Write a project report about High-Performance Computing(HPC) architecture. 

SimplifiedSubmission Template for ACM Papers*

Insert Your Subtitle Here

First A. Author

First Department Name, First Institution/University Name, City, State, Country, email@email.com

Executive Summary/Abstract

100-200 words describing what has been done, main observations and results.

KEYWORDS

Insert comma delimited author-supplied keyword list, Keyword number 2, Keyword number 3, Keyword number 4

Introduction:

This section includes a longer summary of what has been done, main observations and results. The report introduction should briefly discuss how the used techniques are different from previous work on the topic.

Background/Related Work

This submission version of your paper should not have headers or footers, Baldassare (2000). It should remain in a one-column format—please do not alter any of the styles or margins.[footnoteRef:1] [1: Footnote when needed.]

Subsection example

There are two types of math equations: the numbered display math equation and the un-numbered display math equation. Below are examples of both.[footnoteRef:2] [2: Foot print 2 if needed]

(1)

Methodology
Describe your understanding of the main contributions of the topic you are reporting on: what was done, how it was done, how it works, etc. Provide architectural diagrams, charts and figures where necessary with proper citation.

Figure 3: Example of the “Large Float” feature.
Figure 4: Large figure spanning in both the columns in final version.
Experiment Results/Observations
Depending on the topic you are reporting on, you will need to include a description of the experimental setup (if included in the original paper you are reviewing). Aim to be concise and utilize graphs to show any improvements. Include a summary of results analysis: what the results mean and the trends that are revealed
Conclusions and Future Work
Include here a brief summary of the work and results. Include any future work that is expected or could be done.
REFERENCES
[1] Patricia S. Abril and Robert Plant. 2007. The patent holder’s dilemma: Buy, sell, or troll? Commun. ACM 50, 1 (Jan. 2007), 36-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1188913.1188915
[2] Sarah Cohen, Werner Nutt, and Yehoshua Sagic. 2007. Deciding equivalences among conjunctive aggregate queries. J. ACM 54, 2, Article 5 (April 2007), 50 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1219092.1219093.
[3] David Kosiur. 2001. Understanding Policy-Based Networking (2nd. ed.). Wiley, New York, NY.
[4] Sten Andler. 1979. Predicate path expressions. In Proceedings of the 6th. ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL ’79). ACM Press, New York, NY, 226-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/567752.567774.

3
2
2
4
4
2
-±-
–
bbac
bac
a

* http://www.ann.ece.ufl.edu/courses/eel5764_10fal/project.html

CSCI 450 Computer Architecture Report
Topics

1. FPGA

2. RISC-V

3. High Performance Computing (HPC) architectures

4. Security microarchitectures and related vulnerabilities

Expectations
1. Choose a topic from the above list

2. Read relevant paper(s) on the topic

3. Write a technical report demonstrating your understanding of the paper(s)

4. Submit the report by the deadline

Requirements
To help prepare you for writing technical documents in the future, you will write your project

paper in a simplified ACM format with one column, fully justified text. The simplified ACM template is

provided on myleoonline in the project module. Your report should be approximately 5-6 pages,

mimicking a research paper. Your report will basically contain the following sections (which can be

adjusted depending on what you are reporting on)*

• Abstract or executive summary: 100-200 words describing what has been done and results.

• Introduction: This section includes a longer summary of what has been done, main observations

and results. The report introduction should briefly discuss how the used techniques are different

from previous work on the topic.

• Background/Related work: This section includes summaries of previous related work including

references to the papers and other resources you needed to explore to fully understand the

topic you are reporting on. Include references to these resources in the references se ction. In

this section, you should aim to describe how the work you are reporting on is different and how

it improves and/or extends previous methods. This section could be included in the

• Methodology: Describe your understanding of the main contributions of the topic you are

reporting on: what was done, how it was done, how it works, etc. Provide architectural

diagrams, charts, and figures where necessary with proper citation.

• Experiment Results/Observations: Depending on the topic you are reporting on, you may need
to include a description of the experimental setup (if included in the original paper you are

reviewing). Aim to be concise and utilize graphs to show any improvements. Include a summary

of results analysis: what the results mean and the trends that are revealed.

• Conclusions and Future Work: Include here a summary of the work and results. Include

any future work that is expected or could be done.

• Acknowledgments (Optional): Acknowledge any person that helped with your research that is

not listed as an author.

• References: List of papers and resources cited throughout your report.

You should compose the report using your own words: do not directly copy from the
material of the paper you are reporting on. In the case that you quote the words of the

original authors, use quotation marks “ ” and add a reference number. If you cite any

work other than the provided paper, you should use a standard citation format. Please

maintain the template format in terms of font type, size, line spacing and page margins.

Grading Criteria
Report structure: 10% Follow the template as is

Report content: 70% Report content showcasing your understanding of the

original author’s ideas. How you explain the paper’s ideas

clearly (You do not have to explain every detail).

Report quality: 20% Grammar, sentence construction, coherency

Other Guidelines
• You need to submit the report in both PDF and MS Word format.

• Any report that is corrupted and/or cannot be opened will receive zero points.

• Reports that fail plagiarism check will receive zero points.

• Late submission will result in 25% penalty for every day you are late.

• If you have any questions, contact the instructor or the GA immediately.