| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| NRS-490 |
NRS-490-O500 |
Literature Evaluation Table |
75.0 |
| Criteria |
Percentage |
Unsatisfactory 0-71% (0.00%) |
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% (75.00%) |
Satisfactory 76-79% (79.00%) |
Good 80-89% (89.00%) |
Excellent 90-
| 100% |
(100.00%)
Comments |
Points Earned |
| Article Selection |
100.0% |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article |
|
|
|
|
| 5.0% |
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included. |
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present. |
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Article Title and Year Published |
5.0%
Article title and year published section is not included. |
Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Article title and year published section is present. |
Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10.0% |
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included. |
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present. |
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) |
5.0%
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included. |
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present. |
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Setting or Sample |
5.0%
Setting or sample section is not included. |
Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Setting or sample section is present. |
Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Methods: Intervention or Instruments |
5.0%
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is not included. |
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present. |
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Analysis |
10.0%
Analysis section is not included. |
Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Analysis section is present. |
Analysis section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Key Findings |
10.0%
Key findings section is not included. |
Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Key findings section is present. |
Key findings section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Recommendations |
10.0%
Recommendations section is not included. |
Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Recommendations section is present. |
Recommendations section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone |
10.0%
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included. |
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present. |
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well developed. |
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Presentation |
10.0%
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. |
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. |
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. |
The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. |
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) |
10.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
5.0%
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage |
100%
