| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| TSL-532 |
TSL-532-O500 |
Legislative Impacts on ELLs |
75.0 |
|
| Criteria |
Percentage |
No Submission (0.00%) |
Insufficient (69.00%) |
Approaching (74.00%) |
Acceptable (87.00%) |
Target (100.00%) |
Comments |
Points Earned |
Criteria
| 100.0% |
| Description of Three Major Supreme Court Cases |
40.0% |
|
|
|
|
| Not addressed. |
The essay does not include three Supreme Court cases or the cases included are either not significant or not related to the education of ELLs. |
The essay includes three Supreme Court cases and the cases included are significant, but the relation to the education of ELLs is tenuous or the descriptions are vague. |
The essay includes three Supreme Court cases that are significant. The relation of the cases to the education of ELLs is evident. Brief descriptions of the cases are included. |
The essay includes three major Supreme Court cases. Examples are provided to reinforce the significant impact that the cases have on the education of ELLs. The cases are described clearly and concisely. |
| Impact on Teaching |
30.0% |
Not addressed.
The impact of the cases on current teaching is not established. |
The essay includes vague or incomplete explanations of how the cases impact current teaching. |
The essay includes adequate explanations of how the cases impact current teaching. |
The essay includes appropriate and insightful explanations of how the cases impact current teaching. |
| Organization |
| 10.0% |
Not addressed.
The content is not organized. The ideas presented cannot be reconciled into a cohesive unit. |
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. |
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Research Citations (in-text citations, reference page, and type of sources) |
| 5.0% |
Not addressed.
Many citations are missing where needed. References page includes numerous errors. Sources may not be credible. |
Some citations may be missing or the citations do not support the submission. References page may include errors. Sources may not be appropriate for the submission. |
In-text citations and References page have few errors. Sources are credible and appropriate for the submission. |
In-text citations and References page are complete and error-free. Sources are credible and appropriate for the submission. The sources strongly support the submission. |
| APA Format |
5.0% Not addressed.
APA is attempted, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
APA is attempted, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. |
APA is used for the most part, but a few aspects are missing or mistaken. |
All aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) |
10.0% Not addressed.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. |
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. |
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage |
100% |
