Pioneers of the resource dependence theory include Pfeffer and Salancik (1978) for instance.
instructions:
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
resource dependence theory
Just from $13/Page
– i will appreciate if peer-reviewed articles are used.
-discuss research dependence theory
– peer-reviewed articles ONLY
-APA, sixth edition
Individual Written Report
This research paper of about 1500-1800 words will examine in more detail one of the major concepts in organizational theory. The report will be based on detailed research of some concept, issue or domain related to organizational theory.
The focus of this paper is NOT typical organizational or strategic work on ‘how to organize” an organization to achieve goals or strategic analysis/formulation, but rather looking at some course-related theme in organizational theory (e.g., institutional theory, resource dependence, new market category creation and emergence, legitimation of organizational identity, legitimacy of entrepreneurial ventures etc….). Organizational theory covers a wide array of organizational topics. Hence, your paper can focus on any one of these many topics. For instance, you may decide to research theories that discuss how organizations reduce their vulnerabilities of resource dependence (e.g., mergers and acquisitions). Pioneers of the resource dependence theory include Pfeffer and Salancik (1978) for instance. Another topic you may consider is institutional isomorphism or why organizations are all the same (e.g., see DiMaggio and Powell, 1983). Other topics include how leaders influence organizational culture or service entrepreneurship whereby companies are offering more services etc…
The expectation is that research journals will be consulted for this paper, though they need not be the only or primary source. Business magazines are not considered adequate primary sources for this kind of report. ‘A’ level papers will need to have several current journal references from a variety of sources. You are welcome consult with me on your choice of topic. Please keep a file of your research sources and your rough notes and drafts from this research project.
Potential Journals may include the Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, Organization Studies, Administrative Science Quarterly, and Academy of Management Review. Formatting – Double space, 12 point font, Time-Roman Font.
TopicReport Evaluation Criteria Guidelines
|
Written Report
|
Excellent (A)
|
Good (B)
|
C+
or less acceptable
|
|
Research depth –from robust source scholarly journals.
|
Exhaustive research demonstrated by extent of references, particularly relevant sources
|
Thorough research demonstrated by comprehensive references, highly relevant sources
|
Inadequate research; failure to include pertinent references; use of inappropriate sources
|
|
Analysis of viewpoints
|
In-depth analysis, presented very clearly; well supported by textbook citations and current scholarly sources.
|
Solid analysis, clearly presented; well supported by relevant sources (for at least one viewpoint).
|
Major weaknesses in analysis, such that it is incorrect or lacking.
|
|
Consideration of issue
|
Comprehensive review of problems, choices and rationale
|
Considerable review of problems, choices and rationale
|
Failure to consider problems, or choices; rationale incoherent
|
|
Support for arguments/points of main issue
|
Clear, concise essay argument/stance and fully supported with evidence/research (e.g., examples) or explained.
|
Clear argument and conclusions, well supported
|
Inadequate or no argument; conclusions not supported
|
|
Bibliography and supporting documentation
|
Comprehensive, relevant and flawlessly presented
|
Thorough, relevant and well presented
|
Inadequate, not relevant or poorly presented
|
|
Writing style
|
Excellent use of language in clear, interesting manner
|
Appropriate, clear expression, which flows freely
|
Inappropriate expression, very confused, difficult to follow
|
|
Organization
|
All components are well organized and logical; exceeds content required (value added additions)
|
Most components are well organized and logical; includes all required content
|
Lacks organization and logic; required content missing
|
|
Form
|
Flawless grammar, spelling; exactly meets all presentation requirements
|
Reasonable grammar, spelling; meets all presentation requirements
|
Unacceptable errors in grammar, spelling; does not meet presentation requirements
|
