of individuals nearby certain different traits like get ready and air. It suggests specific illustrations of behaviour of a solitary individual in a described circumstance. In terms of identity qualities, good faith, pleasantness, and positive and contrarily affectivity accumulate the most backing as precursor of OCB. Conscientiousness, specifically, has been found to have an in number association with the general agreeability segment of OCB (Organ, Podsakoff and MacKenzie, 2006). Nonetheless it has likewise been accounted for that identity measures are weaker indicators of OCB when contrasted with attitudinal indicators.

According to Kim (2005), Job satisfaction can be defined as the emotions or a general demeanour of the workers in connection with their employments and the employment segments, for example, the workplace, working conditions, impartial prizes, and correspondence with the partners. According to Swailes, (2002), organizational commitment alludes to the worker’s enthusiastic connection to, identification and connection in the association. Basically, measuring organizational commitment is an appraisal of the compatibility between an individual’s own particular qualities and convictions and those of the association. This organizational commitment has a strong impact on the job satisfaction level. Various research studies contend that the managers who are exceptionally dedicated to the associations may encounter larger amounts of satisfaction in the job. Hellriegel, Slocum and Woodman (2001), observed that workers’ beginning duty to an association is dead set to a great extent by their individual characteristics and how well their initial employment encounters coordinate their desires. Later organizational responsibility keeps on being affected by occupation encounters, with a number of the same components that prompt employment fulfilment likewise adding to absence of commitment or organizational commitment.

This literature review has nearly taken observation at measurements of organizational citizenship behaviour. In the wake of taking the investigation of late writing on OCB has recognized different measurements of OCB. After distinguished the predecessor of OCB and inspected its connection with administration style, study demonstrates its lead toward better execution of the association and, administrators would have the capacity to advance OCB among their workers for better execution. Antecedents of OCB are the elements that build the level of worker execution in the association. It is uncovered from the different studies that there is a positive relationship between association execution and OCB (Cardona, Lawrence, and Bentler, 2004; Hodson, 2002).The primary ramifications of this study helps supervisors to expand their productivity of the organization. On the off chance that he/she will support his/her employees in making decision and antecedents of OCB are clear it will get to be cause to get the adequacy of the association.

Barbuto, J., Brown, L., Wilhite, M., and Wheeter, D. (2001). Justify the underlying motives of organizational citizenship behavior; A brief study of agricultural co-op workers.

Cardona, P., Lawrence, B. and Bentler, P. (2004). Influence of Social and Work Exchange Relationships on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. SSRN Journal, 29(2), pp.219-247.

Ehigie, B. and Otukoya, O. (2005). Antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour in a government-owned enterprise in Nigeria. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(4), pp.389-399.

Fernandez, S. and Pitts, D. (2011). Understanding Employee Motivation to Innovate: Evidence from Front Line Employees in United States Federal Agencies. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(2), pp.202-222.

Hodson, R. (2002). Management Citizenship Behavior and its Consequences. Work and Occupations, 29(1), pp.64-96.

Jung, J. and Hong, S. (2008). Organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), TQM and performance at the maquiladora. Int J Qual & Reliability Mgmt, 25(8), pp.793-808.

Kim, W., Leong, J. and Lee, Y. (2005). Effect of service orientation on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention of leaving in a casual dining chain restaurant. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 24(2), pp.171-193.

Lemmon, G. and Wayne, S. (2014). Underlying Motives of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Comparing Egoistic and Altruistic Motivations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies.

Organ, D., Podsakoff, P. and MacKenzie, S. (2006). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences. Personnel Psychology, 59(2), pp.484-487.

Penner, L., Midili, A. and Kegelmeyer, J. (1997). Beyond Job Attitudes: A Personality and Social Psychology Perspective on the Causes of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Human Performance, 10(2), pp.111-131.

Podsakoff, P. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), pp.513-563.

Swailes, S. (2002). Organizational commitment: a critique of the construct and measures. Int J Management Reviews, 4(2), pp.155-178.

Wagner, S. and Rush, M. (2000). Altruistic Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Context, Disposition, and Age. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3), pp.379-391.

Wang, L., Hinrichs, K., Prieto, L. and Howell, J. (2010). Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US. Asia Pac J Manag, 30(1), pp.115-147.

Yen, H. and Niehoff, B. (2004). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Organizational Effectiveness: Examining Relationships in Taiwanese Banks. J Appl Social Pyschol, 34(8), pp.1617-1637.