Complete a 2-3 page tort analysis
EDL 5700 – Ethics and School Law for School Administrators
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Legal Assignment
Just from $13/Page
Focus: LEGAL
Assignment #3: Tort Analysis Paper
PSEL Standard 2: ETHICS and PROFESSIONAL NORMS
Effective educational leaders act ethically and according to professional norms to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.
Effective leaders:
a) Act ethically and professionally in personal conduct, relationships with others, decision-making, stewardship of the school’s resources, and all aspects of school leadership.
b) Act according to and promote the professional norms of integrity, fairness, transparency, trust, collaboration, perseverance, learning, and continuous improvement.
c) Place children at the center of education and accept responsibility for each student’s academic success and well-being.
d) Safeguard and promote the values of democracy, individual freedom and responsibility, equity, social justice, community, and diversity.
e) Lead with interpersonal and communication skill, social-emotional insight, and understanding of all students’ and staff members’ backgrounds and cultures.
f) Provide moral direction for the school and promote ethical and professional behavior among faculty and staff.
Tort Defined
A Tort is a common law jurisdiction, is a civil wrong that unfairly causes someone else to suffer loss or injury resulting in legal liability. Law recognizes torts as grounds for lawsuit. The primary aim of Tort law is to provide relief for damages incurred and deter others from committing the same harms. Tort law is state law created through judges and legislatures. Tort law is said to be a development of the old maxim “ubi jus ibi remedium” that is every right needs remedy.
INSTRUCTIONS:
After completing the textbook readings for Legal Rights; Chapters 5-7 and School Law; Chapters 3, 5, & 7, COMPLETE a 2-3 page tort analysis of the following:
·
RESEARCH the cases
Fields v. Lafayette Sch. Bd.
and
Baheth v. Lafayette Par. Sch. Sys.
· DO a critical tort analysis discussing both cases as they relate to Intentional Torts and Unintentional Torts.
· INCLUDE a title page (
This is in addition to your 2-3 pages
)
· USE APA style
· USE Double-spaced
· USE Times Roman or Calibri font
· USE 12-pt font size
·
INCLUDE a list of references and resources at the end of your paper (
This is in addition to your 2-3 pages
)
Note: Please use the rubric as a guide.
EDL 5700 – Ethics and School Law for School Administrators
Tort Analysis Paper Rubric: 100 points
|
CATEGORY
|
20 points
|
15 points
|
10 points
|
5 points
|
|
Introduction/
Thesis
____
|
exceptional introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic.
thesis/topic is exceptionally clear, well-developed, and a definitive statement.
|
proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic.
thesis is clear and arguable statement of position.
|
basic introduction that states topic but lacks interest.
thesis is somewhat clear and arguable.
|
weak or no introduction of topic.
paper’s purpose is unclear/thesis is weak or missing.
|
|
Content knowledge: Quality of Research
____
|
paper is exceptionally researched, contains 3 resources related to the thesis argument in a logical manner. References are correctly cited
|
information relates to the main topic.
Paper is well-researched in detail and from 3 good sources. References are correctly cited
|
information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Shows a limited variety of sources. References are not cited correctly
|
information has little or nothing to do with the thesis.
information has weak or no connection to the thesis. References are not cited correctly.
|
|
Content application: Support of Thesis and Analysis
____
|
exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis.
excellent analysis.
|
consistent connections made between evidence and thesis
good analysis.
|
some connections made between evidence and thesis.
some analysis.
|
limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis.
lack of analysis.
|
|
Conclusion
____
|
excellent summary of thesis argument with concluding ideas that impact reader.
introduces no new information.
|
good summary of topic with clear concluding ideas.
introduces no new information.
|
basic summary of topic with some final concluding ideas.
introduces no new information.
|
lack of summary of topic.
|
|
Writing
____
|
Writing is clear and relevant, with no grammatical and/or spelling errors – polished and professional. Reference section properly formatted.
|
Most ideas are stated clearly and are related to the topic, with only minor grammatical and/or spelling errors. Reference section adequate.
|
Many ideas require clarification and/or are off-topic or have marginal relevance to the assignment. Many grammatical and/or spellings errors throughout the paper. The paper is very challenging to read due to poor writing flow. Improper reference section.
|
Paper does not meet the criteria for the assignment (too short or incomplete, too long, and/or completely off-topic). Reference section missing.
|
