The interpretation of research in health care is essential to decision-making. By understanding research, health care providers can identify risk factors, trends, outcomes for treatment, health care costs, and best practices. To be effective in evaluating and interpreting research, the reader must first understand how to interpret the findings. You will practice article analysis in Topics 2, 3, and 5.
For this assignment:
On the three articles attached with this question, complete and fill an article analysis for each using the “Article Analysis” template attached with this question.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.
Article Analysis 1
Article Citation and Permalink (APA format)
Article 1
Article
2
Article 3
Point
Description
Description
Description
Broad Topic Area/Title
Identify Independent and Dependent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables
Population of Interest for the Study
Sample
Sampling Method
Descriptive Statistics (Mean, Median, Mode; Standard Deviation)
Identify examples of descriptive statistics in the article.
Inferential Statistics
Identify examples of inferential statistics in the article.
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2
Article Analysis 1
Article Citation and Permalink (APA format)
Article 1
Article
2
Article 3
Point
Description
Description
Description
Broad Topic Area/Title
Identify Independent and Dependent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables
Population of Interest for the Study
Sample
Sampling Method
Descriptive Statistics (Mean, Median, Mode; Standard Deviation)
Identify examples of descriptive statistics in the article.
Inferential Statistics
Identify examples of inferential statistics in the article.
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2
Article Analysis 1
Article Citation and Permalink (APA format)
Article 1
Article
2
Article 3
Point
Description
Description
Description
Broad Topic Area/Title
Identify Independent and Dependent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables
Population of Interest for the Study
Sample
Sampling Method
Descriptive Statistics (Mean, Median, Mode; Standard Deviation)
Identify examples of descriptive statistics in the article.
Inferential Statistics
Identify examples of inferential statistics in the article.
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2
http://wjst.wu.ac.th Health Sciences
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12): 909-919.
An Integrative Literature Review of Basal-Bolus Insulin versus
Sliding-Scale Insulin for Glycemic Management in the Hospitalized
Non-Critically Ill Type 2 Diabetic Patient
Lindy HERR1 and Ladda THIAMWONG2,*
1Orlando Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Orlando, Florida, United States
2College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, United States
(*Corresponding author’s e-mail: ladda.thiamwong@ucf.edu)
Received: 22 May 2017, Revised: 11 February 2018, Accepted: 26 March 2018
Abstract
Diabetes is an increasingly common chronic disease that affects the body’s normal ability to control
blood glucose levels due to impaired use of the hormone insulin. It is estimated that one out of every 4
adults who are hospitalized also have a diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetic inpatients face unique challenges
in regards to managing their blood glucose while hospitalized due to the physiological stress of acute
illness. Unfortunately, those who experience inadequate blood glucose management in the hospital are at
an increased risk for poor patient outcomes, such as infection, increased length of stay, and death. There
are multiple medications used to regulate blood sugar levels; however, the most commonly prescribed
treatment for inpatients is the traditional sliding-scale regimen followed by the basal-bolus insulin
regimen. An integrated literature review was conducted to determine if basal-bolus insulin is more
effective than sliding-scale insulin in managing blood glucose levels of non-critically ill diabetic
inpatients. Four well-known databases were searched and 5 relevant quantitative research articles were
obtained and analyzed. The majority of the evidence supports basal-bolus insulin as the most effective
treatment for managing blood glucose and preventing hyperglycemia without increasing the risk for
hypoglycemia. Health care providers should order basal-bolus insulin accordingly in order to improve
patient outcomes. Future research that questions why sliding-scale insulin is still widely prescribed may
identify barriers related to ordering basal-bolus insulin and assist in decreasing related adverse events.
Keywords: Basal-bolus insulin, blood glucose, diabetes, glycemic control, inpatient, sliding-scale insulin
Introduction
Diabetes is a chronic condition that occurs when an individual is unable to properly produce or
utilize insulin, which leads to impaired regulation of blood glucose levels [1]. In 2017, diabetes affected
nearly 29.1 million people in the United States and approximately 1.4 million new cases have been
recognized every year across the country [1]. The pervasiveness of diabetes in the hospitalized population
is high, with an estimated 25 – 30 % of inpatients considered to have a known diagnosis of the disease [2].
Diabetics who are hospitalized for any condition affecting their health also require their diabetes to be
managed, which can be challenging considering the many factors that have the capability of promoting
abnormal blood glucose levels, such as certain medications, acute stress, or timing of insulin
administration [3]. Poor management of blood glucose levels may result in episodes of either
hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, both of which place an individual at risk for various complications [4].
Evidence supports the fact that hospitalized patients with diabetes who experience poor glycemic control
are more likely to have a greater length of inpatient stay, high hospitalization costs, preventable
complications, elevated incidence of infection, and even increased mortality [4]. Current guidelines
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
910
suggest that the target blood glucose level associated with improved clinical outcomes for inpatients is
below 180 mg/dL and below 140 mg/dL for random and fasting blood glucose levels, respectively [2].
Managing a patient blood sugar in the hospital is most often achieved by using insulin therapy
[2]. The 2 main types of insulin therapy prescribed are the traditional sliding-scale regimen and the basal-
bolus regimen [5]. A sliding-scale insulin regimen consists of the administration of a dose of insulin
based upon pre-meal blood glucose levels; research examining solely the use of sliding-scale insulin has
shown that wide variations in glucose control may occur due to the nature of this type of regimen,
especially because it is considered to be a non-individualized reactive approach to treating hyperglycemia
[5]. Meanwhile, the basal-bolus approach provides long-acting insulin doses with bolus doses at mealtime
in an attempt to mimic normal insulin levels and potentially promote tighter glycemic control [5]. Limited
research has been published that compares the efficacy and safety between these 2 types of regimens [5].
The purpose of this review is to ascertain if the administration of basal-bolus insulin is more effective
than the use of traditional sliding-scale insulin in managing blood glucose and preventing episodes of
hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia in hospitalized adults with type 2 diabetes.
Materials and methods
In order to identify published material that examined the difference between basal-bolus insulin and
sliding-scale insulin on glycemic control among non-critically ill hospitalized diabetics a thorough review
of the literature was conducted. The 4 databases searched in January and February of 2017 were Cochrane
Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, and
MEDLINE. The key words used in the search to retrieve relevant results were: (a) inpatient or
hospitalized; (b) diabetes, diabetic, type 2; (c) basal-bolus insulin; (d) sliding-scale insulin; (e) control or
management; and (f) hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.
Results were refined to include those only written in the English language between the years 2005
and 2016. Articles that were listed multiple times in the search results were removed, and the remaining
articles were scanned to ensure they satisfied the topic of interest. Literature reviews that resulted from
the search were browsed to identify potential quantitative research articles that were not identified
initially. The inclusion criteria were any quantitative research article that investigated the effectiveness of
glycemic control as determined by a blood glucose sample among adult diabetic inpatients achieved by
receiving either a sliding-scale or basal-bolus insulin regimen. Articles were excluded if they: (a)
examined inpatients of long-term care facilities; (b) analyzed the use of intravenous insulin compared to
subcutaneous insulin; (c) evaluated glycemic control based on hemoglobin A1c level; or (d) used
computer-based programs instead of actual humans to compare insulin regimens on glycemic control. The
level of evidence for the articles chosen was determined based on a rating system by Melnyk and Fineout-
Overholt [6], which is presented in the form of a hierarchy of evidence for intervention questions.
Results and discussion
The search conducted on the aforementioned databases resulted in a total of 31 articles that
contained potentially useful information for determining whether basal-bolus insulin is superior to
sliding-scale insulin in adequately managing the glucose levels of diabetic inpatients. Of the 31 articles,
10 were identified as either systematic reviews or articles that provided guidelines on glucose
management, 8 articles were concerned with the use of computerized insulin clinical decision systems or
insulin order sets, and 9 did not fully address the topic of interest or meet the overall inclusion criteria; as
a result, 4 applicable articles were obtained. Skimming the systematic reviews for possible articles that fit
the search criteria but were not found in the originally searched databases led to the discovery of one
additional piece that was ultimately included in this paper. After the comprehensive literature review was
completed, a total of 5 quantitative research articles were identified and analyzed to gather information on
which insulin regimen allows for optimal glycemic management in the diabetic inpatient (see Table 1).
The articles included possessed quality evidence and met the criteria to be designated as level IV
evidence or better based on the rating system by Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt [6]. The occurrence of
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
911
hypoglycemia or hyperglycemic episodes, and the overall degree of blood glucose management were the
outcomes that were evaluated when comparing the use of basal-bolus and sliding-scale insulin to
determine which is more suitable for inpatient use.
Table 1 An integrative literature review of basal-bolus insulin versus sliding-scale insulin for glycemic
management in the hospitalized type 2 diabetic.
Citation
Design/
Methods/
Level of
Evidence
Sample/Setting
Major variables
studied and their
definitions
Intervention Measurement Data analysis and results
Appraisal:
Worth to
practice/
Limitations
Zaman et al.,
2014
[10]
Retrospective
case-control
study.
Level IV
Convenient sampling
method identified 338
cases of patients that
were admitted to the
University of Malaya
Medical Centre
between January 2008
– December 2012 with
diagnosis of
hyperglycemia.
338 cases divided into
2 groups based on
insulin regimen.
Basal-bolus insulin (n
= 159) Sliding-scale
insulin (n = 179).
Patients included in
sample if admitted to
general medical unit
and treated with
insulin only during
admission.
Independent variables
Sliding scale regimen =
Actrapid insulin
Basal-bolus regimen =
Actrapid and Insulatard
insulin
Dependent variables
Hyperglycemia = blood
glucose > 250 mg/dL
Glycemic control =
achieved when fasting
plasma glucose obtained
in the morning was <
126 mg/dL or when pre-
meal plasma glucose
obtained before meals
was < 180 mg/dL
Case of hypoglycemia =
blood glucose < 70
mg/dL
No direct
intervention took
place, the charts of
338 patients were
retrospectively
reviewed and
grouped based on
the type of insulin
regimen they
receive while
admitted.
159 patients
admitted with
hyperglycemia
were treated with
basal-bolus insulin
(mean insulin dose
12.5, SD = 5.5
units)
179 patients were
treated with
sliding-scale
insulin (mean
insulin dose =
3.14, SD = 0.9
units/hr)
Type of insulin
administered was
not specified.
Glycemic control
was measured
between each of
the 2 insulin
regimen groups
based on their
fasting blood
glucose levels and
mean glucose
levels.
Measurements
were obtained
during treatment
according to the
American
Diabetes
Association
guidelines, no
specific
equipment listed
that was used to
obtain blood
glucose
measurement.
T-test evaluated
differences in
means between
continuous data,
which was
expressed as mean
± standard
deviation.
Basal-bolus
insulin group had
significantly lower
fasting blood
glucose and mean
glucose levels
Fasting blood
glucose:
Basal-bolus = 194
± 42 mg/dL
Sliding-scale =
210 ± 63 mg/dL
(p = 0.028)
Mean glucose:
Basal-bolus = 221
± 34 mg/dL
Sliding-scale =
230 ± 40 mg/dL
(p = 0.021)
Nonsignificant
difference between
basal-bolus and
sliding-scale
groups for
hypoglycemic
cases
(p = 0.186).
In order to
achieve glycemic
control in the
inpatient setting,
it may be best to
prescribe patients
basal-bolus
insulin regimens
and avoid sliding-
scale insulin.
Limitations:
No specific
device listed for
how data was
measured,
systematic error
may have resulted
in measurement
bias.
Cases were
obtained from one
geographical area,
may not provide
generalizable
results.
Umpierrez,
et al., 2007
[8]
Multicenter
randomized
control trial
Level II
A total of 130
nonsurgical inpatients
with an initial blood
glucose level of 140 –
400 mg/dL were
enrolled in this study.
Conducted at Grady
Memorial Hospital
and Jackson Memorial
Hospital.
Independent variables
Basal-bolus regimen =
glargine insulin and
lantus insulin
Sliding scale regimen =
regular insulin
administered with meals
based on treatment
protocol
Assigned
treatment protocol
was managed by
internal medicine
residents. Both
groups’ oral
antidiabetic
medications were
stopped.
Basal-bolus
regimen patients
received a total
Blood glucose
monitoring was
performed before
each meal and at
bedtime for
patients in both
insulin regimen
groups. If the
patient was
nothing by mouth
(n.p.o.) then blood
glucose
Repeated-
measures ANOVA
was used to
analyze change in
blood glucose with
a P value < 0.05
considered
significant. Data
was expressed as
mean ± standard
deviation or
percentage.
No significant
differences in
mean age, race,
BMI, or
hemoglobin A1c
found between
treatment groups,
which suggests
results were not
influenced by
these confounding
variables.
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
912
Citation
Design/
Methods/
Level of
Evidence
Sample/Setting
Major variables
studied and their
definitions
Intervention Measurement Data analysis and results
Appraisal:
Worth to
practice/
Limitations
Patients were
randomly assigned to
receive either sliding-
scale (n = 65) or
basal-bolus insulin (n
= 65).
The mean age of both
groups was 56 years;
the mean BMI of both
groups was equal at
32 kg/m2.
Dependent variables
Fasting glucose = pre-
meal blood glucose
measurement (mg/dL)
Random glucose =
measured blood glucose
(mg/dL) obtained at any
time during the day
Hypoglycemic episode
= blood glucose < 60
mg/dL, severe = < 40
mg/dL
daily insulin dose
of glargine and
glulisine based on
admission blood
glucose (0.4
units/kg for blood
glucose between
140 – 200 mg/dL
or 0.5 units/kg for
blood glucose
between 201 – 400
mg/dL). Half of
total daily dose
was given as
glargine, half was
divided into 3
doses to be given
as glulisine with
meals.
Sliding scale
insulin group
received a dose of
regular insulin 4
times a day based
on a protocol that
accounted for pre-
meal blood
glucose level.
monitoring was
performed every 6
h.
Blood glucose
was measured
using a glucose
meter by trained
staff.
Basal-bolus
treatment group
maintained
significantly lower
mean fasting
glucose, lower
mean random
glucose, and
overall lower
mean glucose
during admission.
Mean fasting
glucose
Sliding-scale =
165 ± 41 mg/dL
Basal-bolus = 147
± 36 md/dL
(p < 0.01).
Mean random
glucose
Sliding-scale =
189 ± 42 mg/dL
Basal-bolus = 164
± 35 md/dL
(p < 0.001).
Mean glucose
during admission
Sliding-scale= 193
± 54 mg/dL
Basal-bolus = 166
± 32 md/dL
(p < 0.001).
Basal-bolus group
had 0.4 % of
obtained glucose
values considered
hypoglycemic
while sliding-scale
group had 0.2 %.
Statistical
significance was
not indicated.
Neither groups
had values < 40
mg/dL.
Basal-bolus
insulin may be
prescribed to
noncritically ill
type 2 diabetic
adults to manage
blood glucose
without placing
them at risk for
severe
hypoglycemia
Sliding scale
insulin may not
effectively
manage blood
glucose in
inpatients.
Limitations:
Patients without a
known history of
diabetes as well
as those that were
receiving
corticosteroids
were excluded,
which discounts
many hospitalized
diabetic patients.
The study did not
examine clinical
outcomes
between the 2
treatment groups.
Johnston, et
al., 2011
[5]
Retrospective
case-control
study.
Level IV
45 randomly selected
patient records from
the medical center at
University of North
Caroline Greensboro.
The patient records
were retrospectively
reviewed.
Sliding-scale only
group (n = 23)
Independent variables
Insulin regimen = either
sliding scale insulin or
basal-bolus insulin
Fasting blood glucose
(FBS) = blood glucose
collected between 4-7
am or before breakfast
No direct
intervention took
place, a
retrospective
review of 23
patient charts from
the sliding-scale
insulin group
revealed they
received a dose of
regular insulin
An electronic
chart
documentation
system was
reviewed; serial
blood glucose data
from the point-of-
care testing
database was
collected.
Chi-square
analysis used, data
was presented as
percentages.
302 (56 %) out of
total 540 CBGs
collected from
both groups were
classified as
hyperglycemic
Due to the fact
that both groups
experienced
hyperglycemic
events, and that
greater than 50 %
of the data were
hyperglycemic
readings it may be
necessary to
consider dosing
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
913
Citation
Design/
Methods/
Level of
Evidence
Sample/Setting
Major variables
studied and their
definitions
Intervention Measurement Data analysis and results
Appraisal:
Worth to
practice/
Limitations
Basal plus correction
group (n = 22)
Mean age 55.6 years.
Dependent variables
Capillary blood glucose
(CBG) = sample
collected before meals
and at bedtime
Hypoglycemic event =
(CBG less than 60
mg/dL
Hyperglycemic event =
CBG greater than 180
mg/dL or fasting blood
glucose greater than 130
mg/dL
before meals
according to an
order set based on
their pre-meal
CBG.
Retrospective
review of 22
patient charts from
the basal plus
correction group
revealed they
received long-
acting insulin in
the morning along
with correction
insulin with meals.
Specific insulin
dosages for each
group were not
specified in the
article.
CBGs measured
before breakfast,
lunch, dinner, and
at bedtime were
examined over a
3-day period. In
total 540 CBGs
recorded and
analyzed as data.
events.
70 % of the total
CBG readings
from the basal-
bolus insulin
group were
hyperglycemic
events, while only
42 % of the total
CBGs from the
sliding scale group
were
hyperglycemic
events (p < 0.01).
4 hypoglycemic
events occurred in
sliding-scale only
group (2 %), none
occurred in the
basal-bolus group.
No significant
difference noted.
insulin based on
carbohydrate
intake and
increasing dosing
regimen for
inpatients to
receive optimal
glycemic control.
Limitations:
Small sample
size, only 45
charts reviewed.
Inpatients were
also prescribed
oral antiglycemic
medications,
which may have
altered their CBG
or FBS in ways
that were not
accounted for by
insulin.
Unmeasured
variables such as
pre-existing
comorbidities or
level of stress
were not
accounted for.
Rymaszew-
ski and
Breakwell,
2013
[7]
Retrospective
case-control
study
Level IV
Chart review
conducted for patients
admitted to a general
medical floor at a
140-bed teaching
hospital in
Milwaukee, WI.
A sample of 128
charts reviewed, there
were 2 groups based
on insulin regimen.
Sliding-scale group (n
= 64)
Basal-bolus group (n
=64)
No significant
differences found on
sex, admission blood
glucose, or age (SSI
mean age = 65.2,
basal-bolus mean age
= 63.3).
Independent variables
Sliding scale insulin =
pre-meal insulin dose
administered based on
pre-meal blood glucose
level
Basal-bolus insulin =
long acting insulin
administered once or
twice a day along with
nutritional dose with
meals
Dependent variables
Fasting blood sugar =
glucose level tested
before each meal. Goal
< 140 mg/dL
Hypoglycemia
occurrence = blood
glucose level < 70
mg/dL
No direct
intervention
occurred, a
retrospective chart
review was
conducted to study
the outcomes that
basal bolus insulin
compared to
sliding scale
insulin had on
fasting blood
glucose and mean
blood glucose.
The 64 patients in
the sliding scale
group had
received insulin
based on the
hospitals sliding
scale protocol (not
specifically
outlined in the
article).
The 64 patients in
the basal bolus
group received
insulin based on
Electronic health
records were
reviewed to obtain
blood glucose
data. Blood
glucose data
included fasting
and pre-meal
blood glucose
levels that were
acquired before
meals and at
bedtime. The data
were then
complied to
determine the
mean.
The article does
not specify the
type of equipment
used that obtained
the blood glucose
values.
Independent t-test
analyzed
continuous
variables, Mann
Whitney U test
analyzed
categorical data.
Equality of
variances not
assumed.
Fasting blood
glucose
significantly lower
with basal-bolus
insulin regimen.
Sliding-scale =
201.4 ± 33.7
mg/dL
Basal-bolus =
135.5 ± 29.9
mg/dL
t = 11.71 (70 %
CI: 60.03, 71.74) p
< 0.000
Mean blood
glucose
significantly lower
in basal-bolus
Demographic
variables included
relevant data to
explain
occurrence of
hyperglycemia
and hypoglycemia
with ability of
being replicated.
Prescribing basal-
bolus regimen
may be superior
over sliding scale
insulin to
managing type 2
inpatients
diabetics blood
glucose
effectively
without
increasing their
risk for
hypoglycemia.
Limitations:
Sample largely
African American
due to location,
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
914
Citation
Design/
Methods/
Level of
Evidence
Sample/Setting
Major variables
studied and their
definitions
Intervention Measurement Data analysis and results
Appraisal:
Worth to
practice/
Limitations
the hospitals
basal-bolus insulin
protocol (also not
specifically
outlined).
group
Sliding-scale =
225 ± 37.5 mg/dL
Basal-bolus = 149
± 23.1 mg/dL
t = 13.81 (70 %
CI: 70.25, 81.71)
p < 0.000
No significant
difference between
the 2 groups for
hypoglycemia
occurrence.
Sliding-scale =
0.63 ± 0.13
Basal-bolus = 0.7
± 0.13
t = -0.345 (70 %
CI: -0.31, 0.16) p
= 0.73
may not be
applicable to
other racial
categories.
Noncritical units
not included,
single center
study, results may
not be
generalizable.
Possibility of
glucose readings
being obtained at
inappropriate
times due to meal
delivery at the
hospital in the
study; true pre-
meal blood sugar
may not have
always been
measured.
Umpierrez,
et al., 2011
[9]
Multicenter
randomized
control trial
Level II
Patients > 18 years
old undergoing
surgery and not
requiring ICU care
were eligible.
Conducted at Grady
Memorial Hospital,
Emory University
Hospital and Veterans
Affairs Medical
Center in Atlanta,
GA.
Total 211 patients
enrolled and randomly
assigned to 2 groups.
Sliding-scale group (n
= 107).
Basal-bolus group
(n=104).
Clinical
characteristics such as
gender, race, age,
BMI and body weight
on admission between
the groups were found
to be nonsignificant.
Independent variables
Basal-bolus regimen =
insulins glargine and
glulisine
SSI regimen = Novolin
R, regular insulin
Dependent variables
Mean daily glucose
concentration = mean of
blood glucose readings
collected for the day,
goal was to maintain
between 100 – 140
mg/dL, readings higher
than goal considered
hyperglycemic.
Occurrence of
hypoglycemia
(mild = blood glucose <
70 mg/dL or
severe = < 40 mg/dl).
Patients in the
basal-bolus
regimen received a
total daily dose of
0.5 units/kg of half
glargine once
daily and half
glulisine (divided
into 3 doses to
receive before
meal times).
Adjustments were
made to the total
daily dose based
on increased age
or increased
creatinine.
Patients in the
sliding scale
insulin group
received a dose of
regular insulin
(Novolin R)
before meals and
at bedtime if their
pre-meal/pre-
bedtime blood
glucose was > 140
mg/dL. Dose of
insulin was
increased
according to a
protocol (not
provided in the
article), where the
Mean daily blood
glucose
concentration was
measured for each
of the groups.
This value was
determined based
on blood glucose
levels that were
either randomly
obtained (at any
time during the
day) or obtained
before meals or
before bedtime.
Data collection
methods were the
same for both
groups, however
no specific
equipment stated.
Comparison with
baseline and
outcome variables
completed with
Wilcoxon and chi-
square tests, data
presented as mean
± standard
deviation and
percentages.
Mean daily
glucose
concentration
significantly lower
in basal-bolus
group.
SSI = 176 ± 44
mg/dL
Basal-bolus = 157
± 32 md/dL (p <
0.001)
Fasting glucose
levels significantly
lower in basal
bolus group.
SSI = 165 ± 40
mg/dL
Basal-bolus = 155
± 37 mg/dL
(p = 0.037)
Mean of 53 % of
patients from basal
bolus group met
goal to achieve
Estimated 104
subjects in each
group required to
achieve 90 %
power, this was
met.
Inpatients
prescribed basal-
bolus achieved
better blood
glucose control
and lower pre-
meal and bedtime
glucose levels
throughout the
day, suggesting
the efficacy of
prescribing a
basal-bolus
insulin regimen to
inpatients.
However, patients
receiving basal-
bolus may be at
an increased risk
for hypoglycemia.
Limitations:
Factors associated
with
hypoglycemic
events for this
population may
have been
reduced intake
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
915
Citation
Design/
Methods/
Level of
Evidence
Sample/Setting
Major variables
studied and their
definitions
Intervention Measurement Data analysis and results
Appraisal:
Worth to
practice/
Limitations
dose of insulin
corresponded with
blood glucose
readings.
Oral antidiabetic
medications were
discontinued for
both groups.
glucose reading < 140 mg/dL, while only 31 % met that goal from SSI group (p < 0.001). A significant difference in the occurrence of hypoglycemia found between the 2 groups. 23.1 % of patients in basal-bolus group experienced mild hypoglycemia compared to only 4.7 % of patients in SSI group (p < 0.001). No significant difference found for occurrence of severe hypoglycemia between groups.
from NPO status
for surgery, which
were not
accounted for.
The study
excluded patients
that had history of
hepatic disease,
severe renal
disease, or
hyperglycemic
crises, so not
applicable to all
patients.
Hypoglycemic episodes
All 5 articles examined the occurrence of hypoglycemia and the type of insulin regimen received by
the diabetic inpatient [5,7-10]. Data presented from 4 out of 5 articles found no significant difference for
the occurrence of mild to moderate hypoglycemia between sliding-scale and basal-bolus insulin groups
[5,7,8,10]. Of note, although no significant difference in the data was found for this outcome, the research
by Rymaszewski and Breakwell [7] showed the patients who received sliding-scale insulin had more
hypoglycemic episodes compared to the basal-bolus group and out of the 22 patients who received basal-
bolus insulin in the study by Johnston and Horn [5], none of them ever experienced hypoglycemia.
The only research that presented a significant difference for mild to moderate hypoglycemia was
conducted by Umpierrez et al. [9], in which 24 of the 104 patients in the basal-bolus group and only 5 of
the 107 patients in the sliding-scale group experienced hypoglycemia, resulting in an absolute risk
reduction of hypoglycemia to be 18 % in those receiving sliding-scale insulin compared to the basal-bolus
insulin group.
Hyperglycemic episodes
Two of the 5 articles reviewed specifically identified hyperglycemia as a measured outcome [5,8].
According to Johnston and Horn [5], hyperglycemia was defined as either a capillary blood glucose level
greater than 180 mg/dL or fasting blood glucose greater than 130 mg/dL while Umpierrez et al. [8],
designated hyperglycemia as any blood glucose level greater than 140 mg/dL. Both articles reported
statistically significant values, however the results from one study supported the use of sliding-scale
insulin for prevention of hyperglycemia, while the results of Umpierrez et al. [8], found basal-bolus
insulin to be more effective. Out of 276 total blood glucose samples obtained from the sliding-scale group
in the study conducted by Johnston and Horn [5], 117 were hyperglycemic while 185 out of 264 from the
basal-bolus group were classified as hyperglycemic. Meanwhile, 34 % of patients who received basal-
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
916
bolus insulin had hyperglycemia compared to 62% of those in the sliding-scale group in the research by
Umpierrez et al. [8].
Glycemic management
The overall degree of blood glucose management based on the type of insulin administered was the
major outcome that was examined in all 5 research articles, which all had mentioned that inadequate
glycemic control is associated with poor patient outcomes [5,7-10]. Only one article found that patients
receiving sliding-scale insulin achieved better glycemic control than the basal-bolus group, based on the
data that depicted 41 % of the subjects in the basal-bolus group had daily blood glucose levels considered
inadequately controlled compared to only 19 % of those in the sliding-scale group [5].
The remaining 4 articles reviewed all reported that patients who received basal-bolus insulin
obtained significant improvement in glycemic control in comparison to those who were on a sliding-scale
regimen [7-10]. For example, the blood glucose level on the day of discharge was significantly lower for
patients receiving basal-bolus insulin in 2 studies, one of which reported a mean discharge blood glucose
level of 128 mg/dL in the basal-bolus group compared to a mean discharge blood glucose of almost
double or 244 mg/dL in the sliding-scale group [7,8]. Research by Umpierrez et al. [8] and Umpierrez et
al. [9] investigated the mean glucose during hospital stay as a measure of glycemic control and found that
the patients receiving sliding-scale insulin experienced significantly higher values than the basal-bolus
group. One study had even recognized that patients who had their insulin regimen changed from sliding-
scale to basal-bolus demonstrated a significant improvement in glycemic control during their stay and
found the mean difference in blood sugar measurements among the 2 types of therapy to be 27 mg/dL (p
< 0.01) [11].
Discussion
Based on the evidence found in the research articles analyzed, a basal-bolus insulin regimen is more
effective than the traditional sliding-scale regimen in managing blood glucose and preventing
hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic episodes in the type 2 diabetic inpatient. The results suggest that target
glycemic control is best achieved when patients are administered a long-acting insulin coupled with short-
acting insulin, as this type of regimen closely mimics the actions of a normal pancreas [11]. The findings
that sliding-scale insulin poorly controls blood glucose levels and is associated with hyperglycemia
reflects the results of other published articles [12,13]. For example, Clement et al. [11] reported various
concerns with the use of sliding-scale insulin due to the fact that this therapy treats high blood glucose
levels once they have already occurred and fails to actually prevent the undesirable outcome. The data
presented in this paper is similar to the data described by Christensen et al. [12] in a meta-analysis that
also found mean daily blood glucose levels in diabetic inpatients were significantly lower among those
who were receiving basal-bolus insulin compared to sliding scale insulin. In addition, Lee et al. [13]
conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and identified a significantly higher
incidence of hyperglycemia among patients who were administered sliding-scale insulin compared to
basal-bolus insulin.
Hypoglycemic episodes are considered a major safety concern for patients receiving insulin;
however, the majority of the results indicate that patients receiving basal-bolus insulin are not at an
increased risk for hypoglycemia. These findings are consistent with the results reported by a systematic
review and meta-analysis that confirmed no significant difference for risk of severe hypoglycemia was
present among patients receiving sliding-scale insulin and basal-bolus insulin [11]. Although one research
article analyzed favored sliding-scale insulin for the prevention of hypoglycemia, this type of regimen has
been considered to cause drastic changes in glucose levels leading to a dangerous decrease in blood
glucose and a hypoglycemic event [11]. Overall, the efficacy and safety of basal-bolus insulin has been
demonstrated and the collected evidence suggests that this type of insulin regimen is superior to sliding-
scale in managing hospitalized adults with type 2 diabetes.
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
917
Limitations of the evidence
Each of the 5 research articles acknowledged the presence of limitations in their study. Three of the
studies were retrospective in nature, which may be considered a limitation because the researchers only
had access to the data that was already recorded in the patients’ charts [5,7,10]. The applicability of the
results to critical care units may not be feasible, considering both Rymaszewski and Breakwell [7] and
Umpierrez et al. [9] excluded patients in their study who were cared for in the intensive care unit.
The presence of confounding variables may have led to misrepresentation of the results, as only
Zaman et al. [10] took into account the use of loop diuretics and corticosteroids which are both
medications commonly prescribed to inpatients that have the potential to alter blood glucose levels.
Another potential confounding variable that was not considered by any of the 5 articles was the degree of
physiologic stress each of the subjects was experiencing while hospitalized, which may have interfered
with blood glucose levels differently for participants from each of the 2 insulin groups [5,7-9].
A specific limitation of this integrated literature review would be the quantity of articles analyzed.
A total of only 5 research articles were obtained, which narrowed the amount of evidence that was
examined.
Conclusions and recommendations
The majority of the evidence supports basal-bolus insulin as the most effective treatment for
managing blood glucose and preventing hyperglycemia without increasing the risk for hypoglycemia.
Health care providers should order basal-bolus insulin accordingly in order to improve patient outcomes.
Recommendations
Practice
Due to the fact that a larger part of the evidence reports the basal-bolus insulin regimen promotes
better glycemic control without a significant concern for adverse events such as hypoglycemia, it is
logical to recommend to providers to avoid ordering sliding-scale insulin over basal-bolus insulin in the
diabetic inpatient. Ordering sets with a specific protocol for basal-bolus insulin may be utilized in the
inpatient setting to promote the use of this type of regimen.
It is also important to appreciate the fact that nursing may play a key role in the effective
management of blood glucose levels in the hospitalized type 2 diabetic patient. The nurse caring for the
patient should ideally recognize instances that precipitate abnormal blood glucose levels, such as when a
patient is nothing by mouth (NPO), and notify the provider of the potential need to adjust insulin
accordingly. Nursing should also monitor trends in the blood glucose levels throughout the day and act as
an advocate for patients receiving sliding-scale insulin with inadequate glycemic control by coordinating
with providers and pharmacists and requesting a basal-bolus insulin regimen.
Education
Despite the evidence that basal-bolus insulin offers better glycemic control in the inpatient setting,
sliding-scale insulin is still widely prescribed and administered more often to diabetic patients [7-9].
Therefore, healthcare providers may benefit from education that reviews the benefits of basal-bolus
insulin as well as the disadvantages of sliding-scale insulin. It has been suggested that sliding-scale
insulin is ordered among providers due to its convenience; however, the disadvantages of the practice
should be presented to providers in order to improve patient safety and care.
Hypoglycemia is a potential complication associated with strict glycemic control and has the
capacity to cause seizures, coma, or even death [5]. While only Umpierrez et al. [9], demonstrated that
patients receiving basal-bolus insulin were more likely to experience a hypoglycemic episode, it may be
valuable to provide an education review to nursing staff regarding the signs and symptoms of
hypoglycemia so that it is readily recognized to avoid further adverse events.
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
918
Healthcare policy
The Joint Commission (TJC) offers an Inpatient Diabetes Certification Program for hospitals who
possess certain exceptional qualities such as written blood glucose monitoring protocols, education for
patients on diabetes self-management, and program champions for staff education [14]. Hospitals who are
certified are recognized to promote better patient outcomes and have the capabilities to meet the needs of
the patients by following the clinical practice recommendation put forth by the American Diabetes
Association [14]. Recently, the American Diabetes Association [15] published an article that strongly
discouraged the sole use of sliding-scale insulin for diabetic inpatients due to poor glycemic control and
increased rates of complications associated with its use. A recommendation to TJC would be to not offer
certification to hospitals who are not compliant with ordering basal-bolus insulin and who manage their
patients with sliding-scale insulin, as this practice is associated with ineffective blood glucose control and
poor patient outcomes.
Future research
Further research that includes patients receiving certain medications such as corticosteroids as well
as those with diagnoses that were excluded in the articles reviewed may be valuable. Not examining the
relationship between insulin regimens in populations such as those with renal failure, heart failure,
hepatic disease, or undergoing cardiac surgery suggests that these results are not applicable to a
considerable amount of patients.
Given the data that supports basal-bolus insulin is more effective than sliding-scale insulin in
managing blood glucose levels, it would be interesting to conduct further research on the barriers or
reasoning behind why providers do not order the basal-bolus insulin regimen more frequently. Umpierrez
et al. [8] reported that sliding-scale insulin is the insulin regimen of choice in acute care with less than
one-half of patients being prescribed basal-bolus insulin. Conducting research to determine why providers
choose the suboptimal treatment plan for managing blood glucose may allow researchers to address
potential misconceptions regarding the 2 types of insulin regimens and promote the use of basal-bolus
insulin.
References
[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/
resources/publications/aag/diabetes.htm, accessed March 2017.
[2] AR Gosmanov. A practical and evidence-based approach to management of inpatient diabetes in
non-critically ill patients and special clinical populations. J. Clin. Transl. Endocrinol. 2016; 5, 1-6.
[3] V Magaji and JM Johnston. Inpatient management of hyperglycemia and diabetes. Clin. Diabetes
2011; 29, 3-9.
[4] JG Timmons, SG Cunningham, CA Sainsbury and GC Jones. Inpatient glycemic variability and
long-term mortality in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes Complications 2017;
31, 479-82.
[5] JA Johnston and ERV Horn. The effects of correction insulin and basal insulin on inpatient
glycemic control. Medsurg. Nurs. 2011; 20, 187-93.
[6] BM Melnyk and E Fineout-Overholt. Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide
to Best Practice. 3rd eds. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2015, p. 91-2.
[7] HL Rymaszewski and S Breakwell. A retrospective review of sliding scale vs. basal/bolus insulin
protocols. J. Nurs. Pract. 2013; 9, 214-8.
[8] GE Umpierrez, D Smiley, A Zisman, LM Prieto, A Palacio, M Ceron and R Mejia. Randomized
study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes
(RABBIT 2 trial). Diabetes Care 2007; 30, 2181-6.
[9] G Umpierrez, D Smiley, S Jacobs, L Peng, A Temponi, P Mulligan and M Rizzo. Randomized
study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes
undergoing general surgery (RABBIT 2 surgery). Diabetes Care 2011; 34, 256-61.
Integrative Review of Glycemic Management Lindy HERR and Ladda THIAMWONG
http://wjst.wu.ac.th
Walailak J Sci & Tech 2019; 16(12)
919
[10] HH Zaman, V Permalu and SR Vethakkan. Sliding-scale versus basal-bolus insulin in the
management of severe or acute hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes patients: A retrospective study.
Plos One 2014; 2014, e106505.
[11] S Clement, SS Braithwaite, MF Magee, A Ahmann, EP Smith, RG Schafer and IB Hirsh.
Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27, 553-591.
[12] MB Christensen, A Gotfredsen and K Norgaard. Efficacy of basal-bolus insulin regimens in the
inpatient management of non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2017; 33, e2885.
[13] YY Lee, YM Lin, WJ Leu, MY Wu, JH Tseng, MT Hsu, CS Tsai, AT Hsieh and K Tam. Sliding-
scale insulin used for blood glucose control: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Metab. Clin. Exp. 2015; 64, 1183-92.
[14] The Joint Commission. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/certification/
inpatient_diabetes.aspx, accessed March 2017.
[15] American Diabetes Association. Diabetes care in the hospital. Diabetes Care 2016; 39, 99-104.
Copyright of Walailak Journal of Science & Technology is the property of Walailak Journal
of Science & Technology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or
posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users
may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
B
W
m
L
M
A
Å
K
J
a
I
b
c
d
e
f
A
a
a
A
R
R
3
A
K
M
D
P
C
E
h
1
Australian Cri
tical Care
2
9 (2016) 5–1
4
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Australian Critical Care
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / a u c c
est nursing review paper
hat is the relationship between elements of ICU treatment and
emories after discharge in adult ICU survivors?
eanne M. Aitken PhD, RN a,b,c,∗,
aria I. Castillo PhD, RN a,b,
manda Ullman MAppSci, GCPICU, RN a,
sa Engström PhD, RN, CCN d,
athryn Cunningham PhD, MSc, MA (Honours) e,
anice Rattray PhD, MN, RGN, SCM f
School of Nursing & Midwifery & NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Menzies Health
nstitute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia
Intensive Care Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Australia
School of Health Sciences, City University London, UK
Division of Nursing, Department of Health Science, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden
Population Health Sciences, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, UK
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee, UK
t the conclusion of this article a Continuing Professional Development activity i
s
ttached
r t i c l e i n f o r m a t i o n
rticle history:
eceived 6 July 201
5
eceived in revised form
0 November 2015
ccepted 30 November 2015
eywords:
emory
elusion
sychological recovery
ritical care
vidence based nursing
a b s t r a c t
Objectives: Patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) often experience distressing memories during
recovery that have been associated with poor psychological and cognitive outcomes. The aim of this
literature review was to synthesise the literature reporting on relationships between elements of ICU
treatment and memories after discharge in adult ICU survivors.
Review method used: Integrative review methods were used to systematically search, select, extract,
appraise and summarise current knowledge from the available research and identify gaps in the literature.
Data sources: The following electronic databases were systematically searched: PubMed, Ovid EMBASE,
EBSCOhost CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Additional studies were
identified through searches of bibliographies. Original quantitative research articles written in English
that were published in peer-review journals were included.
Review methods: Data extracted from studies included authors, study aims, population, sample size and
characteristics, methods, ICU treatments, ICU memory definitions, data collection strategies and findings.
Study quality assessment was based on elements of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme using the
checklists developed for randomised controlled trials and cohort studies.
Results: Fourteen articles containing data from 13 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included
in the final analysis. The relatively limited evidence about the association between elements of ICU
treatment and memories after ICU discharge suggest that deep sedation, corticoids and administration of
glucose 50% due to hypoglycaemia contribute to the development of delusional memories and amnesia
of ICU stay.
Conclusions: The body of literature on the relationship between elements of ICU treatment and memories
after ICU discharge is small and at its early stages. Larger studies using rigorous study design are needed
in order to evaluate the effects
of the ICU during recovery.
© 2015 Australian College
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 7 3176 7257.
E-mail address: l.aitken@griffith.edu.au (L.M. Aitken).
ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2015.11.004
036-7314/© 2015 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Lt
of different elements of ICU treatment on the development of memories
of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
d. All rights reserved.
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2015.11.004
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10367314
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jsams
http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1016/j.aucc.2015.11.004&domain=pdf
mailto:l.aitken@griffith.edu.au
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2015.11.004
6
an Cri
1
e
f
s
a
e
m
i
c
r
t
s
p
o
o
c
t
b
t
o
t
s
I
t
t
f
h
p
m
f
i
s
s
a
m
e
e
f
t
a
t
a
e
m
t
t
I
2
s
2
m
m
i
i
c
L.M. Aitken et al. / Australi
. Introduction
Patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) often experi-
nce distressing memories during recovery. Specifically, delusional,
actual and emotional memories are frequently reported.1–3 Delu-
ional memories correspond to the recall of unreal events such
s hallucinations, nightmares and paranoia, which have been
stimated to be present in about 20–48% of patients.3,4 Factual
emories are the recall of real events that occurred during patient’s
ntensive care treatment such as the presence of an endotra-
heal tube and mechanical ventilation; proportions of patients who
ecall factual memories vary significantly from 18% to 96%.1,2 Emo-
ional memories involve the recall of feelings such as anxiety, fear,
uffocation and pain and have been reported by highly variable pro-
ortions of patients, ranging from 9% to 88%.1,2,5,6 Lack of memory
f ICU events has also been reported in about 18–38% of patients.1,7
Memories of ICU treatment play a significant role in the devel-
pment of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), a syndrome that is
haracterised by “new or worsening impairments in physical, cogni-
ive or mental health status arising after a critical illness and persisting
eyond acute care hospitalisation” (page 4).8 Memories are thought
o specifically affect the psychological and cognitive components
f recovery of ICU survivors.9,10 For instance, delusional and emo-
ional memories have been associated with the development of
ymptoms of anxiety, depression and posttraumatic stress after
CU discharge.11–17 The role of factual memories is unclear, with
hem being identified as protecting patients from anxiety and post-
raumatic stress symptoms in some cohorts,11 while in others
actual memories have been associated with poorer psychological
ealth during recovery.18 The number of distressing memories that
atients recall was identified as a significant factor for posttrau-
atic stress symptoms.6,16,19,20 The association between cognitive
unctioning and memories of the ICU has also been explored. An
mproved cognitive functioning after ICU discharge was found to be
ignificantly associated with having no recollections of the inten-
ive care experience.21
A range of elements of ICU treatment have been proposed as
ffecting psychological health, including the number and type of
emories of ICU. These elements of care have included specific cat-
gories of medications such as anti-inflammatory medications, for
xample hydrocortisone22–24 and sedation and analgesic agents,
or example midazolam and opioids.1,2,25 Further, a link between
he level of sedation and psychological health has been proposed,
lthough the evidence of that relationship remains unclear.26 Given
he potential influence of aspects of ICU treatment on memories,
nd the link between memories of ICU and PICS, it is appropriate to
xplore these links with a view to adapting our practice to improve
emories. A review addressing this topic could not be located in
he current literature. The aim of this literature review was to syn-
hesise the literature examining relationships between elements of
CU treatment and memories after discharge in adult ICU survivors.
. Method
Integrative review methods were used to systematically search,
elect, extract, appraise and synthesise the available research.27
.1. Eligibility criteria
Primary research articles were included in the review if they
easured the relationship between specific ICU treatments and
emories reported by adult ICU survivors. Studies were excluded
f they were not written in English. ICU treatments were defined as
nterventions administered to patients during admission to a criti-
al care unit, e.g. mechanical ventilation, use of invasive devices and
tical Care 29 (2016) 5–14
administration of medications. ICU memories were defined as per
the study authors, and included factual and delusional memories
of the survivors’ time in a critical care unit.11
2.2. Search methods
PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, EBSCOhost CINAHL, PsycINFO and
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically
and independently searched in May 2015. Medical Subject Head-
ings (MeSH) were amnesia, memory, intensive care units, critical
care, critically ill, critical illness, and intensive care. Additional stud-
ies were identified through searches of bibliographies. Searches
were performed without year restrictions but were limited to
human studies. Titles and abstracts were scanned for relevance
and eligibility using the a priori eligibility criteria. The search
was undertaken by one author (AU) using search terms developed
by the review team. Selection of articles based on the inclusion
and exclusion criteria was completed by two authors (AU and
LMA) independently, with results compared and disagreements
discussed and resolved by the whole team.
2.3. Data extraction and quality appraisal
A data extraction form was developed by the study authors (AU
and LMA) and applied to each of the included studies. For each
paper the author, study objective, population, sample size and char-
acteristics, methods, ICU treatments, ICU memory definitions, data
collection strategies, findings and study quality were extracted by
study authors (MIC, AU, KC). Study quality assessment, includin
g
t
he elements of validity, significance and usefulness, was based
upon elements of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)
checklists relevant to each included study.28
2.4. Data synthesis
Data from the included studies were categorised and summari-
sed to product a coherent and logical summary across the different
categories of ICU treatment.
3. Results
Following database and bibliographic searching 2748 titles were
identified. This number was reduced to 1548 titles after dupli-
cates were removed (Fig. 1).29 The abstracts of these titles were
reviewed and 64 full text articles examined. A further 50 articles
were excluded because they did not focus on the review question,
with 14 articles (13 studies; one duplicate publication with some
additional results2,18) included in the synthesis of results. No meta-
analyses were able to be undertaken due to the diversity of designs,
interventions examined and instruments used to measure mem-
ories; this resulted in the absence of multiple studies examining
sufficiently similar questions to enable data to be combined.
Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies were the most
commonly used designs in the 13 included studies (Table 1). Sam-
ple sizes were highly variable, ranging from 11 to 313 participants.
Instruments used also varied widely and follow-up was conducted
between 3 days and 5 years after ICU discharge. Studies gener-
ally had variable levels of both bias and usefulness, with this latter
aspect often limited by small sample sizes (Table 2).
Sedation, both in regard to the agents used and the depth
of sedation, was the primary intensive care intervention exam-
ined in relation to memories after ICU and was the focus of eight
studies.1–3,17,18,30–33 Consequently, the most common theme that
was identified focused on sedation and analgesia. The effect of other
L.M. Aitken et al. / Australian Critical Care 29 (2016) 5–14 7
Table 1
Relationships between ICU treatment and memories of ICU survivors.
Author details Aim Participants and design Outcome measure Results Comments including
strengths and
limitations
Henderson et al.,
1994; Australia33
To assess the effects of
adding low dose
midazolam to
papaveretum on
memory recall and
duration of ventilation
in drug paralysed
post-operative patients
100 post-operative
patients; blinded RCT;
recall assessed just
prior to ICU discharge
Locally developed
‘experience’
questionnaire (no
validation)
No difference in recall in
regard to pain, noise,
anxiety, discomfort,
memory. Duration of
ventilation no different (25
vs. 26 h, p > 0.05).
No control of other
aspects of care; asked
patients to recall
‘period of drug
paralysis’ so their recall
might relate to any
period of ICU care;
conducted in a time
where routine
paralysis was common
and therefore not
relevant to the current
practice environment.
Capuzzo et al.
2001; Italy1
To investigate the
relationship between
analgesia, sedation and
memory of intensive
care
152 ICU patients with
LOS > 24 h; prospective
cohort study with
follow-up 6 months
after hospital discharge
in 1 hospital
Structured interview to
assess memories
(factual, sensation and
emotional) based on
the ICU-MT.
Quality of life (locally
developed instrument)
No significant difference in
the incidence of factual,
sensation and emotional
memories between the 3
sedation groups (Group A:
no morphine/0–2 doses
benzodiazepines; Group B:
morphine without other
sedatives; Group C:
morphine and other
sedatives). Although
bivariate analysis indicated
patients reporting at least
1 emotional memory were
more likely to be female,
emergency admission,
have infection/sepsis and
receive corticosteroids,
only gender was significant
in logistic regression.
48 eligible patients not
interviewed due to
loss-to-follow-up (36),
terminally ill (4) and
cognitive impairment
(8)–non-participants
were more likely to be
post-surgery with a
longer ICU and hospital
LOS; convenience
sampling used for
recruitment in single
centre.
Kress et al. 2003,
USA31
To search for evidence
that daily interruption
of sedation was
associated with
long-term
psychological harm.
32 mechanically
ventilated medical ICU
patients; participants
recruited from
previous RCT as well as
contemporaneous
cohort were followed
up 6 months after
discharge
Structured interview
by clinical psychologist
plus self-report
measures (IES-R, SF-36,
STAI, BDI, PAIS)
Locally developed
questions to assess
recollection of ICU
Many patients recalled
being in ICU when
questioned in their hospital
stay (68% control vs. 69%
intervention, p = 1.0); there
was a trend towards more
patients in the control
group recalling waking in
ICU when questioned at 6
months (26% control vs. 0%
intervention, p = 0.06).
Specific methodology
or instruments were
not used to measure
memories of ICU – the
information appears to
have been collected
during the follow-up
interview; potentially
biased cohort given
small proportion of
eligible patients
enrolled.
Pierce et al. 2004;
United Kingdom4
To examine the
association of
delusional and real
memories with
pre-operative and
post-operative factors.
161 cardiac surgical
patients with ICU LOS
>4 days; retrospective
cohort study with
follow-up 2–5 years
after surgery in 1
hospital
Modified ICU-MT with
no validation of
modification
Patients were categories as
‘dreamers’ (1 or more
memories of dreams,
nightmares, thoughts that
others were trying to inflict
harm, were plotting
against patient or that
patient had travelled after
surgery) or ‘non-dreamers.
Factors positively
associated with ‘dreamers’
included treatment with
intravenous 50% glucose,
midazolam, steroid therapy
and episodes of sepsis,
with the development of
new neurological signs
exerting a protective effect.
Clinical factors
collected through
retrospective chart
review; 161 of 423
possible patients
recruited (89 died, 59
whose GP refused
assent, 90 no
response); variable
follow-up time frame.
Schelling et al.
2004; Germany23
To examine whether
stress doses of
hydrocortisone after
cardiac surgery reduce
long term incidence of
chronic stress, PTSD
and traumatic
memories
91 cardiac surgery
patients; RCT with
follow-up at 2–3 days,
1 week and 6 months
(n = 48) after ICU in 1
hospital
PTSS-10 No significant difference in
number and categories of
traumatic memories
between patients in
hydrocortisone and control
groups: nightmares (23%
vs. 36%, p = 0.36), pain (19%
vs. 9%, p = 0.43), respiratory
distress (19% vs. 27%,
p = 0.73), anxiety/panic
(31% vs. 40%, p = .33).
Participants and
clinical staff blinded to
group allocation;
validated traumatic
memories
questionnaire.
8 L.M. Aitken et al. / Australian Critical Care 29 (2016) 5–14
Table 1 (Continued)
Author details Aim Participants and design Outcome measure Results Comments including
strengths and
limitations
Ringdal et al. 2006;
Sweden34
To describe trauma
patients’ memories of
ICU and identify factors
associated with
delusional memories
239 trauma ICU
patients; prospective
cohort study with
follow-up 6–18
months after ICU
discharge in 5 hospitals
ICU-MT Patients with clear
recollection of ICU had
shorter ICU LOS, were less
likely to require
mechanical ventilation and
have shorter duration of
mechanical ventilation,
and were less likely to
receive sedatives. Patients
with delusional memories
were younger, had longer
ICU LOS, higher
temperature; lower
haemoglobin and more
likely to have had renal
failure, surgery, ventilator
support, sedatives and
analgesics.
239 of 344 eligible
participants recruited
(66 did not reply, 39
declined;
non-responders had
shorter ICU LOS but
otherwise did not
differ from the final
participants); analysis
was limited to
bivariate analysis with
no multivariable
analysis reported.
Weis et al. 2006;
Germany35
To determine whether
hydrocortisone
administration reduced
chronic stress
symptoms after cardiac
surgery
36 high risk cardiac
surgery patients; RCT
with 6 month
follow-up after ICU in 1
hospital
PTSS-10
SF-36
Patients who received
hydrocortisone had a
shorter ICU LOS, lower TISS
scores, required less
norepinephrine and a
trend towards lower
pro-inflammatory cytokine
IL-6 as well as higher
quality of life scores and
lower chronic stress
symptom scores. Number
and type of traumatic
memories did not differ
between the two groups
(p ≤ .33).
Participants and
clinical staff were
blinded to group
allocation; 28/36
patients followed up (2
incomplete data, 6 did
not return
questionnaire) with no
differences between
those who completed
the study or not;
previously validated
memory instrument
used.
Samuelson et al.
2006 and
Samuelson et al.
2007; Sweden2,18
To investigate the
relationship between
(i) memory and
intensive care sedation
(ii) recall of stressful
experiences and
intensive care sedation
313 intubated
mechanically
ventilated adults
admitted to ICU for
>24 h; prospective
cohort study with
follow-up 6–10 days
after ICU in 2 hospitals
ICU-MT
ICU-SEQ
Patients with no recall of
ICU (18%) were older and
had fewer periods of
wakefulness (MAAS 0–2)
than those with memories
of ICU (82%). Patients with
delusional memories (34%)
had longer ICU stay, higher
baseline severity of illness,
higher proportions of
MAAS 4–6 and more
midazolam than those with
recall of ICU but no
delusional memories.
Patients with more periods
of wakefulness (MAAS 3),
longer ICU stay and
emergency admissions
recalled stressful
experiences as more
bothersome.
250 of 313 patients
completed the study;
convenience sampling
used to recruit
participants; patients
who were lost to
follow-up were more
frequently emergency
admissions and older
than those retained in
the study; previously
validated ICU Memory
Tool used to measure
recall; follow-up only
6–10 days after ICU.
Samuelson et al.
2008; Sweden3
To assess the presence
of stressful memories
in light vs. heavy
sedation
36 mechanically
ventilated
post-operative
patients; RCT with 2
month follow-up after
ICU in 1 hospital
ICU-MT
ICU-SEQ
IES-R
No significant difference in
memory between light
(MAAS 3–4) and heavy
(MAAS 1–2) sedation
patients; trend towards
more delusional memories
in the heavy sedation
group (33% vs. 6%, p = 0.09);
analysis excluding
prolonged ICU stay showed
higher prevalence of
delusional memories in
heavy sedation group (31%
vs. 0%, p = 0.04).
Previously validated
ICU Memory Tool used
to measure recall;
follow-up only 5 days
after ICU; pilot study
with small participant
numbers.
L.M. Aitken et al. / Australian Critical Care 29 (2016) 5–14 9
Table 1 (Continued)
Author details Aim Participants and design Outcome measure Results Comments including
strengths and
limitations
Weinert et al.
2008; USA7
To determine the
relationship between
critical illness factors
and ICU recall and
symptoms of
post-traumatic stress
disorder
277 adult ICU patients;
prospective cohort
study with follow-up 2
and 6 months post ICU
discharge
ICU amnesia score
(developed by study
authors–limited
validation of this tool);
Posttraumatic stress
diagnostic scale
Intensity of sedation
administration was not
associated with ICU recall
although there was weak
association between
increased wakefulness
during mechanical
ventilation and factual ICU
recall (r2 = 0.03–0.11,
p < 0.05).
Only 90 of 277 patients
provided data for 2 and
6 month follow-up;
those who completed 2
month follow-up were
more likely to be
treated in the surgical
ICU, had shorter
duration of mechanical
ventilation and better
mental status prior to
intubation; recall of
ICU experience
measured using
appears to have been
locally developed with
no validation
described.
Sackey et al. 2008;
Sweden17
To compare memories
of ICU after sedation
with intravenous
midazolam or inhaled
isoflurane
40 mechanically
ventilated general ICU
patients; RCT with
follow-up 6 months
after ICU in 1 hospital
ICU-MT
HADS
IES
WB
Trend towards less
memories of hallucinations
or delusions in the
isoflurane group although
this did not reach
statistical significance
(2/10 vs. 5/7, p = 0.06). No
significant differences
between the groups in
regard to memories of
feelings or factual events.
Only 17 of 40 patients
provided data (11 died;
12 non-responders);
no control of other
related factors such as
opioid medications and
ICU LOS.
Treggiari et al.
2009;
Switzerland32
To determine if light
sedation, compared to
deep sedation, affects
subsequent patient
mental health
137 patients requiring
mechanical ventilation
(129 included in
analysis); RCT with
follow-up at hospital
discharge and 4 weeks
PCL
IES-R
HADS
At hospital discharge more
patients in the deep
sedation group had
“trouble remembering
important parts of the
stressful experience” (37%
vs. 13%, p = 0.01), this
remained similar (37% vs.
14%, p = 0.02) at 4 weeks;
similar patterns were
reported in regard to
“repeated, disturbing
memories of the stressful
experience” (18% vs. 4%;
p = 0.05 at both discharge
and 4 weeks)
No specific instruments
used to assess patients’
memories however 2
items in the PCL
address memories.
Ethier et al. 2011;
Canada30
To evaluate recall of
ICU stay in patients
managed with 2
sedation strategies: a
sedation protocol or a
combination of
sedation protocol and
daily sedation
interruption
21 adult ICU patients
managed with sedation
protocol or no sedation
protocol; pilot RCT
with follow-up 72 h
after ICU discharge
Patients Recall
Questionnaire (develop
by study authors–no
validation of this tool)
No significant differences
in the recall of ICU
experiences between the 2
groups. More than 50% of
patients in both groups
recalled experiencing pain,
anxiety or fear while in the
ICU and 48%, 33% and 29%
of the 21 patients had no
memories of endotracheal
tube suctioning, being on a
breathing machine or
being bathed, respectively.
Convenience sampling,
with 26 of a potential
39 patients approached
and 21 patients
enrolled;
Non-validated, locally
developed, instrument
used to measure
short-term recollection
of ICU; Extremely
short-term (72 h)
follow-up.
MAAS: Motor Activity Assessment Scale; ICU-MT: ICU Memory Tool; IES-R: Revised Impact of Event Scale; SF-36: Medical Outcomes Study SF 36 item short-form health
s AIS: P
s rienc
P
m
e
3
a
o
e
urvey; STAI: State and Trait Anxiety Inventory; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; P
cale; IES: Impact of Event Scale; WB: Well-Being Index; ICU-SEQ: ICU Stressful Expe
CL: PTSD Checklist
edications and the duration of mechanical ventilation were also
xplored in a small number of studies.
.1. Sedation and analgesia
Sedation and analgesia have been explored as possible factors
ssociated with patients’ ability to recall ICU events with most
f the evidence indicating that these therapies have some influ-
nce in this area.2–4,17,32,34 Depth of sedation, as measured using
sychological Adjustment to Illness Score; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression
es Questionnaire; PTSS-10: Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms 10-Question Inventory;
various sedation assessment scales, has been proposed as hav-
ing a significant impact on patients’ recall of ICU events. Deeply
sedated patients reported amnesia of their ICU stay (OR 1.60, 95% CI
1.35–1.91, p < 0.0001),2 had “trouble remembering important parts
of the stressful experience” (37% vs. 13%, p = 0.01),32 and reported
more repeated, disturbing memories (18% vs. 4%, p < 0.05).32 Fur- ther, more deeply sedation patients reported delusional memories (33% vs. 6%, p = 0.09)3 (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.14–2.72, p = 0.008)2 3–5 days after ICU discharge.
10 L.M. Aitken et al. / Australian Critical Care 29 (2016) 5–14
Records id en�fied through
database searc hing
(n = 2,748)
Sc
re
en
in
g
In
cl
ud
ed
El
ig
ib
ili
ty
Id
en
�
fic
a�
on
Addi�onal reco rds ide n�fi ed
through other sources
(n = 3)
Records a�er du plicat es rem oved
(n = 1,5 48)
Reco rds screen ed
(n = 1,548)
Recor ds excluded
(n = 1,484)
Full-text ar�cles ass ess ed
for eligibility
(n = 64)
Full-text ar�cl es exclud ed,
with reason s
(n = 50)
Did not measure
asso cia�o n = 24
ICU tr eatment not studied
= 25
Short term memo ry = 1
Ar�cles included in review
(n = 14 re presen�ng 13
studies)
Randomised con trol led
trials = 7
Prospec�ve cohort = 5
�ve c
A flo
p
t
s
q
a
s
m
a
(
a
o
c
s
m
p
r
f
z
S
m
i
t
d
m
s
b
a
Retrospec
Fig. 1. PRISM
In contrast, the depth of sedation appeared to influence patients’
erception of stressful experiences during ICU treatment with
he more awake patients reporting more stressful or bother-
ome memories, as described on the ICU-stressful experiences
uestionnaire.18 These findings are not consistent with Weinert
nd Sprenkle7 who identified no association between inten-
ity of sedation administration and ICU recall in a cohort of
edical-surgical ICU patients, although they did report a weak
ssociation between increased wakefulness and factual ICU recall
r2 = 0.03–0.11, p < 0.05).7
The association between specific medications such as benzodi-
zepines, opioids and propofol during ICU treatment and memories
f ICU has also been investigated although again, the evidence is
onflicting. A retrospective study including 161 cardiac surgery
urvivors reported a significant association between delusional
emories and midazolam infusion (OR 3.51 95% CI 1.59–7.75,
= 0.002) 2–5 years post ICU discharge.4 On the contrary, an explo-
ative multicentre investigation including 239 trauma participants
ound no such relationship between delusional memories and ben-
odiazepines, opioids, and propofol in multivariable analysis.34
imilarly, no statistically significant difference was reported in
emories by 17 patients enrolled in a pilot RCT designed to exam-
ne the effect of midazolam vs. isoflurane on memories, although
here was a trend towards less memories of hallucinations or
elusions in the group treated with isoflurane.17 Further, in 152
edical-surgical ICU patients the influence different regimens of
edation and analgesia (Group A: no morphine and <2 doses of a enzodiazepine; Group B: morphine without other sedative drugs, nd Group C: morphine and other sedative drugs) was examined.1
ohort = 1
w diagram.
It was concluded that analgesia (morphine) and sedation (propofol,
benzodiazepines and promazine) did not influence the incidence of
factual, sensation, and emotional memories of this cohort.1
The discrepancies in these different results might be explained
by the differences in the design of these studies (prospective vs.
retrospective cohorts vs. pilot RCT) and the characteristics of the
samples investigated (trauma, cardiac surgery and general ICU
patients). For example, delusional memories were reported by 26%
of the trauma patients34 compared to 48% of the cardiac surgery
group.4 In addition, benzodiazepines (no specific information pro-
vided about what medications were used) were administered to
24% of the trauma patients34 compared to 32% of the cardiac surgery
group who received midazolam.4 Delusional memories were not
specifically reported in the medical-surgical ICU group1 but emo-
tional memories incorporating hallucinations, nightmares, dreams
and feeling confused or down were reported in 15% of the group
receiving <2 doses of benzodiazepines and 32% of the group receiv-
ing unlimited sedatives. In the cardiac surgery cohort both the
prevalence of delusional memories (48%) and administration of
midazolam (32%) were much higher than the trauma cohort.4 Of
note, the trauma patients had an average ICU LOS of approximately
4 days34 while the cardiac surgery patients remained in ICU for an
average of 5 (non-dreamers) or 7 days (dreamers).4
Different sedation strategies such as sedation protocols or seda-
tion interruption have been proposed as influencing patients’ recall
of their time in ICU. Despite the theoretical basis for such links, no
difference in the recall of ICU experiences including recollections of
fear, anxiety and pain measured on a locally developed instrument
were reported by 21 patients enrolled in a pilot RCT.30 This pilot
L.M. Aitken et al. / Australian Critical Care 29 (2016) 5–14 11
Table 2
Study quality appraisal using CASP criteria.
Author details Method Validity Significance Usefulness
Henderson et al.,
199433
RCT Selection bias: Unclear
Measurement bias: High
Assessment of confounding
variables: Low
Longevity of follow-up: Low
Reporting bias:
Unclear
Imprecise results
Low
usefulness
Capuzzo et al.
20011
Prospective cohort Selection bias: Low
Measurement bias: Unclear
Assessment of confounding
variables: High
Longevity of follow-up:
Unclear
Reporting bias:
Low
Precise results
Low usefulness
Kress et al. 200331 Prospective and
retrospective
cohort
Selection bias: Low
Measurement bias: High
Assessment of confounding
variables: Low
Longevity of follow-up: Low
Reporting bias:
Low
Imprecise results
Low usefulness
Pierce et al. 20044 Retrospective
cohort
Selection bias: High
Measurement bias: High
Assessment of confounding
variables: Unclear
Longevity of follow-up: High
Reporting bias:
Low
Imprecise results
Low usefulness
Schelling et al.
200423
RCT Selection bias: Low
Performance bias: Low
Attrition bias: Low
Detection bias: Low
Reporting bias:
Low
Imprecise results
Moderate
usefulness
Ringdal et al.
200634
Prospective cohort Selection bias: Low
Measurement bias: Low
Assessment of confounding
variables: Low
Longevity of follow-up: Low
Reporting bias:
Low
Precise results
High usefulness
Weis et al. 200635 RCT Selection bias: Low
Performance bias: Unclear
Attrition bias: Low
Detection bias: Low
Reporting bias:
Low
Imprecise results
Moderate
usefulness
Samuelson et al.
2006 and
Samuelson et al.
20072,18
Prospective cohort Selection bias: Unclear
Measurement bias: Low
Assessment of confounding
variables: Low
Longevity of follow-up: High
Reporting bias:
Low
Precise results
Moderate
usefulness
Samuelson et al.
20083
RCT Selection bias: Low
Performance bias: Unclear
Attrition bias: low
Detection bias: Low
Reporting bias:
Low
Imprecise results
Moderate
usefulness
Weinert et al.
20087
Prospective cohort Selection bias: Unclear
Measurement bias: Unclear
Assessment of confounding
variables: Low
Longevity of follow-up: Low
Reporting bias:
Low
Precise results
Low usefulness
Sackey et al. 200817 RCT Selection bias: Unclear
Performance bias: High
Attrition bias: Low
Detection bias: Low
Reporting bias:
Low
Imprecise results
Moderate
usefulness
Treggiari et al.
200932
RCT Selection bias: Low
Performance bias: Low
Attrition bias: Low
Detection bias: Unclear
Reporting bias:
Low
Imprecise results
Moderate
usefulness
Ethier et al. 201130 RCT Selection bias: Low
bias:
: Low
s: Low
Reporting bias: Moderate
s
v
o
s
a
p
(
o
d
g
t
Performance
Attrition bias
Detection bia
tudy was designed to examine the effect of protocolised sedation
s. protocolised sedation and daily sedative interruption on mem-
ries, with findings indicating that recall was not correlated with
edation scores or doses of sedation received.30 Similarly, Kress
nd colleagues31 found no difference in the number of usual care
atients vs. sedation interruption patients who recalled being in
68% vs. 69%, p = 1.0), or waking in (26% vs. 0%, p = 0.06), ICU. Both
f these studies were small (n = 21 and 32), with limited ability to
etect meaningful differences.
The relatively limited evidence regarding sedation and anal-
esia in ICU patients suggests that these therapies contribute to
he patients’ ability to recall ICU events and to the development
Unclear Low
Imprecise results
usefulness
of delusional memories and amnesia of ICU stay. However, the
evidence is conflicting and inconclusive. Larger studies explor-
ing different aspects of sedation and their association with the
development of memories of the ICU during recovery are needed.
3.2. Other medications
The theory that the exogenous administration of stress doses
of corticosteroids provides a protective effect against the devel-
opment of traumatic memories was tested in two small RCTs of
cardiac surgical ICU patients.24,35 Although some other benefits
such as shorter ICU LOS and improved quality of life scores were
1 an Cri
s
w
R
d
t
t
t
p
r
a
o
3
w
g
r
t
s
b
t
p
3
p
t
a
o
i
m
t
t
m
v
a
i
m
o
3
i
r
M
t
Q
i
w
m
t
s
o
f
a
4
m
S
i
b
d
t
w
2 L.M. Aitken et al. / Australi
een in those receiving corticosteroids, no significant difference
as found in the incidence of traumatic memories in either of these
CTs. In contrast, a significant association between corticoids and
elusional memories (OR 10.2 95% CI 1.11–93.0, p = 0.04) was iden-
ified in a small (n = 161) retrospective cohort study.4 Although
his finding was statistically significant, it is important to note
he limitations of the study design and that only eight out of 161
atients received corticoids during ICU, with six of these patients
eporting delusional memories.4 In this same study a significant
ssociation between delusional memories and the administration
f intravenous 50% glucose to treat hypoglycaemia (OR 15.5, 95% CI
.19–66.4) was identified. To aid understanding of these results it
ould have been beneficial if data regarding the severity of hypo-
lycaemia were presented since one could speculate that the real
isk factor for delusional memories was hypoglycaemia instead of
he administration of 50% glucose. Another point to consider is the
urprisingly high proportion (35%) of participants who received
oluses of glucose during ICU treatment, which could reflect selec-
ion bias with participants not being representative of the usual ICU
opulation.
.3. Duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay
The presence or duration of mechanical ventilation has also been
roposed as influencing memories after ICU, particularly in regard
o the development of traumatic or distressing memories or the
bsence of memories. The duration of mechanical ventilation is
ften related to the length of ICU stay which may be used as an
ndirect marker of this treatment. Approximately half of the 206
echanically ventilated general ICU patients who had memories of
he ICU recalled discomfort associated with the endotracheal tube
hat were bothersome and those who were bothered by stressful
emories of the ICU had longer ICU LOS.18 In contrast, although
entilator support was linked to delusional memories on univariate
nalysis in 239 trauma patients, it did not retain statistical signif-
cance when incorporated into multivariable analysis.34 Similarly,
echanical ventilation was not associated with factual, sensational
r emotional memories in 152 ICU patients.1
.4. Measures and methods used to assess patients’ memories
Memories were measured using a variety of instruments
ncluding structured interviews,1,31,36 the ICU stressful expe-
ience questionnaire (ICU-SEQ),2,3,18 ICU memory tool (ICU-
T)2,3,17,18,34, Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms 10-Question Inven-
ory PTSS-1023,35 and author-developed surveys (Patients Recall
uestionnaire30 and ICU amnesia tool)7 or questions.31 A mod-
fied version of the ICU-MT (with no validation of modification)
as used in one study.4 In another study no specific instru-
ent to assess patients’ memories was used, but two items of
he Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (instrument to assess
ymptoms of posttraumatic stress) that address memories.32 Mem-
ries were assessed at varied time points in the included studies,
rom 72 h30 to 5 years4, with the most common follow-up being
pproximately six months after discharge (Table 1).
. Discussion
The relationship between intensive care interventions and
emories of ICU after discharge was examined in this review.
edation practice was the most common intensive care treatment
nvestigated in relation to the development of memories of ICU,
ut the evidence was inconsistent for the elements of care (e.g.
eep vs. light sedation, different sedative medications, daily seda-
ion interruption). Deep sedation during ICU treatment frequently
as associated with amnesia and delusional memories while light
tical Care 29 (2016) 5–14
sedation was associated with a greater risk of perceiving stress-
ful experiences more bothersome.2,3,18,32 Despite these identified
associations, no such association was reported in one study.7 This
relationship between level of sedation and memories after ICU
is particularly important to understand given the move towards
lighter sedation over the past decade.26
When considering the specific sedative agents, benzodiazip-
ines, including midazolam, were associated with the development
of delusional or hallucination-like memories of ICU in some
settings.4,17 This relationship with delusional memories warrants
further exploration since the available evidence is small and incon-
sistent. Although this relationship was found in two included
studies, it was not identified in others.1,34 Since these four stud-
ies differ in essential aspects of their design (e.g. prospective vs.
retrospective; cardiac vs. trauma vs. general ICU patients), the com-
parison between them might not be appropriate and therefore the
interpretation of the evidence in regard to benzodiazipines is incon-
clusive.
Different sedation strategies such as using sedation protocols,
daily sedation interruption and various sedative agents such as
midazolam, isoflurane, morphine and propofol were tested to eluci-
date their association with memories of ICU.1,17,30,31 No particular
strategy was found to be better or worse than others. Neverthe-
less, these studies had relatively small sample sizes with restricted
ability to determine significant differences. Future studies testing
different sedation strategies should incorporate larger sample sizes
in their design so as to be able to detect significant effects.
Interventions other than sedation that have been examined in
relation to ICU memories were corticosteroids and intravenous
50% glucose to treat hypoglycaemia. The evidence on the associ-
ation between stress doses of corticosteroids and memories of ICU
is limited. As slightly different aspects of memories of ICU were
explored in these studies, the comparison between them is diffi-
cult. In two RCTs the factor explored was the incidence of traumatic
memories (memories of pain, nightmares, anxiety and difficulty
breathing) compared with the presence of delusional memories in
one retrospective study.4,24,35 Delusional memories were associ-
ated with the administration of corticosteroids, but no association
between hydrocortisone and the incidence of traumatic memories
of anxiety, pain, nightmares and difficulty breathing was found in
the RCTs.
Intravenous 50% glucose to treat hypoglycaemia was associated
with delusional memories.4 Unfortunately, information regarding
the severity of hypoglycaemia was not presented and it could
be speculated that 50% glucose might be a confounder and that
hypoglycaemia might have been the real risk factor for delusional
memories. In addition, the high proportion of participants treated
with this medication suggests selection bias.
No relationship between mechanical ventilation and delusional,
factual, sensational or emotional memories was found in the
literature.1,34 Despite the evidence being limited to two studies,
the lack of relationship is consistent.
This review is limited by the nature of the question that guided
the process; only those studies that measured an association
between ICU interventions and memories were considered, result-
ing in the review being limited to studies designed to measure
variables quantitatively. Also to note, a range of interventions that
have the potential to influence memory have not been investigated,
for example early mobilisation and use of alternative sedative
agents such as dexmedetomidine. Further, scales that assess either
memory or perceptions of the intensive care experience generally
have not undergone rigorous psychometric testing thus limiting
reliability and validity of findings. A number of scales exist and
this also makes it difficult to extrapolate consistent findings with
some assessing memories of specific events or treatments and oth-
ers perceptions of the experience. What however does seem clear
an Cri
i
a
c
a
a
t
e
f
W
t
s
d
h
h
c
a
m
o
c
4
t
s
o
i
D
r
s
s
p
n
i
b
h
p
i
e
d
d
5
d
A
g
e
f
i
h
A
a
Q
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
L.M. Aitken et al. / Australi
s that patients can be distressed by their memories whether these
re factual or delusional,11,37,38 and that these memories have been
onsistently linked to poorer outcomes.13,18,39 The strength of that
ssociation has still to be established. Patients who have greater
wareness may report troublesome discomforts of thirst, having
ubes and being unable to communicate1,37 whereas patients who
xperience delusions often find these persecutory and there are
requent reports of staff trying to ‘kill’ patients or do harm to them.
hether these differences in perceptions or memories are related
o depth of sedation is not clear, although the evidence that deep
edation leads to limited recall of ICU and increased incidence of
elusional memories is reasonably consistent.2,3,18,32
Participants in the included studies were enrolled during their
ospital admission, with the exception of one retrospective study,4
owever the timing of follow up varied from prior to ICU dis-
harge to 5 years later, with the most common follow-up being
pproximately six months after discharge. Given the highly variable
ethods of assessing memory it is not possible to assess the effect
f these differences, however it is highly likely that it influences the
ontent and clarity of recall.
.1. Implications for practice and research
Although there is currently limited and inconsistent evidence,
he influence of sedation on memories has moderate support. Deep
edation is linked to limited recall of ICU and increased incidence
f delusional memories.2,3,32 This suggests that strategies to min-
mise sedation should continue to be developed and implemented.
espite this broad principle, there is currently conflicting evidence
egarding the role of different sedation strategies such as daily
edation interruption30,31 or the benefit or disadvantage of specific
edative agents4,17 and additional research involving larger sam-
le sizes and effective control of related interventions is urgently
eeded.
Further, scales that assess either memory or perceptions of the
ntensive care experience generally assume that patients who recall
eing ‘attacked’ or have ‘people trying to hurt me’ are delusional
owever this might not be the case. Instead patients may be inter-
reting behaviours in different, and individual, ways. This variation
n experience should be considered as we research and implement
volving strategies such as patients being more alert and oriented
uring ICU admissions – this experience may affect each patient
ifferently.
. Conclusion
Identification of elements of ICU treatment that affect memories
uring recovery has the potential to influence how care is delivered.
spects of care that have been examined include sedation and anal-
esia, other medications and mechanical ventilation. Although the
vidence was inconsistent, and the numbers of participants was
requently small, it appears that some aspects of treatment may
nfluence the absence of memory or development of delusions and
allucinations.
cknowledgements
All authors have approved the final article and acknowledge that
ll those entitled to authorship are listed as authors.
To answer the Continuing Professional Development
uestions – go to page 12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-
314(16)00010-2.
2
tical Care 29 (2016) 5–14 13
References
1. Capuzzo M, Pinamonti A, Cingolani E, Grassi L, Bianconi M, Contu P, et al. Anal-
gesia, sedation, and memory of intensive care. J Crit Care 2001;16:83–9.
2. Samuelson K, Lundberg D, Fridlund B. Memory in relation to depth of seda-
tion in adult mechanically ventilated intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med
2006;32:660–7.
3. Samuelson KA, Lundberg D, Fridlund B. Light vs. heavy sedation during mechan-
ical ventilation after oesophagectomy – a pilot experimental study focusing on
memory. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:1116–23.
4. Pierce JMT, Allenby-Smith O, Goddard J. Delusional memories following car-
diac surgery and prolonged intensive care: a retrospective survey and case note
review. Brit J Cardiol 2004;11:462–5.
5. Jones C, Humphris G, Griffiths RD. Preliminary validation of the ICUM tool: a
tool for assessing memory of the intensive care experience. Clin Intensive Care
2000;11:251–5.
6. Schelling G, Stoll C, Haller M, Briegel J, Manert W, Hummel T, et al. Health-
related quality of life and posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of the acute
respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 1998;26:651–9.
7. Weinert CR, Sprenkle M. Post-ICU consequences of patient wakefulness
and sedative exposure during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med
2008;34:82–90.
8. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, et al.
Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report
from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med 2012;40:502–9.
9. Davydow DS, Zatzick D, Hough CL, Katon WJ. In-hospital acute stress symptoms
are associated with impairment in cognition 1 year after intensive care unit
admission. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013;10:450–7.
0. Karnatovskaia LV, Johnson MM, Benzo RP, Gajic O. The spectrum of psychocog-
nitive morbidity in the critically ill: a review of the literature and call for
improvement. J Crit Care 2015;30:130–7.
1. Jones C, Griffiths RD, Humphris G, Skirrow PM. Memory, delusions, and the
development of acute posttraumatic stress disorder-related symptoms after
intensive care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:573–80.
2. Jones C, Skirrow P, Griffiths RD, Humphris GH, Ingleby S, Eddleston J, et al.
Rehabilitation after critical illness: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med
2003;31:2456–61.
3. Ringdal M, Plos K, Lundberg D, Johansson L, Bergbom I. Outcome after injury:
memories, health-related quality of life, anxiety, and symptoms of depression
after intensive care. J Trauma 2009;66:1226–33.
4. Kiekkas P, Theodorakopoulou G, Spyratos F, Baltopoulos GI. Psychological dis-
tress and delusional memories after critical care: a literature review. Int Nurs
Rev 2010;57:288–96.
5. Ringdal M, Plos K, Ortenwall P, Bergbom I. Memories and health-related quality
of life after intensive care: a follow-up study. Crit Care Med 2010;38:38–44.
6. Deja M, Denke C, Weber-Carstens S, Schroder J, Pille CE, Hokema F, et al. Social
support during intensive care unit stay might improve mental impairment and
consequently health-related quality of life in survivors of severe acute respira-
tory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2006;10:R147.
7. Sackey PV, Martling CR, Carlsward C, Sundin O, Radell PJ. Short- and long-term
follow-up of intensive care unit patients after sedation with isoflurane and
midazolam – a pilot study. Crit Care Med 2008;36:801–6.
8. Samuelson KA, Lundberg D, Fridlund B. Stressful memories and psychological
distress in adult mechanically ventilated intensive care patients – a 2-month
follow-up study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:671–8.
9. Hauer D, Weis F, Krauseneck T, Vogeser M, Schelling G, Roozendaal B. Trau-
matic memories, post-traumatic stress disorder and serum cortisol levels in
long-term survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Brain Res
2009;1293:114–20.
0. Granja C, Gomes E, Amaro A, Ribeiro O, Jones C, Carneiro A, et al. Understand-
ing posttraumatic stress disorder-related symptoms after critical care: the early
illness amnesia hypothesis. Crit Care Med 2008;36:2801–9.
1. Larson MJ, Weaver LK, Hopkins RO. Cognitive sequelae in acute respiratory dis-
tress syndrome patients with and without recall of the intensive care unit. J Int
Neuropsychol Soc 2007;13:595–605.
2. de Quervain DJ, Roozendaal B, Nitsch RM, McGaugh JL, Hock C. Acute cortisone
administration impairs retrieval of long-term declarative memory in humans.
Nat Neurosci 2000;3:313–4.
3. Schelling G, Kilger E, Roozendaal B, de Quervain DJ, Briegel J, Dagge A, et al.
Stress doses of hydrocortisone, traumatic memories, and symptoms of post-
traumatic stress disorder in patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized study.
Biol Psychiatry 2004;55:627–33.
4. Schelling G, Roozendaal B, De Quervain DJ. Can posttraumatic stress disorder be
prevented with glucocorticoids. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004;1032:158–66.
5. Jones C, Griffiths RD, Humphris G. Disturbed memory and amnesia related to
intensive care. Memory 2000;8:79–94.
6. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gelinas C, Dasta JF, et al. Clinical practice
guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients
in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2013;41:263–306.
7. Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-
reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J Chiropract Med 2006;5:101–17.
8. Clinical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), Oxford UK, http://www.casp-uk.
net/Date [accessed 19.10.15].
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(16)00010-2
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0200
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0205
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0210
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0215
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0220
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0225
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0230
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0235
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0240
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0245
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0250
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0255
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0260
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0265
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0270
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0275
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0280
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0285
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0290
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0295
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0305
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0310
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0315
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0320
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0325
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0330
http://www.casp-uk.net/Date
http://www.casp-uk.net/Date
http://www.casp-uk.net/Date
http://www.casp-uk.net/Date
http://www.casp-uk.net/Date
http://www.casp-uk.net/Date
1 an Cri
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
38. Rundshagen I, Schnabel K, Wegner C, am Esch S. Incidence of recall, nightmares,
and hallucinations during analgosedation in intensive care. Intensive Care Med
2002;28:38–43.
4 L.M. Aitken et al. / Australi
9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for sys-
tematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol
2009;62:1006–12.
0. Ethier C, Burry L, Martinez-Motta C, Tirgari S, Jiang D, McDonald E, et al. Recall
of intensive care unit stay in patients managed with a sedation protocol or
a sedation protocol with daily sedative interruption: a pilot study. J Crit Care
2011;26:127–32.
1. Kress JP, Gehlbach B, Lacy M, Pliskin N, Pohlman AS, Hall JB. The long-term psy-
chological effects of daily sedative interruption on critically ill patients. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:1457–61.
2. Treggiari MM, Romand JA, Yanez ND, Deem SA, Goldberg J, Hudson L, et al. Ran-
domized trial of light versus deep sedation on mental health after critical illness.
Crit Care Med 2009;37:2527–34.
3. Henderson A, Dipplesman J, Miller J. Failure of intravenous low dose midazolam
to influence memory recall in drug paralysed post-operative patients sedated
with papaveretum. Aust Crit Care 1994;7:22–4.
4. Ringdal M, Johansson L, Lundberg D, Bergbom I. Delusional memories from the
intensive care unit – experienced by patients with physical trauma. Intensive
Crit Care Nurs 2006;22:346–54.
3
tical Care 29 (2016) 5–14
5. Weis F, Kilger E, Roozendaal B, de Quervain DJ, Lamm P, Schmidt M, et al. Stress
doses of hydrocortisone reduce chronic stress symptoms and improve health-
related quality of life in high-risk patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized
study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:277–82.
6. Wagner BK, Zavotsky KE, Sweeney JB, Palmeri BA, Hammond JS. Patient
recall of therapeutic paralysis in a surgical critical care unit. Pharmacotherapy
1998;18:358–63.
7. Rotondi AJ, Chelluri L, Sirio C, Mendelsohn A, Schulz R, Belle S, et al.
Patients’ recollections of stressful experiences while receiving prolonged
mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2002;30:
746–52.
9. Rattray JE, Johnston M, Wildsmith JA. Predictors of emotional outcomes of inten-
sive care. Anaesthesia 2005;60:1085–92.
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0340
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0345
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0350
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0355
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0360
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0365
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0370
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0375
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0380
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0385
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1036-7314(15)00176-9/sbref0390
1 Introduction
2 Method
2.1 Eligibility criteria
2.2 Search methods
2.3 Data extraction and quality appraisal
2.4 Data synthesis
3 Results
3.1 Sedation and analgesia
3.2 Other medications
3.3 Duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay
3.4 Measures and methods used to assess patients’ memories
4 Discussion
4.1 Implications for practice and research
5 Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 10031
6
Available online 29 January 20
21
2468-2942/© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
A scoping review of literature: What has been studied about adolescents
and young adults (AYAs) with cancer?
Camila M. Telles a, b, *
a Graduating in Psychology – Senior year, Positivo University – Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil (Student)
b Teen Cancer America – Los Angeles, California, the United States of America (Intern Pro Cancer)
A R T I C L E I N F O
Keywords:
Scoping review
Field gaps
Study purposes
Research goals
A B S T R A C T
Purpose: To map, organize and analyze the articles published in the last five years about AYAs with cancer.
Methods: CAPES database and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant studies from 2015 to February
2020. Eligible articles included empirical or theoretical research, quantitative and/or qualitative studies, tar-
geted AYAs with cancer, addressed different topics related to AYAs such as unmet needs, hospital challenges,
interventions or tools based on evidence, as well as political and socioeconomic aspects.
Results: Of the 161 articles analyzed, 74 (46%) discussed the health system, including hospital dynamics,
treatment and interventions during treatment; 63 (39.1%) discussed aspects or interventions that influence the
quality of life and mental health of AYAs with cancer; 14 (8.7%) discussed issues related to sexual health; and 10
(6.2%) addressed social, economic and demographic problems of AYAs with cancer. Three types of purposes have
been identified in the articles: 118 (73.3%) investigated variables in areas related to AYAs with cancer, aiming to
increase the understanding of the phenomenon and the needs of AYAs; 18 (11.2%) intervened on the needs of
AYAs with cancer through pilot studies or evidence-based interventions; and 22 (13.7%) aimed to evaluate an
intervention previously performed or to evaluate an intervention based on evidence.
Conclusion: There is still much to be researched within the last two categories. In the last three years, these
categories have been growing gradually and on a small scale.
Introduction
The scarcity of support, service and research personalized to the
health of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer or survivors
is evident[1,2,3,4,5]. In recent years, even with advances of health and
science professionals in the awareness of the importance of looking at
this audience and developing specific interventions for them, there are
still many gaps to be filled[6,7]. Due to the diversity of these gaps, filling
them effectively may become even more difficult for professionals and
researchers in the area. This article aims to map, organize and analyze
the articles published in the last five years on AYAs with cancer and
survivors. An overview that considered the extension of the field was
prioritized, instead of focusing on a specific theme studied in it. The
following questions guided the mapping of this scoping review:
(1) Do the purposes of the selected articles have any standards that
may be scientifically relevant to the area if identified?
(2) Is there a scientific gap larger than others that needs to be
prioritized in this field of study aimed at AYAs with cancer?
Methods
Literature search strategy
The scoping review was carried out in February 2020. Combinations
of the terms “Adolescent and young adults” or “AYAs with cancer” with
“main needs” and “cancer” with “Adolescent and young adults” or “AYAs
main needs” were used in the journals of the Coordenação de Aperfei-
çoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Google Scholar. The
search was limited only to peer-reviewed articles, in either English or
Portuguese.
Screen and selection criteria
Initially, 442 articles were screened by their title and abstract
* Corresponding author at: Oscar Borges de Macedo Ribas, 135 – AP 701, Curitiba, Paraná, Zip Code: 81.200-521.
E-mail address: camimarochi18@gmail.com.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications
journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com/journal/cancer-treatment-and-research-communications
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100316
mailto:camimarochi18@gmail.com
www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/2468294
2
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/cancer-treatment-and-research-communications
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.1003
16
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100316
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100316
http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100316&domain=pdf
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
2
(Fig. 1). The author evaluated 270 articles to decide which of them
would be eligible for analysis. For this purpose, the following criteria
were established: studies targeting only AYAs with cancer or survivors;
being published between 2015 and 2020; being either in English or
Portuguese; being an empirical or theoretical research, quantitative
and/or qualitative; addressing different topics related to AYAs, such as
unmet needs, AYAs challenges, hospital challenges, interventions or
tools based on evidence, as well as political and socioeconomic aspects
of this population. This review was conducted by one person, without
blinded evaluation.
Studies that included children or adults with cancer together or in
comparison with AYAs were excluded. The age range applied to define
the population of AYA in the cancer treatment differs from one country
to another[10]. Some researchers and health professionals in the area
focused on the cancer treatment of AYAs considered the age range from
15 to 39, while others considered it from 15 to 29 or even 20 to 29 [8,10]
. This discrepancy creates problems to assist effectively this population
world widely. Since this paper aimed to consider the unmet needs of
AYAs in a broader way, the age range chosen by each article to define the
population of AYAs was neither exclusion nor inclusion criteria. If the
term “AYA” was used to define its population in a study and there were
no other populations (children or adults) being compared with it, the
study was included.
Case studies, theses, dissertations, narrative literature reviews, re-
ports, book chapters, books, summaries or testing of protocols and ar-
ticles describing non-evidence based interventions or tools were
excluded. Additionally, in order to analyze reliable data, only peer-
reviewed researches that had been published in relevant Journals or
magazines in the area were included.
Data analysis
With the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and
Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), it is possible to visualize the steps of this
scoping review more clearly (Fig. 1).
As presented above, 474 articles were identified. Out of these, 204
articles were excluded for being a duplicate or having titles and abstracts
that did not meet the including criteria. Out of the 270 remaining arti-
cles, 109 were still ineligible under the exclusion criteria. Finally, 161
articles were included and analyzed in their entirety. Appendices A and
B show the characteristics of the included studies divided in theoretical
and empirical, respectively.
The data was extracted in two stages. The first stage consisted of
identifying the following aspects of the articles included: a) research
theme, b) research purpose, c) study type, d) study design, e) focused
population and f) country. By compiling the data from these aspects in
Excel spreadsheets, it was possible to quantify how many researches
focused on different themes, purposes, study types and designs, popu-
lation (AYAs, family of AYAs, caregivers, etc.) and, also, to quantify the
amount produced per country in this scientific area.
Despite the substantial number of objective data collected in the first
stage described above, the second stage needed a thorough sentence
interpretation. As this review raised questions about the purposes of the
researches, the author directly approached each of their purpose sen-
tences, aiming to identify any kind of pattern. By analyzing those sen-
tences, it was possible to identify three different purpose patterns
described in the discussion, since they are more interpretative than
objective results. Appendices A and B show the sentences that were
analyzed and the pattern in which they fit in.
Results
Characteristics of included studies
Theme
The 161 articles have four specific themes related to AYAs with
cancer. They are: (1) Health system/treatments, (2) Quality of Life, (3)
Sexual Health and (4) Social Issues. Most of the studies (46%) discuss
aspects of the health system, hospital dynamics, treatment and in-
terventions that could have an impact on AYAs with cancer during
treatment. The second largest amount (39.1%) of articles discuss aspects
or interventions that directly influence the quality of life and mental
health of AYAs with cancer. In third, 8.7% discuss issues and in-
terventions related to sexual health, especially fertility and decision
making during treatment. The remaining articles address the social,
economic and demographic problems of AYAs with cancer, accounting
for 6.2% of the total (Fig. 2). In addition, out of the 161 articles
analyzed, 18 studies (11.1%) were related to the use of technology to
assist AYAs with cancer. Out of the 139 empirical studies, 44.6% dis-
cussed health system/treatments, 40.29% discussed quality of life,
8.63% discussed sexual health and 6.47% discussed social issues. Among
all empirical studies, 17 (12.2%) study the use of technology to improve
patient care. Out of the 22 theoretical studies, 54.55% discuss health
system/treatments, 31.82% discuss quality of life, 9.09% discuss sexual
health and 4.55% discuss social issues. Among all theoretical studies,
one of them (4.5%) studies the use of technology in assisting AYAs.
Fig. 1. PRISMA diagram of the search results. The Preferred Reporting Items
for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) allows visualizing the
steps of this systematic review: identification (474), screening (442), eligibility
(270) and included (161).
Fig. 2. Graph – Themes of 161 articles. The 161 articles have four specific
themes related to AYAs with cancer: health system/treatments with 74 articles
(46%), quality of Life with 63 articles (39.1%), sexual health with 14 articles
(8.7%) and social issues with 10 articles (6.2%).
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
3
Types of studies
The 161 articles analyzed, as previously stated, were divided into
empirical and theoretical studies. Out of the 139 empirical studies, 130
are qualitative and nine are qualitative and quantitative. Out of the
theoretical studies, four are qualitative, one is quantitative and 17 are
qualitative and quantitative. Thus, in total, 134 are qualitative studies,
26 are qualitative and quantitative and one is quantitative.
Study designs
The procedures and instruments used in the 139 empirical studies
varied according to the following: 10.07% were experimental studies
(pilot studies, pre-post or interventions); 18.71% were Cohort studies
(prospective, retrospective or longitudinal); 2.16% were documental;
27.34% were questionnaires only; 22.30% were surveys only; 8.63%
were interviews only; and 10.79% were mixed procedures (combination
of survey, interview, questionnaires, focus groups, medical records,
scales, record sessions, etc.). Out of the 22 theoretical studies, 68.18%
were systematic reviews, 9.09% were systematic reviews and meta-
analysis, 9.09% were scoping reviews, 4.55% were meta-analysis,
4.55% were integrative reviews and 4.55% were critical reviews.
Countries
The 161 articles were published in different countries, according to
the following: 70 in the USA (43.48%), 39 in Australia (24.22%), 10 in
the United Kingdom (6.21%), 9 in Germany (5.59%), 5 in Canada
(3.11%), 4 in the Netherlands (2.48%), 4 in Denmark (2.48%), 3 in
Belgium (1.86%), 2 in China (1.24%), 2 in Italy (1.24%), 2 in Norway
(1.24%), 2 in Spain (1.24%), 1 in Brazil (0.62%), 1 in France (0.62%), 1
in Japan (0.62%), 1 in Korea (0.62%), 1 in Scotland (0.62%) and 1 in
Sweden (0.62%). Two articles are continental studies: one is Asian and
the other is European. Out of the 161 articles, as already mentioned, 139
are empirical studies. Their countries of origin are as follows: 62 were
carried out in the USA (44.60%), 34 in Australia (24.46%), 8 in Germany
(5.76%), 5 in the United Kingdom (3.60%), 4 in Canada (2.88%), 4 in
Denmark (2.88%), 4 in the Netherlands (2.88%), 2 in Belgium (1.44%),
2 in China (1.44%), 2 in Italy (1.44%), 2 in Norway (1.44%), 1 in Brazil
(0.72%), 1 in France (0.72%), 1 in Japan (0.72%), 1 in Korea (0.72%), 1
in Scotland (0.72%), 1 in Spain (0.72%) and 1 in Sweden (0.72%), as
well as the two continental studies previously mentioned. Out of the 22
theoretical studies, 8 were carried out in the USA (36.36%), 5 in
Australia (22.73%), 5 in the United Kingdom (22.73%), 1 in Belgium
(4.55%), 1 in Canada (4.55%), 1 in Germany (4.55%) and 1 in Spain
(4.55%).
Focused population
In general, the articles focus on AYAs with cancer, but some also aim
to analyze the relationship of professionals who assist AYAs and their
professional perspectives, as well as the families of patients. Out of the
161 articles, 82.61% focus only on AYAs with cancer, 8.70% refer to
AYAs and the professionals who care for them, 3.73% study AYAs with
cancer and their families, 3.11% refer only to professionals, 1.24% refer
only to families, and 0.62% include all. Out of the 139 empirical studies,
79.86% refer strictly to AYAs with cancer, 10.07% involve AYAs with
cancer and their professionals, 4.32% involve AYAs and their families,
3.60% are restricted to professionals, 1.44% to family and 0.72% to
everyone. Regarding the 22 theoretical studies, all of them refer only to
AYAs with cancer.
Discussion
Purpose pattern
From the analysis of the 161 articles, a pattern in their research
purposes was recognized. As described in the Data Analysis, the second
stage in the data extraction was collecting, analyzing and interpreting
each of the purpose sentences (Appendices A and B). By compiling these
data, it was possible to evaluate whether there were any similarities in
the purposes.
The vast majority aimed to raise more data involving AYAs with
cancer, so that there would be greater awareness of the researched topic.
Part of the articles aimed to test evidence-based interventions or to turn
a pilot study into scientific evidence. Another part of the articles aimed
to evaluate interventions previously applied in institutions or to eval-
uate evidence-based interventions. Due to this interpretation, dividing
the articles into three categories was proposed according to their ob-
jectives: (a) Awareness, (b) Action and (c) Post- action evaluation.
Purpose pattern:
awareness
The “Awareness” classification was assigned to all articles that
investigated variables in areas related to AYAs with cancer, aiming to
increase the understanding of the phenomenon and, thus, to raise
awareness of the needs of AYAs. Out of the 161 articles, 118 (73.3%)
were classified in this category, with a total of 55 from the USA, 27 from
Australia, eight from Germany and six from the United Kingdom, with
the rest of the other countries already mentioned. Out of the 139
empirical studies, 105 fell into this category and out of the 22 theoretical
studies, 13 were included. In addition, three out of the 22 theoretical
studies were classified as Awareness and Action (two from the USA and
one from the UK), as they aimed to disseminate knowledge of issues
related to AYAs with cancer, as well as to discuss or present different
interventions used with them. In total, over the past five years
(2015–2020), 11, 19, 29, 34, 24 and 3 studies falling into this category
were published each year, respectively.
Purpose pattern:
action
The articles classified as “Action” proposed to intervene on the needs
of AYAs with cancer directly with them, their families or professionals,
through pilot studies or evidence-based interventions [104,105,106,
108,109,110,111,112,113,115,116,117,118,119,120,122,123,128,
130,131,132,133,134,135,137,138,140,142,145,147,148,150,152,
156,157,158,159,160,161,162]. Out of the 161 articles, 18 (11.2%)
were classified in this category, with seven from the USA, four from
Australia, two from Canada, two from Denmark, one from the
Netherlands and one from Sweden. Out of 139 empirical studies, 17 fell
into this category and one was included out of the 22 theoretical studies.
In total, over the past five years (2015–2020), two, zero, two, five, nine
and zero studies falling into this category were published each year,
respectively.
Purpose pattern: post-action evaluation
All articles that aimed to evaluate an intervention previously per-
formed at the institution or to evaluate an intervention based on evi-
dence were classified as “Post-action evaluation [103,107,114,121,124,
125126,127,129,136,139,141,143,144,146,149,151,153,154,155].
Out of the 161 articles, 22 (13.7%) were classified in this category, with
eight from Australia, six from the USA, three from the United Kingdom,
two from Canada and one from Germany. Out of the 139 empirical
studies, 17 fell into this category and five were included out of the 22
theoretical studies. In total, over the past five years (2015–2020), three,
five, three, three, six and zero studies falling into this category were
published each year, respectively. Figs. 3, 4 and 5 provide a better view
of the categorization of the 161 articles based on their objectives and
their relationship with each year and country, respectively.
The “Awareness” category has notably been the most searched in the
field, as shown in Figs. 3, 4 and 5. It is worth noting that all research[1,6,
8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,
31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,
53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,
75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
4
97,98,99,100,101,102] in this category point to the need for more
specific interventions for AYAs with cancer, as well as more protocols,
scales and evidences to confirm the effectiveness towards AYAs. In other
words, the research points to the need for more publications in the
“Action” and “Post-Action Evaluation” categories.
According to Fig. 4, a gradual increase in the “Action” and “Post-
Action Evaluation” categories is noticed since 2017, although they are
still very few compared to the “Awareness” category. If continued in this
graduation, the field of science aimed at AYAs with cancer will be
directed to address more effectively the demands already pointed out in
the articles. It is noteworthy that the low number of publications
computed in 2020 is due to the data collection being carried out in
February of this year.
In view of Fig. 5, the variation in the quantity of studies among the
countries that have more publications in the field is noticed: the USA,
Australia, the United Kingdom and Germany. Among these, the USA
stands out for the number of publications in the “Awareness” and “Ac-
tion” categories, while Australia stands out in the “Post-Action Evalua-
tion” category. The United Kingdom and Germany oscillate between
third and fourth place in the categories “Awareness” and “Post-
Action
Evaluation”.
Conclusions
The present research had as its main objective to map, organize and
evaluate the scientific articles that were published from 2015 to 2020
and researched, through different perspectives, the wide demands and
needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer. Through the full
analysis of the articles, Question 1 was answered and three patterns in
their purposes were identified, allowing the categorization of the articles
into “Awareness”, “Action” and “Post-Action Evaluation”. Question 2 was
answered in a quantitative way. As presented, it is concluded that there
is still much to be researched within the “Action” and “Post-Action
Evaluation” categories. In the last three years, these categories have
been growing gradually, even if on a small scale.
Most of the articles in the area pointed to the need for more research
related to interventions, specific protocols and scales to AYAs with
cancer. It was not possible to quantify the number of researches that
highlighted this essential demand so far, mainly because this review was
done by one author and this is its main gap. Due to the substantial
amount of researches screened, analyzed and synthesized, more than
one point of view would have been enriching. Although other collabo-
rators were not available to do this review from beginning to end, the
author shared the evolution of the stages and asked for advice to other
Teen Cancer America (TCA) collaborators that had experience in the
scientific field.
When looking at the research purpose, this article helps researchers
to identify the biggest gaps in the field and can help prioritize questions
to be answered, topics to be further researched and methodologies to be
chosen, based on the quantitative and qualitative evidence presented. As
this research focused on answering questions about the articles pur-
poses, the relevance of future studies that focus specifically in collecting,
mapping and analyzing what the researches conclusions are establishing
about area concerned with the AYAs with cancer must be emphasized.
Do they point in one direction? Do they have any patterns? Can they be
compiled and quantified? Are they relevant complements for the present
results? Can it be a better guidance for the researchers? By considering
the previous questions in future studies, it may be offered a guide for the
researchers in this area – which is so disregarded – since what most of the
researchers already pointed as needed could be easily accessed by
others. Furthermore, the different paths taken from their purposes to
their conclusions could be identified and better evaluated in order to
make it more effective. This kind of research cannot be useful to
advanced areas of study that already have known paths, but this
approach may be both important and effective considering the scarcity
of evidences focused on AYAs with cancer and the emergency to assess
their needs.
Funding statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding
agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.
Author contributions
All was done by the author.
Fig. 3. Purpose patterns of 161 articles. From the analysis of the 161 articles, a
pattern in their research purposes was identified. Dividing the articles into three
categories was proposed, according to the patterns identified. This graph shows
the categories as Awareness with 118 articles (73.3%), Action with 18 articles
(11.2%) and Post-action evaluation with 22 articles (13.7%).
Fig. 4. Purpose patterns: amount of publications from 2015 to 2020. This
graph shows the amount of publications from 2015 to 2020 based on the three
main purpose patterns identified (Awareness, Action and Post-
Action evaluation).
Fig. 5. Purpose patterns: amount of publications per country. This graph shows
the amount of publications per country based on the three main purpose pat-
terns identified (Awareness, Action and Post-Action evaluation).
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
5
Appendix A – Summary of 139 Empirical Studies
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type
Focused
population
(with number)
Theme
Purpose Purpose
category
Abrol, E.
(2017)
Exploring the digital
technology preferences
of teenagers and young
adults (TYA) with cancer
and survivors: a cross-
sectional service
evaluation questionnaire.
United
Kingdom
Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (102)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
with
technology
To establish (1) the current
pattern of use of TYA
digital technologies
within our service-user
population, and (2) their
preferences regarding
digital information and
support within the service.
awareness
Acquati, C.
(2018)
Sexual functioning
among young adult
cancer patients: A 2-year
longitudinal study.
USA Logitudinal cohort
study – survey
Qualitative AYAs (123)
Sexual
Heath
Investigate sexual
dysfunction in ayas over
the course of 2 years after
the initial diagnosis.
awareness
Baird, H.
(2019)
Understanding and
Improving Survivorship
Care for Adolescents and
Young Adults with
Cancer.
Australia Survey, Interview
and focus group
Qualitative AYAs (19),
Professionals
(75), Family
(7)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
This article canvases
consumer (survivor,
sibling, and parent/carer)
and health care
professional (HCP)
perspectives on AYA
survivorship care,
informing practice
improvements in the YCS
and providing system-level
recommendations to
advance the development
of national AYA
survivorship care initiatives
in Australia.
post
Ballantine, K.
(2017)
The burden of cancer in
25–29 year olds in New
Zealand: a case for a
wider adolescent and
young adult age range.
Australia Retrospective
cohort study – data
from New Zealand
Cancer Registry
(NZCR) –
(2000–2009)
Quanti-
quali
AYAs (1606) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Compare cancer incidence
and survival among 25–29
year olds to New Zealand’s
younger AYA population
and to assess survival for
our 15–29 year population
against international
benchmarks.
Awareness
Ballantine, K.
R. (2017)
Small numbers, big
challenges: adolescent
and young adult cancer
incidence and survival in
New Zealand.
Australia Retrospective
cohort study – data
from New Zealand
Cancer Registry
(NZCR) –
(2000–2009)
Quanti-
Quali
AYAs (1606) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Determine cancer survival
and describe the unique
spectrum of cancers
diagnosed among New
Zealand’s adolescents and
young adult (AYA)
population.
Awareness
Barton, K. S.
(2018)
“I’m not a spiritual
person.” How hope might
facilitate conversations
about spirituality among
teens and young adults
with cancer.
USA Interviews Qualitative AYAs (17)
Quality of
life
To 1) describe spiritual
narratives among ayas
based on their self-
identification as religious,
spiritual, both, or neither
and 2) identify language to
support ayas’ spiritual
needs in keeping with their
self-identities.
awareness
Beaupin, L. K.
(2019)
Photographs of meaning:
A novel social media
intervention for
adolescent and young
adult cancer patients.
USA Pilot study Qualitative AYAs (13)
Quality of
life with
technology
Assess the feasibility of a
novel intervention called
photographs of meaning
(POM).
action
Belpame, N.
(2016)
“The AYA Director”: a
synthesizing concept to
understand pstychosocial
experiences of
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
Belgium Interviews Qualitative AYAs (23) Quality of
life
Describe the psychosocial
experiences of adolescents
and young adults with
cancer to further the
understanding of the
meanings they attribute to
their experiences.
awareness
Belpame, N.
(2018)
The 3-phase process in
the cancer experience of
adolescents and young
adults.
Belgium Interviews Qualitative AYAs (23) Quality of
life
Discover the psychosocial
experiences of and their
meanings for ayas enduring
cancer, as well as its
treatment and follow-up,
and to capture the basic
social psychological
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
6
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
process that shaped these
experiences.
Benedict, C.
(2016)
Fertility issues in
adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors.
USA Interview and
focus group
Qualitative AYAs (43) Sexual
Heath
Explore ayas’ discussions of
fertility in the context of
discussing their
survivorship experiences.
awareness
Bradford, N.
(2020)
Do specialist youth
cancer services meet the
physical, psychological
and social needs of
adolescents and young
adults? A cross sectional
study.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (42) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Assess unmet information
and service needs in
adolescent and young adult
cancer survivors (15–29
years) who access specialist
Youth Cancer Services in
Queensland, Australia.
awareness
Bradford, N.
K.(2018)
Educational needs of
health professionals
caring for adolescents
and young adults with
cancer.
Australia Survey Qualitative Professionals
(122)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Identify the learning needs
of health professionals
providing cancer care to
adolescents and young
adults before and following
the introduction of a state-
wide AYA cancer education
program.
awareness
Brauer, E. R.
(2018)
Coming of age with
cancer: physical, social,
and financial barriers to
independence among
emerging adult survivors.
USA Interview Qualitative AYAs (18) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Explore the transition to
self-care in the recovery
phase following HCT
among emerging adults.
awareness
Breuer, N.
(2017)
How do young adults
with cancer perceive
social support? A
qualitative study.
Germany Interviews Qualitative AYAs (18) Quality of
life
Explore and describe the
support YA receive from
their social environment as
well as the support YA
receive from peer cancer
patients.
awareness
Cha, S. (2016) Clinical application of
genomic profiling to find
druggable targets for
adolescent and young
adult (AYA) cancer
patients with metastasis.
Korea Experimental Qualitative AYAs (7) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Analyze cancer genomes
from rare types of
metastatic AYA cancers to
identify driving and/or
druggable genetic
alterations.
awareness
Chalmers, J.
A.(2018)
Psychosocial assessment
using telehealth in
adolescents and young
adults with cancer: a
partially randomized
patient preference pilot
study.
Australia Pilot study Qualitative AYAs (23) Quality of
life with
technology
Assess the feasibility and
acceptability for both
patients and clinicians of
providing a psychosocial
assessment via telehealth to
adolescents and young
adults currently receiving
treatment for cancer,
relative to face-to-face
delivery.
action
Cho, D. (2017) Moderating effects of
perceived growth on the
association between fear
of cancer recurrence and
health-related quality of
life among adolescent
and young adult cancer
survivors.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (292) Quality of
life
Examine how Fear of
Cancer Recurrence,
perceived growth, and
HRQOL were associated
with one another among
AYA survivors.
awareness
Curtin, K. B.
(2017)
Pediatric advance care
planning (pACP) for
teens with cancer and
their families: Design of a
dyadic, longitudinal
RCCT.
USA Experimental –
Evidence-based
intervention
Qualitative AYAs and
Family (260)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Building Evidence for
Effective Palliative/End of
Life Care to evaluate the
efficacy of FACE-TC/// to
give ayas with cancer a
voice in the present if they
cannot speak for
themselves in the future, to
ensure that families know
what ayas would want in a
bad outcome situation, and
to explore if the care
desired is the care received
for those ayas who die
during the study.
action
Daniel, L.
(2016)
Relationship between
sleep problems and
psychological outcomes
USA Logitudinal cohort
study
Qualitative AYAs (167)
and control
Quality of
life
(1) compare AYA cancer
survivors to controls on
indicators of sleep quality,
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
7
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
in adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors
and controls.
group with
170
sleep quantity (total sleep
time and sleep onset
latency), sleep medication
use, and reports of
problematic sleep and
fatigue; (2) understand the
relationship between
psychological functioning
(anxiety, depression, and
posttraumatic stress) and
current medical concerns
with sleep and fatigue in
survivors and controls; and
(3) understand the
prospective relationship
across 2 months between
sleep and fatigue problems
with later mental health
symptoms in survivors
compared to controls.”
DeRouen, M.
C. (2016)
Disparities in adolescent
and young adult survival
after testicular cancer
vary by histologic
subtype: a population-
based study in California
1988–2010.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (14.249) Social issues To determine whether
race/ethnicity and/or
neighborhood
socioeconomic status (SES)
contribute independently
to survival of ayas with
testicular cancer.
awareness
DeRouen, M.
C.(2015)
Cancer-related
information needs and
cancer’s impact on
control over life
influence health-related
quality of life among
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (484) Quality of
life
Examine whether unmet
information need and
perceived control over life
are associated with health-
related quality of life
awareness
DeRouen, M.
C.(2017)
Sociodemographic
disparities in survival for
adolescents and young
adults with cancer differ
by health insurance
status.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (80.855) Social issues To investigate associations
of sociodemographic
factors—race/ethnicity,
neighborhood
socioeconomic status (SES),
and health insurance—with
survival for ado- lescents
and young adults (ayas)
with invasive cancer.
awareness
Dobinson, K.
A. (2016)
A grounded theory
investigation into the
psychosexual unmet
needs of adolescent and
young adult cancer
survivors.
Australia Interview Qualitative AYAs (11) Sexual
Heath
“delineate the pathways
through which AYA
survivor psychosexual
unmet needs manifest, and
to demonstrate further the
types of psychosexual
unmet needs experienced
by ayas.”
awareness
Domínguez,
M. (2017)
“Others Like Me”. An
approach to the use of the
internet and social
networks in adolescents
and young adults
diagnosed with cancer.
Spain Interviews Qualitative AYAs (20) Quality of
life with
technology
To improve comprehension
about how adolescents and
young adults (AYA) diag-
nosed with cancer use the
Internet and social
networks to seek
information about their
illness and to establish
relationships between
them.
awareness
Donovan, E.
(2019)
A mobile-based
mindfulness and social
support program for
adolescents and young
adults with sarcoma:
development and pilot
testing.
USA Pilot study Qualitative AYAs (37) Quality of
life with
technology
To (1) develop a pilot
version of a mobile-based
mindfulness and social
support program and (2)
evaluate program usage
and acceptability. An
exploratory aim was to
examine change in
psychosocial outcomes.
action
Elsbernd, A.
(2019)
Individual Experiences
and Utilization of
Supportive Resources in
USA Interviews Qualitative AYAs (28) Quality of
life
Understand and identify
AYA patient concerns and
experiences throughout
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
8
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
Adolescents and Young
Adults with Cancer.
cancer treatment, what
resources were utilized,
how they were identified,
and how supportive care
resources for AYA cancer
patients can be improved.
Erickson, J. M.
(2019)
Using a Heuristic App to
Improve Symptom Self-
Management in
Adolescents and Young
Adults with Cancer.
USA Interview Qualitative AYAs (85) Heatlh
system/
treatments
with
technology
Examine the effects of a
heuristic symptom
assessment tool on ayas’
self-efficacy for symptom
management, ayas’ self-
regulation abilities related
to their symptoms, and
communication with their
providers about symptoms.
post
Figueroa
Gray, M.
(2018)
Balancing hope and risk
among adolescent and
young adult cancer
patients with late-stage
cancer: a qualitative
interview study.
USA Interview Qualitative AYAs (12) and
Professionals
(5)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Understand the decision-
making experience of AYA
patients with advanced
stages of cancer.
Awareness
Flink, D. M.
(2017)
Priorities in fertility
decisions for
reproductive-aged cancer
patients: fertility
attitudes and cancer
treatment study.
USA Interview Qualitative AYAs (27) Sexual
Heath
To understand the pri-
orities and decision-making
needs for newly diagnosed
AYA cancer patients by
exploring why some
patients elect FP and others
do not.
awareness
Franklin, M.
(2018)
An invisible patient:
Healthcare professionals’
perspectives on caring for
adolescents and young
adults who have a sibling
with cancer.
Australia Interviews Qualitative Professionals
(9)
Quality of
life
Explore healthcare
professionals’ (hcps’)
perspectives on engaging
and supporting adolescent
and young adult (AYA,
12–25 years) siblings of
young cancer patients in
hospital settings.
awareness
Frederick, N.
N.(2018)
Barriers and facilitators
to sexual and
reproductive health
communication between
pediatric oncology
clinicians and adolescent
and young adult patients:
the clinician perspective.
USA Interview Qualitative Professionals
(22)
Sexual
Heath
Investigate the attitudes
and perceptions of pedi-
atric oncology clinicians
towards discussing SRH
with ayas, and to
understand perceived
barriers to effective
communication in current
practice.
awareness
Froude, C.
(2017)
Contextualizing the
young adult female
breast cancer experience:
Developmental,
psychosocial, and
interpersonal influences.
USA Interviews Qualitative AYAs (23) Quality of
life
Explore the illness
experience of aya women
diagnosed with breast
cancer
awareness
Geue, K
(2018)
Prevalence of mental
disorders and
psychosocial distress in
German adolescent and
young adult cancer
patients (AYA).
Germany Interviews Qualitative AYAs (167) Quality of
life
Provide prevalence data of
mental disorders (four-
week, one-year, lifetime)
and psychological distress
in ayas with cancer.
awareness
Geue, K.
(2015)
Sexuality and romantic
relationships in young
adult cancer survivors:
satisfaction and
supportive care needs.
Germany Survey Qualitative AYAs (99) Sexual
Heath
“examine ayas’ quality of
relationships and sexuality
satisfaction thereby
identifying sex
differences.”
awareness
Gittzus, J. A.
(2019)
Peace of mind among
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
USA Interviews Qualitative AYAs (193) Quality of
life
Evaluate the extent to
which ayas with cancer
experience peace of mind
and to identify factors
associated with greater
peace of mind.
awareness
Gordon, L. M.
(2018)
Primary Care Physicians’
Decision Making
Regarding Initial
Oncology Referral for
Adolescents and Young
Adults With Cancer.
USA Survey Qualitative Professionals
(406)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Determine whether
pediatricians are more
likely than other primary
care physicians (pcps) to
refer newly diagnosed
adolescent and young adult
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
9
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
patients with cancer to
pediatric oncological
specialists, and to assess the
physician and patient
characteristics that affect
patterns of referral.
Graetz, D.
(2019)
Things that matter:
Adolescent and young
adult patients’ priorities
during cancer care.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (203) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Investigate ayas’ priorities
during cancer
awareness
Gutiérrez-
Colina, A.
(2017)
Family functioning and
depressive symptoms in
adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors
and their families: a
dyadic analytic
approach.
USA Questionnaires
and Interviews
Qualitative AYAs (64) Quality of
life
Examine dyadic
relationships between
depressive symptoms and
family functioning in
families of pediatric cancer
survivors.
awareness
Hanghøj, S.
(2019)
Impact of Service User
Involvement from the
Perspective of
Adolescents and Young
Adults with Cancer
Experience.
Denmark Interview Qualitative AYAs (12) Heatlh
system/
treatments
To investigate the impact of
participating in service user
involvement initiatives
from the perspective of
AYA cancer patients and
AYA cancer survivors.
awareness
Hart, R. I.
(2020)
The challenges of making
informed decisions about
treatment and trial
participation following a
cancer diagnosis: a
qualitative study
involving adolescents
and young adults with
cancer and their
caregivers.
United
Kingdom
Interview Qualitative AYAs (18) and
Family (13)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Understand and help
facilitate, informed
treatment-related decision-
making in this age group by
enterviews
Awareness
Hølge-
Hazelton, B.
(2016)
“Perhaps I will die
young.” Fears and
worries regarding disease
and death among Danish
adolescents and young
adults with cancer. A
mixed method study.
Denmark Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (822) Quality of
life
Examine (Q1) to what
extend Danish ayas
experienced fears and
worries about dying; (Q2)
with whom, if anyone, they
had shared those worries;
and finally, (Q3) how fears
and worries influenced
their daily life. The
emphasis is on Q3.
awareness
Høybye, M. T.
(2018)
Virtual environments in
cancer care: Pilot-testing
a three-dimensional web-
based platform as a tool
for support in young
cancer patients.
Denmark Pilot study Qualitative AYAs (10) Quality of
life with
technology
Present the results of a pilot
study that tested an early
prototype of an online
virtual environment for
psychosocial support of
AYA cancer patients,
focusing on areas for
further development of the
environment. The pilot
study did not include or
evaluate an actual
intervention component at
this time.
action
Hughes, R. E.
(2015)
Prevalence and intensity
of pain and other
physical and
psychological symptoms
in adolescents and young
adults diagnosed with
cancer on referral to a
palliative care service.
Australia Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (33) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Identify the prevalence,
severity, and mechanism of
pain and other symptoms in
AYA patients referred to a
palliative care service in a
specialist Australian cancer
center.
awareness
Husson, O.
(2017)
Cancer in adolescents
and young adults: who
remains at risk of poor
social functioning over
time?
USA Longitudinal
study – Inventory
Qualitative AYAs (215) Social issues To examine social
functioning among
adolescents and young
adults (ayas) within the
first 2 years after a cancer
diagnosis and compare
their scores with
population norms and
identify trajectories of
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
10
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
social functioning over time
and its correlates.
Hydeman, J.
A. (2019)
Survivorship needs of
adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors: a
concept mapping
analysis.
USA Focus group Qualitative AYAs (27) Heatlh
system/
treatments
To explore the survivorship
concerns through a concept
mapping analysis.
awareness
Ishibashi, A.
(2016)
Psychosocial strength
enhancing resilience in
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
Japan Interviews Qualitative AYAs (18) Quality of
life
Explore ways of enhancing
psychosocial strengths in
newly diagnosed and
relapsed adolescents and
young adults (ayas) to
improve their resilience.
awareness
Jacob, S. A.
(2017)
No improvement in
clinical trial enrollment
for adolescents and
young adults with cancer
at a children’s hospital.
USA Documental –
cancer registry
data at the
Children’s
Hospital of
Pittsburgh (CHP) –
2010–2014
Qualitative – Heatlh
system/
treatments
Determine if the
enrollment of AYA
patients on therapeutic
studies at the same
institution has improved in
recent years with the
greater focus on this
population locally and
nationally.
awareness
Jacobsen, S. K.
(2015)
Experiences of “being
known” by the
healthcare team of young
adult patients with
cancer.
Quebec Interviews Qualitative AYAs (13) Quality of
life
Explore how ayas are being
known by their healthcare
team.
awareness
Jayasuriya, S.
(2019)
Satisfaction,
disappointment and
regret surrounding
fertility preservation
decisions in the pediatric
and adolescent cancer
population.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (30) and
Family (110)
Sexual
Heath
Investigate the risk of
decision regret in families
involved in making a FP
decision and explored
contributive factors.
awareness
Kaal, S. E.
(2016)
Experiences of parents
and general practitioners
with end-of-life care in
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
Netherlands Questionnaire and
Interview
Qualitative Family (15)
and
Professionals
(9)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Analyze the experiences of
Dutch bereaved parents
and general practitioners
(gps) with palliative care of
ayas (18–35 years) in the
terminal stage.
awareness
Kaal, S. E.
(2018)
Online support
community for
adolescents and young
adults (AYAs) with
cancer: user statistics,
evaluation, and content
analysis.
Netherlands Documental and
Questionnaires
Qualitative AYAs (30 and
433 medical
records)
Quality of
life with
technology
Describe the use and
evaluation of a Dutch
secure online support
community for AYA
diagnosed with cancer
between 18 and 35 years.
action
Kaul, S.
(2016)
Health care experiences
of long-term survivors of
adolescent and young
adult cancer.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (1163) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Evaluate health care access
and experiences with care
among long-term survivors
of adolescent and young
adult (AYA) cancer relative
to a comparison group in
the USA.
post
Kay, J. S.
(2019)
Support and conflict in
relationships and
psychological health in
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (115) Quality of
life
Understand associations
between perceived support
and conflict with primary
caregivers, other family,
close friends, and medical
staff, and four measures of
psychological health (PD,
PTSS, PA, and PTG) among
ayas in outpatient cancer
treatment.
awareness
Keegan, T. H.
(2018)
Sociodemographic
disparities in the
occurrence of medical
conditions among
adolescent and young
adult Hodgkin
lymphoma survivors.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (5.085) Social issues Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)
survivors experience high
risks of second cancers and
cardiovascular disease and
this study have aimed to
consider whether the
occurrence of these and
other medical conditions
differ by sociodemographic
factors in adolescent and
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
11
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
young adult (AYA)
survivors.
Keegan, T. H.
(2018)
Cardiovascular disease
incidence in adolescent
and young adult cancer
survivors: a retrospective
cohort study.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (79.176) Social issues Determiningwhether the
occurrence of CVD differs
by sociodemographic
factors among AYA cancer
survivors will allow us to
identify those patients at
increased risk of poor
outcomes and inform
strategies to enhance long-
term surveillance and care.
awareness
Kirchhoff, A.
C. (2017)
Supporting adolescents
and young adults with
cancer: oncology
provider perceptions of
adolescent and young
adult unmet needs.
USA Survey Qualitative Professionals
(91)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Identify oncology provider
perceptions of ayas Unmet
Needs and knowledge
about best practices to have
with ayas
awareness
Kleinke, A. M.
(2018)
Adolescents and young
adults with cancer:
aspects of adherence–a
questionnaire study.
Germany Questionnaire Qualitative AYAs (343) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Analyze the adherence of
ayas with cancer compared
to a group of older patients
and, second, to determine
correlated parameters, with
focus on the psychosocial
interaction between
physicians and patients.
awareness
Knox, M. K.
(2017)
Lost and stranded: the
experience of younger
adults with advanced
cancer.
Canadá Interviews Qualitative AYAs (10) Quality of
life
Understand the experience
of younger adults with
advanced cancer.
awareness
Korsvold, L.
(2016)
Patient-provider
communication about
the emotional cues and
concerns of adolescent
and young adult patients
and their family
members when receiving
a diagnosis of cancer.
Norway Recorded
consultations
Qualitative AYAs (9) Quality of
life
Examine how emotional
cues/concerns are
expressed and responded to
in medical consultations
with adolescent and young
adults at the time of
diagnosis
awareness
Korsvold, L.
(2017)
A content analysis of
emotional concerns
expressed at the time of
receiving a cancer
diagnosis: An
observational study of
consultations with
adolescent and young
adult patients and their
family members.
Norway Retrospective
cohort study –
Recorded
Consultations
Qualitative AYAs (9) Quality of
life
Investigate the content of
the AYA’s concerns about
their diagnosis- identified
in a preview research
awareness
Kosola, S.
(2018)
Early education and
employment outcomes
after cancer in
adolescents and young
adults.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (196) Social issues Describe the early
educational and vocational
outcomes of Australian
adolescents and young
adults (ayas) after cancer
diagnosis and examines
factors associated with
these outcomes.
awareness
LaRosa, K. N.
(2019)
Provider perceptions’ of
a patient navigator for
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
USA Interview Qualitative Professionals
(17)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Assessing staff perceptions
of (a) barriers to optimal
care for AYA, (b) roles and
responsibilities for a
patient navigator, and (c)
training needed for future
patient navigators.
awareness
Lavender, V.
(2019)
Health professional
perceptions of
communicating with
adolescents and young
adults about bone cancer
clinical trial
participation.
United
Kingdom
Interview Qualitative Professionals
(18)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Research to date does not
adequately explain all
underlying reasons for poor
trial accrual. This paper
reports health
professional perceptions
of communicating with
adolescents and young
adults with bone sarcoma
about clinical trial
participation.
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
12
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
Li, C. K.
(2019)
Care of adolescents and
young adults with cancer
in Asia: results of an
ESMO/SIOPE/SIOP Asia
survey.
Asia (first
author:
chinese)
Survey Qualitative Hospitals
(268)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Assess AYA cancer care
across Asia.
Awareness
Lin, M. (2017) Health literacy in
adolescents and young
adults: perspectives from
Australian Cancer
Survivors.
Australia Interview Qualitative AYAs (40) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Explore health literacy in
Australian cancer survivors
within the AYA age group
either at diagnosis or
interview.
Awareness
Linder, L. A.
(2017)
Symptom self-
management strategies
reported by adolescents
and young adults with
cancer receiving
chemotherapy.
Germany Cohort study –
Computerized
Symptom Capture
Tool.
Quanti-
Quali
AYAs (72) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Describe symptom self-
management strategies
reported by ayas with
cancer
awareness
Linder, L. A.
(2019)
Oral medication
adherence among
adolescents and young
adults with cancer before
and following use of a
smartphone-based
medication reminder
app.
USA Intervention and
Questionnaires
Qualitative AYAs (23) Heatlh
system/
treatments
with
technology
Evaluate oral medication
adherence among
adolescents and yo ung
adults (ayas) with cancer
during a trial of a
smartphone-based
medication reminder
application (app).”
action
Mack, J. W.
(2018)
Communication about
prognosis with
adolescent and young
adult patients with
cancer: information
needs, prognostic
awareness, and outcomes
of disclosure.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (203) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Evaluate experiences with
prognosis communication
among adolescents and
young adults (ayas) with
cancer.
awareness
Mack, J. W.
(2019)
Adolescent and Young
Adult Cancer Patients’
Experiences With
Treatment Decision-
making.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (305) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Evaluate cancer treatment
decision- making among
ayas, including decisional
engagement and regret.
post
Martins, H. T.
(2018)
Who cares for
adolescents and young
adults with cancer in
Brazil?.
Brazil Retrospective
cohort study –
Hospitals
registries
(2007–2011)
Qualitative Hospitals
(271)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Evaluate exactly where
adolescents and young
adults with cancer are
treated in Brazil.
awareness
May, E. A.
(2018)
Adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors’
experiences of the
healthcare system: a
qualitative study.
Australia Interview Qualitative AYAs (42) Heatlh
system/
treatments
To qualitatively examine
the experiences of diagnosis
and treatment, and
attitudes toward ongoing
healthcare of adolescent
and young adult (AYA)
survivors of AYA cancer, to
determine barriers to
healthcare engagement in
the early survivorship
period.
post
McCarthy, M.
C. (2016)
Psychological distress
and posttraumatic stress
symptoms in adolescents
and young adults with
cancer and their parents.
Australia Questionnaires
and Survey
Qualitative AYAs (196)
and Family
(204)
Quality of
life
Investigate the prevalence
and predictors of
psychological distress in
adolescent and young adult
(AYA) cancer patients and
their parent caregivers.
awareness
McDonald, F.
E. (2015)
Predictors of unmet
needs and psychological
distress in adolescent and
young adult siblings of
people diagnosed with
cancer.
Australia Questionnaires Qualitative Family (106) Quality of
life
Predictors of psychological
distress and unmet needs
amongst adolescents and
young adults (ayas) who
have a brother or sister
diagnosed with cancer were
examined.
awareness
McDonald, F.
E. (2015)
Evaluation of a resource
for adolescents and
young adults diagnosed
with cancer.
Australia Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (46) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Evaluate a book for ayas
diagnosed with cancer, in
particular to assess
satisfaction, changes in
perceived knowledge and
coping, the impact of health
literacy (HL) on perceived
knowledge, and the impact
post
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
13
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
of the book on distress
levels.
McDonnell, G.
A.(2018)
A qualitative study of
adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors’
perceptions of family and
peer support.
USA Interview Qualitative AYAs (26) Quality of
life
Examine adolescent and
young adult survivors’
perceptions of support from
family and peers.
awareness
McGrady, M.
E. (2017)
Spending on hospital
care and pediatric
psychology service use
among adolescents and
young adults with
cancer.
USA Documental –
billing data
Qualitative AYAs (96) Quality of
life
Examine the relationship
between need-based
pediatric psychology
service use and spending on
hospital care among
adolescents and young
adults (ayas) with cancer.
awareness
McNeil, R.
(2019)
The changing nature of
social support for
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
Australia Interviews Qualitative AYAs (60) Quality of
life
Explore adolescent and
young adult (AYA)
experiences and
preferences for social
support early within the
continuum of cancer
treatment.
awareness
McNeil, R. J.
(2019)
Financial challenges of
cancer for adolescents
and young adults and
their parent caregivers.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (196)
and Family
(204)
Social issues Examined the financial
impact of cancer and the
use of income support in
adoles- cents and young
adults (ayas) with cancer
and their parent caregivers.
awareness
McVeigh, T. P.
(2018)
The role of genomic
profiling in adolescents
and young adults (AYAs)
with advanced cancer
participating in phase I
clinical trials.
United
Kingdom
Retrospective
cohort study –
medical records
Quanti-
Qualitative
AYAs (219) Heatlh
system/
treatments
To investigate the use and
impact of: 1. Germline
genetic assessment. 2.
tumor molecular profiling.
awareness
Medlow, S.
(2015)
Determining research
priorities for adolescent
and young adult cancer
in Australia.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (26) and
Professionals
(75)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Determining research
priorities for ayas with
cancer was undertaken
utilizing three
complementary
approaches: stakeholder
consultations, a systematic
literature review and a
large- scale online survey of
professional and consumer
perspec- tives. This paper
reports on the survey.
awareness
Mitchell, L.
(2018)
Measuring the impact of
an adolescent and young
adult program on
addressing patient care
needs.
Canada Survey Qualitative AYAs (239) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Evaluate the effectiveness
of an adult-based
adolescent and young adult
(AYA) cancer program by
assessing patient
satisfaction and whether
programming offers added
incremental benefit beyond
primary oncology providers
(POP) to address their
needs.
post
Morrison, C. F.
(2018)
Facilitators and barriers
to self-management for
adolescents and young
adults following a
hematopoietic stem cell
transplant.
USA Interview Quanti-
Quali
AYAs (17) and
Professionals
(13)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Address the knowledge gap
by pre-senting facilitators
of and barriers to AYA self-
management following an
HSCT, based on evidence
from a grounded theory
research study.
Awareness
Muffly, L. S.
(2016)
Psychological
morbidities in adolescent
and young adult blood
cancer patients during
curative-intent therapy
and early survivorship.
USA Questionnaires
and Survey
Qualitative AYAs (61) and
Professionals
(15)
Quality of
life
Describing the prevalence
of psychological
morbidities among ayas
with hematologic
malignancies during
curative-intent therapy and
early survivorship and at
examining provider
perceptions of
psychological morbidities
in their AYA patients.
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
14
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
Murnane, A.
(2015)
Adolescents and young
adult cancer survivors:
exercise habits, quality of
life and physical activity
preferences.
Australia Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (74) Quality of
life
Explore the exercise
programming preferences
and information needs of
AYA survivors and to
examine the impact of a
cancer diagnosis on
physical activity behavior
and qol.
awareness
Murnane, A.
(2015)
Adolescents and young
adult cancer survivors:
exercise habits, quality of
life and physical activity
preferences.
Australia Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (74) Quality of
life
Explore the exercise
programming preferences
and information needs of
AYA survivors and to
examine the impact of a
cancer diagnosis on
physical activity behavior
and qol.
awareness
Murray, A. N.
(2016)
Adolescents and Young
Adults With Cancer:
Oncology Nurses Report
Attitudes and Barriers to
Discussing Fertility
Preservation.
United
Kingdom
Survey Qualitative Professionals
(116)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
To assess oncology nurses’
recommendations for
patients to consider
Fertility Preservation
options and to explore what
patienrelated factors may
influence discussion of FP
with ayas with cancer.
awareness
Mütsch, J.
(2019)
Sexuality and cancer in
adolescents and young
adults-a comparison
between reproductive
cancer patients and
patients with non-
reproductive cancer
Germany Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (577) Sexual
Heath
Examine sexual satisfaction
and sexual supportive care
needs among adolescent
and young adult cancer
patients, with a particular
focus on how the type of
cancer a person has is
associated with these issues
differently.
awareness
Pappot, H.
(2019)
Health-related quality of
life before and after use
of a smartphone app for
adolescents and young
adults with cancer: pre-
post interventional study.
Denmark Pre-post Qualitative AYAs (20) Quality of
life with
technology
To investigate the
feasibility of a smartphone
app among AYA patients
with cancer in active
treatment and
posttreatment, in a pilot
test by measuring health-
related quality of life before
and after the use of the app.
action
Parsons, H. M.
(2015)
Who treats adolescents
and young adults with
cancer? A report from the
AYA HOPE Study.
USA Documental –
National Cancer
Institute’s
population-based
AYA HOPE Study
Qualitative AYAs (464)
and
Professionals
(903)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Discover when there’s no
AYA cancer medical
specialty, where and by
whom ayas with cancer are
treated.
awareness
Patterson, P.
(2015)
“Being Mindful” Does it
Help Adolescents and
Young Adults Who Have
Completed Cancer
Treatment?.
Australia Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (76) Quality of
life
Examine whether a mindful
dispositional trait was
associated with better
adaptive outcomes for
these young people.
awareness
Peavey, M.
(2017)
On-site fertility
preservation services for
adolescents and young
adults in a
comprehensive cancer
center.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (154) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Define the AYA patient
population referred to an
on-site fertility consultation
service within a
comprehensive cancer
center and determine
factors associated with
patients proceeding with FP
treatment.
Awareness
Phillips, C. R
(2020)
Like Prisoners in a War
Camp: Adolescents and
Young Adult Cancer
Survivors’ Perspectives
of Disconnectedness
From Healthcare
Providers During Cancer
Treatment.
USA Interviews Qualitative AYAs (9) Quality of
life
Describe AYA cancer
survivors experiences of
disconnectedness from hcps
during cancer treatment.
awareness
Phillips, C. R.
(2017)
Connecting with
healthcare providers at
diagnosis: adolescent/
young adult cancer
survivors’ perspectives.
USA Interviews Qualitative AYAs (8) Quality of
life
Describe AYA cancer
survivors’ experiences
connecting with hcps
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
15
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
Poort, H.
(2017)
Prevalence and impact of
severe fatigue in
adolescent and young
adult cancer patients in
comparison with
population-based
controls.
Netherlands Questionnaire Qualitative AYAs (83) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Determine the prevalence
of severe fatigue in
adolescent and young adult
(AYA) cancer patients
(aged 18–35 years at
diagnosis) consulting a
multidisciplinary AYA team
in comparison with gender-
and age-matched popu-
lation-based controls. ///
examine the impact of
severe fatigue on quality of
life and correlates of fatigue
severity
awareness
Reblin, M.
(2019)
Family dynamics in
young adult cancer
caregiving:“It should be
teamwork”.
USA Interviews Qualitative AYAs (15) and
Family(9)
Quality of
life
Provide insight into the
expectations young adult
patients and their family
caregivers for types of
psychosocial support.
awareness
Ricadat, É.
(2019)
Adolescents and young
adults with cancer: How
multidisciplinary health
care teams adapt their
practices to better meet
their specific needs.
France Interview Qualitative Professionals
(31)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Identify and describe the
practical methods of care
and teamwork
implemented by hcps in
response to what they
perceive as essential to
support psychosocial
development of AYA
patients.
Awareness
Richter, D.
(2019)
Health literacy in
adolescent and young
adult cancer patients and
its association with
health outcomes.
Germany Survey Qualitative AYAs (206) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Examined the frequency of
health literacy (HL) in
adolescents and young
adult (AYA) cancer patients
and the factors associated
with HL
awareness
Robertson, E.
G.(2016)
Sexual and romantic
relationships:
experiences of adolescent
and young adult cancer
survivors.
Australia Interview Qualitative AYAs (43) Sexual
Heath
Examine the quality and
satisfaction of sexual/
romantic relationships of
adolescents/young adults
(ayas) who recently
completed cancer
treatment.
awareness
Rosenberg, A.
R. (2018)
Hope, distress, and later
quality of life among
adolescent and young
adults with cancer.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (37) and
Family (40)
Quality of
life
Explore the predictive
value of screening for
distress alone, hope alone,
or a combination of both.
awareness
Rosenberg, A.
R.(2015)
Insurance status and risk
of cancer mortality
among adolescents and
young adults.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (57.981) Social issues To identify associations
between insurance status
and both advanced-stage
cancer and cancer-specific
mortality.
awareness
Roth, M. E.
(2016)
Low enrollment of
adolescents and young
adults onto cancer trials:
insights from the
community clinical
oncology program.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
eletronic helth
records
Qualitative AYAs (17.963) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Investigate if Community
Clinical Oncology Program
(CCOP) sites enrolled
proportionately more ayas
than non-CCOP sites onto
Children’s Oncology Group
(COG) trials.
post
Saita, E.
(2019)
Evaluating the Framed
Portrait Experience as an
Intervention to Enhance
Self-Efficacy and Self-
Esteem in a Sample of
Adolescent and Young
Adult Cancer Survivors:
Results of a Pilot Study.
Italy Pilot study Qualitative AYAs (18) Quality of
life
Investigate the Framed
Portrait Experience (FPE)
as an intervention
topromote well-being
among AYA cancer
survivors.
action
Saloustros, E.
(2017)
The care of adolescents
and young adults with
cancer: results of the
ESMO/SIOPE survey.
Europe (first
author:
greek)
Survey Qualitative Professionals
(266)
Heatlh
system/
treatments
Know about the training
and practice of European
healthcare providers in
regard to AYA and the
availability of specialised
services.
Awareness
Sanford, S. D.
(2017)
Clinical research
participation among
adolescent and young
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
medical records
Qualitative AYAs (208) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Examine the current state
of clinical trial enrollment
of ayas at a major adult-
post
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
16
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
adults at an NCI-
designated
Comprehensive Cancer
Center and affiliated
pediatric hospital.
based comprehensive
cancer center and pediatric
affiliate in the USA as a
means to advise program
development and methods
for tailoring existing
innovations, ultimately
increasing the availability
of trials and study partic-
ipation of ayas at these
institutions.
Sansom-Daly,
U. M.
(2015)
Ethical and clinical
challenges delivering
group-based cognitive-
behavioural therapy to
adolescents and young
adults with cancer using
videoconferencing
technology.
Australia Retrospective
cohort study –
medical records
Qualitative AYAs (11) Quality of
life
Discuss the Recapture Life
randomised controlled
trial, which involved
online, videoconferencing-
based delivery of group-
based cognitive
behavioural therapy to
adolescents and young
adults aged 15–25 years in
the first year post-
treatment. Ethical
challenges”
post
Sansom-Daly,
U. M.
(2019)
Feasibility, acceptability,
and safety of the
Recapture Life
videoconferencing
intervention for
adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors.
Australia Pilot study Qualitative AYAs (45) Quality of
life with
technology
Establish the feasibility,
acceptability, and safety of
Recapture life, a six-session
group-based online
cognitive-behavioural
intervention, led by a
facilitator, for ayas in the
early post-treatment
period.
action
Sawyer, S. M.
(2016)
Fulfilling the vision of
youth-friendly cancer
care: a study protocol.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (196)
and Family
(204)
Quality of
life
Develop an evidence-
informed model of cancer
care for this age group
awareness
Sawyer, S. M.
(2019)
Developmentally
appropriate care for
adolescents and young
adults with cancer: how
well is Australia doing?.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (196) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Describe how well
Australian cancer services
deliver patient-focussed,
developmentally
appropriate care to
adolescents and young
adults (ayas) with cancer.
post
Sender, A.
(2019)
Unmet supportive care
needs in young adult
cancer patients:
associations and changes
over time.
Germany Survey Qualitative AYAs (514) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Examine unmet supportive
care needs and to
investigate predictors of
and changes in unmet
needs over time.
awareness
Shay, L. A.
(2017)
Survivorship care
planning and unmet
information and service
needs among adolescent
and young adult cancer
survivors.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
survey records
Qualitative AYAs (1395) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Examine whether
survivorship care planning
(receipt of written
treatment summary or
instructions for follow-up
care) is associated with
unmet needs among
adolescent and young adult
(AYA) cancer survivors
(aged 15–39 at diagnosis).
awareness
Shirazee, N.
(2016)
Patterns in Clinical Trial
Enrollment and
Supportive Care Services
Provision Among
Adolescents and Young
Adults Diagnosed with
Having Cancer During
the Period 2000–2004 in
Western Australia.
Australia Retrospective
cohort study –
medical records
Qualitative AYAs (383) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Examine Support services
provision and clinical trial
enrollment
post
Skaczkowski,
G. (2018)
Factors influencing the
documentation of
fertility-related
discussions for
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
Australia Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (941) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Examine the rate of medical
record documentation of
fertility-related discussions
and fertility preservation
(FP) procedures for
adolescents and young
adults (ayas) with cancer in
Australia.
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
17
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
Skaczkowski,
G.(2018)
Factors influencing the
provision of fertility
counseling and impact on
quality of life in
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (207) Sexual
Heath
Investigate the impact of
fertility-related discussions
on Adolescent and Young
Adult (AYA) cancer
patients’ quality of life
(qol) and the factors
influencing provision of
these discussions.
awareness
Skaczkowski,
G.(2018)
Do Australian
adolescents’ and young
adults’ experiences of
cancer care influence
their quality of life?
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (209) Quality of
life
Examine the relationship
between the cancer care
experiences of
adolescentsand young
adults (ayas) and their
quality of life.
awareness
Smith, A.
(2019)
ReActivate—A Goal-
Orientated
Rehabilitation Program
for Adolescent and Young
Adult Cancer Survivors.
Australia Prospective
(single-site)
cohort study
Qualitative AYAs
survivors (35)
Quality of
life
Evaluate the feasibility and
acceptability of reactivate,
an 8-week, group-based,
goal-orientated
rehabilitation program for
AYA cancer survivors.
action
Smits-
Seemann, R.
R. (2017)
Barriers to follow-up care
among survivors of
adolescent and young
adult cancer.
USA Focus group Qualitative AYAs (28) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Understand whether
additional barriers to
follow-up care exist for
AYA survivors.
awareness
Spathis, A.
(2017)
Cancer-related fatigue in
adolescents and young
adults after cancer
treatment: persistent and
poorly managed.
United
Kingdom
Survey Quanti-
Quali
AYAs (80) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Quantify the impact of
fatigue on young patients
and their carers, to find out
how fatigue is currently
being managed in the
United Kingdom, and to
ascertain perceptions of the
effectiveness of such
management.
post
Spraker-
Perlman, H.
(2018)
Statewide Treatment
Center Referral Patterns
for Adolescent and Young
Adult Patients with
Cancer in Utah.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (5032) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Determine where AYA
cancer patients received
primary therapy.
awareness
Steineck, A.
(2019)
A Psychosocial
Intervention’s Impact on
Quality of Life in AYAs
with Cancer: A Post Hoc
Analysis from the
Promoting Resilience in
Stress Management
(PRISM) Randomized
Controlled Trial.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
Medical records
Qualitative AYAs (99) Quality of
life
This post hoc exploratory
analysis aimed to better
understand the effect of
PRISM on HRQOL by
describing changes in
HRQOL subdomain scores.
post
Sun, H. (2019) Fear of cancer
recurrence, anxiety and
depressive symptoms in
adolescent and young
adult cancer patients.
China Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (249) Quality of
life
Explore the prevalence and
correlate of FCR, anxiety
and depressive symptoms
in Chinese AYA cancer
population.
awareness
Thewes, B.
(2018)
Prevalence and correlates
of high fear of cancer
recurrence in late
adolescents and young
adults consulting a
specialist adolescent and
young adult (AYA)
cancer service.
Netherlands Questionnaires
and scales
Qualitative AYAs
survivors (73)
Quality of
life
Explore the prevalence,
correlates of high Fear of
Cancer Recurrence, and its
association with hrqol in
cancer patients in their late
adolescence or young
adulthood.
awareness
Thompson, C.
M. (2016)
Understanding how
adolescents and young
adults with cancer talk
about needs in online and
face-to-face support
groups.
USA Documental and
Support groups
Quanti-
Quali
AYAs (569 and
360
documents)
Quality of
life with
technology
To determine how talk
about needs differs online
versus face-to- face.
awareness
Tindle, D.
(2019)
Centralizing temporality
in adolescent and young
adult cancer
survivorship.
Australia Interviews Qualitative AYAs (45) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Explore the phenomenon of
cancer survivorship as
experienced by ayas
diagnosed with cancer in
Australia, England, and the
United States.
awareness
Tremolada, M.
(2018)
Adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors
Italy Interviews Qualitative AYAs (1000) Quality of
life
Examine the perceived
personal growth and daily
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
18
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
narrate their stories:
Predictive model of their
personal growth and
their follow-up
acceptance.
routines of adolescent and
young adult childhood
cancer survivors using a
narrative approach based
on an ecocultural
framework; (2) examine the
extent to which cancer-
related factors (age at
diagnosis, time since
diagnosis, cancer diagnosis
type), key
sociodemographic
variables (gender, age at
the assessment, education
status, presence of a long-
term partner) and
psychosocial factors (social
support, relationships with
health staff) predict the
likelihood of young adult
survivors’ attributing
positive outcomes to
having had cancer; and (3)
identify the factors that
could somehow increase
the acceptance and the
level of tranquility
experienced by the
survivors towards follow-
up visits.
Vetsch, J.
(2018)
Educational and
vocational goal
disruption in adolescent
and young adult cancer
survivors.
Australia Interview Qualitative AYAs (42) Social issues To report on AYA cancer
survivors’ experiences of
reintegration into school
and/or work and to
describe perceived changes
in their educational and
vocational goals.
awareness
Walsh, C.
(2019)
Shifting needs and
preferences: supporting
young adult cancer
patients during the
transition from active
treatment to survivorship
care.
USA Interview Qualitative AYAs (13) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Identify and explore the
social support needs and
preferences of young adult
cancer patients during the
transition process from
active treatment to
survivorship care.
awareness
Warner, E. L.
(2016)
Health behaviors, quality
of life, and psychosocial
health among survivors
of adolescent and young
adult cancers.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (7619) –
control group
with 334.759
Quality of
life
Asses health behaviors and
constructs including quality
of life (QOL) and
psychosocial well-being
among survivors of AYA
cancer compared to the
general population.
awareness
Warner, E. L.
(2018)
Patient navigation
preferences for
adolescent and young
adult cancer services by
distance to treatment
location.
USA Interview Qualitative AYAs (39) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Describe how distance to
treatment location
influences patient
navigation preferences for
ado- lescent and young
adult (AYA) cancer patients
and survivors.
awareness
Wasilewski-
Masker, K.
(2016)
Adolescent and young
adult perceptions of
cancer survivor care and
supportive
programming.
USA Survey Qualitative AYAs (157) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Conduct a program
evaluation to identify ayas’
perceptions of survivor care
services.
post
Watson, A.
(2019)
Interdisciplinary
communication:
documentation of
advance care planning
and end-of-life care in
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
USA Retrospective
cohort study –
eletronic helth
records
Qualitative AYAs (30) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Assess the Eletonic Health
Record of a large tertiary
care pediatric hospital for
inclusion of discussions
about goals of care and
details about preferences
and the actual care
delivered at End of Life
post
Wettergren, L.
(2017)
Cancer negatively
impacts on sexual
function in adolescents
USA Cohort study –
Survey
Qualitative AYAs (465) Sexual
Heath
Examine the impact of
cancer on sexual function
and intimate relationships
awareness
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
19
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design Study type Focused
population
(with number)
Theme Purpose Purpose
category
and young adults: the
AYA HOPE study.
in adolescents and young
adults (ayas) and explore
the factors predicting an
increased likelihood that
cancer had negatively
affected these outcomes.
White, V.
(2018)
Experiences of care of
adolescents and young
adults with cancer in
Australia.
Australia Survey Qualitative AYAs (207) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Examine the care
experiences of Australian
Adolescents and Young
Adults (ayas) with cancer
during a period when youth
cancer services (YCS) were
developing across the
country.
post
Wiklander, M.
(2017)
Feasibility of a self-help
web-based intervention
targeting young cancer
patients with sexual
problems and fertility
distress.
Sweden Participatory
research –
education
meetings, forum
discussion and
telephone
consultations
Qualitative AYAs (23) Sexual
Heath and
technology
“To evaluate the feasibility
of a self-help web-based
intervention to alleviate
sexual problems and
fertility distress in
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.”
action
Wu, X. C.
(2015)
Impact of the AYA HOPE
comorbidity index on
assessing health care
service needs and health
status among adolescents
and young adults with
cancer.
USA Survey and
madical records
Qualitative AYAs (485) Heatlh
system/
treatments
Assess impact of
comorbidities on health
care service needs and
health status among AYA
cancer survivors using the
newly developed AYA
HOPE comorbidity index in
comparison with the
existing indices.
action
Wu, Y. P.
(2018)
Use of a Smartphone
Application for
Prompting Oral
Medication Adherence
Among Adolescents and
Young Adults With
Cancer.
USA Pre-post Qualitative AYAs (23) Heatlh
system/
treatments
with
technology
Explore the feasibility and
acceptability of use of a
smartphone medication
reminder application to
promote adherence to oral
medications among
adolescents and young
adults (ayas) with cancer.
action
Wurz, A.
(2019)
Exploring the feasibility
and acceptability of a
mixed-methods pilot
randomized controlled
trial testing a 12-week
physical activity
intervention with
adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors.
Canada Pilot study Qualitative
AYAs (16) Quality of
life
A pilot study exploring the
feasibility and acceptability
of a physical activity
intervention and proposed
trial methods to inform a
definitive randomized
controlled trial (RCT) is
therefore necessary to fill
this gap.
action
Wurz, A.
(2019)
Exploring the feasibility
and acceptability of a
mixed-methods pilot
randomized controlled
trial testing a 12-week
physical activity
intervention with
adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors.
Canadá Pilot study Quanti-
Quali
AYAs (16) Quality of
life
A pilot study exploring the
feasibility and acceptability
of a physical activity
intervention and proposed
trial methods to inform a
definitive randomized
controlled trial (RCT) is
therefore necessary to fill
this gap.
action
Xie, J. (2017) A prevalence study of
psychosocial distress in
adolescents and young
adults with cancer.
China Questionnaires Qualitative AYAs (551) Quality of
life
Investigate the prevalence
of psychological distress in
Chinese ayas with cancer
and examine the
associations among
distress, anxiety and
depression, medical coping,
and social support in the
same population.
awareness
Yurkiewicz, I.
R. (2018)
Effect of Fitbit and iPad
wearable technology in
health-related quality of
life in adolescent and
young adult cancer
patients.
USA Pre-post Qualitative AYAs (33) Quality of
life with
technology
Investigate whether the use
of digital wearable
technology (Fitbits, along
with synced ipads) can
affect health-related quality
of life (HRQOL) in AYA
aged patients with cancer.
action
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
20
Appendix B
Summary of 22 Theoretical Studies
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design (with
numbers)
Theme(with
technology or
not)
Focused
population
Purpose Purpose
category
Fridgen
(2017)
Contraception: the need for
expansion of counsel in
adolescent and young adult
(AYA) cancer care.
USA Systematic Review –
289 identified – 5
included
Sexual heatlh
Ayas in
general
Identify related studies on
contraception recommendations,
counseling discussions, and methods
of contraception in the AYA
oncology population.
Awareness
and action
Stanton
(2018)
Sexual function in
adolescents and young adults
diagnosed with cancer: A
systematic review.
USA Systematic Review –
2975 identified – 15
included
Sexual heatlh Ayas in
general
Identify, with supporting evidence,
the impact of cancer and its
treatment on the sexual function of
adolescents and young adults.
Awareness
Warner
(2016)
Social well-being among
adolescents and young adults
with cancer: a systematic
review.
USA Systematic Review –
253 identified – 26
included
Social issues Ayas in
general
Identify gaps in current research and
highlight priority areas for future
research. Social well-being
Awareness
Carretier
(2016)
A Review of Health Behaviors
in Childhood and Adolescent
Cancer Survivors: Toward
Prevention of Second
Primary Cancer.
United
Kingdom
Systematic review –
105 identified – 27
included
Quality of life
Ayas
(survivors)
Review the available literature on
cancer risk factors (lifestyle and
occupational exposures) in children
and ayas previously treated for
cancer, to identify interventions that
might be implemented to improve
healthy behaviors in this population.
Awareness/
action
Walker
(2016)
Psychosocial interventions
for adolescents and young
adults diagnosed with cancer
during adolescence: a critical
review.
United
Kingdom
Critical review – 1632
identified – 18
included
Quality of life Ayas in
general
Examine the availability of AYA-
specific psychosocial interventions
to assess the impact they have and
identify elements that make them
successful
Post
Sodergren
(2017)
Systematic review of the
health-related quality of life
issues facing adolescents and
young adults with cancer.
United
Kingdom
Systematic review –
2671 identified – 69
included
Quality of life Ayas in
general
Report the health-related quality of
life issues experienced by ayas
diagnosed with cancer and
undergoing treatment
Awareness
Bradford
(2017)
Health promotion and
psychological interventions
for adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors: A
systematic literature review.
Australia Systematic review and
metanalysis- 1123
identified – 17
included to synthesis –
0 to metanalysis
Quality of life Ayas
(survivors)
Identify, appraise and synthesize the
effects of health promotion and
psychological interventions for AYA
after cancer treatment.
Post
Richter
(2015)
Psychosocial interventions
for adolescents and young
adult cancer patients: a
systematic review and meta-
analysis.
Germany “Systematic review
and meta-analysis –
5084 identified – 12
included in synthesis –
7 included
in meta-
analysis”
Quality of life Ayas in
general
Assess the impact of
psychosocial
interventions on
mental health in ayas
Post
Quinn
(2015)
Quality of life in adolescent
and young adult cancer
patients: a systematic review
of the literature.
USA Systematic Review –
97 identified – 35
included.
Quality of life Ayas in
general
Identify key psychosocial factors
impacting quality of life in ayas with
cancer
Awareness
Barnett
(2016).
Psychosocial outcomes and
interventions among cancer
survivors diagnosed during
adolescence and young
adulthood (AYA): a
systematic review.
USA Systematic review –
15.301 identified – 38
included
Quality of life/
psychological
demands
Ayas in
general
Identify and synthesize literature
about psychosocial outcomes and
existing interventions specific to
ayas
Awareness
and action
Wong
(2017)
Patterns of unmet needs in
adolescent and young adult
(AYA) cancer survivors: in
their own words.
USA Systematic review –
2417 identified – 58
included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas
(survivors)
Classify the phenomenological
experiences of AYA survivors based
on their own language.
Awareness
Galán(2018) Needs of adolescents and
young adults after cancer
treatment: a systematic
review.
Spain Systematic review –
1334 identified – 14
included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas
(survivors)
To report on the needs of adolescent
and young adult cancer survivors
after their treatment.
Awareness
Gibson
(2017)
Improving the identification
of cancer in young people: A
scoping review
United
Kingdom
Scoping review – 340
identified – 28
included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Identify elements of the diagnostic
pathway; contextualize the many
factors across the diagnostic
pathway; search the possibility of
those to influence the practice and
oportunity to achieve the diagnose.
Awareness
Mccann
(2019)
Digital interventions to
support adolescents and
United
Kingdom
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Identify, characterize and fully
assess the quality, feasibility and
Post
(continued on next page)
C.M. Telles
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
21
(continued )
First author
(year)
Title Country Study design (with
numbers)
Theme(with
technology or
not)
Focused
population
Purpose Purpose
category
young adults with cancer:
systematic review.
Systematic Review-
4731 identified – 43
included.
efficacy of existing digital health
interventions that are specific to
ayas
Janin
(2018)
Talking About Cancer Among
Adolescent and Young Adult
Cancer Patients and
Survivors: A Systematic
Review.
Australia Systematic Review-
472 identified – 6
included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Analyze how cancer-related
communication was established
among young patients and their
surrounders
Awareness
Rojas
(2019)
Access to clinical trials for
adolescents and young adults
with cancer: A meta-research
analysis.
Belgium -Metanalysis – 3547
identified – 2176
clinical trials included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Analyze the impact of the age limit
spliting childhood from adulthood
on ayas with cancer and their
enrollment in clinical trials
Awareness
Friend
(2017)
Clinical trial enrollment of
adolescent and young adult
patients with cancer: a
systematic review of the
literature and proposed
solutions.
USA -Systematic review –
17 included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Understand the trends in trial
enrollment, recognize the facilitators
and barriers, and evaluate methods
to improve the enrollment.
Awareness
Rae (2019) System Performance
Indicators for Adolescent and
Young Adult Cancer Care and
Control: A Scoping Review.
Canadá – Scoping review – 697
identified – 19 includes
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Indicate the quality indicators used
in AYA cancer care and control in a
Canadian context
Post
Kim (2016) Understanding the
experiences of adolescents
and young adults with
cancer: a meta-synthesis.
Australia -Systematic review –
2670 identified – 51
included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
exploring experiences of young
cancer patients to identify the
overarching concepts that inform
future service and research
directions.
Awareness
Bibby
(2017)
What are the unmet needs
and care experiences of
adolescents and young adults
with cancer? A systematic
review.
Australia Sistematic Review –
7861 identified – 45
included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Assess what is currently known
about both Unmet Needs and Care
Experiences of ayas with cancer;
identify gaps in the research
literature; highlight potential areas
for improvement in the research
undertaken in this area.
Awareness
Robertson
(2015)
Strategies to improve
adherence to treatment in
adolescents and young adults
with cancer: a systematic
review.
Australia Sistematic review –
309 identified – 9
included
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Synthesize recommendations and
strategies to improve Treatment
Adherence summarize evidence-
based strategies
Action
Pyke-Grimm
(2019)
Treatment Decision-Making
Involvement in Adolescents
and Young Adults With
Cancer
USA Integrative review –
4.047 identificados –
21 incluidos
Heatlh system/
treatments
Ayas in
general
Knowledge state about ayas
perspectives and involvements in
Treatmente Decision-Making; factor
that may influence it; relation with
their family and HCP context
Awareness
References
[1] E.G. Robertson, C.E. Wakefield, K.H. Marshall, U.M. Sansom-Daly, Strategies to
improve adherence to treatment in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a
systematic review, Clin. Oncol. Adolesc. Young Adults 5 (2015) 35–49.
[2] E. Walker, A. Martins, S. Aldiss, et al., Psychosocial interventions for adolescents
and young adults diagnosed with cancer during adolescence: a critical review,
J. Adolesc. Young. Adult Oncol. [Internet] 5 (4) (2016) 310–321. Aug 3Available
from: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0025.
[3] N.K. Bradford, R.J. Chan, Health promotion and psychological interventions for
adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic literature review,
Cancer Treat. Rev. [Internet] 55 (2017) 57–70. Available from: http://www.sci
encedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737217300300.
[4] A.M. Stanton, A.B. Handy, C.M. Meston, Sexual function in adolescents and
young adults diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review, J. Cancer Surviv.
[Internet] 12 (1) (2018) 47–63, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0643-y.
Available from:.
[5] C. Rae, N. Shah, S. De Pauw, et al., System performance indicators for adolescent
and young adult cancer care and control: a scoping review, J. Adolesc. Young
Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 9 (1) (2019) 1–11. Nov 11Available from: 10.1089/
jayao.2019.0069.
[6] E.L. Warner, E.E. Kent, K.M. Trevino, et al., Social well-being among adolescents
and young adults with cancer: a systematic review, Cancer [Internet] 122 (7)
(2016) 1029–1037, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29866. Apr 1Available from:.
[7] S. Galán, R. de la Vega, J. Miró, Needs of adolescents and young adults after
cancer treatment: a systematic review, Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.) [Internet] 27
(6) (2018) e12558. Nov 1Available from: 10.1111/ecc.12558.
[8] A.M. Grieger, S.M. Castellino, Delineating the age ranges used to define
adolescents and young adults, J. Clin. Oncol 29 (16) (2011) e492–e493.
[9] E. Abrol, M. Groszmann, A. Pitman, et al., Exploring the digital technology
preferences of teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer and survivors: a
cross-sectional service evaluation questionnaire, J. Cancer Surviv. [Internet] 11
(6) (2017) 670–682, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0618-z. Available
from:.
[10] C. Acquati, B.J. Zebrack, A.C. Faul, et al., Sexual functioning among young adult
cancer patients: a 2-year longitudinal study, Am. Cancer Soc. J.: Cancer [Internet]
124 (2) (2017) 398–405, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31030. Available from:.
[11] K. Ballantine, V. Utley, H. Watson, et al., The burden of cancer in 25–29 year olds
in New Zealand: a case for a wider adolescent and young adult age range, New
Zealand Medical Journal 131 (1468) (2018) 15–24.
[12] K.R. Ballantine, H. Watson, S. Macfarlane, et al., Small numbers, big challenges:
adolescent and young adult cancer incidence and survival in New Zealand,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 6 (2) (2017) 277–285, https://doi.org/
10.1089/jayao.2016.0074. Available from:.
[13] K.S. Barton, T. Tate, N. Lau, et al., I’m not a spiritual person.” How hope might
facilitate conversations about spirituality among teens and young adults with
cancer, J. Pain Symptom. Manage. [Internet] 55 (6) (2018) 1599–1608. Available
from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392418300435.
[14] N. Belpame, M.C. Kars, D. Beeckman, et al., The 3-Phase process in the cancer
experience of adolescents and young adults, Cancer Nurs. [Internet] 41 (3)
(2018). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltex
t/2018/05000/The_3_Phase_Process_in_the_Cancer_Experience_of.14.aspx.
[15] N. Belpame, M.C. Kars, D. Beeckman, et al., The AYA Director”: a synthesizing
concept to understand psychosocial experiences of adolescents and young adults
with cancer, Cancer Nurs. [Internet] 39 (4) (2016). Available from: https://journ
als.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2016/07000/_The_AYA_Director___
A_Synthesizing_Concept_to.6.aspx.
C.M. Telles
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0001
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0001
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0001
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0002
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0002
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0002
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0002
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737217300300
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737217300300
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0643-y
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0005
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0005
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0005
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0005
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29866
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0007
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0007
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0007
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0008
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0008
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0618-z
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31030
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0011
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0011
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0011
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0074
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0074
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392418300435
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2018/05000/The_3_Phase_Process_in_the_Cancer_Experience_of.14.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2018/05000/The_3_Phase_Process_in_the_Cancer_Experience_of.14.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2016/07000/_The_AYA_Director___A_Synthesizing_Concept_to.6.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2016/07000/_The_AYA_Director___A_Synthesizing_Concept_to.6.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2016/07000/_The_AYA_Director___A_Synthesizing_Concept_to.6.aspx
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
22
[16] C. Benedict, E. Shuk, J.S. Ford, Fertility issues in adolescent and young adult
cancer survivors, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 5 (1) (2015) 48–57.
Nov 18Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0024.
[17] N. Bradford, R. Walker, C. Cashion, et al., Do specialist youth cancer services
meet the physical, psychological and social needs of adolescents and young
adults? A cross sectional study, Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. [Internet] 44 (2020), 101709.
Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388
919301772.
[18] N.K. Bradford, R. Greenslade, R.M. Edwards, et al., Educational needs of health
professionals caring for adolescents and young adults with cancer, J. Adolesc.
Young Adult Oncol. [Internet] 7 (3) (2018) 298–305, https://doi.org/10.1089/
jayao.2017.0082. Jan 16Available from:.
[19] E. Brauer, H.C. Pieters, P.A. Ganz, et al., Coming of age with cancer: physical,
social, and financial barriers to independence among emerging adult survivors,
Oncol. Nurs. Forum 45 (2) (2018) 148–158, https://doi.org/10.1188/18.
ONF.148-158. Mar 1PMID: 29466341; PMCID: PMC6162052.
[20] N. Breuer, A. Sender, L. Daneck, et al., How do young adults with cancer perceive
social support? A qualitative study, J. Psychosoc. Oncol. [Internet] 35 (3) (2017)
292–308. May 4Available from: 10.1080/07347332.2017.1289290.
[21] S. Cha, J. Lee, J.-.Y. Shin, J.-.Y. Kim, et al., Clinical application of genomic
profiling to find druggable targets for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer
patients with metastasis, BMC Cancer [Internet] 16 (1) (2016) 170. Available
from: 10.1186/s12885-016-2209-1.
[22] D. Cho, C.L. Park, Moderating effects of perceived growth on the association
between fear of cancer recurrence and health-related quality of life among
adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, J. Psychosoc. Oncol. [Internet] 35
(2) (2017) 148–165, https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2016.1247408. Mar
4Available from:.
[23] L. Daniel, A.E. Kazak, Y. Li, et al., Relationship between sleep problems and
psychological outcomes in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and
controls, Support Care Cancer [Internet] 24 (2) (2016) 539–546, https://doi.org/
10.1007/s00520-015-2798-2. Available from:.
[24] M.C. DeRouen, M. Mujahid, S. Srinivas, T.H.M. Keegan, Disparities in adolescent
and young adult survival after testicular cancer vary by histologic subtype: a
population-based study in California 1988–2010, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol.
[Internet] 5 (1) (2015) 31–40. Nov 18Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0041.
[25] M.C. DeRouen, H.M. Parsons, E.E. Kent, et al., Sociodemographic disparities in
survival for adolescents and young adults with cancer differ by health insurance
status, Cancer Causes Control [Internet] 28 (8) (2017) 841–851, https://doi.org/
10.1007/s10552-017-0914-y. Available from:.
[26] M.C. DeRouen, A.W. Smith, L. Tao, et al., Cancer-related information needs and
cancer’s impact on control over life influence health-related quality of life among
adolescents and young adults with cancer, Psychooncology [Internet] 24 (9)
(2015) 1104–1115, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3730. Sep 1Available from:.
[27] K.A. Dobinson, M.A. Hoyt, Z.E. Seidler, et al., A Grounded Theory Investigation
into the Psychosexual Unmet Needs of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer
Survivors, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 5 (2) (2015) 135–145. Nov
30Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0022.
[28] M. Domínguez, L. Sapiña, Others like me”. An approach to the use of the internet
and social networks in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer,
J. Cancer Educ. [Internet] 32 (4) (2017) 885–891, https://doi.org/10.1007/
s13187-016-1055-9. Available from:.
[29] M. Figueroa Gray, E.J. Ludman, T. Beatty, A.R. Rosenberg, K.J Wernli, Balancing
hope and risk among adolescent and young adult cancer patients with late-stage
cancer: a qualitative interview study, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 7
(6) (2018) 673–680, https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0048. Available from:.
[30] D.M. Flink, L.A. Kondapalli, Y. Kellar-Guenther, Priorities in fertility decisions for
reproductive-aged cancer patients: fertility attitudes and cancer treatment study,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 6 (3) (2017) 435–443, https://doi.org/
10.1089/jayao.2016.0072. Feb 21Available from:.
[31] M. Franklin, P. Patterson, K.R. Allison, et al., An invisible patient: healthcare
professionals’ perspectives on caring for adolescents and young adults who have a
sibling with cancer, Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.) [Internet] 27 (6) (2018). Nov
1e12970Available from: 10.1111/ecc.12970.
[32] N.N. Frederick, K. Campbell, L.B. Kenney, et al., Barriers and facilitators to sexual
and reproductive health communication between pediatric oncology clinicians
and adolescent and young adult patients: the clinician perspective, Pediatr. Blood
Cancer [Internet] 65 (8) (2018) e27087. Aug 1Available from: 10.1002/
pbc.27087.
[33] C. Froude, S. Rigazio-DiGilio, L. Donorfio, K. Bellizzi, Contextualizing the young
adult female breast cancer experience: developmental, psychosocial, and
interpersonal influences, Qual. Rep 22 (6) (2017) 1488–1510.
[34] K. Geue, E. Brähler, H. Faller, et al., Prevalence of mental disorders and
psychosocial distress in German adolescent and young adult cancer patients
(AYA), Psychooncology [Internet] 27 (7) (2018) 1802–1809, https://doi.org/
10.1002/pon.4730. Jul 1Available from:.
[35] K. Geue, R. Schmidt, A. Sender, et al., Sexuality and romantic relationships in
young adult cancer survivors: satisfaction and supportive care needs,
Psychooncology [Internet] 24 (11) (2015) 1368–1376, https://doi.org/10.1002/
pon.3805. Nov 1Available from:.
[36] J.A. Gittzus, K.M. Fasciano, S.D. Block, J.W. Mack, Peace of mind among
adolescents and young adults with cancer, Psychooncology [Internet] 29 (3)
(2020) 572–578, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5309. Mar 1Available from:.
[37] L.M. Gordon, R.H. Johnson, M.A. Au, et al., Primary care physicians’ decision
making regarding initial oncology referral for adolescents and young adults with
cancer, J. Adolesc. Heal [Internet] 62 (2) (2018) 176–183. Available from: http://
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X17304706.
[38] D. Graetz, K. Fasciano, C. Rodriguez-Galindo, S.D. Block, J.W. Mack, Things that
matter: adolescent and young adult patients’ priorities during cancer care,
Pediatr. Blood Cancer [Internet] 66 (9) (2019) e27883. Sep 1Available from:
10.1002/pbc.27883.
[39] A.M. Gutiérrez-Colina, J.L. Lee, M. VanDellen, et al., Guest Editors: cynthia A.
Gerhardt Deborah J. Wiebe and Grayson N. Holmbeck CAB. Family functioning
and depressive symptoms in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and
their families: a dyadic analytic approach, J Pediatr. Psychol. [Internet] 42 (1)
(2016) 19–27. May 15Available from, 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw041.
[40] S. Hanghøj, H. Pappot, L.L. Hjalgrim, et al., Impact of service user involvement
from the perspective of adolescents and young adults with cancer experience,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 9 (1) (2019) 78–84. Oct 4Available
from: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0073.
[41] R.I. Hart, D.A. Cameron, F.J. Cowie, et al., The challenges of making informed
decisions about treatment and trial participation following a cancer diagnosis: a
qualitative study involving adolescents and young adults with cancer and their
caregivers, BMC Health Serv. Res. [Internet] 20 (1) (2020) 25. Available from: htt
ps://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6950988.
[42] B. Hølge-Hazelton, H.U. Timm, C. Graugaard, K.A. Boisen, C.D. Sperling, Perhaps
I will die young.” Fears and worries regarding disease and death among Danish
adolescents and young adults with cancer. A mixed method study, Support Care
Cancer [Internet] 24 (11) (2016) 4727–4737, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-
016-3322-z. Available from:.
[43] R.E. Hughes, L.R. Holland, D. Zanino, et al., Prevalence and intensity of pain and
other physical and psychological symptoms in adolescents and young adults
diagnosed with cancer on referral to a palliative care service, J. Adolesc. Young
Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 4 (2) (2015) 70–75, https://doi.org/10.1089/
jayao.2014.0015. Jun 1Available from:.
[44] O. Husson, B.J. Zebrack, C. Aguilar, et al., Cancer in adolescents and young
adults: who remains at risk of poor social functioning over time? Cancer
[Internet] 123 (14) (2017) 2743–2751, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30656. Jul
15Available from:.
[45] J.A. Hydeman, O.C. Uwazurike, E.I. Adeyemi, L.K. Beaupin, Survivorship needs of
adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a concept mapping analysis,
J Cancer Surviv [Internet] 13 (1) (2019) 34–42, https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11764-018-0725-5. Available from:.
[46] A. Ishibashi, J. Okamura, R. Ueda, et al., Psychosocial strength enhancing
resilience in adolescents and young adults with cancer, J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs.
[Internet] 33 (1) (2015) 45–54, https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454214563935.
Apr 10Available from:.
[47] S.A. Jacob, P.H. Shaw, No improvement in clinical trial enrollment for
adolescents and young adults with cancer at a children’s hospital, Pediatr Blood
Cancer [Internet] 64 (12) (2017) e26638. Available from: 10.1002/pbc.26638.
[48] S.K. Jacobsen, G.M. Bouchard, J. Emed, et al., Experiences of “being known” by
the healthcare team of young adult patients with cancer, In: Oncology nursing
forum. Oncology Nursing Society; (2015) 250–256.
[49] S. Jayasuriya, M. Peate, C. Allingham, et al., Satisfaction, disappointment and
regret surrounding fertility preservation decisions in the paediatric and
adolescent cancer population, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet [Internet] 36 (9) (2019)
1805–1822, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01536-4. Available from:.
[50] S.E.J. Kaal, N.M.J. Kuijken, CAHHVM Verhagen, et al., Experiences of parents
and general practitioners with End-of-Life care in adolescents and young adults
with cancer, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 5 (1) (2015) 64–68. Dec
1Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0009.
[51] J.S. Kay, V. Juth, R.C. Silver, L.S. Sender, Support and conflict in relationships
and psychological health in adolescents and young adults with cancer, J. Health
Psychol. [Internet] 24 (4) (2016) 502–517, https://doi.org/10.1177/
1359105316676629. Dec 26Available from:.
[52] T.H.M. Keegan, L.H. Kushi, Q. Li, et al., Cardiovascular disease incidence in
adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a retrospective cohort study,
J. Cancer Surviv. [Internet] 12 (3) (2018) 388–397, https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11764-018-0678-8. Available from:.
[53] T.H.M. Keegan, Q. Li, A. Steele, et al., Sociodemographic disparities in the
occurrence of medical conditions among adolescent and young adult Hodgkin
lymphoma survivors, Cancer Causes Control [Internet] 29 (6) (2018) 551–561,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1025-0. Available from:.
[54] A.C. Kirchhoff, B. Fowler, E.L. Warner, et al., Supporting adolescents and young
adults with cancer: oncology provider perceptions of adolescent and young adult
unmet needs, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 6 (4) (2017) 519–523.
Jun 12Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0011.
[55] A.M. Kleinke, C.F. Classen, Adolescents and young adults with cancer: aspects of
adherence – a questionnaire study, Adolesc. Health Med. Ther. [Internet] 9 (2018)
77–85. May 1Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29750063.
[56] M.K. Knox, S. Hales, R. Nissim, et al., Lost and stranded: the experience of
younger adults with advanced cancer, Support. Care Cancer [Internet] 25 (2)
(2017) 399–407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3415-8. Available from:.
[57] L. Korsvold, A.V. Mellblom, H.C. Lie, et al., Patient-provider communication
about the emotional cues and concerns of adolescent and young adult patients
and their family members when receiving a diagnosis of cancer, Patient Educ.
Couns. [Internet] 99 (10) (2016) 1576–1583. Available from: http://www.scienc
edirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399116301501.
[58] L. Korsvold, A.V. Mellblom, A. Finset, et al., A content analysis of emotional
concerns expressed at the time of receiving a cancer diagnosis: an observational
study of consultations with adolescent and young adult patients and their family
C.M. Telles
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0016
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0016
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0016
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388919301772
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388919301772
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2017.0082
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2017.0082
https://doi.org/10.1188/18.ONF.148-158
https://doi.org/10.1188/18.ONF.148-158
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0020
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0020
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0020
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0021
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0021
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0021
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0021
https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2016.1247408
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2798-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2798-2
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref00
24
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0024
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0024
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0914-y
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0914-y
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3730
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0027
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0027
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0027
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0027
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1055-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1055-9
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0048
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0072
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0072
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0031
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0031
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0031
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0031
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0032
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0032
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0032
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0032
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0032
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0033
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0033
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0033
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4730
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4730
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3805
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3805
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5309
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X17304706
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X17304706
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0038
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0038
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0038
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0038
http://10.1093/jpepsy/jsw041
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0040
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0040
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0040
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0040
https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6950988
https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6950988
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3322-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3322-z
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2014.0015
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2014.0015
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30656
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0725-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0725-5
https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454214563935
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0047
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0047
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0047
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0048
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0048
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0048
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01536-4
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0050
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0050
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0050
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0050
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316676629
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316676629
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0678-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0678-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1025-0
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0054
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0054
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0054
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0054
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29750063
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3415-8
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399116301501
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399116301501
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
23
members, Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. [Internet] 26 (2017) 1–8. Available from: http://
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388916301089.
[59] S. Kosola, M.C. McCarthy, R. McNeil, et al., Early education and employment
outcomes after cancer in adolescents and young adults, J. Adolesc. Young Adult.
Oncol. [Internet] 7 (2) (2017) 238–244. Nov 13Available from: 10.1089/
jayao.2017.0045.
[60] K.N. LaRosa, M. Stern, C. Lynn, J. Hudson, et al., Provider perceptions’ of a
patient navigator for adolescents and young adults with cancer, Support Care
Cancer [Internet] 27 (11) (2019) 4091–4098, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-
019-04687-3. Available from:.
[61] V. Lavender, F. Gibson, A. Brownsdon, et al., Health professional perceptions of
communicating with adolescents and young adults about bone cancer clinical
trial participation, Support Care Cancer [Internet] 27 (2) (2019) 467–475,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4337-4. Available from:.
[62] C.K. Li, R. Dalvi, K. Yonemori, et al., Care of adolescents and young adults with
cancer in Asia: results of an ESMO/SIOPE/SIOP Asia survey, ESMO Open
[Internet] 4 (3) (2019), e000467. Jun 1Available from: http://esmoopen.bmj.
com/content/4/3/e000467.abstract.
[63] M. Lin, U.M. Sansom-Daly, C.E. Wakefield, et al., Health literacy in adolescents
and young adults: perspectives from Australian cancer survivors, J. Adolesc.
Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 6 (1) (2016) 150–158. Sep 22Available from:
10.1089/jayao.2016.0024.
[64] L.A. Linder, J.M. Erickson, K. Stegenga, et al., Symptom self-management
strategies reported by adolescents and young adults with cancer receiving
chemotherapy, Support Care Cancer [Internet] 25 (12) (2017) 3793–3806,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3811-8. Available from:.
[65] J.W. Mack, K.M. Fasciano, S.D. Block, Communication about prognosis with
adolescent and young adult patients with cancer: information needs, prognostic
awareness, and outcomes of disclosure, J. Clin. Oncol. [Internet] 36 (18) (2018)
1861–1867. Apr 23Available from: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.2128.
[66] H.T.G. Martins, N.V. Balmant, Paula de, N. Silva, et al., Who cares for adolescents
and young adults with cancer in Brazil? Jornal de Pediatria. Scielo 94 (2018)
440–445.
[67] M.C. McCarthy, R. McNeil, S. Drew, et al., Psychological distress and
posttraumatic stress symptoms in adolescents and young adults with cancer and
their parents, J. Adolescent Young Adult Oncol. [Internet] 5 (4) (2016) 322–329,
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0015. Available from:.
[68] F.E.J. McDonald, P. Patterson, K.J. White, et al., Predictors of unmet needs and
psychological distress in adolescent and young adult siblings of people diagnosed
with cancer, Psychooncology [Internet] 24 (3) (2015) 333–340, https://doi.org/
10.1002/pon.3653. Mar 1Available from:.
[69] G.A. McDonnell, E. Shuk, J.S. Ford, A qualitative study of adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors’ perceptions of family and peer support, J. Health Psychol.
[Internet] 25 (5) (2018) 713–726, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318769366.
Apr 24Available from:.
[70] G.A. McDonnell, E. Shuk, J.S. Ford, A qualitative study of adolescent and young
adult cancer survivors’ perceptions of family and peer support, J. Health Psychol.
[Internet] 25 (5) (2018) 713–726, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318769366.
Apr 24Available from:.
[71] M.E. McGrady, J.L. Peugh, G.A. Brown, A.L.H. Pai, Spending on hospital care and
pediatric psychology service use among adolescents and young adults with
cancer, J. Pediatr. Psychol. [Internet] 42 (9) (2017) 1065–1074. Feb 26Available
from: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx001.
[72] R. McNeil, M. Egsdal, S. Drew, et al., The changing nature of social support for
adolescents and young adults with cancer, Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. [Internet] 43
(2019), 101667. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S1462388919301279.
[73] R.J. McNeil, M. McCarthy, D. Dunt, et al., Financial challenges of cancer for
adolescents and young adults and their parent caregivers, Soc. Work Res.
[Internet] 43 (1) (2018) 17–30. Oct 6Available from: 10.1093/swr/svy027.
[74] T.P. McVeigh, R. Sundar, N. Diamantis, et al., The role of genomic profiling in
adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer participating in phase
I clinical trials, Eur. J. Cancer [Internet] 95 (2018) 20–29. Available from, http://
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804918302363.
[75] C.F. Morrison, A.L.H. Pai, D. Martsolf, Facilitators and barriers to self-
management for adolescents and young adults following a hematopoietic stem
cell transplant, J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. [Internet] 35 (1) (2018) 36–42, https://
doi.org/10.1177/1043454217723864. Available from:.
[76] L.S. Muffly, F.J. Hlubocky, N. Khan, et al., Psychological morbidities in
adolescent and young adult blood cancer patients during curative-intent therapy
and early survivorship, Cancer [Internet] 122 (6) (2016) 954–961, https://doi.
org/10.1002/cncr.29868. Mar 15Available from:.
[77] A. Murnane, K. Gough, K. Thompson, et al., Adolescents and young adult cancer
survivors: exercise habits, quality of life and physical activity preferences,
Support Care Cancer [Internet] 23 (2) (2015) 501–510, https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00520-014-2446-2. Available from:.
[78] J. Mütsch, M. Friedrich, K. Leuteritz, et al., Sexuality and cancer in adolescents
and young adults – a comparison between reproductive cancer patients and
patients with non-reproductive cancer, BMC Cancer [Internet] 19 (1) (2019) 828.
Available from: 10.1186/s12885-019-6009-2.
[79] P. Patterson, F.E.J. McDonald, Being Mindful”: does it Help Adolescents and
Young Adults Who Have Completed Cancer Treatment? J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs.
[Internet] 32 (4) (2015) 189–194, https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454214563401.
Jan 9Available from.
[80] M. Peavey, S. Arian, W. Gibbons, et al., On-site fertility preservation services for
adolescents and young adults in a comprehensive cancer center, J. Adolesc.
Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 6 (2) (2016) 229–234. Nov 15Available from:
10.1089/jayao.2016.0057.
[81] C.R. Phillips, J.E. Haase, M.E. Broome, et al., Connecting with healthcare
providers at diagnosis: adolescent/young adult cancer survivors’ perspectives, Int
J Qual Stud Health Well-being [Internet] 12 (1) (2017), 1325699. Jan 1Available
from: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1325699.
[82] C.R. Phillips, J.E. Haase, Like prisoners in a war camp: adolescents and young
adult cancer survivors’ perspectives of disconnectedness from healthcare
providers during cancer treatment, Cancer Nurs. [Internet] 43 (1) (2020).
Available from: https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2020/0
1000/Like_Prisoners_in_a_War_Camp__Adolescents_and.9.aspx.
[83] M. Reblin, N.B. Stanley, A. Galligan, et al., Family dynamics in young adult
cancer caregiving: “It should be teamwork, J. Psychosoc. Oncol. [Internet] 37 (4)
(2019) 526–540, https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2018.1563582. Jul
4Available from:.
[84] É. Ricadat, K.-.L. Schwering, S. Fradkin, et al., Adolescents and young adults with
cancer: how multidisciplinary health care teams adapt their practices to better
meet their specific needs, Psychooncology [Internet] 28 (7) (2019) 1576–1582,
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5135. Jul 1Available from:.
[85] A.R. Rosenberg, M.C. Bradford, K. Bona, et al., Hope, distress, and later quality of
life among adolescent and young adults with cancer, J. Psychosoc. Oncol.
[Internet] 36 (2) (2018) 137–144, https://doi.org/10.1080/
07347332.2017.1382646. Mar 4Available from:.
[86] A.R. Rosenberg, L. Kroon, L. Chen, et al., Insurance status and risk of cancer
mortality among adolescents and young adults, Cancer [Internet] 121 (8) (2015)
1279–1286, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29187. Apr 15Available from:.
[87] E. Saloustros, D.P. Stark, K. Michailidou, et al., The care of adolescents and young
adults with cancer: results of the ESMO/SIOPE survey, ESMO Open [Internet] 2
(4) (2017), e000252. Sep 1Available from: http://esmoopen.bmj.com/content
/2/4/e000252.abstract.
[88] S.M. Sawyer, M.C. McCarthy, D. Dunt, et al., Fulfilling the Vision of Youth-
Friendly Cancer Care: a Study Protocol, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol.
[Internet] 5 (3) (2016) 267–277, https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2015.0050. Feb
26Available from:.
[89] L.A. Shay, H.M. Parsons, S.W. Vernon, Survivorship care planning and unmet
information and service needs among adolescent and young adult cancer
survivors, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 6 (2) (2017) 327–332,
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0053. Jan 19Available from:.
[90] G. Skaczkowski, V. White, K. Thompson, et al., Factors influencing the
documentation of fertility-related discussions for adolescents and young adults
with cancer, Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. [Internet] 34 (2018) 42–48. Available from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388918300334.
[91] G. Skaczkowski, V. White, K. Thompson, et al., Do Australian adolescents’ and
young adults’ experiences of cancer care influence their quality of life?
Psychooncology [Internet] 27 (3) (2018) 990–997, https://doi.org/10.1002/
pon.4625. Mar 1Available from:.
[92] R.R. Smits-Seemann, S. Kaul, E.R. Zamora, et al., Barriers to follow-up care
among survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer, J. Cancer Surviv.
[Internet] 11 (1) (2017) 126–132, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0570-3.
Available from:.
[93] H. Spraker-Perlman, R.R. Smits-Seeman, H. Li, A.C. Kirchhoff, Statewide
treatment center referral patterns for adolescent and young adult patients with
cancer in Utah, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 7 (6) (2018) 688–691.
Jul 23Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0059.
[94] H. Sun, Y. Yang, J. Zhang, et al., Fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety and depressive
symptoms in adolescent and young adult cancer patients, Neuropsychiatr Dis.
Treat. [Internet] 15 (2019) 857–865. Apr 8Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/31118635.
[95] B. Thewes, S.E.J. Kaal, J.A.E. Custers, et al., Prevalence and correlates of high fear
of cancer recurrence in late adolescents and young adults consulting a specialist
adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer service, Support Care Cancer [Internet]
26 (5) (2018) 1479–1487, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3975-2.
Available from:.
[96] C.M. Thompson, B. Crook, B. Love, et al., Understanding how adolescents and
young adults with cancer talk about needs in online and face-to-face support
groups, J. Health Psychol. [Internet] 21 (11) (2015) 2636–2646, https://doi.org/
10.1177/1359105315581515. Apr 27Available from:.
[97] D. Tindle, C. Windsor, P. Yates, Centralizing temporality in adolescent and young
adult cancer survivorship, Qual. Health Res. [Internet] 29 (2) (2018) 173–183,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318797087. Sep 5Available from:.
[98] M. Tremolada, S. Bonichini, G. Basso, M. Pillon, Adolescent and young adult
cancer survivors narrate their stories: predictive model of their personal growth
and their follow-up acceptance, Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. [Internet] 36 (2018)
119–128. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S1462388916301387.
[99] J. Vetsch, C.E. Wakefield, B.C. McGill, et al., Educational and vocational goal
disruption in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, Psychooncology
[Internet] 27 (2) (2018) 532–538, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4525. Feb
1Available from:.
[100] C. Walsh, J. Currin-McCulloch, P. Simon, et al., Shifting needs and preferences:
supporting young adult cancer patients during the transition from active
treatment to survivorship care, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 8 (2)
(2018) 114–121. Oct 12Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0083.
[101] E.L. Warner, G.E. Nam, Y. Zhang, et al., Health behaviors, quality of life, and
psychosocial health among survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers,
C.M. Telles
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388916301089
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388916301089
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0059
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0059
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0059
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0059
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04687-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04687-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4337-4
http://esmoopen.bmj.com/content/4/3/e000467.abstract
http://esmoopen.bmj.com/content/4/3/e000467.abstract
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0063
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0063
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0063
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0063
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3811-8
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0065
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0065
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0065
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0065
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0066
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0066
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0066
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0015
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3653
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3653
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318769366
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318769366
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0071
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0071
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0071
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0071
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388919301279
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388919301279
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0073
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0073
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0073
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804918302363
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804918302363
https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454217723864
https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454217723864
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29868
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29868
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2446-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2446-2
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0078
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0078
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0078
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0078
https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454214563401
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0080
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0080
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0080
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0080
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0081
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0081
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0081
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0081
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2020/01000/Like_Prisoners_in_a_War_Camp__Adolescents_and.9.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2020/01000/Like_Prisoners_in_a_War_Camp__Adolescents_and.9.aspx
https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2018.1563582
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5135
https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2017.1382646
https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2017.1382646
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29187
http://esmoopen.bmj.com/content/2/4/e000252.abstract
http://esmoopen.bmj.com/content/2/4/e000252.abstract
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2015.0050
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0053
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388918300334
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.46
25
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4625
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0570-3
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0093
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0093
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0093
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0093
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31118635
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31118635
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3975-2
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315581515
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315581515
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318797087
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388916301387
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388916301387
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4525
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0100
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0100
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0100
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0100
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
24
J. Cancer Surviv. [Internet] 10 (2) (2016) 280–290, https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11764-015-0474-7. Available from:.
[102] L. Wettergren, E.E. Kent, S.A. Mitchell, et al., Cancer negatively impacts on sexual
function in adolescents and young adults: the AYA HOPE study, Psychooncology
[Internet] 26 (10) (2017) 1632–1639, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4181. Oct
1Available from:.
[103] J. Xie, S. Ding, S. He, et al., A prevalence study of psychosocial distress in
adolescents and young adults with cancer, Cancer Nurs. [Internet 40 (3) (2017).
Available from: https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2017/
05000/A_Prevalence_Study_of_Psychosocial_Distress_in.8.aspx.
[104] H. Baird, P. Patterson, S. Medlow, K.R. Allison, Understanding and improving
survivorship care for adolescents and young adults with cancer, J. Adolesc. Young
Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 8 (5) (2019) 581–586. Jul 3Available from: 10.1089/
jayao.2019.0031.
[105] M. Barnett, G. McDonnell, A. DeRosa, et al., Psychosocial outcomes and
interventions among cancer survivors diagnosed during adolescence and young
adulthood (AYA): a systematic review, J. Cancer Surviv. [Internet] 10 (5) (2016)
814–831, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0527-6. Available from:.
[106] L.K. Beaupin, M.E. Pailler, E. Brewer-Spritzer, et al., Photographs of meaning: a
novel social media intervention for adolescent and young adult cancer patients,
Psychooncology 28 (1) (2019) 198–200.
[107] H. Bibby, V. White, K. Thompson, A. Anazodo, What are the unmet needs and care
experiences of adolescents and young adults with cancer? A systematic review,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 6 (1) (2016) 6–30. Jul 25Available
from: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0012.
[108] N.K. Bradford, R.J. Chan, Health promotion and psychological interventions for
adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic literature review,
Cancer Treat. Rev. [Internet] 55 (2017) 57–70. Available from: http://www.sci
encedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737217300300.
[109] J. Carretier, H. Boyle, S. Duval, et al., A review of health behaviors in childhood
and adolescent cancer survivors: toward prevention of second primary cancer,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 5 (2) (2015) 78–90. Dec 1Available
from: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0035.
[110] J.A. Chalmers, U.M. Sansom-Daly, P. Patterson, et al., Psychosocial assessment
using telehealth in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a partially
randomized patient preference pilot study, JMIR Res. Protoc [Internet] 7 (8)
(2018) e168. Available from: http://www.researchprotocols.org/2018/8/e168/.
[111] K.B. Curtin, A.E. Watson, J. Wang, et al., Pediatric advance care planning (pACP)
for teens with cancer and their families: design of a dyadic, longitudinal RCCT,
Contemp Clin. Trials. [Internet] 62 (2017) 121–129. Available from: http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714417302550.
[112] T. de Rojas, A. Neven, M. Terada, et al., Access to clinical trials for adolescents
and young adults with cancer: a meta-research analysis, JNCI Cancer Spectr
[Internet] 3 (4) (2019). Aug 1Available from: 10.1093/jncics/pkz057.
[113] E. Donovan, S.R. Martin, L.C. Seidman, et al., A mobile-based mindfulness and
social support program for adolescents and young adults with sarcoma:
development and pilot testing, J. Med. Internet Res.: mHealth and uHealth
[Internet] 7 (3) (2019) e10921. Available from: http://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/3/
e10921/.
[114] A. Elsbernd, C. Crenner, T. Rosell, J. Panicker, Individual experiences and
utilization of supportive resources in adolescents and young adults with cancer,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 8 (3) (2019) 329–334, https://doi.org/
10.1089/jayao.2018.0107. Jan 17Available from:.
[115] J.M. Erickson, S. Ameringer, L. Linder, et al., Using a heuristic app to improve
symptom self-management in adolescents and young adults with cancer,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 8 (2) (2018) 131–141. Oct 24Available
from: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0103.
[116] O. Fridgen, I. Sehovic, M.L. Bowman, et al., Contraception: the Need for
Expansion of Counsel in Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) cancer care, J. Cancer
Educ. [Internet] 32 (4) (2017) 924–932, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-
1003-8. Available from:.
[117] B.D. Friend, A. Baweja, G. Schiller, et al., Clinical trial enrollment of adolescent
and young adult patients with cancer: a systematic review of the literature and
proposed solutions, Clin. Oncol. Adolesc. Young Adults 6 (2016) 51.
[118] F. Gibson, S. Pearce, L. Fern, et al., Improving the identification of cancer in
young people: a scoping review, Expert. Rev. Qual. Life Cancer Care [Internet] 2
(2) (2017) 87–101. Mar 4Available from: 10.1080/23809000.2017.1307089.
[119] M.T. Høybye, P.R. Olsen, H.E. Hansson, et al., Virtual environments in cancer
care: pilot-testing a three-dimensional web-based platform as a tool for support in
young cancer patients, Health Inf. J. [Internet] 24 (4) (2016) 419–431, https://
doi.org/10.1177/1460458216678442. Nov 28Available from:.
[120] M.M.H. Janin, S.J. Ellis, C.E. Wakefield, J.E. Fardell, Talking about cancer among
adolescent and young adult cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 7 (5) (2018) 515–524, https://doi.org/
10.1089/jayao.2017.0131. May 31Available from:.
[121] S.E. Kaal, O. Husson, F. van Dartel, et al., Online support community for
adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer: user statistics, evaluation, and
content analysis, Patient Prefer Adherence [Internet] 12 (2018) 2615–2622. Dec
6Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30584285.
[122] S. Kaul, M. Fluchel, H. Spraker-Perlman, C.F. Parmeter, A.C. Kirchhoff, Health
care experiences of long-term survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer,
Support Care Cancer [Internet] 24 (9) (2016) 3967–3977, https://doi.org/
10.1007/s00520-016-3235-x. Available from:.
[123] B. Kim, K. White, P. Patterson, Understanding the experiences of adolescents and
young adults with cancer: a meta-synthesis, Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. [Internet] 24
(2016) 39–53. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S1462388916300515.
[124] L.A. Linder, Y.P. Wu, C.F. Macpherson, et al., Oral medication adherence among
adolescents and young adults with cancer before and following use of a
smartphone-based medication reminder app, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol.
[Internet] 8 (2) (2018) 122–130. Oct 10Available from: 10.1089/
jayao.2018.0072.
[125] J.W. Mack, K.M. Fasciano, S.D. Block, Adolescent and young adult cancer
patients’ experiences with treatment decision-making, Pediatrics [Internet] 143
(5) (2019), e20182800. May 1Available from: http://pediatrics.aappublications.
org/content/143/5/e20182800.abstract.
[126] E.A. May, B.C. McGill, E.G. Robertson, et al., Adolescent and young adult cancer
survivors’ experiences of the healthcare system: a qualitative study, J. Adolesc.
Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 7 (1) (2017) 88–96. Jul 24Available from:
10.1089/jayao.2017.0015.
[127] L. McCann, K.A. McMillan, G. Pugh, Digital interventions to support adolescents
and young adults with cancer: systematic review, JMIR Cancer [Internet] 5 (2)
(2019) e12071. Available from: http://cancer.jmir.org/2019/2/e12071/.
[128] F.E.J. McDonald, P. Patterson, Evaluation of a resource for adolescents and young
adults diagnosed with cancer, J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. [Internet] 32 (5) (2015)
284–294, https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454214563408. Feb 2Available from:.
[129] S. Medlow, P. Patterson, Determining research priorities for adolescent and young
adult cancer in Australia, Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.) [Internet] 24 (4) (2015)
590–599, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12291. Jul 1Available from:.
[130] L. Mitchell, S. Tam, J. Lewin, et al., Measuring the impact of an adolescent and
young adult program on addressing patient care needs, J. Adolesc. Young Adult.
Oncol. [Internet] 7 (5) (2018) 612–617, https://doi.org/10.1089/
jayao.2018.0015. Jul 9Available from:.
[131] A.N. Murray, J.C. Chrisler, M.L. Robbins, Adolescents and young adults with
cancer: oncology nurses report attitudes and barriers to discussing fertility
preservation, Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs 20 (4) (2016).
[132] H. Pappot, G. Assam Taarnhøj, A. Elsbernd, et al., Health-related quality of life
before and after use of a smartphone app for adolescents and young adults with
cancer: pre-post interventional study, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth [Internet] 7 (10)
(2019) e13829. Available from: https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/10/e13829.
[133] H.M. Parsons, L.C. Harlan, S. Schmidt, et al., Who treats adolescents and young
adults with cancer? A report from the AYA HOPE study, J. Adolesc. Young Adult.
Oncol. [Internet] 4 (3) (2015) 141–150, https://doi.org/10.1089/
jayao.2014.0041. Aug 11Available from:.
[134] Poort H., Kaal S.E.J., Knoop H., et al. Prevalence and impact of severe fatigue in
adolescent and young adult cancer patients in comparison with population-based
controls. Support Care Cancer [Internet]. 2017;25(9):2911–8. Available from:
10.1007/s00520-017-3746-0.
[135] K.A. Pyke-Grimm, L.S. Franck, K. Patterson Kelly, et al., Treatment decision-
making involvement in adolescents and young adults with cancer, Oncol. Nurs.
Forum (2019). E22-e37.
[136] G.P. Quinn, V. Gonçalves, I. Sehovic, et al., Quality of life in adolescent and young
adult cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature, Patient Relat Outcome
Meas [Internet] 6 (2015) 19–51. Feb 17Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/25733941.
[137] D. Richter, M. Koehler, M. Friedrich, et al., Psychosocial interventions for
adolescents and young adult cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-
analysis, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. [Internet] 95 (3) (2015) 370–386. Available
from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842815000694.
[138] D. Richter, A. Mehnert, D. Forstmeyer, et al., Health literacy in adolescent and
young adult cancer patients and its association with health outcomes, J. Adolesc.
Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 8 (4) (2019) 451–457, https://doi.org/10.1089/
jayao.2018.0118. Mar 14Available from:.
[139] E.G. Robertson, U.M. Sansom-Daly, C.E. Wakefield, et al., Sexual and romantic
relationships: experiences of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 5 (3) (2016) 286–291, https://doi.org/
10.1089/jayao.2015.0061. Feb 17Available from:.
[140] M.E. Roth, A.M. O’Mara, N.L. Seibel, et al., Low enrollment of adolescents and
young adults onto cancer trials: insights from the community clinical oncology
program, J. Oncol. Pract. [Internet] 12 (4) (2016) e388–e395, https://doi.org/
10.1200/JOP.2015.009084. Mar 29Available from:.
[141] E. Saita, C. Acquati, Evaluating the framed portrait experience as an intervention
to enhance self-efficacy and self-esteem in a sample of adolescent and young adult
cancer survivors: results of a pilot study, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol.
[Internet] 9 (1) (2019) 111–114. Nov 19Available from: 10.1089/
jayao.2019.0063.
[142] S.D. Sanford, J.L. Beaumont, M.A. Snyder, et al., Clinical research participation
among adolescent and young adults at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer
Center and affiliated pediatric hospital, Supp. Care Cancer [Internet] 25 (5)
(2017) 1579–1586. Available from: 10.1007/s00520-016-3558-7.
[143] U.M. Sansom-Daly, C.E. Wakefield, R.A. Bryant, et al., Feasibility, acceptability,
and safety of the Recapture Life videoconferencing intervention for adolescent
and young adult cancer survivors, Psychooncology [Internet] 28 (2) (2019)
284–292. Feb 1Available from: 10.1002/pon.4938.
[144] U.M. Sansom-Daly, C.E. Wakefield, B.C. McGill, P. Patterson, Ethical and clinical
challenges delivering group-based cognitive-behavioural therapy to adolescents
and young adults with cancer using videoconferencing technology, Aust. Psychol.
[Internet] 50 (4) (2015) 271–278. Aug 1Available from: 10.1111/ap.12112.
[145] S.M. Sawyer, R. McNeil, K. Thompson, et al., Developmentally appropriate care
for adolescents and young adults with cancer: how well is Australia doing?
C.M. Telles
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0474-7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0474-7
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4181
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2017/05000/A_Prevalence_Study_of_Psychosocial_Distress_in.8.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/cancernursingonline/Fulltext/2017/05000/A_Prevalence_Study_of_Psychosocial_Distress_in.8.aspx
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0104
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0104
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0104
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0104
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0527-6
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0106
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0106
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0106
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0107
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0107
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0107
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0107
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737217300300
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737217300300
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0109
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0109
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0109
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0109
http://www.researchprotocols.org/2018/8/e168/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714417302550
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714417302550
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0112
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0112
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0112
http://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/3/e10921/
http://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/3/e10921/
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0107
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0107
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0115
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0115
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0115
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0115
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1003-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1003-8
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0117
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0117
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0117
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0118
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0118
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0118
https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458216678442
https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458216678442
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2017.0131
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2017.0131
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30584285
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3235-x
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3235-x
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388916300515
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388916300515
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0124
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0124
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0124
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0124
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0124
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/143/5/e20182800.abstract
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/143/5/e20182800.abstract
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0126
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0126
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0126
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0126
http://cancer.jmir.org/2019/2/e12071/
https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454214563408
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12291
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0015
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0015
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0131
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0131
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0131
https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/10/e13829
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2014.0041
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2014.0041
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0135
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0135
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0135
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25733941
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25733941
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842815000694
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0118
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0118
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2015.0061
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2015.0061
https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2015.009084
https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2015.009084
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0141
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0141
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0141
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0141
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0141
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0142
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0142
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0142
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0142
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0143
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0143
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0143
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0143
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0144
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0144
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0144
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0144
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0145
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0145
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 27 (2021) 100316
25
Support Care Cancer [Internet] 27 (5) (2019) 1783–1792. Available from:
10.1007/s00520-018-4420-x.
[146] A. Sender, M. Friedrich, K. Leuteritz, et al., Unmet supportive care needs in young
adult cancer patients: associations and changes over time. Results from the AYA-
Leipzig study, J. Cancer Surviv. [Internet] 13 (4) (2019) 611–619. Available from:
10.1007/s11764-019-00780-y.
[147] N. Shirazee, A. Ives, J. Collins, et al., Patterns in clinical trial enrollment and
supportive care services provision among adolescents and young adults diagnosed
with having cancer during the Period 2000–2004 in western Australia, J. Adolesc.
Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 5 (3) (2016) 254–260. May 2Available from:
10.1089/jayao.2016.0002.
[148] A. Smith, A. Murnane, K. Thompson, S. Mancuso, ReActivate—A goal-orientated
rehabilitation program for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, Rehabil.
Oncol. [Internet] 37 (4) (2019). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/reh
abonc/Fulltext/2019/10000/ReActivate_A_Goal_Orientated_Rehabilitation.4.as
px.
[149] S.C. Sodergren, O. Husson, J. Robinson, et al., Systematic review of the health-
related quality of life issues facing adolescents and young adults with cancer,
Qual. Life Res 26 (7) (2017) 1659–1672.
[150] A. Spathis, H. Hatcher, S. Booth, et al., Cancer-related fatigue in adolescents and
young adults after cancer treatment: persistent and poorly managed, J. Adolesc.
Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 6 (3) (2017) 489–493. Jul 17Available from:
10.1089/jayao.2017.0037.
[151] H. Spraker-Perlman, R.R. Smits-Seeman, H. Li, A.C. Kirchhoff, Statewide
treatment center referral patterns for adolescent and young adult patients with
cancer in Utah, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 7 (6) (2018) 688–691.
Jul 23Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0059.
[152] A. Steineck, M.C. Bradford, N. Lau, et al., A psychosocial intervention’s impact on
quality of life in AYAs with cancer: a Post Hoc analysis from the Promoting
Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) randomized controlled trial, Children 6
(11) (2019) 124.
[153] E.L. Warner, B. Fowler, S.T. Pannier, et al., Patient navigation preferences for
adolescent and young adult cancer services by distance to treatment location,
J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 7 (4) (2018) 438–444. May 3Available
from: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0124.
[154] K. Wasilewski-Masker, J. Gilleland Marchak, K. Vangile, et al., Adolescent and
young adult perceptions of cancer survivor care and supportive programming,
J. Commun. Support. Oncol 14 (7) (2016) 291–298.
[155] A. Watson, M. Weaver, S. Jacobs, M.E. Lyon, Interdisciplinary communication:
documentation of advance care planning and End-of-Life care in adolescents and
young adults with cancer, J. Hosp. Palliat. Nurs. [Internet] 21 (3) (2019).
Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jhpn/Fulltext/2019/06000/Interdisci
plinary_Communication__Documentation_of.7.aspx.
[156] V. White, G. Skaczkowski, K. Thompson, et al., Experiences of care of adolescents
and young adults with cancer in Australia, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol.
[Internet] 7 (3) (2018) 315–325, https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2017.0104. Jan
22Available from:.
[157] M. Wiklander, J. Strandquist, C.M. Obol, et al., Feasibility of a self-help web-
based intervention targeting young cancer patients with sexual problems and
fertility distress, Support Care Cancer [Internet]. 25 (12) (2017) 3675–3682,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3793-6. Available from:.
[158] A.W.K. Wong, T. Chang, K. Christopher, et al., Patterns of unmet needs in
adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: in their own words, J. Cancer
Surviv. [Internet] 11 (6) (2017) 751–764, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-
0613-4. Available from:.
[159] X.-.C. Wu, P.K. Prasad, I. Landry, et al., Impact of the AYA HOPE comorbidity
index on assessing health care service needs and health status among adolescents
and young adults with cancer, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev
[Internet] 24 (12) (2015) 1844. Dec 1LP – 1849. Available from: http://cebp.
aacrjournals.org/content/24/12/1844.abstract.
[160] Y.P. Wu, L.A. Linder, P. Kanokvimankul, et al., Use of a smartphone application
for prompting oral medication adherence among adolescents and young adults
with cancer, Oncol. Nurs. Forum (2018).
[161] A. Wurz, J. Brunet, Exploring the feasibility and acceptability of a mixed-methods
pilot randomized controlled trial testing a 12-week physical activity intervention
with adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, Pilot. Feasib. Stud. [Internet] 5
(1) (2019) 154. Available from: 10.1186/s40814-019-0530-6.
[162] I.R. Yurkiewicz, P. Simon, M. Liedtke, et al., Effect of fitbit and iPad wearable
technology in health-related quality of life in adolescent and young adult cancer
patients, J. Adolesc. Young Adult. Oncol. [Internet] 7 (5) (2018) 579–583. Jun
20Available from: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0022.
C.M. Telles
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0145
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0145
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0146
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0146
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0146
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0146
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0147
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0147
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0147
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0147
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0147
https://journals.lww.com/rehabonc/Fulltext/2019/10000/ReActivate_A_Goal_Orientated_Rehabilitation.4.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/rehabonc/Fulltext/2019/10000/ReActivate_A_Goal_Orientated_Rehabilitation.4.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/rehabonc/Fulltext/2019/10000/ReActivate_A_Goal_Orientated_Rehabilitation.4.aspx
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0149
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0149
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0149
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0150
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0150
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0150
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0150
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0151
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0151
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0151
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0151
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0152
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0152
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0152
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0152
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0153
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0153
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0153
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0153
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0154
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0154
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0154
https://journals.lww.com/jhpn/Fulltext/2019/06000/Interdisciplinary_Communication__Documentation_of.7.aspx
https://journals.lww.com/jhpn/Fulltext/2019/06000/Interdisciplinary_Communication__Documentation_of.7.aspx
https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2017.0104
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3793-6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0613-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0613-4
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/24/12/1844.abstract
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/24/12/1844.abstract
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0160
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0160
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0160
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0161
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0161
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0161
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0161
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0162
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0162
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0162
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2468-2942(21)00015-0/sbref0162
Introduction
Methods
Literature search strategy
Screen and selection criteria
Data analysis
Results
Characteristics of included studies
Theme
Types of studies
Study designs
Countries
Focused population
Discussion
Purpose pattern
Purpose pattern: awareness
Purpose pattern: action
Purpose pattern: post-action evaluation
Conclusions
Funding statement
Author contributions
Appendix A – Summary of 139 Empirical Studies
Appendix B
References
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.