Is there anybody that can complete this assignment for me for $30 due monday at 9am. Attached is the assignment. 

JWI530: Financial Management I

Assignment 2

© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This course
guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

530 – Assignment 2 (1198) Page 1 of 6

Assignment 2: Cost-Benefit Analysis
Parts A and B Due Sunday, Midnight of Week 10 (25% of Final Grade)

Overview

In this assignment, you will take on the role of a senior member of the finance team assigned to lead the

investment committee of a medium-sized telecommunications equipment manufacturer. Your team is

evaluating a “make-versus-buy” decision that has the potential to improve the company’s competitiveness,

but which requires a significant capital investment in new equipment.

The assignment is organized into two

parts:

Part A: Data calculations based on the information in the scenarios

Part B: Recommendations based on the calculations

Opportunity Details

The new equipment would allow your company to manufacture a critical component in-house instead of

buying it from a supplier. This capability would help you stabilize your supply chain (which has suffered from

some irregularities and quality issues in the past). It could also have a positive impact on profitability through

the absorption of fixed costs since this new machine will have plenty of excess capacity. There may even be

a possibility that the company could leverage this capability to create a new external revenue stream by

providing services to other companies.

The company has been growing steadily over the past 5 years, and the financials and future prospects look

good. Your CEO has asked you to run the numbers. After doing some digging into the business, you have

gathered information on the following:

 The estimated purchase price for the equipment required to move the operation in-house would be

$500,000. Additional net working capital to support production (in the form of cash used in Inventory,

AR net of AP) would be needed in the amount of $25,000 per year starting in year 0 and through all 5

years of the project to support production.

 The current spending on this component (i.e. annual spend pool) is $875,000. The estimated cash

flow savings of bringing the process in-house is 20% or annual savings of $175,000. This includes

the additional labor and overhead costs required.

 Your company has access to a credit line and could borrow the funds at a rate of 6%.

 Finally, the equipment required is anticipated to have a somewhat short useful life, as a new wave of

technology is on the horizon. Therefore, it is anticipated that the equipment will be sold after five

years for $25,000. (i.e. the terminal value).

JWI 530: Financial Management I

Assignment 2

© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This course
guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

530 – Assignment 2 (1198) Page 2 of 6

Input from Stakeholders

As part of your research, you have sought input from a number of stakeholders. Each has raised important
points to consider in your analysis and recommendation. Some of the points and assumptions are purely
financial. Others touch on additional concerns and opportunities.

1. Ann, your colleague from Accounting, recommends using the base assumptions above: 5-year

project life, flat annual savings, and 9% discount rate. Ann does not feel the equipment will have any

terminal value due to advancements in technology.

2. Steve from Sales is convinced that this capability would create a new revenue stream that could

significantly offset operating expenses. He recommends savings that grow each year: 5-year project

life, 10% discount rate, and an 8% compounded annual savings growth in years 2 through 5. In other

words, instead of assuming savings stay flat, assume that they will grow by 8% in year 2, and then

grow another 8% over year 2 in year 3, and so on.

3. Ellen from Engineering believes we use a higher Discount Rate because of the risk of this type of

project. As such, she is recommending a 5-year project life and flat annual savings. Ellen suggests

that even though the equipment is brand new, the updated production process could have a negative

impact on other parts of the overall manufacturing costs. She argues that, while it is

difficult to

quantify the potential negative impacts, to account for the risk, a 14% discount rate should be used.

4. Peter, the Product Manager, is convinced the new capability will allow better control of quality

and

on-time delivery, and that it will last longer than 5 years. He recommends using a 7 Year Equipment

Life (which means a 7-year project and savings life), flat annual savings, and 10% discount rate. In

other words, assume that the machine will last 2 more years and deliver 2 more years of savings.

Peter also feels the equipment will have an estimated terminal value of $15,000 at the end of its 7-

year useful life.

5. Owen, the head of Operations, is concerned that instead of stabilizing the supply chain, it will just add

another process to be managed, and will distract from the core competencies the company currently

has. He feels the company should focus on improving communication and supply chain management

with its current vendor, and he feels confident he can negotiate a discount of 4% off of the annual

outsourcing cost of $875,000 if he lets it be known they are considering taking over this step of the

process. As there is little risk associated with Owen’s proposal due to no upfront capital requirements,

a lower risk-free discount rate of 7% would be appropriate. Owen feels that any price reductions from

the current vendor will last for five years. (NOTE: because there is no “investment”, the Payback and

IRR metrics are not meaningful…simply provide the NPV of the Savings cash flows).

JWI 530: Financial Management I
Assignment 2

© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This course
guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

530 – Assignment 2 (1198) Page 3 of 6

PART A: Data Calculations

Using the data presented above (and ignoring the extraneous information), for this profit and supply chain

improvement project, calculate each of the following (where applicable):

 Nominal Payback

 Discounted Payback

 Net Present Value

 Internal Rate of Return

Scenario Nominal Payback Discounted Payback Net Present Value Internal Rate of

Return

#1: Ann

#2: Steve

#3: Ellen

#4: Peter

#5: Owen

N/A

N/A

N/A

Submission Requirements

Present your calculations and results either in an Excel Spreadsheet or in Word (using tables and headers to

organize the information in a way that is clear and easy to read). Be sure to show your detailed calculations.

If you get something wrong, you may still be able to get partial credit.

JWI 530: Financial Management I
Assignment 2

© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This course
guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

530 – Assignment 2 (1198) Page 4 of 6

Part B: Recommendations

After completing the calculations for all scenarios, create a brief memo to the CEO outlining your committee’s

recommendations. You may organize the memo as you see fit, but it must include the following:

 A clear opening statement of your recommendation for or against the project.

 A brief synopsis of the processes and factors that led to your recommendations.

o What information did you gather, and how did you get it?

o From whom did you seek input, and why?

 A summary of the strategic benefits and risks in pursuing (or not pursuing) this project, including:

o Highlights of the main data points that support your position

o Acknowledgement of the data points that oppose your argument

o Identification of open/unresolved items

 An identification of the scenario that, from a purely financial perspective, represents the most

accurate estimate of the anticipated results and your rationale as to why.

 An identification of non-financial elements that need to be considered for the recommended scenario.

 Any assumptions in project economics can have a significant impact on the result. Identify 3 financial

elements/assumptions in your analysis that would make this project financially unattractive. Be as

transparent and candid with your BOD as possible. What would have to be true for this to be a bad

investment?

 A summary restating your recommendation and key action items.

Submission Requirements

 Your memo should be no more than 2 pages, single-spaced, using 10- or 12-point font.

 Focus on the rationale for your recommendations. Include key numbers to support your

recommendations, but do no re-present all your calculations.

JWI 530: Financial Management I
Assignment 2

© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This course
guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

530 – Assignment 2 (1198) Page 5 of 6

RUBRIC

25% of Course

Grade

Assignment 2, Parts A and B

Criteria Unsatisfactory Low Pass Pass High Pass Honors

1. Correct answers

for the

investment

recommendation

scenarios.

Weight: 30%

Did not

demonstrate

understanding,

either by not

submitting, or by

calculating 8 or

fewer answers

correctly.

Partially

demonstrated

understanding by

calculating 9 to

10 answers

correctly.

Satisfactorily

demonstrated
understanding by

calculating 11 to

12 answers

correctly.

Demonstrated a

high level of

understanding by

calculating 13 to

14 answers

correctly.

Demonstrated

exemplary

understanding by

calculating 15 or

more answers

correctly.

2. Showed work

for calculations

for the
investment
recommendation
scenarios.

Weight: 20%

Does not show

work and/or has

significant errors

and shortcomings

of

process, order

and calculation of

metrics.

Incorrectly
demonstrates

process,

order and

calculation and has
many

errors.

Demonstrates

basic level of

understanding of

process, order and

calculation, but

may have some

errors.

Shows process,

order and

calculation that

mostly supports

generation of the

required metrics.

Fully and

Completely shows

process, order
and calculation of

the required

metrics

3. Analyzed the

investment

opportunity

leveraging the

supplied data

sets, and

provided clear,

well-reasoned

recommendation

s to the CEO.

Weight: 40%

Did not submit, or

incompletely

analyzed the

investment

options and did

not address the

key questions or

explain

recommendations.

Provided minimal,

basic analysis

and

recommendations

addressing 3 or

fewer of the

required memo

components and

options.

Provided good

analysis and

recommendations

addressing at

least 4 of the

required memo
components and

options.

Provided

excellent analysis

and
recommendations

addressing all

required memo
components and

all 5 options.

Provided
exemplary
analysis and
recommendations
addressing all
required memo
components and

all 5 options;

included additional

insights drawing

on learning from

outside sources

and demonstrating

excellent business

sense.

JWI 530: Financial Management I
Assignment 2

© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This course
guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

530 – Assignment 2 (1198) Page 6 of 6

4. Professionally

communicated

with clear

writing; concise

and free of

mechanical

errors.

Weight: 10%

Written

communication

does not flow,

and/or fails to

justify or

express

recommendations;

multiple

mechanical errors;

much of the

communication is

difficult to

understand.

Written

communication is

basic; fails to

clearly connect

conclusions and

assertions to

data; has several

mechanical errors

making parts of

the text difficult to

understand.
Written

communication

flows well, but

lacks conciseness

or clarity in places;

assertions and

conclusions are

generally justified

and explained;

contains several

minor grammatical

errors.

Written
communication

flows well;

concisely and

clearly expresses

recommendations

in a

manner that

rationally and

logically develops

the topics; there

are a few

mechanical
errors.
Written
communication is

excellent;

concisely and
clearly expresses
recommendations

in an exemplary

manner that
rationally and
logically develops

the topics; free of

mechanical errors.