Purchasing Organization Metrics Report

  

Assignment #3: Purchasing Organization Metrics Report

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Purchasing Organization Metrics Report
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

The resources provided in the assignment 3 attached document are the only ones to be used. Assignment must be written within the rubric. Assignment 1 & 2 have been attached to help with writing. 

Moving forward with the work you’ve started with Assignment 1 and 2, discuss the various legal ramifications of buying and using the five different types of materials you’ll need for your new company. Specifically, discuss the type of contract you’ll use, potential liability you might be exposed to, and the terms and conditions that will most likely lead to a harmonious relationship with your suppliers. Also, create a detailed RFP that includes the corn leaf supplier taking over the processing of this material into an enzyme that you can mix with to the other four materials. Your paper should be two to three pages, double-spaced, 12-point font, one-inch margins.

Required Formatting of Assignment #3:

The report should be double spaced, 12-point font,  three pages in length excluding the title page and reference page

Third person writing is required. Third person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link: http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person.

Contractions are not used in business writing, so you are expected NOT to use contractions in writing this assignment. 

Title page

Use headings to help organize the paper

Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page. You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary.

The expectation is that you provide a robust use of the course readings. No other books besides the course eBook can be used. When using a source document, the expectation is that the information is cited and referenced with a page or paragraph number.

Assignment #3: Purchasing Organization Metrics Report

The resources provided are the only ones to be used. Assignment must be written within the rubric. Assignment 1 & 2 have been attached to help with writing.

Moving forward with the work you’ve started with Assignment 1 and 2, discuss the various legal ramifications of buying and using the five different types of materials you’ll need for your new company. Specifically, discuss the type of contract you’ll use, potential liability you might be exposed to, and the terms and conditions that will most likely lead to a harmonious relationship with your suppliers. Also, create a detailed RFP that includes the corn leaf supplier taking over the processing of this material into an enzyme that you can mix with to the other four materials. Your paper should be two to three pages, double-spaced, 12-point font, one-inch margins.

Required Formatting of Assignment #3:

The report should be double spaced, 12-point font, three pages in length excluding the title page and reference page

Third person writing is required. Third person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link: http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person.

Contractions are not used in business writing, so you are expected NOT to use contractions in writing this assignment.

Title page

Use headings to help organize the paper

Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page. You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary.

The expectation is that you provide a robust use of the course readings. No other books besides the course eBook can be used. When using a source document, the expectation is that the information is cited and referenced with a page or paragraph number.

Resources:

https://www.legal500.com/assets/pages/gc/summer-2016/procurement-and-legal-a-perfect-storm.html#sthash.JcomAXrg.zkRCKlH7.dpbs

https://www.slideshare.net/myzamri01/the-legal-aspect-of-purchasing

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SS5RRF_7.6.5/com.ibm.mavmpr /procure/c_purch_rec.html

https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/PARTICIPANT_GUIDE_RECORD_KEEPING

https://www.nextlevelpurchasing.com/articles/procurement-reports.php

https://www.nextlevelpurchasing.com/articles/procurement-report.php

http://purchasing.houstontx.gov/bids/Q23472/Q23472%20Exhibit%20B%20%20-%20Reporting%20Requirements

https://tenderspage.com/everything-need-know-rfp-process/

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-ucc-contracts-the-sale-goods.html

https://www.clarkewillmott.com/news/battle-of-forms-whose-terms-apply-to-the-contract/

2/20/2020 Rubric Assessment – BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) – UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/

comp

etencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921357&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881966&groupId=0… 1/5

Criteria Outstanding Superior Good Subst

Contract Type

Selected

Potential

Liability

Exposure

2 points

All types of relevant

contracts were discussed

thoroughly and selection

was logically reasoned

using insightful application

of the case study facts and

class materials. Rejection

of other contracts than the

one selected was

comprehensively discussed

and support with case

study facts and class

material.

(1.8-2.0)

1.7 points

All major types of relevant

contracts were discussed and

selection was logically reasoned

by applying the case study facts

and class materials. Rejection of

other contracts than the one

selected was underdeveloped as

to one or two types because

support with case study facts and

class material was minimal.

(1.60-1.799)

1.5 points

Comments generally identified

the major types of contracts

under consideration. Comments

reflect a satisfactory level of

analysis, synthesis, evaluation

and reasoning of the case

material and case study facts.

However, discussion of those

types rejected was too

general leaving the reasoning to

be underdeveloped.

(1.4-1.599)

1.3 p

Comm

minim

the ty

contr

to the

justif

selec

implie

analy

evalu

reaso

case

case

spars

demo

(1.2-1

3 points

Discussion identified

all potential legal liability

for the company. All points

were discussed thoroughly

and selection was logically

reasoned using insightful

application of the case

2.55 points

Discussion identified major

potential legal liability for the

company but one minor area was

missed and or one major area was

underdeveloped. Points discussed

were logically reasoned using a

good application of the case

study facts and class

materials.

2.25 points

Discussion identified most major

potential legal liability for the

company but one or two major

points were missed and or

underdeveloped. Points discussed

were logically reasoned mostly

using a application of the case

study facts and class materials.

1.95

An at

to ref

satisf

analy
evalu

poten

liabili

comp

2/20/2020 Rubric Assessment – BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) – UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921357&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881966&groupId=0… 2/5

Recommended

terms and

conditions for

the contract

are suggested

Created

study facts and class
materials.

(2.7-3.0)

(2.4-2.699) Comments tended to be

overbroad.

(2.1-2.399)

Howe

reaso
case
case

in mi

of the

used.

majo

liabili

missi

(1.8-2

2.25 points

Comments specifically

identify and

comprehensively explain

the terms and conditions

needed in the contract to

protect the

company. Conclusions

drawn reflected a highly

accomplished level of

analysis, synthesis,

evaluation and reasoning

of the case material and

case study facts resulting

in accurate, thorough, and

soundly reasoned

conclusions

(2.025-2.25)

1.91 points

Comments specifically identify

and explain the terms and

conditions that would most

benefit the company. Comments

demonstrated a good level of

analysis, synthesis, evaluation
and reasoning of the case

material and case study facts

resulting in mostly accurate

reasoned conclusions. One or

two terms while mentioned were

not developed as to why they

would benefit the company.

(1.8-2.024)

1.69 points

Comments identified and

explained most of the major

terms and conditions needed to

benefit the company. Justification

for the selection of the terms was

mostly reasoned from the case

material and case study facts

tended to be overbroad and

rarely discussed specifically why

the terms and conditions were

selected.

(1.575-1.799)

1.46

Comm

to ide

expla

cond

the u

mate

study

suppo

reaso

the c

minim

Justif

selec
implie

discu

may o

list of

cond
expla

(1.35

3 points 2.55 points 2.25 points 1.95

2/20/2020 Rubric Assessment – BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) – UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921357&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881966&groupId=0… 3/5

detailed RFB

that includes

discussion of

the enzyme

mixing process

Attention to

Instructions

Writing

Formatting and

development of RFP was

correct and

comprehensively explained.

Mixture process was

detailed as to all four

materials. Each element

of the report defined the

conclusions drawn

reflecting a highly

accomplished level of
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and reasoning
of the case material and
case study facts resulting
in accurate, thorough, and
soundly reasoned
conclusions
(2.7-3.0)

Formatting and development

of RFP reports was correct

and explained. Each element

of the report defined

the conclusions drawn reflecting

a good level of analysis,

synthesis, evaluation and

reasoning of the case material

and case study facts resulting in

accurate, and logically reasoned

conclusions. However,

development of the mixing

process was not fully explained

and or supported by class

material.

(2.4-2.699)

RFP report was created and all

elements were present.

Comments identified

elements but had 3-4 mistakes in

the discussion of the mixing

process. Comments reflect a

satisfactory level of analysis,

synthesis, evaluation and
reasoning of the case material

and case study facts. Discussion

was general as a result.

(2.1-2.399)
An at

made

RFP r

eleme

prese

Comm

some

eleme

in the

only w

suppo

eithe

unde

reaso
(1.8-2
2.25 points

Demonstrates exceptional

understanding of

requirements responding

completely to each aspect

of assignment including

minor aspects of the

assignment such as using

third person writing,

required use of course

readings, and assignment

format.

(2.025-2.25)
1.91 points

Demonstrates excellent

understanding of requirements;

missed one minor aspect of

assignment.

(1.8-2.024)

1.69 points

Demonstrates satisfactory

understanding of requirements;

missed a key element or two

minor aspects of assignment.

(1.575-1.799)
1.46

Fails

unde

requi

misse

eleme

mino

assig

(1.35

2 points 1.7 points 1.5 points 1.3 p

2/20/2020 Rubric Assessment – BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) – UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921357&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881966&groupId=0… 4/5

Total / 15

Overall Score

Mechanics

Adherence to

APA Style (6th

ed.)

Strictly adheres to standard

usage rules of written

English, including but not

limited to capitalization,

punctuation, run-on

sentences, missing or extra

words, stylistic errors,

spelling and grammatical

errors. No errors found. No

contractions or jargon

used.

(1.8 – 2)

Excellently adheres to standard

usage of mechanics: conventions

of written English, including

capitalization, punctuation, and

spelling. One to three errors

found.

(1.6 – 1.799)

Satisfactorily adheres to standard

usage rules of mechanics:

conventions of English, including

capitalization, punctuation, and

spelling. Four to 10 errors found.

(1.4 – 1.599)

Minim

to sta

rules

conve

writte

includ

capita

punct

spelli

10 er

(1.2 –

0.5 points

No APA style or usage

errors; Proper citation of

source material is used

throughout paper;

Reference titles follow APA

with only the first word,

the first word after a colon

and proper nouns

capitalized.

(0.45 – 0.5)

0.425 points

Attempts in-text citations and

reference list but one or two APA

style errors noted or fails to use

APA citations when appropriate

1-2 times.

(0.40 – 0.44)

0.375 points

Attempts in-text citations and

reference lists; APA style errors

are noted throughout document;

Fails to use APA citations

when

appropriate 3 times in document.

(0.35 – 0.39)

0.325

Attem

citati

refere

to us

when

5 tim

only

citati
refere

pape

APA

throu

docu

(0.30

2/20/2020 Rubric Assessment – BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) – UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921357&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881966&groupId=0… 5/5

Close

Outstanding
13.5 points minimum

Superior
12 points minimum

Good
10.5 points minimum

Substandard
9 points minimum

Failure
0 points minimum

Running head: SUPPLIER SELECTION REPORT 1

SUPPLIER SELECTION REPORT 5

Supplier Selection Report

Zachary T. Trigger

UMCG

Purchasing Management

Professor James Swaim

February 2, 2020

The criteria for the selection of suppliers has significantly changed over the years. In the past, price was utilized as the primary criteria for the selection of suppliers together with location and preferences. However, there has been a greater emphasis on food safety and quality hence the need to improve on the quality of raw materials supplied. Choosing the right suppliers can help an organization to meet and supersede the set regulatory standards while increasing consumer demand and building the brand reputation. The supplier that is chosen has to be able to deliver quality and safe ingredients which will translate to quality and safe end products for the consumer (Eldridge, 2012).

Identifying the appropriate supplier is a costly affair but has significant results if done in the correct manner. The opinions of the stakeholders are sought to determine the appropriate criteria to follow in selecting a supplier. Some of the stakeholders include members of the research and development, processing, quality assurance, marketing and purchasing among others. After the identification of the appropriate criteria potential suppliers are identified and their capabilities and pricing is compared. This stage involves working with the potential suppliers and maintaining open communication where the manufacturer explains to the supplier the manufacturing process. While cost is a significant driver, value is paramount and it should be key in selecting the appropriate supplier. Some of the factors which contribute towards value include delivery commitments, responsiveness and reliability, hard and soft resource savings and customer service (Eldridge, 2012).

The raw materials that are being sought are highly perishable and one criteria for the supplier is that it should be able to reach the company in a fresh state. This should be one of the factors to look for when sourcing for the supplier. Because of the sensitive nature of the raw materials that are required, it is paramount that the supplier is able to assure of the quality of the raw materials they will be supplying. For example, the supplier for hearts from pigs should have a pig farm rather than outsourcing from another farm. This way, they are able to raise the pigs to standard and consequently they will have good quantity hearts to serve the purpose aimed at by the company. This is carried out on all of the other required raw materials.

Before signing the contact, there is need to carry out an audit on the suppliers to determine whether or not they have the capacity to deliver. The audit is carried out to enable the determination of whether the supplier is compliant or has some significant compliance or quality system failures. These shortcomings have a significant impact on the supplier’s capability to produce top quality products. This procedure is carried out on the best suited supplier since it is a costly process and it aims at protecting the manufacturers from contracting a supplier that may be good in the books but this does not match the actual situation of the company. The audit also aims at helping the company to understand the weaknesses and strengths of the supplier before the relationship is made official. Therefore, by carrying out an audit of the suppliers, the company is able to determine the capability of the supplier to meet the company’s requirements (Assemblymag, 2001).

Evaluating the performance of a supplier is important to grade them and determine whether or not the partnership will continue. Evaluation can be carried out through a self-assessment questionnaire by the suppliers. This helps the supplier to identify any existing gaps ad take the appropriate measures towards covering them. It also helps the company to understand how the supplier understands its operations and whether or not they are willing to make improvements on existing discrepancies. The company should also set up appropriate metrics with which the measurement of performance can be carried out. Some of the metrics which can be used include lots that are rejected, documentation errors and perfect shipments among many others. The metrics allows for the categorization of the supplier as either full partner, associate partner, high risk or incapable. A full partner is a supplier that has been able to meet all the company’s expectations and can be trusted to supply quality raw materials to the manufacturer. An associate partner is a supplier that falls short of the expectations and needs to put in more effort so as to attain the status of a full partner. High risk supplier is utilized for current production but it is advised not to award them with future business. An incapable supplier does not meet the needs of the manufacturer and hence they should be let go as soon as possible. These categorizations help the company to know which supplier they need to replace and which one they need to retain. It plays a significant role in the continuous process of assuring quality in the raw materials that they are supplied with (Assemblymag, 2001).

Establishing long term supplier relationships has many advantages on the company. It leads to a reduction is costs since there is a significant amount of resources that is associated with searching for a supplier including months of determining the appropriate one and setting up a relationship with them. With long term suppliers, there is an increase in communication and efficiency hence a smooth operation unlike in instances where the supplier is regularly changed. With the long term relationship, there is also room for continued improvement and the supplier is able to better understand the needs of the manufacturer and hence they are able to satisfy them better (Figues, 2020). Long term suppliers are those that have been able to achieve the metrics of full partnership and the two entities have been able to establish a level of trust and by working together, the company has been able to achieve and supersede the required quality.

References

Assemblymag. (2001). Retrieved 2 February 2020, from

https://www.assemblymag.com/articles/82672-how-to-evaluate-suppliers

Eldridge, B. (2012). Supplier Management: Six Steps to Selecting the Right Supplier. Retrieved 2 February 2020, from

https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/augustseptember-2012/supplier-management-six-steps-to-selecting-the-right-supplier/

Figues, R. (2020). Retrieved 2 February 2020, from

http://www.academia.edu/8304256/CHAPTER_4_QUALITY_IN_CUSTOMER_SUPLLIER_RELATIONSHIPS

Running head: TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP REPORT 1

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP REPORT 5

Total Cost of Ownership

Zachary T. Trigger

UMCG

Purchasing Management

Professor James Swaim

2/8/2020

Balanced scorecard

A balanced scorecard is a concept used by managers to analyze their business using four different perspectives. It helps to provide a customer’s perspective, the organization’s internal perspective, the innovation and learning perspective and the financial perspective. The advantage for this measure is that it reduces the data overload by minimizing the number of required measures.

The mission statement of the organization is used to determine the customer perspective. This is helps to frame how the customer views the organization. The mission for the organization is to become a leader in delivering products used in laboratory testing. The concerns of the customer deal with time, quality, cost and performance and service. The company has been able to deliver orders made by customers within a short lead time except for few instances when suppliers had failed to deliver the raw materials within the stipulated time. The quality of the products it delivers has been undisputed. The cost of the products is also competitive in the market when compared to those of the competitors. This has helped the organization to gain a substantial market base. Convenience has been created for the customers by carrying out delivery to their preferred destination. Under this goals and achievements, it can be concluded that the organization is preferred by many customers (Kaplan & Norton, 1992).

Company based measures are important as they dictate how the organization meets the customer’s needs. Quality is the main concern for the organization’s customers and therefore, measures should be put in place to ensure that the final products are of good quality. This can be achieved through the selection of the best suppliers based on the quality of their raw materials rather than the price. This was achieved in the process of supplier selection and the continuous evaluation of the suppliers to ensure that they maintain the quality. The processes undertaken to produce the products used in laboratory settings are also meticulously monitored and improvements made over time. This means that the quality increases with time and this ensures that the internal metric of quality is achieved (Kaplan & Norton, 1992).

Innovation and learning is part of the culture within the organization. There is a research and development department within the organization whose sole purpose is to carry out research and come up with new and improved products. These are aimed at meeting the ever changing needs of the consumer. The financial perspective of the organization is also promising since the profitability has increased. The company has experienced growth and this has placed it in a better position to bargain for lower supply costs. It has been able to enjoy the benefits of economies of scale (Kaplan & Norton, 1992).

Total cost of ownership

Total cost of ownership (TCO) is different from the procurement approach because it does not account for the purchase price only. Other costs associated with the supply include storage, taxes, shipping, insurance and disposal. The raw materials that are purchased some of them are perishable such as the hearts of pigs. Although there might be an advantage in buying bulk, it is advisable to buy in small quantities that are required in the manufacturing process. This prevents any losses from being incurred in the form of deterioration when the raw material is purchased in large quantities (Plues, 2012).

There are several other factors to be considered in TCO model. First is the supply partner development costs. There are costs associated with the development of the partnership and this should be proportional to the value that the supplier brings to the organization. An example is for the turkey legs; it is advisable to look for a supplier that will supply the muscles only rather than the whole leg for the organization to obtain muscle from it. This reduces the manufacturing costs associated with the product. The location of the supplier is also important as it determines the shipping cost and time. Although a supplier may have quality products at a lower price, their location may disqualify them because the shipping cost and time taken to transport them ultimately makes the product expensive. Therefore, it is advisable to source for raw materials in a nearby location (Lancione, 2018).

There are various costs associated with the quality of the raw materials. Low quality raw materials lead to low quality final products and disappointment by the customer. There are also costs associated with returns when the quality is not good. Low quality also presents safety issues. It is therefore advisable to choose high quality suppliers to avoid the costs associated with low quality. The payment terms should also be clearly outlined. Payment to the suppliers should be done after delivery and not before as this would hurt the cash flow and places the organization at risk. The procurement department should also protect the organization from potential cost fluctuations by choosing to purchase a position in the foreign currency for the price at that point in time (Lancione, 2018).

References

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that Drive Performance. Retrieved 7 February 2020, from

https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2

Lancione, T. (2018). 6 TCO Considerations When Choosing a Supply Partner | IndustryStar Solutions. Retrieved 7 February 2020, from https://www.industrystarsolutions.com/blog/2018/07/6-total-cost-ownership-considerations/

Pluess, J. (2012). What Total Cost of Ownership Offers Sustainable Procurement | Blog | BSR. Retrieved 7 February 2020, from https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/blog-view/what-total-cost-of-ownership-offers-sustainable-procurement

What Will You Get?

We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.

Premium Quality

Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.

Experienced Writers

Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.

On-Time Delivery

Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.

24/7 Customer Support

Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.

Complete Confidentiality

Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.

Authentic Sources

We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.

Moneyback Guarantee

Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.

Order Tracking

You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.

image

Areas of Expertise

Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.

Areas of Expertise

Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.

image

Trusted Partner of 9650+ Students for Writing

From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.

Preferred Writer

Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.

Grammar Check Report

Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.

One Page Summary

You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.

Plagiarism Report

You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.

Free Features $66FREE

  • Most Qualified Writer $10FREE
  • Plagiarism Scan Report $10FREE
  • Unlimited Revisions $08FREE
  • Paper Formatting $05FREE
  • Cover Page $05FREE
  • Referencing & Bibliography $10FREE
  • Dedicated User Area $08FREE
  • 24/7 Order Tracking $05FREE
  • Periodic Email Alerts $05FREE
image

Our Services

Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.

  • On-time Delivery
  • 24/7 Order Tracking
  • Access to Authentic Sources
Academic Writing

We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.

Professional Editing

We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.

Thorough Proofreading

We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.

image

Delegate Your Challenging Writing Tasks to Experienced Professionals

Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!

Check Out Our Sample Work

Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality

Categories
All samples
Essay (any type)
Essay (any type)
The Value of a Nursing Degree
Undergrad. (yrs 3-4)
Nursing
2
View this sample

It May Not Be Much, but It’s Honest Work!

Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.

0+

Happy Clients

0+

Words Written This Week

0+

Ongoing Orders

0%

Customer Satisfaction Rate
image

Process as Fine as Brewed Coffee

We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.

See How We Helped 9000+ Students Achieve Success

image

We Analyze Your Problem and Offer Customized Writing

We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.

  • Clear elicitation of your requirements.
  • Customized writing as per your needs.

We Mirror Your Guidelines to Deliver Quality Services

We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.

  • Proactive analysis of your writing.
  • Active communication to understand requirements.
image
image

We Handle Your Writing Tasks to Ensure Excellent Grades

We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.

  • Thorough research and analysis for every order.
  • Deliverance of reliable writing service to improve your grades.
Place an Order Start Chat Now
image

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code Happy