Attached is the pdf for your Case Study #1.  Please read the case and answer the following questions presented in the “Classroom Notes”: Q# 1, 6, 7, and 8 (these are found at the bottom of the case pages).

You can use your textbook, class notes, and any other outside sources in preparing your case responses. Please make sure to cite all sources.

I expect very complete, thorough, and well constructed answers to each of the questions. Your Case Study submission should be abut 3-4 pages, 1.5 spacing, 11pt. Times New Roman font. 

CASE STUDY
CAN YOU FIX A TOXIC CULTURE
WITHOUT FIRING PEOPLE?
A CFO WONDERS HOW TO TURN
AROUND A STRUGGLING DIVISION.
BY FRANCESCA GINO

The flight attendant had to
ask her twice, “Anything
to drink, ma’am?”
“Oh, sorry—water, no ice, please,” said Noelle
Freeman, the CFO of Franklin Climate Systems.
Watching the clouds out her window at 30,000
feet, she’d been deep in thought. She was on her
way home from two days in Arkansas visiting her
company’s largest facility. Franklin was in the
business of designing, engineering, and manufac­
turing climate control systems for cars and SUVs.
It was a division of FB Holdings, a manufacturing
company based in Aurora, Illinois, and it had the
unfortunate distinction of having been the group’s
poorest-performing unit for nearly a decade.

As CFO, Noelle was, of course, concerned
about the numbers. But after spending time in
Little Rock, she worried they might be facing a
bigger problem. She’d gone to Arkansas to review
operational plans and financial projections for the
rest of the year with the team on the ground. FB
Holdings had made it through the financial crisis
of2008 without losing money—but the climate
control systems divisions, a Tier 1 automotive

supplier, had not fared as well. Franklin had
finally returned to profitability, but she and
Cameron Koren, a turnaround specialist who’d
been brought in as CEO five years earlier to right
the ship, were still working hard to keep the busi­
ness on track. She knew the Little Rock plant had
been through years of belt-tightening and turn­
over, so she hadn’t expected a warm welcome, but
the negative vibe she’d felt from the employees
had been even worse than she’d expected. The
word that kept popping into her mind was “toxic.”1

Doug Lee, the company’s head of HR, had
warned her and Cameron about the plant’s “bad
mood,” as he called it. He’d been very vocal about
his concerns that although Franklin was now on
stable financial ground, a less quantifiable prob­
lem was still dampening performance: extremely
low morale and widespread disengagement,2
especially in Little Rock.

Noelle had listened to Doug’s concerns, but as
a numbers person, she’d assumed that once the

©FRANCESCA GINO is a behavioral scientist
and the Tandon Family
Professor of Business
Administration at Harvard
Business School.

HBR’s fictionalized case
studies present problems
faced by leaders in real
companies and offer
solutions from experts.
This one is based on
the HBS Case Study
“Webasto Roof Systems
Americas: Leadership
Through Change” (case
no. 917015-PDF-ENG), by
Francesca Gino and Paul
Green, which is available
at HBR.org.

Harvard Business Review 1/1 Q
November-December 2018 İT’ö

HBR.org

“The feeling is that Aurora is focused on the
bottom line. Everything that’s been done over
the past few years has been about the penny,
not the people.”

division was out of the red, the people
problems would go away. As the plane
descended into Aurora, Noelle won­
dered if she was wrong. This may be
a problem a spreadsheet just can’t fix,
she thought.

TWO DAYS EARLIER
It was Noelle’s third scheduled meeting
to review financials, and again she was
alone in a conference room waiting for
people to show up.

When one of the plant supervisors
popped his head into the room, she
asked, “Are you joining?”

“I guess so,” he said noncommittally
and took a seat at the opposite end of
the table.

Noelle leaned toward him, hoping to
demonstrate her eagerness to engage.

He leaned back. “I don’t even know if
I’m supposed to be here,” he said. “I got
an invite, but it was forwarded to me by
someone else.”

Noelle had been hearing things like
that all day. It was clear that people
weren’t communicating across depart­
ments or even with colleagues on their
own teams. No one seemed interested in
hearing a financial update—the few who
had shown up in previous meetings were
just short of hostile. When she’d walked
into the building earlier that day, it had
been dead silent. On the plant floor and
in the offices people kept to themselves;
when she walked by, no one even looked
up. There was no bustle, no camaraderie.

“Can I ask you a favor, Marshall?”
Noelle asked. “It is Marshall, right?”

He nodded.

“It doesn’t look like anyone else is
coming to this meeting,” she said, look­
ing at the clock, which now read 11:20.
“Can you tell me what’s going on here?”

Marshall sat quietly for a minute and
then shrugged. “I guess I have nothing to
lose at this point,” he said. “This just isn’t
a good place to work anymore. I have
people quitting or threatening to quit
all the time.2 * * 5 People don’t like coming
to work. They clock in and clock out.
I’ve been here for 18 years, and it hasn’t
always been like this. We used to have
fun at work, and we’d hang out together
after. Now all I hear is T just want to do
my job and get out of here.’ There’s no
sense of community.”

2. This is not uncommon.
Gallup’s 2017 State of the
Global Workplace report found
that 67°/o of employees are

“not engaged” and i8°/o are
“actively disengaged” at work.

“Because of the cuts?” she asked,
knowing the answer before she even
finished the question.

“Yes, exactly. Everyone knows that
the company hit hard times. But all the
‘belt-tightening’”—he used air quotes
here, and Noelle winced, realizing how
stupid the euphemism sounded—“has
taken a toll. The perks that used to bring
teams together—on-site lunches and
dinners; bonuses, even small ones—they
meant a lot to our people. Now we don’t
do anything for them. And making $15 an
hour isn’t cutting it for them.”

“I appreciate your being candid
with me,” Noelle said. “I imagine it can’t
be easy.”

“Like I said, nothing to lose.” Marshall
smiled ruefully. “But it’s sad. I remember
when it felt like the company noticed
me, even cared about me. But now it’s
like nobody trusts anybody.”

“Is there any way the company can
regain your faith?”

“Honestly, I’m not sure. The feeling
is that Aurora is focused on the bottom
line. Everything that’s been done over
the past few years has been about the
penny, not the people. The message has
become ‘Just be glad you have a job.’ And
I haven’t seen any signs that things will
be changing anytime soon.”

BACK IN AURORA
The morning after Noelle returned from
Little Rock, she found herself in another
empty conference room, this time
waiting for Cameron and Doug. A few
minutes later, they walked in together.

“How was your trip?” Cam asked.
“Bleak,” she said. She recounted her

meeting with Marshall.
Cam shook his head impatiently.

“These are tough times for everyone.
Our other sites have felt the pinch, but

CLASSROOM

NOTES

1. When is calling
a culture “toxic”
appropriate? How bad
do things need to be to
earn that label?

3. Downsizing a workforce by
7% leads to a 31% increase
in voluntary turnover the next
year, research shows.

4- Studies show that when
employees feel valued by their
companies, they are more
committed and satisfied in their
jobs and show fewer signs of
stress and burnout.

Harvard Business Review
November-December 2018

none has turned as sour as Little Rock.”
He paused. “You know we’re still under
intense scrutiny from FB. Layoffs might
be our best option to keep things moving
in the right direction.”

Noelle exchanged a quick glance
with Doug. She knew he was adamantly
against more layoffs now that they were
on better financial footing.

“I realize that personnel cuts are not
necessary from a financial perspective.
But culturally, it might be time for a
purge,” Cam continued. “We can’t have
people like Marshall—a supervisor­
spreading doom and gloom across the
entire facility. We need people who are
positive about the company’s future, not
holding on to an unattainable past.”

Doug spoke up. “Respectfully,
I disagree with you, Cam.” He had never
been one to tell the CEO only what he
wanted to hear. “These employees have
stuck with us through the worst of it,
and with the right initiatives, we can
bring them back around. Additional
layoffs—especially now that we’re
making money again—would just make
things worse. And who wants to join a
company that treats its people like that?4
How would we find enough people to
replace the experienced—albeit disen­
gaged—staff we’d be letting go? And
remember the research I showed you:
Companies that lay off large numbers of
employees are twice as likely to file for
bankruptcy as companies that don’t.”

7. Is this viewpoint too narrow? In a 2012 review 8. Should a CFO be getting
of 20 studies of companies that had conducted involved in HR issues?
layoffs, Deepak Datta of the University of Texas at
Arlington found that staff reductions had a neutral
to negative effect cn stock prices in the days after
the announcement and that most of the companies
eventually suffered declines in profitability.

“But your engagement surveys—
not to mention the anecdotal stories
like Noelle’s—show that things are just
getting worse,” Cam responded. “So I’m

struggling to find a way to make this
work. We’re still not where we need to be
operationally and financially, and maybe
that’s because we have too many people
holding us back.5 It’s like we’re surgeons
who have a patient bleeding out on the
operating table. Do we join hands and
sing ‘Kumbaya’? Or pull out our scalpels?”

Doug stood firm. “I think—and
correct me if I’m wrong, Noelle—that the
bleeding has stopped. So now it’s more
like we have a patient in the ICU who
needs help getting better.”

He and Cam sat back and looked at
her, waiting for her response.

“You’re right that we’ve stabilized,
Doug,” she said. “But given what I saw
in Arkansas, the patient is definitely not
out of the woods.”

HIT THE RESET BUTTON
The following Saturday, Noelle met her
friend Joss at the reservoir near their
houses. The two women had gone to
business school together and had both
ended up in Aurora, so they often turned
to each other for work advice. Having
executed a successful turnaround as
COO of a construction company, Joss had
been especially helpful to Noelle during
her time at Franklin.

Now, as they started out on their
five-mile loop, Noelle described the
situation in Little Rock and Cameron and
Doug’s most recent debate. “We talked a
lot about ‘excising the bad seeds,’ and as
you know, we’ve already laid off a lot of
people. But the crazy thing is that even
once the worst offenders were gone,
morale stayed just as low.”

“It’s not the people who are toxic,”
Joss said, “it’s the culture.6 So even
though it’s hard, you have to fix that
first. I gave you the name of the consul­
tants we worked with, right?”

“Yes, Doug and I even had an explor­
atory call with them. But whenever
we’ve floated the idea of working with
them to Cameron, he has shot it down,
saying we can’t afford it right now. And
he’s right. Our bottom line will look
better if we keep reducing overhead7
rather than spending more money to try
to fix the problem.”

“For our company, it was the best
money we ever spent,” Joss said. “Ardu­
ous, yes. Time-consuming, yes. Most
of the time it felt like I was living in a
Dilbert parody. But employees’ attitudes
have really improved, and so have the
numbers.”

“I’ve got more than enough to do
with the financials—I don’t know why
I’m even getting involved.8 But I hate
feeling that the executive team is letting
our people down—and using my num­
bers to justify it.”

“Bringing the company back to a
high level of operational performance
will take the focus and energy of
hundreds of employees,” Joss said.
“Cameron is kidding himself if he thinks
he can rely on a few good people who
somehow—miraculously—manage to
stay engaged through another round
of cuts.”

“I just keep looking around for the
reset button,” Noelle said.

“Unfortunately, when it comes to
culture, no such thing exists.”

5. In the U.S. layoffs are
straightforward from a legal
standpoint. In other countries they
are highly regulated, and in some
regions companies are required to
justify the reductions to authorities.

6. Is Joss right in saying
that getting rid of toxic
people won’t change
the culture?

Harvard Business Review 1 A r
November-December 2018 I i0