Provide turn it in report
(Literature review topic is: Business Leadership)
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
APA, 3,000 word in length Paper (Not Including The Title And Reference Pages). The Description Is Below:ONE-
Just from $13/Page
LITERATURE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS
The purpose of this Literature Review is for you to create a scholarly piece of graduate-level research and writing that conforms to current APA format. Competency in APA format is required of all business graduates.
You will research and write a Literature Review of at least 3,000 words (excluding the title page, abstract, and references page) on a topic you will select from a list provided by your instructor. Your paper must be written in strict conformance to current APA format and must reference at least 12 scholarly research articles.
Do not reuse work from any previous courses you have taken. Your Literature Review will be a comprehensive thematic review of the scholarly literature related to your topic.
Important Points to Consider
• It is highly recommended that you download and read the instructions to avoid any stress created by issues that are the result of waiting until the last minute.
• A SafeAssign draft submission link is provided for you to use to improve the originality score of your paper prior to your final submission.
• Since this is a graduate-level Literature Review, you must use 3 headings in current APA format throughout your paper.
Paraphrasing vs. Plagiarism
Some students do not fully understand the difference between plagiarism and paraphrasing. Paraphrasing is when you take a source or someone else’s idea and say it in your own words. When you paraphrase, you must still give the author’s name, date, title of the source, the scholarly journal it came from, and the exact website address or book.
However, when you directly quote a source, it must have quotation marks around the quote, or (if 40 words or more) it must be set in block quotation format. Give detailed information of where you acquired the quote.
For the purpose of this academic paper, adhere to the following rules when quoting or using a source:
• Do not directly quote more than 120 words from any 1 source.
• If the source is 2,000 words or less, do not directly quote more than 50 words from the source.
• When quoting or paraphrasing, do not use the same source more than 3 times within the whole document.
• Quotes must contain the section (if provided) and paragraph or page numbers of the quote, and this information must be placed on the references page.
• In all instances, use current APA guidelines for citations and references.
This paper must not be a series of quotations. You may email your instructor with any questions regarding the Literature Review.
Below are 2 published literature reviews from the Jerry Falwell Library databases that will help you understand the major assignment for this course.
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. Doi:10.1177/0149206309347376
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185–222. Doi:10.1177/0149206310383911
Literature Review Instructions
The purpose of this Literature Review is for you to create a scholarly piece of graduate-level research and writing that conforms to current APA format. Competency in APA format is required of all business graduates.
You will research and write a Literature Review of at least
3,000 words
(excluding the title page, abstract, and references page) on a topic you will select from a list provided by your instructor. Your paper must be written in strict conformance to current APA format and must reference at least 12 scholarly research articles.
Do not reuse work from any previous courses you have taken. Your Literature Review will be a comprehensive thematic review of the scholarly literature related to your topic.
Important Points to Consider
· It is highly recommended that you download and read the instructions to avoid any stress created by issues that are the result of waiting until the last minute.
· A SafeAssign draft submission link is provided for you to use to improve the originality score of your paper prior to your final submission.
· Since this is a graduate-level Literature Review, you must use 3 headings in current APA format throughout your paper.
Paraphrasing vs. Plagiarism
Some students do not fully understand the difference between plagiarism and paraphrasing. Paraphrasing is when you take a source or someone else’s idea and say it in your own words. When you paraphrase, you must still give the author’s name, date, title of the source, the scholarly journal it came from, and the exact website address or book.
However, when you directly quote a source, it must have quotation marks around the quote, or (if 40 words or more) it must be set in block quotation format. Give detailed information of where you acquired the quote.
For the purpose of this academic paper, adhere to the following rules when quoting or using a source:
· Do not directly quote more than 120 words from any 1 source.
· If the source is 2,000 words or less, do not directly quote more than 50 words from the source.
· When quoting or paraphrasing, do not use the same source more than 3 times within the whole document.
· Quotes must contain the section (if provided) and paragraph or page numbers of the quote, and this information must be placed on the references page.
· In all instances, use current APA guidelines for citations and references.
This paper must not be a series of quotations. You may email your instructor with any questions regarding the Literature Review.
Below are 2 published literature reviews from the
Jerry Falwell Library
databases that will help you understand the major assignment for this course.
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. Doi:10.1177/0149206309347376
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185–222. Doi:10.1177/0149206310383911
Page 1 of 2
BUSI600 Literature Review Grading Rubric 240 Points
|
Content – 70%
|
|
Advanced
|
|
Proficient
|
|
Developing
|
|
Not present
|
|
Topic Coverage
|
52 to 56 points
Thoughtful, detailed and comprehensive discussion is presented. Key findings are specifically related to previous research. The topic is clearly organized, presented and discussed in detail. Demonstrates exceptional depth of knowledge of the topic. Comprehensive use of most recent and seminal sources. Clearly discriminates among seminal sources.
|
47 to 51 points
Discussion relates findings to previous research on topic. Discussion relates key findings to previous research and prevents implications. The topic is organized, presented and discussed appropriately. Demonstrates proficient knowledge of the topic. Thorough selection of sources pertinent to topic. Shows some discrimination among seminal sources.
|
1 to 46 points
Limited discussion with some comparison to previous research. The topic is unclear or fairly clear but discussed too broadly or does not meet expectations. Demonstrates a basic knowledge of the topic. Selected sources relevant to topic. Limited discrimination among seminal sources.
|
0 points
No discussion to compare findings to previous research Lacks a basic knowledge of the topic. Selected sources irrelevant to topic. Does not discriminate among seminal sources. Misinterprets sources.
|
|
Literature Analysis
|
52 to 56 points
The final paper takes a clearly critical, contextualized and possibly creative stance on the topic from multiple perspectives. The work carefully examines the literature assumptions and results.
|
47 to 51 points
The final paper takes a clearly critical stance on the topic from multiple perspectives. The work explores the literature assumptions and results.
|
1 to 46 points
The final paper somewhat critically addresses a focus in cited literature. The work considers the literature results primarily from a single perspective, with minimal exploration of assumptions.
|
0 points
The final paper does not critically addresses a focus in cited literature. The work does not consider the literature results or assumptions.
|
|
Application of Scholarly Research
|
52 to 56 points
Accurately identified and applied more than 12 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
|
47 to 51 points
Accurately identified and applied at least 12 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
|
1 to 46 points
Accurately identified and applied between 1 – 11 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
|
0 points
Did not use and apply scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
|
|
Structure – 30%
|
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
|
Mechanics
|
22 to 24 points
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. Includes clear transitions and systematic use of headings and subheadings.
|
20 to 21 points
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. Includes transitions, headings, and subheadings.
|
1 to 19 points
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. Limited use of transitions and/or logical headings.
|
0 points
Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor. Poor transitions and/or few headings.
|
|
APA Style
|
22 to 24 points
Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, Abstract, and References are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. Paragraphs are indented ½”.
|
20 to 21 points
Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, Abstract, and References are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.
|
1 to 19 points
Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, Abstract, and References are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.
|
0 points
Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, Abstract, and References are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect.
|
|
Paper Length
|
22 to 24 points
Submitted more than 3,000 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
|
20 to 21 points
Submitted between 2,800 – 2,999 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
|
1 to 19 points
Submitted between 2,500 – 2,799 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
|
0 points
Submitted less than 2,499 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
|
|
Professor
Comments
|
