I need this in one hours

John

Snow and the Origin of Epidemiology; “You Know Nothing, John Snow.”

Adapted from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BYGcSlV4ufjg-7dcKtPUYMD3O90fsBd44V-

9Lujn1xE/edit#

Instructions: Read the passages and answer the questions.

Part I—Beginnings

John Snow was born in York, England, in 1813, the first of 9 children of a working-class

family. Snow’s wealthy and well-connected uncle, arranged an apprenticeship for his nephew

with a surgeon-apothecary, one of the two types of health care providers in 19th century

London. Physicians were graduates of the medical programs at Oxford or Cambridge while

surgeon-apothecaries went through a longer apprenticeship, attending classes part-time at

smaller medical schools. John Snow moved to Newcastle at the age of 14 to apprentice with

William Hardcastle. It was in Newcastle, near the end of Snow’s apprenticeship, that he first

encountered cholera as it arrived in England in 1831.

In his medical studies, Snow learned the prevailing humoral model of disease, which held that

health depended on the balance of four humors: blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow

bile. Diseases resulted from an excess or deficit in one of these four humors. To correct the

problem, physicians would use leeches to bleed patients or purgatives to cause diarrhea or

vomiting. The humoral model eventually was replaced with the miasma model of disease,

which suggested that diseases were caused by pollution or “bad air.” At the time, the Germ

Theory of Disease had not been established, and physicians didn’t fully understand the nature

of disease and its transmission.

After being released from his apprenticeship, John Snow was one of the first physicians to study

and calculate dosages for ether and chloroform as surgical anaesthetics. It was his work with

anesthesia and gases that made him doubt the miasma model of disease.

1. Compare the two different types of medical professions of the 19th century. What modern

professions would compare to these?

2. *Search cholera and list the major symptoms of the disease. Why is it sometimes called

“The Blue Death?”

3. Compare the humoral model of disease (part 1) to the miasma model of disease. Which do

you think is closest to our modern understanding of disease?

Part II: Sanitation in the 19th Century

London in the middle of the 19th century contained 2.5 million people, housed in 30 square

miles, a population density greater than present-day Manhattan. The Soho district of London

had a serious problem with filth due to the large influx of people and a lack of proper sanitary

services: the London sewer system had not reached Soho. Many cellars had cesspools

underneath their floorboards.

A cesspit (cesspool) was an underground holding tank used for the storage of feces. Some pits

were emptied when they became full; cleaned out by tradesmen using shovels and horse-

drawn wagons. Some cesspits were designed to allow liquid to leach into the soil. Because of

the population density in London, many of these cesspits were overflowing; waste accumulated

in basements, courtyards, and even the streets. Since the cesspools were overrunning, the

London government decided to dump the waste into the River Thames.

Because of the problems of waste disposal, few Londoners had a source of drinking water

uncontaminated by human sewage. At that time, a total of nine different water companies

supplied Londoners with water, obtained from either shallow wells or the Thames River. Some

companies had their intake pipes farther upstream than others. Water obtained from pipes

downstream were more likely to be contaminated with human waste.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basement

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesspit

4. What was it like to live in London in the early 19th century?

5. Examine the diagram showing a cesspit. Before houses installed cesspits, chamber pots

were dumped into the streets. What were some advantages to having a cesspit? What were

the disadvantages?

6. How does changing the location of the pipes (either upstream or downstream) improve water

quality? Sketch an image of the river and the intake pipes and sewer pipes to show the ideal

location.

Part III: Outbreak

On 31 August 1854, after several other outbreaks had occurred elsewhere in the city, a major

outbreak of cholera struck Soho. By September, 500 people had died and the mortality rate

was 12.8 percent in some parts of the city. By the end of the outbreak, 616 people had died.

John Snow later called it “the most terrible outbreak of cholera which ever occurred in this

kingdom.”

The germ theory was not created at this point (as Louis Pasteur would not create it until 1861),

so Snow was unaware of the mechanism by which the disease was transmitted, but evidence

led him to believe that it was not due to breathing foul air as the miasma model would suggest.

He first published his theory in an essay On the Mode of Communication of Cholera in 1849

which proposed that cholera was transmitted in water. The essay received negative reviews in

the Lancet and the London Medical Gazette. However, a reviewer made a helpful suggestion in

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_of_disease

terms of what evidence would be compelling: the crucial natural experiment would be to find

people living side by side with lifestyles similar in all respects except for the water source.

Snow sought ways of strengthening his argument by carrying out the crucial experiment sought

by the Medical Gazette’s reviewer. He went door to door interviewing families of cholera

victims.

Snow began marking cholera deaths on city maps, and patterns began to emerge. . He mapped

out the locations of individual water pumps and generated cells which represented all the points

on his map which were closest to each pump.

7. Based on the data shown in the map, which pump is the most likely source of the cholera

infection? Circle all pumps that might also be suspect in this investigation.

8. The cluster of cases near Saville Row might be considered an outlier as they have their own

pump nearby. What questions would Snow want to ask family members in this area?

Part IV: Snow Makes His Case

In Snow’s own words:

On proceeding to the spot, I found that nearly all the deaths had taken place within a short

distance of the [Broad Street] pump. There were only ten deaths in houses situated decidedly

nearer to another street-pump. In five of these cases the families of the deceased persons

informed me that they always sent to the pump in Broad Street, as they preferred the water to

that of the pumps which were nearer. In three other cases, the deceased were children who went

to school near the pump in Broad Street…

The result of the inquiry, then, is, that there has been no particular outbreak or prevalence of

cholera in this part of London except among the persons who were in the habit of drinking the

water of the above-mentioned pump well.

I had an interview with the Board of Guardians of St James’s parish, on the evening of the 7th inst

[September 7], and represented the above circumstances to them. In consequence of what I said,

the handle of the pump was removed on the following day.

—John Snow, letter to the editor of the Medical Times and

Gazette

Although Snow’s chemical and microscopic examination of a sample of the Broad Street pump

water was not able to conclusively prove its danger, his studies of the pattern of the disease

were convincing enough to persuade the St James parish authorities to disable the well pump

by removing its handle. At this point, John Snow had partnered with Reverend Henry

Whitehead who assisted with interviewing families and tracking the disease. Whitehead

succeeded in identifying an earlier case, an infant living in a house a few feet from the Broad

Street pump who died from diarrhea two days before the cholera outbreak was officially

recognized.

After excavation of the Broad Street well, it was found that it had been dug only three feet from

an old cesspit that had begun to leak fecal bacteria. A mother of the baby who had contracted

cholera had its diapers washed into this cesspit and was likely the source of the original

infection.

12. What was John Snow’s original hypothesis and how did it conflict with prevailing models of

health and disease?

13. Why would evidence of cholera in people living side by side, differing only in water supply,

provide critical evidence ?

14. Snow found that none of the monks in the adjacent monastery contracted cholera. They

drank only beer, which they brewed themselves. Does this mean that beer made with

contaminated water is safe to drink? How could you test this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_St_James

Part V: The Aftermath

Unfortunately, after the cholera epidemic had subsided, government officials replaced the Broad

Street Pump Handle. They had responded only to the urgent threat posed to the population, and

afterward they rejected Snow’s theory. To accept his proposal would have meant indirectly

accepting the oral-fecal method transmission of disease, which was too unpleasant for most of

the public to contemplate.

Although many continued to reject Snow’s explanation, some began to give it grudging

acceptance, often without acknowledging his contribution. Snow’s vindication came at a meeting

of the Medical Society where a member stood up after such a presentation insisting that Snow

be given credit. The pump is now a historic site in London and is located in front of the John

Snow Pub.

15. The basic questions of epidemiology focus on time and place: “why here” and “why now”.

What are the answers to these questions for the Broad Street outbreak?

16. Why was the death of the baby a significant observation for this study?

17. Epidemiology relies on non-experimental tests of hypotheses. What was Snow’s hypothesis

and how did he test it without performing experiments.

18. Consider the term “non-experimental.” Given you had no ethical concerns with testing on

humans, how would you test the hypothesis in an “experimental” way?