This Assignment consists of Short-Answer responses to questions related to basic principles and ethical guidelines in early childhood research. The various types of research, the main parts of research articles, and the strategies for gathering data are among the key topics covered in this Assessmentt.
CECS RC001: Foundations of Research
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
SHORT ANSWER
Just from $13/Page
Short-Answer Assessment Submission Form
Contact Information
Please provide your contact information and date of submission below.
Your Name: First and Last
Your E-mail address: Your Email Here
Date: Click here to enter a date
Instructions
This Competency includes a Short-Answer Assessment. Write your response to each prompt below in the space provided. Beneath the prompts is the
Rubric
which will be used by the Competency Assessor to evaluate your responses. Carefully review the Rubric rows associated with each prompt to provide a complete response.
When writing your response, begin typing where it reads “Enter your response here.” Write as much as needed to satisfy the requirements of the prompt (as defined in the Rubric).
Save this file as RC001_firstinitial_lastname (for example, RC001_J_Smith) and upload it to this Assessment within the learning platform.
Short Answer 1
In 1–2 sentences, explain each of the principles or concepts of early childhood research listed below.
· Quantitative approaches
· Qualitative approaches
· Longitudinal research
· Hypotheses
· Replication
· Generalizability
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
Not Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Needs Improvement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Meets Expectations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
Exceeds Expectations
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Competency 1: Explain key principles, concepts, and ethical standards in early childhood research.
|
|
Learning Objective 1.1: Define key principles and concepts.
|
Some or all definitions are not present.
|
Definitions are weak or illogical.
|
Definitions are succinct and accurate.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Definitions provide context in the field of early childhood studies.
|
Short Answer 2
List three principles of high-quality research and explain the importance of each principle. Your response should be 2–3 paragraphs in length.
Your Responses
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
Sub-Competency 1: Explain key principles, concepts, and ethical standards in early childhood research.
|
Learning Objective 1.2 Explain the importance of the principles of high quality research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
|
Response lists fewer than three principles of high quality research.
Response provides weak or partial explanations of their importance.
|
Response clearly describes three principles of high quality research.
Response provides a thorough explanation of the importance of the identified principles.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response includes a thoughtful analysis of the importance of each principle in terms of early childhood research.
|
Short Answer 3
Define informed consent. How does informed consent apply to research with children? Your response should be 3–5 sentences in length.
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
Sub-Competency 1: Explain key principles, concepts, and ethical standards in early childhood research.
|
Learning Objective 1.3:
Define informed consent and its application to research with children.
|
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response partially defines informed consent and/or its application to children.
|
Response accurately defines informed consent and its application to research with children.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response addresses the legal and ethical implications of informed consent.
|
Short Answer 4
Provide at least one example of ethical behavior in research with children. Provide at least one example of unethical behavior in research with children. (Description of each 1 paragraph )
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
Sub-Competency 1: Explain key principles, concepts, and ethical standards in early childhood research.
|
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe examples of ethical and unethical behaviors in research with children.
|
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response is incomplete or provides weak examples.
|
Response provides one relevant example of ethical and unethical behavior in research with children.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response provides more than one example of both ethical and unethical behavior in research with children.
|
Short Answer 5
For each link below, identify the type of source that is represented from the “Types of Sources” list. Then, explain the characteristics of each type of source.
Types of Sources
· Web article
· Research article
· Research brief
· Peer-reviewed research article
Links
Johanson, S., & Kuh, L. (2013). Critical friends groups in an early childhood setting: Building a culture of collaboration. Voices of Practitioners, 8(2), 1–16. Retrieved from
http://www.schoolreforminitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Voices_Johanson_v8n2
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Recchia, S., & Bentley, D. F. (2013). Parent perspectives on how a child-centered preschool experience shapes children’s navigation of kindergarten. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 15(1). Retrieved from
http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v15n1/recchia.html
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Mira, W. A., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2013). The impact of reading expressiveness on the listening comprehension of storybooks by prekindergarten children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(2), 183–194.
Retrieved from Walden University Library.
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Friedman-Krauss, A., & Barnett, W. S. (2013). Early childhood education: Pathways to better health (NIEER Preschool Policy Brief, Issue 25). New Brunswick, NJ: NIEER. Retrieved from
http://nieer.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/health20brief
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
|
|
Sub-Competency 2: Describe types of sources of early childhood research studies.
|
|
Learning Objective 2.1 Describe the characteristics of different types of sources of early childhood research studies.
|
Response is not present.
|
|
Response is incomplete.
|
Response correctly defines the type of source and provides the correct example.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response elaborates on the characteristics by describing the value of each type of source.
|
Short Answer 6
Choose at least two high-quality research publications. Provide the name of each publication, describe what type of research each publication covers, and explain why each source is considered “high quality.”
Refer to this ASU resource for an overview of high-quality research publications:
· Angelo State University (ASU). (n.d.-a). Library Guides. How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals. Retrieved from https://www.angelo.edu/services/
library
/handouts/peerrev.php
Note: You may also access high-quality early childhood research publications in the Walden Library.
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
Sub-Competency 2: Describe types of sources of early childhood research studies.
|
Learning Objective 2.2 Describe high-quality sources of early childhood research studies.
|
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response is incomplete.
Response describes the type of research covered in two high-quality publications.
Response includes an explanation of the reasons the publications are consider high quality.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response describes more than two high-quality publications.
|
Short Answer 7
List the main parts of a research article and provide a brief description of each.
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
|
Sub-Competency 3: Describe the main parts of research articles and the purpose of each.
|
|
Learning Objective 3.1 Describe the main parts of a research article and the purpose of each part.
|
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response describes some of the parts of a research article.
Description includes a partial explanation of the purpose of each part of a research article.
|
Response accurately describes the five parts of a research article.
Description includes a clear explanation of the purpose of each part of a research article.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Description includes each of the four parts of the methods section.
|
Short Answer 8
Define the terms “reliability” and “validity” in the context of research. Your response should be 3–5 sentences in length.
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
|
|
Sub-Competency 4: Explain the importance of validity and reliability in early childhood research.
|
|
Learning Objective 4.1: Define reliability and validity within the context of early childhood research.
|
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response includes a partially-accurate definition of reliability and validity in the context of early childhood research.
|
Response includes an accurate definition of reliability and validity in the context of early childhood research.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response includes an example of reliable or valid test results cited in a peer-reviewed journal article.
|
Short Answer 9
In 1–2 sentences, define each type of validity and reliability.
Types:
· Face validity
· Criterion validity
· Content validity
· Inter-rater reliability
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
Sub-Competency 4: Explain the importance of validity and reliability in early childhood research.
|
Learning Objective 4.2: Define types of validity and reliability.
|
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response is incomplete.
|
Response includes an accurate definition of each type of validity and reliability.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response includes an example of each type of validity from research articles.
|
Short Answer 10
Read the two research questions below. Then, suggest one or more data-gathering techniques that could be used to test a hypothesis related to each, and explain why.
Research questions:
1. To what extent do preschoolers whose parents read to them on a regular basis perform better on academic tasks in elementary school than preschoolers who are not read to?
2. Does flexible scheduling of parent-teacher meetings increase working parents’ involvement in their children’s education?
Your Response
Enter Your Response Here
Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations
|
Sub-Competency 5: Describe the strategies used to gather data for research studies.
|
|
Learning Objective 5.1: Describe strategies for gathering data in research studies.
|
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response mentions data-gathering techniques but does not match them to the questions.
|
Response clearly describes one strategy for gathering data related to each research question presented.
Response includes a logical rationale.
|
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response clearly describes more than one strategy for gathering data related to each research question presented.
|
©2014 Walden University 1
Academic Writing Expectations Checklist
The faculty Assessor will use this checklist to evaluate whether your written responses adhere to the conventions of scholarly writing. Review this checklist prior to submitting your Assessment to ensure your writing follows academic writing expectations. Click the links to access Writing Center resources:
Sentence-Level Skills
|_| Constructing complete and correct sentences
Note: See an explanation of
sentence components
and how to avoid
sentence fragments and run-ons
.
|_| Using and spelling words correctly
Note: See a list of
commonly misused words
and information on
MS Word’s spell check
.
|_| Using
punctuation
appropriately
Note: See the different types of
punctuation and their uses.
|_| Using grammar appropriately
Note: See a
Grammarly tutorial
to catch further errors.
Paragraph-Level Skills
|_| Using paragraph breaks
Note: See a description of
paragraph basics
.
|_| Focusing each paragraph on one central idea (rather than multiple ideas)
Note: See an explanation of how
topic sentences
work.
Use of Evidence
|_| Using resources appropriately
Note: See examples of
integrating evidence
in a paper.
|_| Citing and referencing resources accurately
Note: See examples of
citing and referencing resources
in a paper.
|_| Paraphrasing (explaining in one’s own words) to avoid plagiarizing the source
Note: See
paraphrasing strategies
.
Formatting Written Assignments
|_| Using appropriate APA formatting, including title page, margins, and font
Note: See
APA overview
and
APA template
from the Writing Center.
Comments:
©2014 Walden University 1
