$25.00 on essay paper

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name:

 

Signature Assignment Final Paper

• Grid View
• List View

Show Descriptions

Show Feedback

Content–

Levels of Achievement:

Meets Expectations
48 (40.00%) – 60 (50.00%)

Paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts.
Paper includes several high quality, thought- provoking ideas.
Topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.

Approaches Expectations
36 (30.00%) – 47.4 (39.50%)

Paper does not demonstrate that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts.
Paper includes few, if any, thought-provoking ideas or unique insights to the discussion.
Topic is not focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.

Does Not Meet Expectations
0 (0.00%) – 35.4 (29.50%)

The paper indicates no understanding of the concepts in the course.
The paper lacks any exploration of the subject by the author.
The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment.

Feedback:

Organization/
Cohesiveness–

Levels of Achievement:

Meets Expectations
19.2 (16.00%) – 24 (20.00%)

Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant.
Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas.
Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful.

Approaches Expectations
14.4 (12.00%) – 18.96 (15.80%)

Connections among subtopics are missing or forced.
Conclusion is unclear or disconnected from the topic.
Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing.

Does Not Meet Expectations
0 (0.00%) – 14.16 (11.80%)

Connections among subtopics are missing. Subtopics are not presented.
Conclusion is missing or disconnected from the topic.
Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present.

Feedback:

Supporting Evidence/Research–

Levels of Achievement:

Meets Expectations
19.2 (16.00%) – 24 (20.00%)

Three or more appropriate sources are completely and eloquently integrated throughout the paper.
At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials.
Detailed, meaningful quotations and paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic.

Approaches Expectations
14.4 (12.00%) – 18.96 (15.80%)

Fewer than three appropriate sources are used.
At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials.
Quotations and paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics.

Does Not Meet Expectations
0 (0.00%) – 14.16 (11.80%)

Sources are missing.
Paper lacks quotations and paraphrases.

Feedback:

Mechanics and APA Formatting–

Levels of Achievement:

Meets Expectations
9.6 (8.00%) – 12 (10.00%)

The assignment consistently follows current APA style format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references.
No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

Approaches Expectations
7.2 (6.00%) – 9.48 (7.90%)

The assignment does not follow current APA style format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed.

Does Not Meet Expectations
0 (0.00%) – 7.08 (5.90%)

No attempt to follow APA style format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page.
Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

Feedback:

Name:Signature Assignment Final Paper

This week you will submit the final draft of your term paper. Your submission must include:

· A title page.

· The body of the paper, which includes 4–6 pages of professionally written text

· At least three references from textbooks, websites and articles that provide adequate justification and support your claim

· Subheadings (technical aspects, public policy, and personal opinion/conclusion)

· Appropriate 

in-text citations

 throughout paper

· A 

reference list

 with only the sources used in the body of the paper (All sources should be less than 5 years old unless recent research is not available, and at least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a profession journal. Do not use Wikipedia or an encyclopedia as they are not considered reliable academic sources and will not be accepted.)

·

APA style formatting

 throughout your paper

Remember my Topic is Access to Healthcare, barriers

Use the outline the was done on week 4 as guide.

Access to Healthcare

1. Introduction

Access to healthcare is an idea that evaluates the capability of the health system to outreach the people without eliminating part of it from getting healthcare services. Access to healthcare improves general health status, reduces health inequalities, and extends the life expectancy.

2. Body Paragraph 1 – Technical Aspects

Topic Sentence: Access to healthcare services encompasses 3 main elements, coverage, services, and timeliness.

Supporting detail 1: Health insurance coverage aids patients to attain access to the health care system (ESIF, 2017).

Supporting detail 2: Enhancing access to health care facilities will depend partly on ensuring that patients have a normal and continuing source of care (Repetto, Jaress, Lindsey & Bae, 2016).

Supporting detail 3: Timeliness which is the ability of the healthcare system to offer health care quickly when required (ODPHP, 2020).

3. Body Paragraph 2 –Public Policy

Transition: Notably,

Topic Sentence: Access to healthcare in the U.S. should be considered a priority in effort to improve the general public health status and the economy.

Supporting detail 1: Initiating access to healthcare would reduce the cost of health care in the U.S.

Supporting detail 2: Access to health care could make medical services affordable for all citizens.

Supporting detail 3: Access to health care could reduce the quality and accessibility of disease screening and treatment.

Body Paragraph 3 -Arguments

Transition: Moreover,

Topic Sentence: Proponents assert that access to health care can enhance public health and lower general health care expenditure.

Supporting detail 1: Improve to access to health can help save lives.

Supporting detail 2: Right to health care access is internationally identified human right.

Supporting detail 3: Providing access to health care services to everyone is good for economic growth

4. Body Paragraph 4 – Arguments

Transition: However,

Topic Sentence: majority of the opposing side are policymakers who argues that the right to health care should be individual responsibility and not the United States government role.

Supporting detail 1: A right to access to health care could increase the U.S. deficit and debt

Supporting detail 2: Increase in waiting time for medical services

Supporting detail 3: Can lead to increase in tax

5. Opinion and Conclusion

Overall, for effective access to health care, the federal government needs to come up with the health care Act that will do more good than harm to the people and also increase the number of health care providers in the future.

6. References

Cooper, M. (2015). The theology of emergency: Welfare reform, US foreign aid and the faith- based initiative. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(2), 53-77.

ESIF, (2017). Access to healthcare. Retrieved from http://www.esifundsforhealth.eu/sites/default/files/201902/Mapping%20Document%20ac cess%20to%20healthcare

ODPHP, (2020). Access to Health Services. Retrieved from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/Access-to-Health- Services/ebrs

ProCon.org. (n.d.) (2020). Should All Americans Have the Right (Be Entitled) to Health Care? Retrieved from https://healthcare.procon.org/#argument-22-popup

Repetto, J. B., Jaress, J., Lindsey, J., & Bae, J. (2016). Investigation of health care components in transition IEPs. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(1), 4-11.

Singh, D. A. (2015). Essentials of the US health care system. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Schmidt, H., Gostin, L. O., & Emanuel, E. J. (2015). Public health, universal health coverage, and Sustainable Development Goals: can they coexist?. The Lancet, 386(9996), 928-930.