Need a Reflective essay writen

Assignment: Write a 2-3 page substantive essay, not including title page or reference, demonstrating an understanding of ELOs presented during term. In reviewing ELOs write how you can employ the lessons learned

Running Head: COMBAT 1

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on

Just from $13/Page

Order Essay

COMBAT 9

Combat Essay

The purpose of this paper is to explain how combat and the effects of war is the major cause for our soldiers having mental and psychological problems today. The mental health impairments experienced by the soldiers who are deployed during the war have received massive attention from the government. War greatly impacts soldiers and civilians alike, both physically and emotionally. Death, injury, sexual violence, malnutrition, illness, and disability are some emotional impacts. The effects of war, torture, and depression greatly impacts a soldier’s life. After returning home, the soldiers may have to cope with depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, brain injury and conditions due to the services that they offer during the war. Soldiers who have been working in combat areas tend to be at a higher risk of having a mental health issue. This ethics paper will discuss the root cause of combat and the effects of war that are the major cause for our soldiers having mental and psychological problems today through the three ethical lenses, its impact on the force, and possible solutions to the ethical dilemma.

Root Cause

Combat stress is one of the main causes of mental health issues with soldiers today. The engagement in war, impact tremendously on the mental health of veterans and service members. Soldiers in war-torn countries like Iraq and Afghanistan, for example, have recorded high levels of mental illness (Joel Young, 2016). The exposure to war combat, anxiety, trouble with supervision, and separation from loved ones causes psychological stress. All these factors ultimately play a role in the rise of mental problems among soldiers. They are exposed to the killing of other people or even their own during war. As Joel Young (2016) describes the effect of having to experience deaths or close to death scenarios always leaves these troops under constant depression. The images and the experiences they encounter during the war have an everlasting impact on their mental health and also impact on their future interaction with members of the society even after they retire. The long term stresses, for instance, the one encountered during long tours, and the receipt of physical combat injuries are one of the main causes of mental health disorders.

The combat stresses may result in one being emotionally and physically exhausted with time, thus changing the way a person reasons and copes with challenges. Additionally, age also plays an essential part in the cognitive and physical health issues in the soldiers. Mental health issues have a possibility of taking place at a later time in life between the age of 40 and 50 due to cumulative impacts. The cumulative impact of war maximizes the risk of mental and physical health conditions. This maximizes the rates of mental health issues as well as other sicknesses (Callahan, 2010). Anxiety also attributes to soldiers having mental health issues. The change in military operations like the deployment to different regions or even change in the working schedules leaves many soldiers uncertain of what the future holds. Increased uncertainty causes some to be in constant worry of their plans, which, according to Joel (2016), plays a significant role in their mental illness. The military often imposes massive control on these soldiers, which requires them to follow orders given to them diligently. The loss of control of their lives sometimes results in soldiers, especially the junior ones, to experience mental breakdown (Joel, 2016).

Generally, during the war, soldiers are exposed to dangerous traumatic experiences. Thus, maximized exposure to such violence should continually foretell negative impacts on their mental health (Pizarro, Silver, & Prause, 2006). Additionally, the disconnection from their families also impacts the mental health of these soldiers. During war or training, soldiers tend to separate from their families for a long time and the separation impacts their lives. According to Joel (2016), the issue has impacted on the figures of mental health among soldiers. The experiences soldiers encounter during the war is the root cause of mental illness. For instance, killings in combat, uncertainty, the detachment from their loved one, and the loss of control often impact on their mental health. These effects have led to increased mental issues and high rates of suicide attempts.

Impacts on the Force

The effects of mental issues, depression and anxiety acquired in war negatively influences the work productivity of soldiers. Soldiers who have post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) experience loss of interest to work, fatigue, and lack of concentration and often have suicidal thoughts. As a result, these soldiers cause the military force to fall into substantial economic consequences that pertain to treating the diseases; they also impact on the decisions made by the military and influence soldiers’ turnover in combat. The cost of treating soldiers who have PTSD and other related medical expenses that pertain to suicides has risen to over $3.1 billion annually (Kartavya et al. 2016). The cost has increased the total spending of the government, ultimately impacting several military operations. Moreover, post-traumatic stress disorder soldiers influence the decision making process in the military. As a result of depression, many soldiers fail to concentrate fully and often reduce the rate at which they work. Depression impacts their brain processing speed and negatively affects the decisions they make. It has tremendously changed military operations due to the proliferation of technology, which calls for high vigilance in the battlefield.

Additionally, mental issues has also had an influence on soldiers’ absenteeism in the military today. The high rates of drugs and alcohol abuse to reduce mental issues have also served to record a considerable turnover of soldiers for war. With the high rate of soldiers’ absenteeism, military operations have been put at risk. Severe symptoms of PTSD among military personnel has impacted the operations of the military. The cost of treating the disease, fatigue, and loss of interest to work as a result of mental issues have impacted on the military spending, the decisions made by the military and the soldiers’ turnover in the fighting force. It is therefore crucial that soldiers who have PTSD are cared for before their situation becomes worse.

Once the soldiers return home from war, in the process of recreating a personal identity and developing new values, the soldiers have to address issues related to rejection and criticism from the non-appreciating society. Most soldiers struggle to acquire self-unity which results in mental health issues such as PSTD. The returning soldier requires social support, affection, and a positive welcome from the society so as to work through the war experiences while designing his sense of identity. Since they do not have the ability to share their war experiences with their relatives and close associates, this results in loneliness and separation and at times complete continued hatred of oneself (Hochgesang, Lawyer & Stevenson, 1999).

In addition, soldiers tend to react to the traumas of battles and these reactions are referred to as shell shock. These reactions can be caused by the intensity of the bombardment and long days of the war. Similarly, the consistent sounds of war are enough to haunt someone. Due to long periods in the battlefield, they may experience chronic stress, which may result in long term cardiovascular activation that results in hypertension and atherosclerotic growth (Pizarro, Silver, & Prause, 2006). Long term transitions in the structure and function of the stress regulatory systems may possibly result in mental health issues.

Soldiers tend to suffer from combat stress reaction with acute behavioral disorientation which is caused by the trauma of war. This is mostly related to shell shock and post-traumatic stress disorder since they have little difference. They all have the same symptoms and it’s difficult to differentiate them. These psychological disorders are not very chronic but they still impact mental health negatively. If the person does not get medical assistance the condition may develop to a chronic disorder such as depression, insomnia, and many others. The soldiers with these condition tend to display horror in their eyes. Post-traumatic stress disorder is a mental disorder that can develop in a soldier that has been exposed to traumatic incidents during the war. The things that the soldiers do for their nation don’t only take physical strength but they require to be mentally strong as well. They tend to sacrifice than they can imagine. These facts transform them in a way that no person wants to feel or see (Kumar, 2016).

Recommendations

First, I would recommend that the soldiers should use the three ethical lenses. This model will guide the soldiers on the course that represents the soldier’s values positively. Applying the model in various ethical dilemmas that the soldiers face in the battlefield and evaluating the models against the dilemmas will enable them to make effective decisions. The course of action that needs to be taken should be evaluated based on three different approaches for ethical decision making. These approaches include: rules, consequences, and virtues. Based on the rule-based approach a soldier should act based on the agreed values and principles. The moral effect of an action does not depend on the impact which is thought from it that has to borrow its intention from the expected impact. Despite the impact of an action, the soldiers should behave as if the maxim of his/her action was to be a global law of nature.

Based on the consequences based ethics, the decisions made based on this are made on the possible results of the actions. Soldiers should always learn to choose decisions that increase security, happiness, pleasure, and dignity. How an action produces happiness is the immediate appeal of all ethical questions that are established on long term interests of man. When considering the ethical dilemmas of a soldier based on the consequences based ethics, considerations have to be put in place for the individuals who win or lose. Thus, they should never give up when fighting for their country since they are expected to do that which produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Thus, when fighting they should continue since this is for the security of the whole nation.

Base on the virtue-based ethics insists that a soldier should learn from other soldiers on how to be good and patriotic to his or her nation. This ethic insists that a person should learn from others instead of learning from your experience on that which is ethical. The nature of the virtues has to be implemented in a judicious way. When deciding on the course of actions to be undertaken, considerations have to be made for what a virtuous individual should undertake. The golden rule that is applied in this scenario is doing to others what you would want them to do to you. Thus, a soldier should protect his country as he would like the country to protect them (Kem, 2004).

Apart from the three ethical lenses, I would recommend that the soldiers who are about to go to war should be taken through the resiliency training. This is a training that offers one the skills that are required to adapt and adjust to traumatic war experience without being in need of long term and short term medication. Once they undergo this training, most of them return from war without any mental health and psychological issue. This training mainly results in increases sense of self-worth thus teaching resiliency skills is a valuable component aimed at preventing combat-related mental health issues.

The soldiers should as well undergo the stress inoculation training. It is a cognitive behavioral therapy that involves exposing a patient to a little quantity of stress in treatment or educational context. Through this, an individual develops the ability to get ready for any stressful event and heightened resilience. This strategy improves attitudinal inoculation with every exposure and triggers the coping ability that safeguards individuals in stressful contexts. Stress inoculation is carried out in three overlapping levels education; skills acquisition and consolidation and last application and follow through. The elements of stress inoculation training can assist service the participants to understand that stress is not abnormal instead one should make them see that is a way of coping with abnormal events. The normal coping strategies that should be taught include intrusive thoughts of denial, which are basically partitioned into small portions of stresses which makes them easy to solve. This training provides the participant with the ability to minimize the unintentional implementation of unproductive coping strategies. It as well provides one with the capability to use coping strategies for various stressful occasions. Therefore, stress inoculation training strategies can be used to handle several mental conditions (Callahan, 2010). Most types of mental health issues can be controls by this strategy for military and community use.

Conclusion

Combat and the effects of war is the major cause for our soldiers having mental and psychological problems today. There are increased cases of psychological and mental health disorders from soldiers who have been in the war, this condition has been triggered by some of the experiences from the battlefield. These experiences include: viewing dead bodies, killing civilians, engaging in hand to hand battles, being attacked, drug abuse, lack of privacy, being wounded and many others. These events make these soldiers be mentally disturbed which results in mental health disorders. However, this condition can be reduced if the soldiers implement the three ethical lenses. These ethical laws will ensure that they undertake the most effective course of action. Additionally, through this, the soldiers will have the ability to minimize the guilt that they feel when they kill an enemy. This is because they will understand that, this action was the best for most people and that it would help win the war. Additionally, the soldiers should as well undertake the stress inoculation training which will enable them to cope with the events that they will experience on the battlefield.

References

Callahan Daryl. (2010, September). Combat-Related Mental Health Disorders: The Case for Resiliency in the Long Way. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 110, pp. 520-527

Hochgesang J., Lawyer T., & Stevenson T. (1999, July 26). The Psychological Effects of the Vietnam War. Ethics of Development in a Global Environment. Retrieved from

https://web.stanford.edu/class/e297c/war_peace/media/hpsych.html

Joel, L.Y. (2016). Military Mental Health Understanding the crisis. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/when-your-adult-child-breaks-your-heart/201606/military-mental-health

Kartavya, J.V, Susan F.F, Bonnie J.N, Steven K.G, Nicholas D.B, Eileen M.D, Jennifer A.W, CAPT Scott L. J (2016). Preventing PTSD and Depression and Reducing Health Care Costs in the Military: A Call for Building Resilience among Service Members. Military medicine, 181(10), 1240

Kem Jack. (2004). Ethical Decision Making: Using the “Ethical Triangle” Retrieved from

http://www.cgscfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Kem-UseoftheEthicalTriangle

Kumar Aditya. (2016, October 24). Psychological Effects of War on Soldiers. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@adityakumar_23453/psychological-effects-of-war-on-soldiers-95573bf75d70

Pizarro J., Silver V. R., & Prause J., (2006, February). Physical and Mental Health Costs of Traumatic War Experiences Among Civil War Veterans. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 63(2), pp. 193-200. Retrieved from doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.193

Positive Psychology DB

Top of Form

. Positive Psychology is a topic that was not heard about much less talked about when i joined the military in the late eighties. It is defined as the scientific study of the strengths that enable individuals to thrive. (Seligman,2002). Since the war on terrorism has started the military has found out that the soldiers need some kind of help to deal with the deployment’s and struggles of leaving their family at home. In 2008 General Casey invited Dr. Seligman to come and talked to him and his staff to try and come up with a better way to train our soldiers in dealing with deployments. They came up with a program called Comprehensive Soldier Fitness (CSF) ( Mattews, 2019). The program has 2 parts which is the Global Assessment Tool (GAT) and the other one is a resilience training. The GAT is a on line tool that asks soldiers several questions about their life on topics like emotional, social,family and spiritual issues they deal with on a daily basis. The concept I believe was a good one but in my opinion does not meet the desired effect. The reason I say this is because its a mandatory assessment we have to do every year and most soldiers just go through the material and put some answers that look good because they do not want everyone to know what is really going on.

The Master Resilience Training (MRT) is a different and better program for our soldiers in my opinion. The program is taught by fellow soldiers in a classroom and involves soldier participation. This program allows soldiers to express their positive experiences of deployments and how they deal with contentment of being away from their families. The soldiers can express their past experiences and the hopes they have for the future of our Military.

Matthews, Michael, 2019. Ten Years of Military Positive Psychology.(n.d.). retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/head-strong/201901/ten-years-military-positive-psychology.

Seligman, Martin, 2008, https://ppc.sas.upenn.edu/learn-more/readings-and-videos/selected-scholary-articles

Power and Influence DB

I do not totally agree with the definitions given for Power and Influence in the discussion board topic. The two topics are very similar in some ways regarding the outcome of a given task but the process of getting there is totally different. Power can be defined as a way to get others to implement change. (Klann, 2010). Power a lot of the times comes from a title or position a person holds in a organization and has more to do with that then the person who holds the position or title. I do agree that some leaders abuse the power given them either by rank, position or title to make people under their command do things that are moral or ethically wrong. When a leader abuses their power within an command it often leads to what is called toxic leadership and that destroys the unity within the command.

Influence to me is more personal than power that is given to a person by virtue of position or title. Influence in the dictionary as defined by Merriam -Webster is the power or capacity of causing an effect in indirect or intangible ways (Dictionary, 2019). I believe having an influence on personnel will allow leaders a better chance of getting tasks done within their units and keep the moral high. I would always tell my soldiers that if I take care of them then they would in turn take care of me. i always told my soldiers that I would never tell them to something that I would not do myself. I feel that by doing this I had a lot of influence on my soldiers and could easily get any task completed that came up.

References

Klann, G, (2010). The Application of Power and Influence in Organizational Leadership. Retrieved from https://usasma.blackboard.com/bbcswebhav

Dictionary, M. W. (2019). retrieved from www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary

Leadership and Culture in Military Operations

The strength of the U S army relies heavy on having strong and unwavering leadership. Mission command gives a good outline on the roles of military leadership and how commanders can establish a culture of collaboration in their organization. (Department of the Army, 2012). The army operates under challenging and dynamic environments and conditions. Thus, the traditional climate and culture has become obsolete. The traditional culture is that the power rests on the senior leaders and the junior leaders are required to take and implement orders from their superiors without questions. However, it has become inevitable that the junior leaders be given the power and freedom to make decisions on behalf of their units, especially concerning the aspects that touch on their operations directly (Laurence, 2011). Leadership motivates the junior leaders to work more and ensures that their operational initiatives are considered by senior leadership. The influence of the junior leaders can only be achieved when the unit maintains high discipline and trust in their subordinates. Training soldiers to practice army values, warrior ethos, and strive for honor during their operations is crucial.

As a senior leader in my organization I would bring cultural transformation in military recruitment, training practices and military education for the professionals. I would also create a culture that involves newer military technologies, especially in areas like drones and guided missiles, new weapons and advance information systems. Training officers on modern military doctrines would also enable them to adapt more on the changing military concept of operations. I would also conduct an assessment of my organization to see what is working and what needs to be improved. This will give me a good starting point on how to best change the culture within my organization.

References

Department of the Army, (2012), Mission Command (ADP 6-0), Retrieved from https://armypubs.army.mil/eupubs/DR_a/pdf/web/adp_6_0

Laurence, J, (2011), Military Leadership and the Complexity of Combat and Culture, Military Psychology, 23 (5), 489-501.

Bottom of Form

As professional members of the army, it is important to exhibit a total commitment to the service of the United States and the Army warrior ethics. The army is entitled to upholding ethical values, just like any other civil service profession. Human societies ranging from clans, tribes, state, empires, and organized regions to religions tend to fight for several reasons such as their love for a fight, love for their countries, and civic duties (Hynes, 2015). In the army and military as a whole we are known as national servants who uphold and maintain peace and order across nations while upholding the virtue of ethics. I expect the soldiers in my section to adhere to the soldier’s creed and live the army values. Therefore our integrity as army professionals should be centered on the leadership virtues we learned as leaders and soldiers. Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Delete the spacing Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: APA Format: APA allows the use of two spaces following any punctuation mark such as periods, question marks or exclamation marks. However, you may have a professor who prefers only one space in the body text of the paper. (Two spaces – emphasis mine) YOU did this throughout. Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Spacing Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Comma

For quite some time, it has been noted that there has been an omission of essential value in our doctrine, namely army ethic (Snider, 2018). The doctrine of the arms lacks an accessible and understandable expression of the army ethics and its beliefs, heritage, culture, and traditions. However, in the profession of army, the officers are guided by informal rules and policies of ethically through which they carry out their daily duties and objective, serving the community without discrimination. I encourage the soldiers in my unit to be honest and candid about how they think the leadership is upholding the army values and ethics in our unit through the command climate survey. This is how we know what is working and what needs to be fixed in our unit as a whole. Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Although you paraphrased, the words highlight illustrate Passive Voice Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Spelling Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Passive Voice

The army ethic should be imperative in many other ways to citizens and public servants through creating army-civilian decisions that are informed and conform to a set of ethical standards in public service. Mission accomplishment in war and conflicts will then be based on professional ethics on how activities and policies are coordinated in arms perspective. Security at the cross-border and nationally is successfully influenced by ethics and values of army professionalism. We all should be aware that the implication of the ethical standards of the army profession in the war was to provide guidance on standards and duty for the military. In this regard our roles as soldiers include protecting borders and serving the public through combat and war, require loyalty to fellow members of the army. Trustworthy and ethics are essential values for the soldiers in our military. Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Passive Voice Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Passive Voice Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: Comma Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: … war, which require

414 words

References

Hynes, R, (2015). Army civilians and the army profession. Military Review. 95(3), 71. Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: (JOURNAL)
Hijzen, A., Upward, R., & Wright, P. W. (2010). The income losses of displaced workers. Journal of Human Resources, 45(1), 243–269. Retrieved from
http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/jhr/

Snider, D. M. (2018). Dissent and strategic leadership of the military profession. Orbis, 52(2), 256-277 Comment by Rolan, Melissa Y MSG MIL USA TRADOC: (JOURNAL)
Hijzen, A., Upward, R., & Wright, P. W. (2010). The income losses of displaced workers. Journal of Human Resources, 45(1), 243–269. Retrieved from
http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/jhr/

Organizational Vision and Influence

Creating influence in the workplace is entirely based on the corporate vision and measures that are put in place to implement it. The vision statement of an organization provides a picture that describes the direction or goal of the company, along with the means of accomplishing it. Organizational vision plays a significant role in encouraging people to work hard, influencing investors to partner with the firm for short-term and long-term investment goals, and striving to attain the desired goals by all means (Dayan, Heisig, & Matos, 2017). Vision is the mental image or future orientation that provides the direction or the goal of an organization and strategic plan to achieve the goals.

Most successful organizations have invested in creating a sustainable organizational vision that can have an impact or influence in the local, regional, and international business markets. To create a significant influence on the public or society, the corporate vision should align with the demands or the needs of the target clients. A clear marketing strategy for most organizations sells the vision and depicts how the achievement of the goals will impact society and target client base. I support my commander’s vision and try to influence every soldier in my section to support it also. I have posted the commanders intent and vision statement in my office to remind myself and the soldiers under me what they are. I include the commander’s mission statement into every exercise that my section plans and trains on.

The organizational vision should be flexible to address the ever-changing demands and needs in the workplace. A flexible vision is the one that the corporate leadership can rely on to transform the workplace culture and make new goals after a failure. The vision should not only address the existing issues in the unit but also the needs or demands that may emerge in the future to affect the effectiveness of the unit. All decisions in an organization should be made by consulting the key leaders that are crucial to the development and growth of the unit. When soldiers have concerted efforts to achieve a goal, there is a high possibility of accomplishing the vision and reaching higher levels of influence.

To sum up, vision is the mental image or future orientation that provides the direction or the goal of an organization and strategic plan to achieve the goals. Organizations are indebted to extend influence in the market or society through a shared vision in the workplace and having a clear, coherent, and flexible vision statement. The commander’s vision should set goals to achieve in their unit and commit himself to achieving them to have an impact on the soldiers.

Reference

Dayan, R., Heisig, P., & Matos, F. (2017). Knowledge management as a factor for the formulation and implementation of organization strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management.

Ethics

by Ethics Ethics

Submission date: 16-Mar-2020 05:00AM (UTC-0500)
Submission ID: 1276398726
File name: Ethics_in_Conflict (28K)
Word count: 600
Character count: 3153

12%
SIMILARITY INDEX

2%
INTERNET SOURCES

1%
PUBLICATIONS

12%
STUDENT PAPERS

1 5%
2 4%
3 2%
4 1%

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography Off

Exclude matches Off

Ethics
ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Presentation College
Student Paper

Submitted to HotChalk Inc
Student Paper

Submitted to Excelsior College
Student Paper

Submitted to University of Surrey
Student Paper

United States Army Sergeants Major Academy
Department of Distance Education
Welcome
Organizational Assessment Brief