There are 2 parts to this discussion. Details on what is expected in both parts is found below the prompt.
Prompt (Use your imagination!):
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Discussion Board For Anatomy and Physiology
Just from $13/Page
You are a space tourist traveling to a distant planet when a malfunction occurs on your spaceship. All will need to exit the ship within a day. You will take an emergency escape pod to one of the planets nearby.
Your friend bets you that they can accurately describe the integumentary system of the organisms on the planet you are going to stop at. Little does your friend know that you have been studying the integumentary system.
Based on your knowledge of the human integumentary system, what do you think the integumentary systems of the organisms on this planet would be like? What will you see?
Choose one planet below and using the features of the human integumentary system, consider how that system may be altered for survival in these conditions.
1. Planet Aridosol: Hot, dry, windy
Temperature range: 9
5
-115 degrees Fahrenheit
Wind range: 50-65 mph daily
Sunlight range: 20-24 hours a day (in a 24hr day)
Precipitation range: 2 short rainy seasons 10” a year. One lake highly saline.
2. Planet Histosol: Tropical, heavy vegetation, heavy rainfall
Temperature range: 75-95 degrees Fahrenheit. High humidity
Wind: very little
Sunlight: 18 hours a day but little gets through the trees. A shady planet
Precipitation range: Heavy, 1-2” per day
3. Planet Gelisol: Cold, gusty, icy
Temperature range: -35-20 degrees Fahrenheit
Wind range: 30-45 mph, gusts up to 80mph
Sunlight range: 14 hours a day (in a 24hr day)
Precipitation range: mild, snow/ice 3-5” per month
There is no perfect answer, but here are a few things to consider:
-Layers of the skin
-Cellular activity within the layers
-Depth of certain structures
-How the integumentary system may affect other organ systems in the body
-You may want to look at the animal kingdom for some ideas
Through this 2 part discussion with your classmates, you will state your planet choice, explain how the integumentary system (the alteration you think you will see) would affect the survival of these organisms using appropriate and sufficient evidence, and then respond to your classmates posts to convince them your alterations will most likely be seen. In other words, you need to know why your description is the most advantageous. You want to win the bet! Use science to win!
Remember, no answer is one hundred percent correct so you are not saying that others are wrong, but instead why your description is more optimal based on evidence of how the integumentary system works.
Part 1: Initial Post (Worth up to 50 points)
·
Length: 250-500 words
· State your planet choice and explain why you chose the integumentary alterations for survival there. When stating the evidence, consider the challenges that others may have to your evidence and how you could counter those respectful challenges.
· You will need to use at least 3 reputable scientific references to support your post (not including your textbook). Reputable sources= peer reviewed scientific journal articles, accredited websites, or books. Google, Wikipedia, etc. are not acceptable sources.
Part 2: Responses (Worth up to 50 points)
Comment on at least 2 classmate’s discussion submissions.
· Each comment must be 150-200 words!
· Evaluate their post
· You are either adding more evidence to a post that made the same choice as you or challenging another choice (respectfully) with evidence.
·
Offer questions or substantive responses to what is said. Offer Research and share information that backs or refutes a point being made (“Good Jobs”, or “I agree” are NOT allowed as your response!!).
· You may also let your classmate know why they may have changed your mind about a part of the integumentary system.
See last page for charts to use to organize your thoughts. This is for you and not to be handed in.
How will I be graded?
The rubric to this assignment is located in the same spot on Blackboard where this guideline is located, as a separate document. Take a look prior to starting the assignment and let your instructor know if you have any questions regarding expectations.
What kind of sources should you use?
Your information must be credible, accurate, and well supported by evidence. The best sources of information are the research journals and the books as well as webpages maintained by professional societies and organizations. Search for articles and academic material should start with the electronic databases of libraries such as
FTCC’s Paul H. Thompson Library
(opens new window),
PubMed
(opens new window) or other such resources. When in doubt about material, use
CARS checklist
(opens new window) to see if it can be used in discussions and writings.
Don’t forget to CITE!
You must cite all sources. Citation format must be MLA or APA (Visit the
Purdue Owl Writing Lab
(opens new window) for instructions on proper formatting)
Examples: In science we primarily use APA. These are basic examples of common citations. Please see the Purdue Owl (linked above) for more details/examples.
In-text citation: When you are paraphrasing from an author, so whenever you a
taking information form a source and putting it in your own words.
According to Jones (1998), APA style is a difficult citation format for first-time learners.
In-text citation quote: If you are taking a quote, you need to include the page number:
According to Jones (1998), “students often had difficulty using APA style, especially when it was their first time” (p. 199).
Reference Page: At the end of the document, you want to make sure you reference all of the sources you took information from.
Article:
Scruton, R. (1996). The eclipse of listening. The New Criterion, 15(3), 5–13
Book:
Stoneman, R. (2008). Alexander the Great: A life in legend. Yale University Press
Electronic Source/Website:
Price, D. (2018, March 23). Laziness does not exist. Medium.
https://humanparts.medium.com/laziness-does-not-exist-3af27e312d01
5
Discussion Board Rubric: Total possible point value
10
0
|
Categories
|
Excellent
100%
|
Sufficient
80%
|
Needs Improvement
60%
|
Not Evident
0%
|
Total Value
|
|
Initial Post
|
Clear, strong, and supported explanation of the prompt and all components.
There is an adaptation to the skeletal system that is supported with scientifically based evidence. There is a description both anatomically and physiologically.
4
0 points
|
Explanation is clear, but is incomplete or unsupported.
There is an adaptation to the skeletal system that is supported with scientifically based evidence. The description includes either anatomical or physiological aspects.
32 points
|
Explanation is unclear, incomplete, and not supported.
There may be adaptations described but not to the skeletal system.
24 points
|
No explanation
0 points
|
40
|
|
Response Posts
|
A minimum of two responses are used and sufficient detail is used (150-
20
0 words). Comments are thoughtful, reflective, and respectful of other’s postings
30
points
|
Two responses that are not reflective of the topic or other students posting. Either or both are less than 100 words.
24 points
|
One response is used or two responses show a minimum effort in reading and understanding other student’s post. (e.g. “I agree with Bill”)
1
8 points
|
No responses
0 points
|
30
|
|
Sources
|
The required number of sources are provided (minimum of 3, not including textbook). All sources used for quotes, statistics, and facts are credible and cited correctly.
20 points
|
Fewer than required number of sources are provided. Most sources used for quotes, statistics, and facts are credible and cited correctly.
16 points
|
Only 1 or 2 sources are provided. Not all sources used are credible and not all are cited correctly.
12 points
|
Sources are not cited at all, are not credible, and/or are not cited correctly.
0 points
|
20
|
|
Writing Mechanics
|
Post is of required length. Author makes fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content
10 points
|
Post is at least one half of the required length. Author makes 2-3 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content
8 points
|
Post is about one fourth of the required length. Author makes 4-5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
6 points
|
Post is less than one fourth of required length. Author makes more than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 points
|
10
|
