COU 630 Assessment Report Draft Two Guidelines and RubricIn your first draft of the Assessment Report, you address the introduction, assessment review, and assessment administration.You will now build on that draft with your assessmentscoring, assessment results interpretation, recommendations, and conclusion. You are using the same results you received fromyour partner for your first draft as you complete this second draft. As part of your Assessment Results Interpretation, you will again explore validity and reliability. When considering validity and reliability of the instruments, together, often what you are looking for is how well the instruments predict suitability for a career. Typically the results will match up the individuals’ interests and personality with a potential career path. Refer to the COU 630 Final Project I Outline (located in the Assignment Guideline and Rubric section within Start Here)to help structure your project. Prompt: For this assignment, you willsubmit the assessment scoring, assessment results interpretation, recommendations, and conclusion sections of your career assessment report for instructor feedback. Specifically, the following critical elementsmust be addressed:

IV.Assessment Scoring

A.Discuss how the assessments are scored. 

V.Assessment Results Interpretation

A.State the results of each assessment.

B.Summarize what each assessment means. Discuss the personality and career assessments in separate paragraphs. 

C.Summarize what the assessmentsmean together. 

          i.What is your interpretation of the assessment results?(Note: Your interpretation should be discussed as a separateheading under your summary of what the assessments mean together.)

D.Summarize what the results mean in terms of the client’s future career. 

          i.Make sure to provide rationalee. Your rationale should include how the meaning of the results align with the client’s future career. 

E.Address the validity and reliabilityof the results. 

         i.Note: You discussed concerns around validity and reliability of the tools in the assessment review of your first draft. Now, discuss the validity and reliability of the tools’ ability to predict future career options based on the assessment results and research on the tool.  

VI.Recommendations

A.Discuss how the results impact their educational level.

          i.Does the client need more education to seek a new career?

          ii.What do the results implicate with respect to their education? 

B.Identify any specific education resourcesyou would recommend. Why?

C.Identify any occupational resourcesyou may provide the client with.

       i.What occupational resources would you recommend to help? Why?

D.Discuss what you suggest the client’s career directionshould be moving forward.

E.Support the client’s recommended career direction using data.

       i.How is the data informing the labor market and the career path you are suggesting?

 VII.Conclusion

A.Summarize your overall career recommendations.

           i.What are your overall recommendations and predictions and prognosis?

Attached you will find the result of the career assessment completed by the client 

Please ensure you read all the requirements completion needs to be that on the level of a graduate student
 

week 7

by Shannen Carambia

Submission date: 08-Mar-2020 12:55PM (UTC-0400)
Submission ID: 1271504935
File name: week_7_ (32K)
Word count: 983
Character count: 5337

→

Address task

Vague

Address task

Strong evidence

Address task
Vague

VagueCheck evidence

Strong evidence

Explain your evidence

Strong evidence

Check evidence

Critical Element

8%
SIMILARITY INDEX

5%
INTERNET SOURCES

5%
PUBLICATIONS

7%
STUDENT PAPERS

1 3%
2 2%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%

Exclude quotes On

Exclude bibliography Off

Exclude matches Off

week 7
ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to York St John University
Student Paper

Submitted to Argosy University
Student Paper

www.drryanduffy.com
Internet Source

Submitted to Roehampton University
Student Paper

Submitted to American Public University System
Student Paper

QM

QM
QM
QM

FINAL GRADE

/70

week 7
GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

→
Move right

Additional Comment

Level 1 heading is centered; applies to all subsequent Level 1 headings- see project outline

Address task
Present a topic sentence that clearly addresses the task. Look back at the question and revise your
response so that your ideas on the topic are clear.
Additional Comment

Refer to the rubric on this criterion. Here you should discuss what you learned from the scoring
information for each assessments.

Vague
Unclear:
When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the most common mistakes is to not
offer enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem vague and sketchy. A paper is
always strengthened when your claims are as specific as possible, The more detailed evidence you
offer, the more reference points your reader will have. Remember that you are communicating your
argument to a reader who has only your description to go by. Someone who reads your essay will
not automatically know what you mean to express, so you have to supply details, to show the reader
what you mean, not just tell him or her.
Additional Comment

For example, stating what assessment was used and what interests were assessed would explain
what you are discussing.

Address task
Present a topic sentence that clearly addresses the task. Look back at the question and revise your
response so that your ideas on the topic are clear.
Additional Comment

It appears that only one assessment was addressed. The results of both a personality assessment
and career assessment was needed for draft 2

QM
QM
QM
QM
QM

Strong evidence
The evidence selected is highly relevant to your topic sentence. In future responses, continue to
include the most appropriate evidence to support your ideas.

PAGE 3

Address task
Present a topic sentence that clearly addresses the task. Look back at the question and revise your
response so that your ideas on the topic are clear.
Additional Comment

only one assessment was interpreted

Vague
Unclear:
When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the most common mistakes is to not
offer enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem vague and sketchy. A paper is
always strengthened when your claims are as specific as possible, The more detailed evidence you
offer, the more reference points your reader will have. Remember that you are communicating your
argument to a reader who has only your description to go by. Someone who reads your essay will
not automatically know what you mean to express, so you have to supply details, to show the reader
what you mean, not just tell him or her.
Additional Comment

It was expected that the assessment offered specific career options

Vague
Unclear:
When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the most common mistakes is to not
offer enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem vague and sketchy. A paper is
always strengthened when your claims are as specific as possible, The more detailed evidence you
offer, the more reference points your reader will have. Remember that you are communicating your
argument to a reader who has only your description to go by. Someone who reads your essay will
not automatically know what you mean to express, so you have to supply details, to show the reader
what you mean, not just tell him or her.
Additional Comment

Validity and reliability were not adequately addressed

Check evidence
Check your evidence here. Be sure to represent all information appropriately.
Additional Comment

a cited source will substantiate the discussion here

Also remember the goal is to assess how well these assessments can predict career options for your
client

PAGE 4

QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
Strong evidence
The evidence selected is highly relevant to your topic sentence. In future responses, continue to
include the most appropriate evidence to support your ideas.

Explain your evidence
Explain to the reader how the evidence supports your ideas about the topic. Your response should
show that you understand the topic and/or source(s).
Additional Comment

How should your client practice? Where is the practice?:

Strong evidence
The evidence selected is highly relevant to your topic sentence. In future responses, continue to
include the most appropriate evidence to support your ideas.

PAGE 5

Check evidence
Check your evidence here. Be sure to represent all information appropriately.
Additional Comment
a cited source will substantiate the discussion here

Critical Element

Missing Critical Element

Additional Comment

Your report did not reflect information obtained from both a personality assessment and career
assessment.

PAGE 6

week 7
by Shannen Carambia
week 7
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
week 7
GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor

Assignments View Feedback

Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report:
Draft Two

Submission Feedback

Rubric Name: COU 630 Assessment Report Draft Two Rubric

COU-630-Q3485 Career Counseling 20TW3 SC

mySNHU Online Student Services Shapiro LibraryCourse Menu Tools Help

Hi Shannen,

There is room for improvement on draft 2. Please see Turn it in Markups for areas to improve.
Please reach out if you have any questions on the feedback.

Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident

Assessment

Scoring: Scored

0 / 8

Assessment

Results

Interpretation:

Results

6.8 / 8

8 points

Discusses how the

assessments are

scored

6.8 points

Discusses how the
assessments are

scored, but lacks

detail or has

inaccuracies

Criterion Feedback

See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion

8 points

States the results of

each

assessment

0 points

Does not state the

results of each

assessment
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
0 points

Does not address

how assessments are

scored
6.8 points
States the results of

each assessment but

lacks detail or

contains inaccuracies

Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two – COU… https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f…

1 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM

Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:

Assessment Means

6.8 / 8
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:

Mean Together

0 / 8
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:

Future Career

6.8 / 8
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:

Validity and

Reliability

0 / 8
8 points

Summarizes what

each assessment

means

0 points

Does not summarize

what each

assessment means

Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Summarizes what

the assessments

mean

together

6.8 points

Summarizes

what the

assessments mean

together, but lacks

detail

Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Summarizes what

the results mean in

terms of the client’s

future

career

0 points
Does not summarize

what the results

mean in terms of the

client’s future career

Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points

Addresses the

validity and reliability

of the results

6.8 points

Addresses the validity

and reliability of the

results, but has

inaccuracies or lacks

detail
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
6.8 points
Summarizes what
each assessment

means, but lacks

detail or has
inaccuracies
0 points
Does not summarize
what the
assessments mean
together
6.8 points

Summarizes what the

results mean in terms

of the client’s future

career, but lacks

detail in potential

future careers or has

inaccuracies
0 points

Does not address the

validity and reliability
of the results
Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two – COU… https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f…

2 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM

Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident

Recommendations:

Educational Level
6.8 / 8

Recommendations:

Education

Resources

6.8 / 8
Recommendations:

Occupational

Resources
6.8 / 8
Recommendations:

Career Direction
6.8 / 8

8 points
Discusses how the

results

impact their

educational level

0 points

Does not discuss

how the results

impact their
educational level
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points

Identifies any

specific education

resources

recommended for

the

client

0 points

Does not identify any

specific education
resources

recommended for the

client
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Identifies any

occupational

resources you may

provide the client

with

0 points
Does not identify any
occupational
resources you may
provide the client
with
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points

Discusses what the

client’s suggested

career direction

should be moving

forward

0 points
Does not discuss

what you suggest the

client’s career

direction should be

moving forward

6.8 points
Discusses how the

results impact their

educational level, but

lacks detail or
contains inaccuracies
6.8 points

Identifies any specific

education resources

recommended for the

client, but submission

is inappropriate or

does not cover all

required elements

6.8 points
Identifies any specific
occupational
resources
recommended for the
client, but submission
is inappropriate or
does not cover all
required elements
6.8 points
Discusses what the
client’s suggested
career direction
should be moving

forward, but lacks

sufficient

Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two – COU… https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f…

3 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM

Total 66.4 / 100

Overall

Score

Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident
Recommendations:

Data
6.8 / 8

Conclusion: Career

Recommendations
8 / 8

Articulation of

Response
4 / 4

Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points

Supports the client’s

career direction

using data

0 points

Does not support the

client’s career

direction using data

Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
6.8 points

Summarizes overall

career

recommendations but

has inconsistencies or

lacks detail

0 points
Does not summarize

overall career

recommendations

Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion

3.

4 points

Submission has major

errors related to

citations, grammar,

spelling,

syntax, or

organization that

negatively impact

readability and

articulation of main

ideas

0 points

Submission has

critical errors related

to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or
organization that

prevent

understanding of

ideas
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion

recommendations, or

recommendations do

not align to the

assessment results

6.8 points
Supports the client’s

career direction using

data, but lacks clarity

8 points
Summarizes overall
career
recommendations
4 points

Submission has no

major errors related

to citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization

Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two – COU… https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f…

4 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM

Score

46.48 / 70 – F

Feedback Date

Mar 15, 2020 2:08 PM

Assignment

7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two

Points earned out of 100
86 points minimum

The overall submission earned 86

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum

The overall submission earned 1

points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.

Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum

The overall submission earned 0

points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.

Submission ID Submission(s) Turnitin® Similarity Inline Feedback Date Submitted

10454617 week 7 (32 KB) 8 %

View

Turnitin®

GradeMark®

Mar 8, 2020 12:55 PM

Done

Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two – COU… https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f…

5 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM