| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| NUR-514 |
NUR-514-O501 |
Leadership Style Reflective Essay |
125.0 |
| Criteria |
Percentage |
Unsatisfactory (0.00%) |
Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) |
Satisfactory (88.00%) |
Good (92.00%) |
Excellent (100.00%) |
Comments |
Points Earned |
| Content |
70.0% |
| Summary of Self-Assessment Results |
| 10.0% |
A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is not included. |
A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is present. |
A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is clearly provided and well developed. |
A comprehensive summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| A Specific Leadership Style That You Believe Aligns With Your Philosophy of Care, Including Appeal |
|
| 20.0% |
A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is not included. |
A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is present. |
A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is clearly provided and well developed. |
A comprehensive discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Reflection on How to Incorporate Elements of the Leadership Style |
1
|
|
|
| 5.0% |
A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is not included. |
A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is present. |
A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is clearly provided and well developed. |
A comprehensive reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Areas for Self-Improvement, Including Steps to Improve Leadership Capabilities |
20.0%
A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is not included. |
A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is present. |
A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is clearly provided and well developed. |
A comprehensive discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Required Sources |
5.0%
Sources are not included. |
Number of required sources is only partially met. |
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. |
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. |
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. |
| Organization and Effectiveness |
20.0%
| Thesis Development and Purpose |
7.0% |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction |
8.0% |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
5.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
Format 10.0%
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
5.0%
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
5.0%
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage |
100% |
