Table of Contents
Introduction
Purpose of the Study
Research Problem
Research Hypothesis
Literature Review
International Standards and Accounting Quality
Adaptation of IFRS and Accounting Quality
Methodology
Data Collection Technique
Sample
Findings
Summary
Conclusion
References
Introduction
Consideration of the IFRS framework is an essential issue in the quality characteristics of financial reporting: the subjective attributes of valuable financial statements identify the types of data that may be useful to customers in choosing report content based on their financial data (Ebaid, 2016). Subjective attributes also apply to economic data for the main reasons and to financial data provided in different ways. Financial data is valuable when it is valid and expresses accurate outcomes (Barth et al., 2006). The value of business information is discounted based on the disputed assumption that they are equivalent, undisputed, promising, and reasonable. Valentincic et al., (2017) describes the quality of financial reporting (FRQ) as “the introduction of historical data into the financial reporting process (Ebaid, 2016). The FRQ expects organizations to voluntarily expand the scope and nature of the information they report so that members of the advertising industry are fully informed and can make informed decisions about speculation, lending, etc. As noted by Isidro et al. (2019), the quality of financial reporting suggests “the extent to which critical financial data reflect primary monetary conditions. Mnif Sellami and Gafsi, (2019) noted that “the nature of the data is high when clients can distinguish the similarities and differences between the two miraculous monetary arrangements,” referring to the way IFRS “proposes to eliminate the externalities in education that result from non-equivalence (Barth et al., 2006).” 
As there has been a significant movement in international accounting around the world, it is increasingly important to demonstrate that IFRS is being used in accounting. Valentincic et al., (2017); Isidro et al., (2019); Barth et al., (2006). In particular, many related studies have been conducted on the conditions and results of the deliberate application of IFRS. 
We hope to refer to these studies by applying subjective research methods to accounting. Our research will be based on approximately 30 articles, which will be distributed in journals in the ProQuest central database. This international database has been selected because it is considered “the largest total database of journals,” and because we have had the opportunity to reach a large number of articles with broad and accessible content. To select the split articles, we scanned the words “IFRS” in the modified sections and “accounting quality” in all available j to get the full content. We then refine the pieces on the list to include only those articles distributed at meetings, academic, and exchange journals, written in English or French.  We will review journals and articles and, as we aim to decompose the impact of the progress of national accounting standards relating to IFRS on the quality of financial reporting that link specific changes in IFRS to the quality of financial reporting. From the first point of departure, we can draw attention to more distant aspects of our research concerning the emotions associated with the choice of documents. In addition, we recognize the importance of examining the impact of IFRS on the quality of financial reporting in other audited databases. In any case, some of the popular articles may be considered relevant because of the far-reaching assumption that the Reference Protocol should be taken into account. 
Purpose of the Study
A key objective of the IASB is “to use open contracts to create a visible, reasonable, and enforceable individual global contract that requires simple and comparable data across all financial statements.”
Similarly, in addition to maintaining IFRS, they should also preserve the conceptual framework for financial reporting by 2010. (IFRS framework) adopted by the IASB as a hypothetical definition of various explicit accounting standards. “The IFRS framework expresses the objective of useful financial reporting (for major customers) by reinforcing certain subjective characteristics of useful financial data (Mnif Sellami and Gafsi, (2019).”
Research Problem
IFRSs that are credible to the IASB’s long-term objective means that many high-quality accounting standards are applied most reliably and comprehensively possible by open organizations to ensure that they are satisfactory to global capital markets (Barth et al., 2006). Although there is no consensus on which are the major accounting standards, IFRS is considered world-class because they refer to some of the best accounting evidence in the world and implicitly represent more capital than many national accounting standards (Christensen et al., 2015). The prescriptive nature of IFRS (Ebaid, 2016) also encourages companies to present accounting data that better reflect the monetary content of the structure and, therefore, to move forward in terms of linearity (Ahmed et al., 2013). It is rightly stressed that the choice of IFRS goes hand in hand with high-quality accounting and that the study by Hribar et al. (2014) is an important document in this regard. 
Research Hypothesis
H1: International Accounting Standards (IASs) play a vital role in assuring the quality of accounting results.
H2: The IASs are more reliable than the other accounting standards.
H3: IASs strengthen the accounting system of organizations.
Literature Review
Given that there are “different financial reporting needs of entities other than stock market speculators.” (Chua et al., 2012), experts have developed different measures of accounting quality to meet the specific requirements of the valuable accounting data provided by various stakeholders. For the particular needs of individual banks and lenders, analysts have developed a solvency concept to assess whether the application of IFRS is gradually leading to the preparation of valuable financial statements. This recognition is characterized by “the overall ability of the accounting risk measures to explain the probability of default identified by the ratings of S&P’s guarantors.” (Ames, 2013; Ebaid, 2016). Even more correct is the manufacturer’s attempt to determine whether the results are increasingly sensitive to the benefits, effects, and intrigues identified by the IFRS reporting requirements system. Following the mandatory adoption of IFRS, financial loans in the education sector should increasingly contribute to improving the soundness of accounting data. Following the improvement of accounting information as a result of the choice of IFRS, Iatridis (2010) discussed the impact of mandatory adoption of IFRS in the European Union on corporate liability costs. They explained the link between achieving IFRS compliance and the value of corporate liabilities affected by the risk of insufficient data on the organization. “This is because the data is excessive to ensure the credibility of the organization, and may have to be reliable (Chua et al., 2012).”

Get Help With Your Essay
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
Essay Writing Service

Analysts provide evidence of the benefits of IFRS, but also analyze the critical points of this process, showing the impact of IFRS on profits, accounting estimates or issues other than financial statements. According to Abdul and Haniffa, (2019) and Ebaid, (2016), “it is essential to review the proposed financial statements, taking into account that while the application of IAS may lead to retrospective financial results, direct effect of the implementation of IAS is to change the financial statements.  To achieve the expected benefits of the choice of IFRS, which have been found to ensure more significant similarity and simplicity of financial reporting, the application of IFRS should result in improved quality of accounting data. 
International Standards and Accounting Quality
Since the IASs have developed extensively, which made full transformation of the IASB into the IASB in 2010. So the recognising the quality of a centralized agreement on IAS, the International Organisation of Securities Commissions proposed in 2000 that global data protection regulators allow donors to apply IAS to their cross-border contributions (Rathore, 2019; Ebaid, 2016). Since 2001, almost all organizations freely registered in Europe and many different countries are required to make financial arrangements under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Besides, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has initiated extensive efforts to bridge the gap between IFRS and United States standards. One of the goals of the IASC and IASB is to create an excellent set of international accounting standards. To achieve this goal, the IASB and the International Narcotics Control Board have adopted standards-based standards and found ways to exclude viable accounting options and require accounting estimates that best reflect the financial position and financial performance of the association (Rathore, 2019).
Book values that better reflect a firm’s fundamental economic problems, derived from accounting standards based on the required accounting standards or estimates, can improve the quality of accounting by providing speculators with data that help them make informed business decisions. These two sources of accounting quality improvement are linked because it is the employer who determines the extent to which the hidden financial aspects of the company are taken into account in its accounts. Mnif Sellami and Gafsi, (2019) as well as Ebaid, 2016 are thus structure a robust desire model that shows that accounting rules that limit innovative prudence bring accounting benefits that make the essential financial aspects of a partnership gradually smarter and, in this sense, more standardised. The quality of accounting could also be improved as a result of changes in the current financial reporting structure, with the introduction of IAS by companies, for example, through their gradual and full endorsement. We, therefore, assume that the accounting values resulting from the application of IAS are higher than those resulting from the use of national standards.
Adaptation of IFRS and Accounting Quality
The full scope of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 2006 for registered companies is unique. It currently analyses the impact of IFRS ownership on the quality of financial reporting. The characteristic accounting quality as quality and materiality of earnings and assume that these two elements will go beyond the application of IFRS (Ebaid, 2016). In some details, I do not believe that revenue quality will improve significantly once adopted. Also, I think the relevance of some parts of the financial statements will change after the selection. 
Two studies have legitimately examined the impact of the necessary adoption of IFRS on the quality of accounting in Australia. For the first time, Ahmed et al. (2010) examined the effects of IFRS ownership in Australia on accounting records and its relevance, looking at initial implementation through IFRS commitments in the underlying annual IFRS records. Although the researcher concluded that the adoption of IFRS resulted in significant adjustments to accounting figures and ratios. They found that the cumulative results were substantial enough to make IFRS-compliant values meaningful in comparison to Australian GAAP and recommended not to improve the quality of financial reporting under the CRF (Valentincic et al., 2017; Barth et al., 2006). In a second study, which uses board income as an indicator of the quality of financial reporting, (Valentincic et al., 2017); (Păşcan, 2015); (Ames, 2013); (Chua et al., 2012); (Li, 2010); (Iatridis, 2010) examined whether companies treated their profits in a way that allowed them to maintain an even smaller strategic distance from IFRS failures. The study found that the FRC did not significantly improve the quality of financial reporting. While each of the two reviews assessed the quality of financial reporting from a different perspective, both investigations were subject to a similar limitation, namely the use of a single measure to examine the multidimensional concept of quality of financial reporting. Furthermore, both reviews covered only a short period after the introduction of IFRS in Australia and, therefore, may not have had sufficient energy to consider the impact of ownership.
Even if we assume that improvements in accounting quality accompany the application of IAS, there are at least two reasons why this is not justified. Firstly, IAS may be the most appropriate option. For example, if administrative prudence is limited by being associated with accounting decisions, it may be that a company can no longer provide increasingly intelligent accounting estimates of its financial situation and performance. Besides, the natural ability to adapt standards-based rules could give companies more significant opportunities to monitor their revenues, which would affect the quality of financial reporting. This adaptability has been a concern for security market managers for some time, especially in an international environment (Ahmed et al., 2013). Second, whether or not IAS are more stringent standards, the impact of real events on the structure of financial statements that do not comply with the rules themselves may lead to an improvement in the quality of financial statements as a result of IAS. (Chen et al., 2010)(Li, 2010)(Chua et al., 2012) and (Ames 2013) suggests that application may result in limited compliance with standards and then reduce their usefulness.
Methodology
This study aims to examine the possible outcomes that will conclude the results of the hypothesis in this research. The collection of secondary information has a specific purpose based on the hypothesis of the research. One of the main reasons conducts the thematic analysis. According to Abdul and Haniffy (2019), most analysts agree that collecting information from secondary sources is more efficient than gathering data from primary sources, which will increase the relevancy of data. This type of research and results enhance accuracy and saves the researcher’s time. According to Abdul and Haniffy (2019), it is not difficult to establish criteria for gathering information from secondary sources, as opposed to primary sources. We are currently focusing on researching this issue, using the appropriate methodological approach to collect the relevant data. Also, moral considerations are taken into account when selecting the different studies published. 
Data Collection Technique
It is also vital that the researcher selects the appropriate online sources to collect the data needed for the research. The study will collect secondary information from various published journals, which include the Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, JSTOR, Google Scholar, Journal of accounting, and Journal of international accounting (Chua et al., 2012). 
PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram

Records identified through database searching(n = 112)
Additional records identified through other sources(n = 52)
Identification
Records after duplicates removed(n = 72)
Screening
Records screened(n = 72  )
Records excluded(n =  35)
Full-text articles assessed for eligibility(n =  37)
Full-text articles excluded, with reasons(n =  33 )
Eligibility
Studies included in qualitative synthesis(n = 4  )
Included
Sample
To evaluate various relevant publications on the impact of international accounting standards on accounting quality, this study will focus on the journals and articles to be published in 2010-2019. The themes used in the thematic analysis are “international accounting standards,” “accounting results,” “accounting quality,” and “accounting standards.” Another point to consider when collecting important information is that the journals and articles published. These themes will follow the outcome of the research hypothesis by which the results can be found, and the selection and rejection of the thesis can be concluded in a study.
Findings
Some studies analyze the accounting amounts involved and the economic impact of applying IAS and local standards in each country. The vast majority of these studies find striking contrasts. Păşcan (2015) and Ebaid (2016) conclude that different companies applying IAS show no difference in management performance compared to companies using other standards. Abdul and Haniffa (2019) and Barth et al., (2006) find no evidence of a reduction in the cost of capital for individual companies applying IAS. Abdul and Haniffa, (2019) also noted that the carrying values and dependent values of IAS, which are required for first-time adopters of IAS, do not differ in meaning.
Interestingly, Ames (2013) showed and also verified by Chua et al. (2012) that the income of IAS subsidiaries is worth more than the income of IAS subsidiaries. Iatridis, (2010) and Hribar et al., (2014) examined the dependent amounts of IAS and Chinese standards. They concluded that the dependent values of IAS are not worth more than the dependent values of Chinese standards for companies that can be claimed by external financial experts. In any event, the investigation concludes that the IAS dependent amounts for companies to be claimed by local speculators are lower than those in the PRC. The explanation for the above cumulative results is that the companies preparing to introduce IAS should gradually amend their IAS-dependent amounts to approach the IAS-dependent values for the companies developing to introduce IAS. (Hribar et al., 2014) noted, for example, that there is little identification with hidden management benefits, which is surprising given that the existence of such benefits is a typical concern of managers when they apply different standards.
Another explanation is that the creation of savings lags behind the IAS framework. Iatridis (2010) noted that this was one of the main reasons for not thinking that IAS-based balance sheet totals are more important. A third explanation is that the feasibility of controls to motivate forces involved in the application of a particular set of accounting standards and the impact of the economic situation of the company vary . The fourth explanation is that studies use different means, obtain information to some extent from different periods, and apply various control factors. Our research differs from that of this country and analyses the paths that lead to it. First, our example includes companies in 21 countries. There are preferences and disadvantages in focusing on specific countries, rather than using models from many countries. Focusing on one country, for example, removes control over the potentially misleading effect of clearly arbitrary country elements in the financial reporting framework. However, it is difficult to extrapolate the assumptions of such studies to individual countries. Secondly, we use different measures that are reliably derived over a period of time. Thirdly, we developed experimental techniques, including the use of coordinated examples and multiple replications, to limit the impact on our assumptions of any element of the financial reporting structure, that is, the motivational forces and economic conditions.
Summary
In light of these studies, improving the quality of financial reporting based on high-quality accounting standards and improving equivalence are some of the benefits provided by the proponents of IFRS. In any case, the natural bias of the above review with respect to the informed application of IFRS led to a consideration of whether positive results can be added to the benefit of mandatory entities. Unlike traditional methods of informed use of IFRS, such as those of others (Hribar et al., 2014), more and more countries are following in the footsteps of their predecessors, such as Australia and the European Union, by making retention mandatory for companies in their countries. As a result, these companies are legally required to move to IFRS and have so far had little impact. (Iatridis, 2010) and (Chua et al., 2012) have met with lavish opposition to IAS by companies applying them. In particular, for the 279 companies that refer to the application of IAS in their annual accounts, is examining these accounting policies for consistency with the main IAS accounts.
Conclusion
Accounting standards and their frameworks are key elements that affect the quality of the financial statements. The results of detailed research on the effects of obtaining IFRS on the quality of financial reporting, as well as clear national factors and clear fixed variables, should be decoded. Research on the impact of the choice of IFRS on the quality of financial reporting is essential but not sufficient; the question is not whether IFRS improves the quality of financial reporting. Further research is needed on the results of improving the quality of data presented in financial statements.
The widespread use of IFRS around this time frame, which was endorsed in 2002 by the IAS Regulation, has opened the door to a number of observational studies examining different views on the deliberate or mandatory use of IFRS. In response to the proposed benefits of using IFRS, which were seen as more similar and straightforward in financial reporting, the application of IFRS should lead to improved accounting data. The main objective of our paper is to analyse the impact of the transition from national accounting standards to IFRS on the quality of financial reporting in Europe in order to design this operation. Our research presents the measures used by experts to assess the quality of financial reporting and describes the factors that determine the quality of financial information. All of the hypothesis are accepted as the findings support the accounting standard as a vital tool to maintain the quality of accounting results in an organisation. However the results are more reliable whenever the organisation follow IAS although it can be concluded that whenever organisation follow IAS the accounting system will be strengthen. 
References

Abdul‐Baki, Z. and Haniffa, R., 2019. The impact of accounting reform on accounting quality: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting.
Ahmed, A.S., Neel, M. and Wang, D., 2010. Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality. Preliminary evidence. Document de travail non publié, disponible à l’adresse Internet suivante: http://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers. cfm.
Ahmed, A.S., Neel, M. and Wang, D., 2013. Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), pp.1344-1372.
Ames, D., 2013. IFRS adoption and accounting quality: The case of South Africa. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 3(3), pp.154-165.
Barth, M.E., Landsman, W., Lang, M. and Williams, C., 2006. Accounting quality: International accounting standards and US GAAP. Manuscript, Stanford University, pp.1-46.
Barth, M.E., Landsman, W.R. and Lang, M.H., 2006. International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality.
Chen, H., Tang, Q., Jiang, Y. and Lin, Z., 2010. The role of international financial reporting standards in accounting quality: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of international financial management & accounting, 21(3), pp.220-278.
Christensen, H.B., Lee, E., Walker, M. and Zeng, C., 2015. Incentives or standards: What determines accounting quality changes around IFRS adoption?. European Accounting Review, 24(1), pp.31-61.
Chua, Y.L., Cheong, C.S. and Gould, G., 2012. The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on accounting quality: Evidence from Australia. Journal of International accounting research, 11(1), pp.119-146.
Ebaid, I.E.S., 2016. International accounting standards and accounting quality in code-law countries. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance.
Hribar, P., Kravet, T. and Wilson, R., 2014. A new measure of accounting quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), pp.506-538.
Iatridis, G., 2010. International Financial Reporting Standards and the quality of financial statement information. International review of financial analysis, 19(3), pp.193-204.
Isidro, H., Nanda, D. and Wysocki, P., 2019. On the relation between financial reporting quality and country attributes: Research challenges and opportunities. The Accounting Review.
Mnif Sellami, Y. and Gafsi, Y., 2019. Institutional and economic factors affecting the adoption of international public sector accounting standards. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), pp.119-131.
Păşcan, I.D., 2015. Measuring the effects of IFRS adoption on accounting quality: A review. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, pp.580-587.
Rathore, S., 2019. International accounting. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Valentincic, A., Novak, A. and Kosi, U., 2017. Accounting quality in private firms during the transition towards international standards. Accounting in Europe, 14(3), pp.358-387.