Methods Draft
Preparation
Remember that the most important element of your project is the research question. Before submitting this assignment, be sure that you have an instructor-approved research question. It is essential that you identify the purpose of the project as a reflection of your research question. As the project develops, the research question, theory of method, and theory of content should be highlighted in chapter submissions.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Methods Draft Preparation
Just from $13/Page
Please use the appropriate project guide to identify all required elements needed for a complete Chapter 3 methodology. Remember to incorporate instructor and peer feedback from discussions before submitting Chapter 3.
Instructions
Additional Requirements
Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.
Resources
- Methods Draft Scoring Guide.
- Principles and Procedures for Writing a Literature Review [PDF].
- Capella Writing Center.
- APA Style and Format.
- Writing Feedback Tool.
- Qualitative Integrated Project Guide [DOCX].
- Quantitative Integrated Project Guide [DOCX].
Running head: ABBREVIATED TITLE OF YOUR PAPER 1
ABBREVIATED TITLE OF YOUR PAPER 11
Full Title of Your Paper
Learner’s Full Name (no credentials)
Capella University
Abstract
It is necessary to complete the abstract after the entire project has been developed. The abstract contains an abbreviated overview of the entire project. This overview will reference the following elements of the project:
The Research Question_________________________________
The Research Problem: _____________________________________
The Significance of the Study:_______________________________
Theory or theories that apply to the concepts associated with the RQ:________________
A narrative describing the qualitative approach planned, implications for stakeholders, significance to the scientific community, and a description of expected results. The abstract is one concise paragraph.
Keywords: [Add keywords here.]
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
1
Background of the Study
1
Need for the Study
1
Purpose of the Study
1
Significance of the Study
1
Research Question
1
Definition of Terms
1
Research Design
1
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 1
Theoretical Orientation for the Study 1
Review of the Literature
1
Synthesis of the Research Findings
1
Critique of Previous Research Methods
1
CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY 1
Purpose of the Study 1
Research Question 1
Target Population 1
Recruitment Strategy 1
Sampling Design (purposive for qualitative) 1
Procedure 1
Analysis 1
Ethical Considerations
1
CHAPTER 4. EXPECTED FINDINGS/RESULTS 1
CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION 1
Implications 1
Methodological Strengths and Weaknesses 1
Suggestions for Future Research 1
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
[Note: the final draft of the Introduction is typically written after the entire project has been completed and just prior to the abstract. It is important to understand that the project is iterative. You will work on, change, and refine all elements of the project. In your initial submission, begin to flesh out the sections listed below: Abstracted Outline of Chapter 1.]
Need for the Study
Purpose of the Study
Significance of the Study
Research Question
Definition of Terms
Research Design
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW
This is typically the entry point for beginning the project. It is important to understand that the project is iterative. You will work on, change, and refine all elements of the project. You will begin by understanding and synthesizing what is known so far in the Literature Review, (Chapter 2).
Theoretical Orientation for the Study
The Literature Review provides detailed information about theory that applies to the research topic, theory that applies to the research method, population(s) studied, and key concepts under review. Seminal and current sources are analyzed and evaluated thematically. The research problem is identified.
Review of the Literature
It is essential that the literature review be organized with reference to themes identified in articles that you have read. It is not acceptable to organize the literature review article by article or one article at a time.
Synthesis of the Research Findings
Critique of Previous Research Methods
Summary
CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY
Purpose of the Study
The introductory paragraph addresses the research problem or proposes to fill the gap in the literature. It includes the purpose of the proposed research and presents formally the research question. The purpose is to answer the research question. State your research question in the form of a question in the introductory paragraph for Chapter 3. As you prepare this section of this chapter review the characteristics of qualitative research questions:
1. Qualitative research questions ask for description and interpretation of phenomena through the identification of socially constructed themes and categories.
2. Qualitative questions address concepts associated with thoughts, feelings, and actions that are not necessarily accessible with empirical methods of measurement.
3. Qualitative data take the form of stories, narratives, and observations.
4. Qualitative questions identify the target population and phenomena under consideration.
5. Qualitative questions do not test empirically measured data.
Research Question
Conclude the introductory paragraph to Chapter 3 by writing out the research question.
Target Population
As you describe the target population you will include:
Information about the number of participants.
Information about inclusion and exclusion criteria; describe how you decide who can participate in the study and who cannot.
Recruitment Strategy
Sampling Design (purposive for qualitative)
Procedure
As you describe the procedures you will include:
Information about materials used for data collection.
Information about the location where data collection takes place.
Information about the time required for data collection.
Information about the instruments used to collect data. Instruments used vary widely and may include audio and video recording equipment, pen and paper, interventions, observation journals, member-checking documents and so on, depending on the requirements indicated in the research question.
Information about the order of steps taken to obtain data.
Information about how data will be recorded and transferred into a transcript or documents, audio or video, ready for analysis.
When using an interview guide or observation, a check sheet is also included.
Analysis
Analysis describes strategies for analyzing the narratives offered by participants. Once the data has been transcribed into a format for interpretation, typically “words on the page,” then it can be interpreted. Analysis uses strategies that interpret meaning components from words, phrases, and narratives into interpreted conceptual descriptions across transcripts.
Ethical Considerations
The APA Code of Ethics that apply to your study and research design should be addressed.
CHAPTER 4. EXPECTED FINDINGS/RESULTS
For the expected findings/results section, use the literature reviewed in Chapter 2 to anticipate findings that are likely to result from the collection and interpretation of data. Note: some unexpected results are possible and should be addressed in this chapter.
CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION
Implications
Implications of the potential results are discussed; implications for a wide range of potential stakeholders are addressed. Significance to the scientific community and the potential to address the research problem is discussed. Limitations of the study are addressed and suggestions for future research are offered.
Methodological Strengths and Weaknesses
Suggestions for Future Research
The suggestions for future research should close the gap on the methodological limitations.
References
List references using APA format (APA, 2010, p.169).
Running head: ABBREVIATED TITLE OF YOUR PAPER 1
ABBREVIATED TITLE OF YOUR PAPER 13
Full Title of Your Paper
Learner’s Full Name (no credentials)
Capella University
Abstract
It is necessary to complete the abstract after the entire project has been developed. The abstract contains an abbreviated overview of the entire project. This overview will reference the following elements of the project:
The Research Question_________________________________
The Research Problem _____________________________________
The
Significance of the Study
_______________________________
Theory or theories that apply to the concepts associated with the RQ ________________
Narrative describing the quantitative approach planned, implications for stakeholders, significance to the scientific community, and a description of expected results. The abstract is one concise paragraph.
Keywords: [Add keywords here.]
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
1
Background of the Problem
1
Statement of the Problem
1
Purpose of the Study
1
Significance of the Study 1
Research Questions
1
Definition of Terms
1
Research Design
1
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 1
Theoretical Orientation for the Study 1
Review of the Literature
1
Synthesis of the Research Findings
1
Critique of Previous Research Methods
1
CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY
1
Purpose of the Study 1
Research Question and Hypotheses 1
Research Design 1
Target Population and Sample
1
Procedures
1
Ethical Considerations
1
CHAPTER 4. EXPECTED FINDINGS/RESULTS 1
CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION 1
Implications 1
Methodological Strengths and Weaknesses 1
Suggestions for Future Research 1
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
[Note, the Final draft of Introduction is typically written after the entire project has been completed and just prior to the abstract. It is important to understand that the project is iterative. You will work on, change, and refine all elements of the project. In your initial submission, begin to flesh out the sections listed below: Abstracted Outline of Chapter 1.]
Background of the Problem
Statement of the Problem
Purpose of the Study
Significance of the Study
Research Questions
Definition of Terms
Research Design
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Note, this is typically the entry point for beginning the project. It is important to understand that the project is iterative. You will work on, change, and refine all elements of the project. You will begin by understanding and synthesizing what is known so far in the Literature Review, (Chapter 2).
Theoretical Orientation for the Study
The Literature Review provides detailed information about theory that applies to the research topic, theory that applies to the research method, population(s) studied, and key concepts under review. Seminal and current sources are analyzed and evaluated thematically. The research problem is identified.
Review of the Literature
It is essential that the literature review be organized with reference to themes identified in articles that you have read. It is not acceptable to organize the literature review article by article or one article at a time.
Synthesis of the Research Findings
Critique of Previous Research Methods
Summary
CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY
Purpose of the Study
The introductory paragraph addresses the research problem or proposes to fill the gap in the literature. It includes the purpose of the proposed research and presents formally the research question. The purpose is to answer the research question. State your research question in the form of a question in the introductory paragraph for Chapter 3. As you prepare this section of this chapter, review the characteristics of quantitative research questions:
1. Quantitative research questions point to empirical methods that will test the hypothesis or hypotheses associated with the question.
2. Quantitative research questions have independent and dependent variables.
3. Quantitative research questions measure relationships or correlations and/or manipulate natural phenomena through experimentation.
4. Quantitative data are presented in numerical categories or quantities.
5. Quantitative research questions do not interpret socially constructed themes, narratives, or observations.
Research Question and Hypotheses
Conclude the introductory paragraph to Chapter 3 by writing out the Research Question and hypotheses. Identify the independent and dependent variables associated with your Research Question.
Research Design
Target Population and Sample
As you describe the target population you will include:
Information about the number of participants (include a Power Analysis).
Information about inclusion and exclusion criteria; that is you will describe how you decide who can participate in the study and provide data and who cannot.
Information about the planned recruitment strategy.
Information about the sampling design and randomization strategies.
Procedures
As you describe the procedures you will include:
Information about how the participants will be identified and contacted.
Information about materials used for data collection.
Information about the instruments used to collect data.
Information about the location where data collection takes place.
Information about the time required for data collection.
Information about the order of steps taken to obtain data.
Describe how the data will be statistically analyzed (Analysis).
Describes strategies for analyzing and interpreting numerical data. Analyses of data is the section of the paper discussing strategies that support the interpretation of numerical information about the data collected. Typically, statistical methods are used to interpret components of natural phenomena that represent natural phenomena. The analysis section of the methods presents and addresses evidence of validity, reliability, and generalizability discovered in the process of interpreting the data.
Note, Chapter 3, Methodology, is typically written after the literature review. It is important to understand that the project is iterative. You will work on, change, and refine all elements of the project.
Ethical Considerations
The APA Code of Ethics that apply to your study and research design should be addressed.
CHAPTER 4. EXPECTED FINDINGS/RESULTS
For the expected findings/results, use the literature reviewed in Chapter 2 to anticipate findings that are likely to result from the collection and interpretation of data. Note: some unexpected results are possible and should be addressed in this chapter.
CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION
Implications
Implications of the potential results are discussed, implications for a wide range of potential stakeholders is addressed, significance to the scientific community and the potential to address the research problem is discussed, limitations of the study are addressed, and suggestions for future research are offered.
Methodological Strengths and Weaknesses
Suggestions for Future Research
The suggestions for future research should close the gap on the methodological limitations.
References
List references using APA format (APA, 2010, p.169).
Online Writing Center
Principles and Procedures for
Writing a Literature Review
Capella University | 225 South 6th Street, 9th Floor
Minneapolis, MN 55402 | 1-888-CAPELLA (227-3552)
Page 2 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
Table of Contents
Principles and Procedures for Writing a Literature Review…………………………………..3
Introduction: The Purpose of a Literature Review………………………………………………3
Defining the Literature Review………………………………………………………..……………5
Placement of a Literature Review in the Academic Conversation…………………………….5
Crafting the Literature Review……………………………………………………………………..7
Goals of the Literature Review…………………………………………………………………….7
Tools for Showing Synthesis in the Body Paragraph of the Literature Review………………7
Definitions..………………………………………………………………………………………7
Examples…………………………………………………………………………………………8
Acknowledging the Critics………………………………………………………………………9
Applying the Tools to the Literature Review……………………………………………………10
The Writing Process for the Literature Review………………………………………………..11
References……………………………………………………………………………………………12
Page 3 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
Principles and Procedures for Writing a Literature Review
Introduction – The Purpose of a Literature Review
Entering an academic conversation involves many steps. Two of the most fundamental of
these steps involves reading material in the field and forming a perspective on what you read.
Academics demonstrate their perspective on the reading of the field by composing a literature
review. A literature review traces the genealogy of a topic in the field; it notes the history of
the topic and the notable perspectives of others in the field who have addressed the topic. The
purpose of a literature review is to “demonstrate that the writer has insightfully and critically
surveyed relevant literature on his or her topic in order to convince an intended audience that
this topic is worth addressing” (Clark, 2007, p.105). The literature review is not intended to
report the literature, but instead to synthesize it.
The literature review appears at many stages of your graduate education. Early in a graduate
education, you will often be required to write a short literature review for a paper in a course to
demonstrate analysis, synthesis, and evaluationi of the assigned readings for the course.
Page 4 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
The expectations for the literature review increase steadily throughout a doctoral program,
finally culminating in a chapter-length literature review, which functions as the second chapter
of the dissertation.
How do you prepare to write informed reviews of the literature in your field?
Page 5 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
First, you must spend considerable time reading the academic literature of the field. Over time,
you explore many topics through reading these academic sources, which include books, journal
articles, and published studies and any other credible materials that work to add to the
knowledge of your field. This ‘reading time’ constitutes the majority of your time in graduate
school. The more you read, the more you begin to form an individual identity as a scholar
through the choices you make as you read.
At the beginning of your graduate career, you read the materials that your course assignments
guide you to in the library. However, over time, you start to recognize the names of authors
with whom you’ve agreed in the past. You also start to recognize the names of authors with
whom you’ve disagreed in the past. You become familiar with journal names and publisher
names, and you can start to research a topic based on more than the key words listed in the
assignment. Through continued reading in your field, you gain the experience to make
informed choices about which authors to align yourself within the formation of your own
academic identity.
Increased knowledge through reading comes through experience with multiple research
projects, and that increasing knowledge also serves to shape your individual perspective on
your own field of study. Over time, you focus your attention on a specific research area, and,
ultimately, on a specialty area in which you will conduct research to complete a dissertation.
Making these kinds of decisions about where you’ll conduct further research and writing marks
your entry into the field as an individual scholar drawn to some topics and not persuaded by
others.
Defining the Literature Review
Placement of a Literature Review in Academic Conversation
A graduate education anticipates learners making choices and forming an individual identity as
a scholar. Assignments requiring literature reviews are some of the touchstones in a graduate
education that allow you to identify your individual voice and stance on important topics
within a field. A graduate education culminates in the writing of a dissertation, your official
entry into the academic conversation through the completion of a book-length project that
advances the knowledge of the field. In a shorter, paper-length form, your literature review
typically consists of several paragraphs placed early in the text to explain the history of the
problem or issue and to explore what the field has said on the topic. The literature review
establishes a context, a history, and a reason for why you are writing. You will also be asked
to write paper-length literature reviews in which the review is a much more developed
examination of the literature on a particular topic in the field. These literature reviews, short
and long, culminate in a chapter-length literature review that serves to underpin your
dissertation research.
At Capella, the disciplines of Business, Education, Human Services, and Psychology structure
the dissertation in the following way:
Page 6 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
1. Introduction and problem statement
2. Literature review
3. Research and methodology
4. Data analysis and results
5. Conclusions and recommendations
Notice the placement of the literature review. In the context of a dissertation, the literature
review comes immediately after the introduction. In the introduction, you give a picture of
what the dissertation will do and what the dissertation will address, much as the first paragraph
of an academic paper offers an introduction and a thesis statement that will guide the body of
the paper. As with all literature reviews, Chapter 2, the literature review, establishes a context,
a history, and a reason for the project.
This early placement of the literature review is important for several reasons.
• The literature review offers a critical look at existing research that’s significant to the
writer’s topic.
• The literature review demonstrates the writer’s knowledge of the field.
• The literature review justifies the writer’s proposed study.
• The literature review sets the context for the research.
• The literature review defines which issues and authors are important to the writer and
which are not.
Thus, the literature review defines you as a writer and a scholar in the field. Readers can learn
what you value and what you don’t by reading your review. In the literature review, you
choose to include some sources while choosing not to include others. These choices offer a lot
of information about who you are as a scholar for an audience familiar with the research in
your field. For example, imagine that you are writing about educational theories. John Dewey
serves as your foundational source for your literature review. You read two scholars who
come after Dewey: Paolo Freire and Malcolm Knowles. You speak favorably about what
Knowles adds to Dewey’s ideas, but you note several shortcomings in Freire’s assumptions.
From those statements, readers in your field understand that you are aligned with the Knowles
school of thought and not with the Freirian school of thought. Readers can also place what you
value within the context of their own perspectives and within the larger issues of the field.
In academic writing, the primary audience, readers in the field, works to situate new voices
within the already-existing conversation. This audience will evaluate which sources you use in
the context of their own perspectives—their own established identity in the academic
conversation. Just as you have your individual perspective on the topic for which you are
composing a literature review, so will your audience. That’s why the literature review is so
important. In short, your literature review defines where you stand in the academic
conversation of your field within the context of those who came before you and for those who
will come after you.
Page 7 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
Crafting the Literature Review
Goals of the Literature Review
For a literature review to be accepted as a credible representation of your understanding of
your field, it must accomplish several goals.
• The literature review must be organized around and related directly to research
questions that you are developing.
• The literature review must synthesize results into a summary of what’s known and not
known.
• The literature review must identify areas of controversy in the literature.
• The literature review must formulate questions that need further research.
In the following instructional module, you’ll work with three tools to help you craft a literature
review that accomplishes all of these goals. Whether you are writing a short literature review
within a paper or Chapter 2 of your dissertation, these tools will assist you in synthesizing your
readings to compose reviews that give your readers a clear understanding of the issues and
scholars that you are reviewing and will outline your stance on the position.
Tools for Showing Synthesis in the Body Paragraphs of the Literature Review – Definition,
Examples, and Acknowledging the Critics
Three basic tools will help you share your synthesis of the literature you read with your
audience: definitions, examples, and acknowledging your critics.
Definitions
Definitions bolster your argument by making sure that you and the reader are starting on the
same page and with the same definitions. Definitions can be a derived from multiple sources,
from dictionaries to reference books to seminal works in a field.
For example, if your topic is the color blue, you might rely on a reputable art dictionary to
define what blue means in terms of the color spectrum. You might also rely on a book of
literary criticism to enhance that definition by looking at how the color blue has historically
been used to symbolize courage in great western literature, including Shakespeare. Combining
these two definitions gives you a definition of your own for the color blue in the context of
your specific topic–of your unique argument.
When using key words and concepts in the field for your literature review, remember that over
time, terms and concepts gather many meanings. Simply relying on a dictionary definition
might not be enough to define a term for your audience, a group of academics in your field.
For example, unconscious is a term that has many meanings in the field of psychology. That
term means different things to, say, Sigmund Freud than it does to those who come after him,
like, for example, Jacques LaCan. Therefore, in a literature review about psychoanalytic
theories with an academic audience, it will be important to talk about which scholar you
Page 8 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
follow, which definition of that term you agree with, and how you will apply that definition to
your own theory.
You can also use definitions to define a concept or topic by what it is not.
For example, if you follow LaCan’s definition of the unconscious, you might want to include
Freud’s definition to show where it differs from LaCan’s. You will also want to offer specific
reasons to justify why those differences prompted you to side with LaCan’s definition.
Remember: definitions can be used to define both what something is and what it is not.
Examples
Examples bolster your argument by adding an extra level of explanation for the reader.
Examples often serve to make a concept concrete for the reader. Imagine that you are trying to
explain a method for teaching. After the key terms in the method are defined, take the next
step: offering examples of the method at work.
Notice the pattern of examples in the section you just read above on definitions:
Definitions can be a derived from multiple sources, from dictionaries to reference
books to seminal works in a field.
For example, if your topic is the color blue, you might rely on a reputable art
dictionary to define what blue means in terms of the color spectrum.
Simply relying on a dictionary definition might not be enough to define a term for your
audience, a group of academics in your field.
For example, unconscious is a term that has many meanings in the field of psychology.
That term means different things to, say, Sigmund Freud that it does to those who come
after him, like, for example, Jacques LaCan.
You can also use definitions to define a concept or topic by what it is not.
For example, if you follow LaCan’s definition of the unconscious, you might want to
include Freud’s definition to show where it differs from LaCan’s and why those
differences don’t offer a definition that works within the context of your argument.
In these examples, a statement is made, and that statement is then applied—‘teased out’—by
the use of examples. Examples, either hypothetical or from the literature, bring your synthesis
to life by offering real-life connections to your theories and interpretations. As a Capella
scholar-practitioner, connecting theory to practice underpins your educational journey, and
examples are an excellent and primary method for making that theory-to-practice connection.
Remember: examples can be used to enhance definitions and to give the reader another
perspective on your evaluative statements made during the literature review.
Page 9 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
Acknowledging the Critics
While many in your audience will agree with your position on the topic of your literature
review, many will not. An important function of the literature review is to acknowledge what
critics of your argument say. To create an informed perspective about the literature of a
field, you must read many perspectives about key issues and discussions within your field. In
an academic conversation, a writer who has looked at all sides of the argument comes across as
an informed and balanced speaker. Just as working to define something by what it is not is an
effective tool, so is presenting a position on a subject and including the perspectives and
arguments that differ from that position.
For example, let’s say that you make the statement that many in your field have conjectured
that the sky is blue. You define blue in terms of meteorology, and you give examples of what
you mean by the color blue. During your research, you discover many speakers who say that
the sky is not blue. Some of these speakers are not credible, so you discard those dissenting
positions. But some of those speakers are credible. They are published in peer-reviewed
journals, and they have many followers at universities across the country. Leaving those
credible sources out of your literature review creates a slanted perspective on the body of
literature in the field, while acknowledging those critics shows that you have considered all
perspectives, but for at least one reason, you have decided to reject those critics in favor of
your chosen perspective.
Acknowledging the critics also offers you the chance to create new ways of thinking about
your topic within your field. For example, imagine that you address the way in which two
different scholars, Scholar A and Scholar B, use a shape to discuss a concept in the field. You
note that Scholar A and those after him have conjectured that the term ‘square’ is effective for
describing a concept that encompasses four terms.
You also acknowledge that Scholar B has conjectured that the term ‘square,’ which implies
that all four sides are equal in length, is too limiting, and, thus, must be changed to the term
‘quadrangle.’
Page 10 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
While you acknowledge the validity of Scholar B’s purpose in expanding the term, you also
note that in the context of the concept being discussed, all angles in Scholar B’s conception are
actually 90 degree angles. In fact, then, in spite the difference in terms, both scholars are really
talking about a similar concept. In essence, from your perspective, Scholar B supports Scholar
A’s assertion, but with a different definition of square, which, perhaps, you re-label as
“rectangle.”
In this example, noting the other side of the argument has led you to a new understanding of
the concept addressed by both Scholars A and B. While acknowledging the critic shows depth
of exposure to the literature of the field, in this case, that acknowledgement has also led to a
new interpretation not yet noted by your field, filling a gap in the field while boosting your
credibility as a new voice entering the field.
The review of the literature you create with definitions, examples, and your acknowledgement
of critics is your synthesis of the literature of your field. You will not just be summarizing the
literature, but instead, finding connections through tools like the ones described here. When
you finish organizing and drafting it, this synthesis becomes a persuasive argument which
creates the context in which your readers will understand your research.
Applying the Tools to the Literature Review
Now that you’ve explored the tools, you are ready to apply them to a literature review in your
field.
Once you’ve selected your literature review, work to locate the definitions, examples, and
acknowledgement of the critics used by the author. As you read your sample literature review,
make notes in the margins, and locate where the writer has used the tools you’ve learned in this
module. You may also want to highlight each example in a different color. For example, you
may mark definitions in blue, examples in green, and acknowledging the critics in red.
Once you’ve completed this process, ask yourself the following questions.
Which definitions worked well? Why?
Which definitions could have worked better? How?
Which definitions convinced you because they came from credible sources? Why?
Page 11 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
Which definitions did not convince you due to lack of credibility of the source? Why?
Which examples worked well? Why?
Which examples could have worked better? How?
Which examples convinced you because they came from credible sources? Why?
Which examples did not convince you due to lack of credibility of the source? Why?
Which acknowledgments of critics worked well? Why?
Which acknowledgments of critics could have worked better? How?
Which acknowledgement of critics convinced you because they came from credible sources?
Why?
Which acknowledgments of critics did not convince you due to lack of credibility of the
source? Why?
For all three tools, as you identify them and question their effectiveness, work to find methods
that you might want to use in your own literature reviews.
Do you see methods of incorporating these tools that you’d like to model in your own review?
Note what you like and what you don’t like in these examples. You can often learn as much
about your own writing process by charting what you don’t like as you can learn by charting
what you like. Remember: the literature reviews posted above were deemed successful
Chapter 2 literature reviews for Capella dissertations, so applying the tools to these reviews
gives you practice with the dissertation standards for Capella.
The Writing Process for the Literature Review
Like any academic writing process, crafting an effective literature review is not a linear
process. As the writing map below indicates, the literature review writing process is recursive
and iterative.
Read
Refine idea
Read more
Draft
Revise
Proofread
Propose
Take
Get an
idea
Edit
Do focused
research
Page 12 of 12 5/31/2007 1:24 PM
Capella Proprietary and Confidential
Literature Review
Reminders
Upon your completion of each draft in this recursive process, remember to compare the
following important outcomes of the literature review to ensure that your review satisfies the
expectations of your audience.
• Reviews background of the problem area
• Identifies merits of previous studies (who, what, when, where, why, how)
For the dissertation project:
• Helps to select research methods
• Provides required theoretical framework
• Establishes context and rationale for the study
• Establishes that study does not unintentionally duplicate work already published
• Shows how your study contributes to the knowledge base of the field
References
Clark, I. L. (2007). Writing the successful thesis and dissertation: Entering the conversation.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Methods Draft Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 7
Percentage of Course Grade: 10%.
|
CRITERIA
|
NON-PERFORMANCE
|
BASIC
|
PROFICIENT
|
DISTINGUISHED
|
|
Describe the methodology of a proposed research study and determine qualitative or quantitative method in relation to the research question.
16%
|
Does not identify the methodology of a proposed research study.
|
Identifies the research question but does not identify whether it is qualitative or quantitative method, or misidentifies method.
|
Describes the methodology of a proposed research study and determines qualitative or quantitative method in relation to the research question.
|
Describes the methodology of a proposed research study and determines qualitative or quantitative method in relation to the research question. Points to an appropriate method for analysis.
|
|
Describe the purpose of a research study and connect purpose to the research question.
12%
|
Does not identify the purpose of a research study or connect purpose to the research question.
|
Identifies but does not describe the purpose of a research study or does not connect purpose to the research question.
|
Describes the purpose of a research study and connects purpose to the research question.
|
Describes the purpose of a research study; connects purpose to the research question and choice of methodology with support from the literature.
|
|
Describe a target population that represents a sampling of the general population in a way that respects diversity, including race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, physical ability, and gender.
12%
|
Does not describe a target population that represents a sampling of the general population in a way that respects diversity, including race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, physical ability, and gender.
|
Identifies, but does not describe a target population that represents a sampling of the general population in a way that respects diversity, including race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, physical ability, and gender.
|
Describes a target population that represents a sampling of the general population in a way that respects diversity, including race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, physical ability, and gender.
|
Describes a target population that represents a sampling of the general population in a way that respects diversity. Clearly defines inclusion and exclusion criteria and demonstrates an appreciation of individual differences and diversity in the practice of psychology.
|
|
Describe a recruitment strategy that balances diversity with the need for data simplification.
12%
|
Does not identify a recruitment strategy.
|
Identifies, but does not describe a recruitment strategy that balances diversity with the need for data simplification.
|
Describes a recruitment strategy that balances diversity with the need for data simplification.
|
Describes a recruitment strategy that balances diversity with the need for data simplification; articulates how to approach community members for data collection.
|
|
Discuss the potential contribution of the proposed research study, considering pertinent stakeholders and supporting argument of expected results with current literature.
12%
|
Does not identify the potential contribution of a proposed research study.
|
Identifies, but does not describe the potential contribution of a proposed research study.
|
Discusses the potential contribution of a proposed research study, considering pertinent stakeholders and supporting argument of expected results with current literature.
|
Analyzes the potential contribution of a proposed research study. Draws on current evidence to support argument describing the purpose, which is to answer the research question and solve the research problem. Discusses how anticipated research findings contribute to existing literature and the potential remaining gaps in the literature. Considers pertinent stakeholders.
|
|
Describe the application of theoretical and research knowledge to the evaluation of proposed research study outcomes.
12%
|
Does not identify the application of theoretical or research knowledge to the evaluation of proposed research study outcomes.
|
Identifies but does not describe the application of theoretical and research knowledge to the evaluation of proposed research study outcomes.
|
Describes the application of theoretical and research knowledge to the evaluation of proposed research study outcomes.
|
Describes the application of theoretical and research knowledge to the evaluation of proposed research study outcomes. Distinguishes theory of method and theory of content. Discusses anticipated research findings and potential conclusions. Connects conclusions to a research problem.
|
|
Describe the implementation of a proposed research study and address elements of the methodology, such as target population, recruitment strategies, ethical considerations, data-collection procedures, and steps planned for data analysis.
12%
|
Does not address the implementation of the proposed research study.
|
Partially describes the implementation of a proposed research study and addresses few elements of the methodology.
|
Describes the implementation of a proposed research study and address elements of the methodology, such as target population, recruitment strategies, ethical considerations, data-collection procedures, and steps planned for data analysis.
|
Describes the implementation of the proposed research study, using the research question to address elements of the methodology, such as target population, recruitment strategies, ethical considerations, data-collection procedures, and steps planned for data analysis. Discusses feasibility, challenges, and limitations associated with implementation of the project.
|
|
Adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines while demonstrating concise, well-organized writing.
12%
|
Does not adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines and does not demonstrate concise or well-organized writing.
|
Partially adheres to APA style and formatting guidelines and demonstrates concise, well-organized writing inconsistently.
|
Adheres to APA style and formatting guidelines while demonstrating concise, well-organized writing.
|
Adheres to APA style and formatting guidelines while demonstrating concise, well-organized writing in a way that enhances the message and supporting points; writing reflects the quality and expertise expected for academic work.
|
