| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| NRS-451VN |
NRS-451VN-O504 |
Organizational Culture and Values |
130.0 |
| Criteria |
Percentage |
Unsatisfactory (0.00%) |
Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) |
Satisfactory (79.00%) |
Good (89.00%) |
Excellent (100.00%) |
Comments |
Points Earned |
| Content |
| 40.0% |
| Purpose of Organizational Mission, Vision, and Values |
|
|
|
| 8.0% |
Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is omitted. |
Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is partially summarized. There are omissions and inaccuracies. |
Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies. |
Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is outlined. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. |
Purpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is accurate and clearly outlined. |
| Significance of Mission, Vision, and Values on Nurse Engagement and Patient Outcomes |
8.0%
Explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is omitted. |
An incomplete explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. There are omissions and inaccuracies. The significance is not established. |
A summary of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. More information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies. The significance is partially established. |
An explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. Some rationale or information is needed for support. The significance is generally established. |
A detailed explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. Sound rationale is provided for support. The significance is clearly established. |
| Factors Leading to Conflict in Professional Practice and Influence of Organizational Values and Culture in Addressing Conflict |
8.0%
Factors leading to conflict in a professional practice are omitted. |
Factors leading to conflict in a professional practice are partially presented. A vague summary of how organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is presented. There are significant omissions. |
A general explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is presented. A summary of how organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is presented. Some aspects are unclear. More information and rationale are needed. |
An explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is presented. How organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is described. Some information or rationale is needed for support. |
An explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is clearly presented. How organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is described in detail. Strong rationale and evidence are provided for support. |
| Effective Strategies for Resolving Workplace Conflict and Encouraging Interprofessional Collaboration |
8.0%
Effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are omitted. |
Strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are partially discussed. It is unclear how the proposed strategies would be effective; the proposed strategies are not relevant. |
Strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are generally discussed. The proposed strategies are relevant and would be generally effective for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration. More evidence and rationale are needed. |
Effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration is discussed. Some detail or rationale is needed for clarity or support. |
Effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration is discussed. Strong support and rationale are provided to support each strategy. |
| Influence of Organizational Needs and Culture of Health Care on Organizational Outcomes |
8.0%
How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is not discussed. |
How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is partially presented. There are major omissions and inaccuracies. |
How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is generally discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is summarized. The relationship among these is not clearly established. More information is needed. There are some inaccuracies. |
How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is described. The relationship among these is generally established. Some information or rationale is needed. |
How organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is clearly discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is described in detail. The relationship among these is established. Rationale and evidence is provided for support. |
| Organization, Effectiveness, and Format |
60.0% |
| Presentation of Content |
40.0%
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. |
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. |
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. |
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. |
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Layout |
|
|
| 5.0% |
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. |
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. |
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. |
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. |
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. |
| Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) |
5.0%
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. |
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. |
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. |
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. |
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
5.0%
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. |
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. |
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
5.0%
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage |
100% |
