| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| HCA-515 |
HCA-515-O500 |
| Collaborative Team |
-Based Health Care Delivery Paper
130.0 |
| Criteria |
Percentage |
1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) |
2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) |
3: Satisfactory (79.00%) |
4: Good (87.00%) |
5: Excellent (100.00%) |
Comments |
Points Earned |
| Content |
70.0% |
| Patient Case |
|
|
| 5.0% |
A description of the patient case is not present. |
|
| N/A |
N/A N/A
A description of the patient case is present. |
Collaborative Team
|
|
| 15.0% |
A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is incomplete. |
A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is incomplete or incorrect. |
A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is complete. |
A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is complete and includes supporting details. |
A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Indicators and Determinants of Health |
|
| 10.0% |
A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is incomplete. |
A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is incomplete or incorrect. |
A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is complete but lacks supporting details. |
An explanation of A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is complete and includes supporting details. |
A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Management and Line Staff |
10.0%
A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is incomplete. |
A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is incomplete or incorrect. |
A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is complete but lacks supporting details. |
A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is complete and includes supporting details. |
A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Financial and Resource Challenges |
15.0%
An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is incomplete. |
An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is incomplete or incorrect. |
An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is complete but lacks supporting details. |
An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is complete and includes supporting details. |
An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Advantages |
15.0%
A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is incomplete. |
A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is incomplete or incorrect. |
A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is complete but lacks supporting details. |
A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is complete and includes supporting details. |
A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Organization and Effectiveness |
20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose |
7.0% |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction |
8.0% |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
5.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
Format 10.0%
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
5.0%
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
5.0%
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage |
100% |
