Powerpoint due in 48 hours
INSTRUCTIONS ARE ATTACHED
MUST FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS AND RUBRIC CAREFULLY
48 hours POWERPOINT
Nurs 406
PowerPoint Rubric
Rev. 8/9/2015 PDR
Rev. 12/2016 PDR
Proficient Outcome
Competent Outcome
Developing Outcome
Points
Possible
Actual
Earned
Points
Title & Author
(3 – 5 pt)
Title is short & to the point. Student
name & credentials are beneath the
title. School is correct: University of
Louisiana Lafayette
(1-2 pts)
Missing Title, Name and /or school
(0 pts)
Missing Title, Name, and school
5
PPt – Overall
Appearance
(14-20 pts)
Arrangement is sequential for research
report. Professional creative
appearance. Format with consistent
font in size and color (bullets align,
minimal use of color. Contains 5-15
slides.
(7-13 pts)
Professional research order not followed. Font
is not consistent in size and color. Contains 5 –
15 slides. Formatting not consistent
throughout the presentation.
(1-6 pts)
Information is scattered or
disorganized. Lacks creativity.
Contains less than 5 and/or more
than 15 slides.
20
PPt – Content
(55-65 pt)
Contains all components of the research
critique: Introduction, Problem,
Purpose, IV & DV, Hypotheses,
Conceptual or Theoretical framework,
ROL, Methods, Design, Results,
Discussion, Significance to nursing.
Each component is concise and to the
point. Minimal full sentences used.
(20-54 pts)
Missing no more than 2 components of the
research critique: Problem, Purpose, IV & DV,
Hypotheses, Conceptual or Theoretical
framework, ROL, Methods, Design, Results,
Discussion, Significance to nursing.
Components are unclear; use of full sentences
dominates the presentation.
(1-19 pts)
Missing greater than 2 components
of the research critique.
Organization of the research
elements is unclear and rambling.
Components are all described in full
sentences. Concepts are lost in the
wordiness of the presentation.
65
PPt – APA &
Spelling
(8 – 10 pts)
APA style citations and references are
correct. No spelling or grammar errors.
(5-8 pts)
Minimal problems with APA citations and/or
references; less than 5 citation and/or
reference errors. Minor spelling and/or
grammar errors; less than 5 errors.
(1-4 pts)
Major problems with APA, spelling
and /or grammar. Greater than 5
errors in APA, spelling, and/or
grammar.
10
Total 100
The following program policy applies:
3. Written Assignments and Final Project:
a. Are to be submitted by the due date and time.
Nurs 406
PowerPoint Rubric
Rev. 8/9/2015 PDR
Rev. 12/2016 PDR
b. Students failing to meet the deadline will receive an automatic 50% reduction on their paper prior to actual grading. If the student fails to submit within the next 24 hours, a
grade of “0” will be assigned.
c. It is the student’s responsibility to recognize their failure to submit and notify the instructor or academic coach within the 24 hour time frame. Contact should be made via
email for further instructions. (This is not for routine use. It is only for late assignments.)
Chapter 20
Disseminating Evidence Through Presentations, Publications, Health Policy Briefs, and the Media
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Importance of
Dissemination
Primary goal of dissemination is to facilitate transfer and adoption of research findings into clinical practice or disseminate results from evidence-based practice and evidence-based quality improvement projects.
Dissemination
Builds cache of evidence available for discovery
Increases chance of translation of evidence into practice
Increases quality of care through informing evidence-based decision making
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
2
Essential Information Needed Prior to Planning a Podium/Oral Presentation
Analyze your audience:
Who are they? What’s their background? How many?
Assess the technology capabilities/resources:
AV equipment available? Recording the presentation? Access to internet? Microphone? Tech support on hand?
Plan the content:
Length and format of presentation? Content to be addressed? Expectations? Handouts?
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
3
BOPPPS Model for Presentation Development
BOPPPS is an interdisciplinary model for developing presentations. It’s based on audience analysis and conference purpose.
Bridge
Objectives
Pretest
Participatory learning
Post test
Summary
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
4
Developing a Great Slide Presentation
Present a minimal amount of material on each slide
Use bullet points
Timing: one slide for every 30 to 60 seconds
Font: size- 24 to 32; type should be consistent throughout
Photographs or graphics enhance presentations
Test use of multimedia within the presentation on site; have a “plan B” in case it doesn’t work!
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
5
Converting the Presentation to Publication
Dissemination is incomplete until you convert your presentation into a publication.
Plan time for multiple drafts/revisions.
Goal: submit manuscript for publication within 90 days of oral presentation.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
6
Question #1
Which of these strategies is the best advice to podium speakers who are using slide presentations?
Use several different fonts and font sizes throughout the presentation
Present as much written material as possible on each slide
Vary the slide background from slide to slide
Change slides not less than every 30 seconds
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
7
Answer to Question #1
D. Change slides not less than every 30 seconds
Rationale: Changing slides faster than every 30 seconds does not give the audience an opportunity to process the content. Alternately, presenting too much content on one slide usually means that font size needs to decrease and less white space is seen, which makes reading difficult. Varying slide backgrounds and font types and sizes between slides is distracting to audiences.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
8
Disseminating Through Panel Presentations
Panel is usually made up of a moderator and panelists
Provides a mechanism to share different perspectives on the topic
Effective way to disseminate information/experiences/perspectives from various professions, clinical sites
Both formal and informal formats can be utilized
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
9
A Panelist’s Dos and Don’ts
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
10
Responsibilities of Moderator: Preparing for the Panel Presentation
Before the Panel Presentation:
Prepare an overview of the panel’s purpose, brief biographical introductions of panelists, and their evidence-based topic
Speak with panelists individually to obtain information about their presentation and expertise
Serve as a liaison for exchanging logistic information
Assure that panelists’ remarks meet the session
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
11
Responsibilities of the Moderator During a Panel Presentation
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
12
Disseminating Through Roundtable Presentations
Informal way to disseminate information to small groups
Typically 6–12 people
More informal, conversational atmosphere
Allow for group discussion about practical application of content
Need suitable room; often AV equipment not available
Use printed handouts if necessary
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
13
Disseminating Evidence Using Poster Presentations
Allows more interaction between presenter and participants
Allows dissemination of preliminary research data or evidence reviews
Posters presentations are:
Usually displayed for longer periods of time
Less intimidating for presenters
Better for visual learners
Plan for:
Poster creation
Printing
Transportation
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
14
Disseminating Evidence to Small Groups #1
Evidence-Based Grand Rounds
Designed for clinicians to speak directly to their colleagues
In person or internet-based grand rounds
Evidence-Based Clinical Rounds
Smaller in scope than grand rounds
Used to present finding from unit- or department-level EBP projects back to the other members of the unit/department
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
15
Disseminating Evidence to Small Groups #2
Brief Consultations
Informal
“Hallway consultations”
On-the-ground approach to facilitate discussion
Digitizing Evidence Communications
Utilizing technology can be very effective in disseminating information to a targeted audience
Podcasts
Videocasts
Webinars
Social media
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
16
Disseminating Evidence at Hospital/Organizational and Professional Committee Meetings
In preparing, consider:
What is the composition of the audience?
What do they know about the topic?
How much time do I have?
Remember—
Time is tight
Stick to the key points
Anticipate latecomers
Anticipate questions the group might have
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
17
Disseminating Evidence Through Journal Clubs
Evolved over the years
Held in a variety of settings
Provides opportunity for clinicians to share and learn
Typically led by an advanced-level clinician who understands research design, methods, statistics, but may be led by faculty mentor or trainee
On-site journal clubs
Online journal clubs
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
18
Responsibilities of the Journal Club Leader
Before the Journal Club:
Decide how the article is going to be chosen
Disseminate the article and information about location/time to participants
Secure the site
During Journal club:
Clearly communicate the purpose and expectations
Use open-ended questions to facilitate discussion
Actively listen
Avoid the appearance of preferences or bias
Monitor the flow of discussion to stay on topic
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
19
Question #2
Journal clubs are an effective mechanism for enhancing which of the following aspects?
Clinician’s ability to conduct research studies
Building expertise and confidence in reading and appraising research studies
Identifying patient preferences
Helping participants better understand how to write PICO(T) questions
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
20
Answer to Question #2
B. Building expertise and confidence in reading and appraising research studies
Rationale: Participation in a journal club helps build expertise and confidence in reading and appraising research studies. Journal clubs are not focused on writing PICO(T) questions, build clinicians skills on producing primary research nor directly address patient preferences.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
21
Steps in Disseminating Evidence Through Publication
Find a mentor or collaborate on a joint writing project with experienced author(s)
Generate the general concept/idea
Decide what type of publication the idea would best fit
Plan and organize the manuscript outline
Adopting a positive attitude
Select a journal (see next slide)
Develop the content following publisher’s guidelines!
Develop a timeline for completion of manuscript sections, including literature review
Proofread the manuscript before submitting it
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
22
Questions to Ask in Selecting the Right journal for Publication
Is the journal peer-reviewed?
What is the journal’s impact factor?
What is the profile of the journal’s readership?
What is the turnaround cycle for review?
What is the “in-press” period (time between acceptance and publication)?
What are the technical specifications?
Is the journal an open or closed access journal?
Are there specific reporting guidelines for selected manuscripts?
It’s critical to follow the journal’s guidelines for authors when preparing your manuscript!!
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
23
Question #3
Which of the following areas is the least important to address when choosing a journal for a manuscript submission?
The readership profile of the journal
Whether the article will have an accompanying commentary
The lag time between manuscript acceptance and its publication
The average length of time it takes for peer review
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
24
Answer to Question #3
B. Whether the article will have an accompanying commentary
Rationale: The readership profile is important to know, as this will determine whether there is a good “fit” between journal and manuscript. Turnaround times for review and between acceptance and publication are important, as clinically relevant research results should be disseminated as quickly as possible to support practice changes. If the manuscript submitted is well supported by evidence and/or has a sound research design, then whether or not a commentary will accompany it should not matter.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
25
Disseminating Evidence to Influence Health Policy
Health policy briefs allow opportunity to provide evidence to inform policy creation Should be
Succinct
Written in language that legislators can understand
Examples of topics of policy briefs
Health care financing
Quality and safety of patient outcomes
Risk/benefit analysis of cost reduction alternatives
Human resource needs
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
26
Working With the Media to Disseminate Evidence #1
The basics:
Always engage your public relations or marketing department before engaging with the media
Have a clear and newsworthy message that is easy to understand
Know the audience you intend to reach
Formulate a plan
Develop a “pitch”; make your case quickly why a reporter should cover your story
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
27
Working With the Media to Disseminate Evidence #2
When working with media, DON’T:
Use scientific jargon
Wait for hours to return calls; call back immediately
Expect a story to name every contributor
Assume the reporter is familiar with your project or discipline
Dictate the “proper” angle to take
Talk about only the positive aspects; discuss the challenges or limitations as well
Don’t ask to see a copy of the story before it is published
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
28
Do It Yourself (DIY) Opportunities to Disseminate
Write an Op-Ed or Commentary
Follow publication guidelines
Show thought leadership and expertise
Short (typically 500–800 words)
Disseminate using Social Media
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
29
Question #4
There are many opportunities to disseminate your work through various media. Which of the following is likely to reach the largest audience?
Podium presentation at a large conference
Poster presentation at a large conference
Publication in a peer-reviewed journal
News story
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
30
Answer to Question #4
C. Publication in a peer-reviewed journal
Rationale: Although presentations at large conferences (both podium and poster) and having the news do a story on your work are exciting and offer opportunity to reach a large audience, publication in a peer-reviewed journal provides you the best opportunity to disseminate to the largest audience for many years to come.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
31
PowerPoint Slide Presentation of the Final Project
Objective:
Dissemination is a critical part of a good research project. In chapter 7 of Schmidt & Brown (2015), pages 514-516, the authors discuss oral presentations. The PowerPoint (PPt) can be a powerful tool and usually accompanies the oral presentation. PowerPoint presentations enhance the oral presentation but care must be taken to prepare the PPt so as not to distract from the speaker. See this link for some tips on preparing a PPt.
http://www.garrreynolds.com/preso-tips/design/
Overview:
The PowerPoint (PPt) presentation is intended to be a presentation. This assignment can be creative, but should be a professional looking project. Microsoft Office offers a variety of layouts that you can choose from for your PowerPoint. Please keep your PPt between 7 to 15 slides. The slide limit does not include the title slide or references.
Please review the following general guidelines for your PPT presentation.
⢠Make your title short, summarizing the message of your chosen study.
⢠Use font size that is readable and consistent.
⢠Avoid capital letters except at the beginning of sentences and proper nouns.
⢠Try to use standard Windows fonts, such as Times New Roman.
⢠Do not underline anything.
⢠Use bold, larger typeface for the main titles and headings.
⢠Check the draft of your PPt against the rubric very carefully to ensure all required components are included.
