PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:
1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment: Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders
Just from $13/Page
2). ATLEAST 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS
3). PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENT FOR RUBRIC DETAILS.
4). Please carefully review the grading rubric and focus on the “Excellent” column, and please include each component in the assignment as required. Also, please follow APA writing rules and style.
5). Please Include the Title page, Introduction, purpose statement, Literature Review, conclusion, and reference page.
Thank you.
heart disease remains the No. 1 killer in America; nearly half of all Americans have high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or smoke—some of the leading risk factors for heart disease…
—Murphy et al., 2018
Despite the high mortality rates associated with cardiovascular disorders, improved treatment options do exist that can help address those risk factors that afflict the majority of the population today.
As an advanced practice nurse, it is your responsibility to recommend appropriate treatment options for patients with cardiovascular disorders. To ensure the safety and effectiveness of drug therapy, advanced practice nurses must consider aspects that might influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes such as medical history, other drugs currently prescribed, and individual patient factors.
Reference: Murphy, S. L., Xu, J., Kochanek, K. D., & Arias, E. (2018). Mortality in the United States, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db328.htm
To Prepare
- Review the Resources for this module and consider the impact of potential pharmacotherapeutics for cardiovascular disorders introduced in the media piece.
- Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment.
- Select one of the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior factors.
- Reflect on how the factor you selected might influence the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
- Consider how changes in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
- Think about how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Reflect on whether you would modify the current drug treatment or provide an alternative treatment option for the patient.
Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
- Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.
- Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.
- Explain how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.
After you’ve made changes to the current drug list, you are required to provide a Revised Drug List
Patient Case:
Case Study
Patient AO has a history of obesity and has recently gained 9 pounds. The patient has been diagnosed with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Drugs currently prescribed include the following:
- Atenolol 12.5 mg daily
- Doxazosin 8 mg daily
- Hydralazine 10 mg qid
- Sertraline 25 mg daily
- Simvastatin 80 mg daily
Provide an explanation for the drug changes to the patient’s current list at
the end of the post:
EXAMPLE of a Revised Drug List.
Drug 10mg 1 tab bid
Drug 20mg I tab q day.
Drug No change
Add Drug 2 mg hs
DC Drug
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name:
| |
NURS_6521_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Fair
|
Poor
|
Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.
|
Points:
Points Range:
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and completely explains in detail how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response provides a basic explanation of how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient, or is missing.
Feedback:
|
Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.
|
Points:
Points Range:
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response accurately and completely describes in detail how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
Accurate, complete, and aligned examples are provided to support the response.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response accurately describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
Accurate examples may be provided to support the response.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
Inaccurate or vague examples are provided to support the response.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy, or is missing.
Inaccurate and vague examples may be provided to support the response, or is missing.
Feedback:
|
Explain how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan, and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.
|
Points:
Points Range:
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan.
The response includes an accurate and detailed explanation to support the recommended improvements.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response accurately explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan.
The response may include an accurate explanation to support the recommended improvements.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan.
The response may include an inaccurate, vague, or misaligned explanation to support the recommended improvements.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan, or is missing.
The response may include an inaccurate and vague explanation to support the recommended improvements, or is missing.
Feedback:
|
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
Feedback:
|
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
Feedback:
|
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3–4) APA format errors
Feedback:
|
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
Feedback:
|
Show Descriptions
Show Feedback
Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and completely explains in detail how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
Good
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response provides a basic explanation of how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
Fair
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
Poor
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient, or is missing.
Feedback:
Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response accurately and completely describes in detail how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
Accurate, complete, and aligned examples are provided to support the response.
Good
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response accurately describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
Accurate examples may be provided to support the response.
Fair
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
Inaccurate or vague examples are provided to support the response.
Poor
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy, or is missing.
Inaccurate and vague examples may be provided to support the response, or is missing.
Feedback:
Explain how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan, and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan.
The response includes an accurate and detailed explanation to support the recommended improvements.
Good
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response accurately explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan.
The response may include an accurate explanation to support the recommended improvements.
Fair
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan.
The response may include an inaccurate, vague, or misaligned explanation to support the recommended improvements.
Poor
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan, or is missing.
The response may include an inaccurate and vague explanation to support the recommended improvements, or is missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
Good
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Fair
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Poor
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
Good
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
Fair
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
Poor
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors
Good
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors
Fair
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3–4) APA format errors
Poor
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
Feedback:
Name: NURS_6521_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
