Professional Context
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria:
- Competency 1: Transformation: Facilitate a change process that effectively involves patients, communities, and professionals in the improvement and delivery of health care and wellness.
Align a problem statement, performance indicators, and outcome measures with an organizational strategic need.
Provide evidence-based leadership recommendations for problem resolution and organizational transformation.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Data Review Project Report ( NO PLAGIARISM!!!)
Just from $13/Page
- Competency 2: Execution: Translate strategy to develop and maintain optimal organizational performance in health care settings.
Write a concise, substantive summary of current and relevant authoritative literature.
Analyze performance data and trends.
Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature.
- Competency 3: People: Create an organizational climate that values and supports employees and colleagues in health care settings.
Articulate the value of a data review project to an organization and to one’s professional health care leadership competency development goals.
Instructions
Develop your data review project final report, as revised from the Unit 8 discussion. Use the Data Review Project Report Template linked in the Resources, for your report outline.
This report should be succinct, substantive, and written for a hypothetical executive leadership team. It is not a lengthy academic paper. Authoritative, evidence-based sources should be integrated into the Evidence-Based Recommendations and Conclusion sections of the report.
Update your initial Unit 3 proposal to reflect that this is a final report. Specifically, provide a minimum of three visual data summaries (for example, pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, and process map), two evidence-based recommendations from the literature, and one new insight. Place these additions in your document under the headings: Data Display, Recommendations, and Conclusion.
Include and label the following appendices:
- Leadership Component.
- Timeline.
- Project Information.
Readers of your final report should have a clear picture of your data summary, recommendations, insights, and the potential impact on the organization. Remember to update the table of contents.
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your final report addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Data Review Project Report Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.
- Align the problem statement, performance indicators, and outcome measures with an organizational strategic need.
What additional information would strengthen the alignment and make it more explicit?
- Write a concise, substantive summary of current and relevant authoritative literature.
Provide sufficient breadth and depth in the summary to adequately cover the selected topic.
Consider adding additional best practice sources to your initial review of a current literature.
- Articulate the value of a data review project to an organization and to one’s professional health care leadership competency development goals.
Consider a strategic, systems perspective when contemplating value to the organization.
Express main points, assertions, and conclusions clearly and effectively.
What evidence do you have to support your conclusions?
- Analyze performance data and trends.
Review quality improvement concepts such as performance indicators, metrics, and benchmarks.
Present your visual data displays, along with a concise analysis.
Describe the significant findings, trends, and any new insights evident from the data summaries.
Are there any limitations to your findings, obstacles to collection or interpretation of data, or potential for bias?
Is the data valid and reliable?
- Provide evidence-based leadership recommendations for problem resolution and organizational transformation.
Identify a short list of interventions to solve the problem, supported by a current (published within the past 3–5 years) authoritative literature.
Consider how legal, regulatory, ethical, patient safety, and organizational factors are related to the problem.
Your recommendations should be realistic, within the organization’s capability, and should not be based upon uncertain funding sources, such as government grants, which might be discontinued.
Your recommendations should be sufficiently compelling to convince the target audience to implement them.
Most importantly, your conclusion should include a clear statement about how the project added value to the organization and aligned with the organization’s strategic direction and goals.
- Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature.
Apply correct APA formatting to your source citations.
Consider how or why a particular evidence supports your main points, claims, or conclusions.
Is your supporting evidence clear and explicit?
2
>Data Review Project Report Template
Your Data Review Project Report should include the following elements:
Cover Page: Include the project topic, the course title, your name, the date, the instructor’s name, the client organization, and the contact person to whom the report is submitted.
Table of Contents: Include all headings, sub-headings, a list of figures and tables, a list of appendices, and right-justified page numbers.
Executive Summary:
1
–2 pages, double-spaced, with the title Executive Summary: [Final project title]. Include the explicit, succinct purpose, focus of the project, the rationale for the project, the method to examine the data (data review), metrics for performance measurement, and a specific outcomes data summary statement. It is important that your executive summary reflects how the project added value to the organization.
Abstract: 500 words or less.
Introductory paragraph: Clearly convey the purpose and focus of the project, the order in which topics will be introduced, and a transition sentence to the body of the document. [Identify the condition that] contributes to [identify the adverse consequence] (source, year).
Review of the literature: Identify the authoritative sources used to justify the purpose and focus of your data review, summarized in short statements, with citations.
Body of the data review: Use headings and sub-headings, which should also be reflected in the table of contents. Customize the following examples of suggested content areas according to your project:
Focus.
Situational analysis: State the context for the project. What are the organizational considerations and context?
Rationale for engaging in the project.
Description of data measured for the project.
· Method or framework utilized.
· Units used to measure data. These must be explicitly stated, precise, and easy to locate.
· At least three visual data summaries displayed in charts, graphs, tables, or other format, with accompanying discussion.
Analysis of data and rationale for your interpretation. Are there limitations to your findings, obstacles to collection or interpretation of data, or potential for bias?
Analyze the validity and reliability of your data.
Recommendations for the future: Provide a minimum of two evidence-based recommendations supported by current (within the past 3–5 years) authoritative literature. Your recommendations should be realistic, within the organization’s capability, and should not be based upon uncertain funding sources, such as government grants, which might be discontinued.
Conclusion: Present your results and findings, recommendations, and leadership insights. Most importantly, your conclusion should include a clear statement about how the project added value to, and was aligned with, the organization.
Reference List: List relevant, credible, peer-reviewed sources in correct APA format. All links for web resources must be active (working). Wikipedia and secondary source literature are not acceptable for this report.
Appendices: Each appendix should have a letter and a title, as in this example, “Appendix A: Situational Analysis Using Porter’s Model.”
Note: Add, in an appendix, the balanced scorecard table that you had created in Assignment 1.
Signatures:
____________________________________________________________________________
Proposal Reviewer’s Signature and Date
____________________________________________________________________________
Learner’s Signature and Date
1
2
