| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| MGT-655 |
MGT-655-O500 |
Internal Processes |
90.0 |
| Criteria |
Percentage |
Unsatisfactory (0.00%) |
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) |
Satisfactory (79.00%) |
Good (87.00%) |
Excellent (100.00%) |
Comments |
Points Earned |
| Content |
70.0% |
| Chipotle Flowcharts and Commentary |
40.0% |
Chipotle flowcharts are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. |
Chipotle flowcharts make weak connections with several gaps, and they are weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. |
Chipotle flowcharts make connections at a cursory level and contain minimal gaps. Supporting sources show some understanding of the content. |
Chipotle flowcharts make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are clear and integrated. Supporting sources illustrate an understanding of the content. |
Chipotle flowcharts make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are thorough and well integrated. Supporting sources illustrate a deep understanding of the content. |
| Restaurant Flowchart and Commentary |
30.0% |
Restaurant flowchart and commentary are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. |
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make weak connections with several gaps, and they are weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. |
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make connections at a cursory level and contain minimal gaps. Supporting sources show some understanding of the content. |
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are clear and integrated. Supporting sources illustrate an understanding of the content. |
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are thorough and well integrated. Supporting sources illustrate a deep understanding of the content. |
| Organization and Effectiveness |
20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose |
7.0% |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction |
8.0% |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
5.0% |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation |
| 10.0% |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
10.0%
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage |
100% |
