In order to develop a solid rationale to support the need for your program, you will conduct a needs assessment.  This needs assessment will be based largely on secondary data you collect from existing statistics and the scientific literature.  This annotated bibliography serves as a way for you to collect, catalog, and review the secondary data in preparation for your needs assessment. I am writing a project based on Obesity among age group 10 to 18. So an annotated bibliography based on obesity. More details is in the attachment.

AHS 619: Advanced Program Planning and Coordination
Spring 2020

Annotated Bibliography
10 total points

What is an Annotated Bibliography? An annotated bibliography is a list of citations to books,
articles, and other resources. Each citation is followed by a brief descriptive and evaluative
paragraph: the annotation. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the
relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited and to help you organize your materials
prior to writing your research paper. Check out Purdue OWL for examples:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/ (review only the APA-style sample).

Requirements for Content:
For this part of the assignment, you will create an APA-style annotated bibliography containing
a minimum of ten credible sources published between 2013 and 2020.

Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a variety of intellectual skills:
concise writing, succinct analysis, and informed library research. You will be reviewing scholarly
journal articles and other credible sources relevant to your selected topic. You will create
citations for these resources using APA format. You will write concise annotations that
summarize the central theme and scope of the articles. These annotations must be
approximately 100-150 words and include one or more sentences that:

1. Summarize the article in your own words. DO NOT copy and paste directly from the
abstract or article. This is always considered plagiarism!

2. Compare or contrast this work with others you have cited in this assignment
3. Discuss how this work relates to your selected topic
4. As you will be locating current health information, please note that your ten (minimum)

required credible sources must have been published between the years 2013-2020.

Requirements for Formatting:

• An APA-style title page must be included
• Citations must be alphabetized by the last name of the first author.
• Citations and annotations must be double-spaced (see APA-style sample at:

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/
• Use 1” margins all around
• Use Times New Roman, Calibri or Arial 12-point font

Information about APA Style and Scholarly References:
For APA style, pay attention to the left-side menu (how to correctly cite in-text; formatting a
reference page, etc.) at this site: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ Some
helpful information about finding credible, scholarly references include:

http://libguides.indstate.edu/content.php?pid=175498&sid=3038787. Information about
credible journal articles: http://lib.colostate.edu/howto/evaljrl2.html

Grading Rubric:

Criterion Not done/poorly
done

Acceptable but room
for improvement

Well done

Includes a minimum
of ten APA-style
citations for credible
sources published
between 2013-2020.
Also, adheres to
specific
formatting/layout
guidelines

0-1 2 3

Summarizes each
article in your own
words

0-1 2 3

Compares or
contrasts this work
with others you have
cited & discusses how
this work relates to
topic and target
population

0-1 1.5 2

Correct grammar,
spelling, sentence
structure, other
mechanics.

0-1 1.5 2

Total: __/10 points

AHS

619 Seminar: Spring 2020
Program Planning & Coordination Intervention – Final Program Plan

Assignment Rubric, Content & Formatting
50 total possible points

Final Program Plan: Grading Rubric
Excellent Good Fair Poor

1. Content

Score:
Out of 30 pts.

(27-30 pts.)
Includes ALL required
elements listed in the
guidelines with sufficient
detail provided.
Information is supported
with relevant, accurate &
appropriate sources. Clear
focus. Good evidence of
insight & critical thinking
apparent.

(24-26 pts.)
Includes all required
elements listed in the
guidelines. Adequate
information given with
many relevant points
but not in-depth.
Information is mostly
supported, although 1-2
sources not optimal or
inappropriate. Some
evidence of critical
thinking apparent.

(21-23 pts.)
Some required element(s)
listed in the guidelines
missing. Adequate
information given, but few
relevant points addressed
or not supported with
details. More than 1
source not optimal or
inappropriate. Some or
little evidence of critical
thinking.

(20 pts. or less)
Elements are missing.
Insufficient detail
provided. Sources
generally not appropriate.
No evidence of critical
thinking.

2. Quality of
Writing &
Organization

Score:
Out of 10 pts.

(9-10 pts.)
Focused, well-organized.
Unified & paper flows.
Clear, direct, excellent
logical structure, great
transitions. Contains no
major grammatical or
spelling errors. Minimal or
no quotes. Paper is
required length.

(8 pts.)
Good portion was
focused & organized,
most flows easily. Clear,
direct sentences.
Contains no more than
1-2 major grammatical
or spelling errors.
Minimal or no quotes.
Required length.

(7 pts.)
Adequately focused &
organized. Limited flow-
not very clear. Average
logical structure. More
than 2 major grammatical
or spelling errors. Used
quotes, but less than 10%
of section. Required
length.

(6 pts. or less)
Little or no focus/
organization.
Does not flow—poor
logical structure, not clear.
Contains more than 3
major in grammar or
spelling. Excessive use of
quotes; > 10%. Less than
required length.

3. Format &
Following
Direction

Score:
Out of 7 pts.

(7 pts.)
Proper APA format used
in-text & reference list.
Required length of 10-12
pages of content (not
including title or reference
pages). At least 10
credible sources used.
Titles & other formatting
elements corrected. All
directions followed.

(6 pts.)
Only 1-2 errors in APA
in-text citation &
reference list. Required
length. At least 10
credible sources used.
Only 1-2 errors in titles
& other formatting
elements. Most
directions followed.

(5 pts.)
APA format used, but >3
errors in-text or reference
list. Ten sources used, but
1 or more not credible or
appropriate. More than 3
errors in titles or other
formatting elements. Only
some directions followed.

(4 pts. or less)
APA format not
consistently used in-text;
reference list is a mess.
Less than 10 sources used
or >2 not credible or
appropriate. More than 5
errors in titles or other
formatting elements.
Many directions not
followed.

4. Overall
Impression

Score:
Out of 3 pts.

(3 pts.)
True reflection of project.
Demonstrated insight,
knowledge, writing skill &
critical thinking. Well
done.

(3.5 pts.)
Some reflection of
project. Demonstrated
some insight, adequate
knowledge & writing
skills, some critical
thinking. Overall good
effort.

(2 pts.)
Limited reflection of
project. Demonstrated
little insight or knowledge,
problems with writing
skills, little critical thinking.
Overall only adequate
effort.

(0-1 points)
No or very little reflection
of project. Demonstrated
no insight & poor
knowledge. Poor writing
skills, no critical thinking.
Overall unsatisfactory

Total Score (50 points possible):
NOTE: Please refer to the feedback on your original assignments, and make the appropriate edits for this final
program plan.

Final Program Plan: Content

Report Section Approx. Length

Title Page
A) Introduction to health topic/disparity, target population, and geographic location 1 paragraph
B) Description of key stakeholders 1/2 page
C) Needs Assessment – including primary (from key informant interview) and secondary

data 2 pages
D) Mission Statement, Goals and Objectives < 1 page E) Description of Collaborators 1 paragraph F) Logic Model 1 page G)

Program Sequence, Strategies and Marketing Plan. Be sure to include how you will
use your selected health behavior theory as a guide for your program (including
rationale for this theory) and your key collaborators who will work with you on these
interventions. 2.5 – 3 pages

H) Budget. Be sure to use the table format and include a justification column 1 page
I) Potential Barriers to Program Success – include steps to address these barriers 1/2 – 1 page

References (minimum of ten credible sources)

Total content
length = 10-12 pgs

Final Program Plan: Formatting, etc.

General Directions & Document Format

All papers must be submitted as a ONE SINGLE document (MS Word), using :

• Times New Roman, 12-point font
• double-spaced
• margins must be 1-inch on all sides
• page numbers centered at the bottom of each page

Your report must have an APA-style title page. Be sure to review APA-style title page requirements.

Use proper grammar and spelling.

All papers must be written in a scholarly manner using proper APA format (6th edition).

Credible sources appropriate for academic writing used to support your narrative. A minimum of 10
sources must be used (revise based on annotated bibliography feedback), and included in a properly
formatted APA-style references page at the end of the report.

Report content is 10-12 pages long (the title and reference pages do not count toward this length).

1
Power Point Presentation Grading Rubric

AHS 619: Spring 2020
Power Point Presentation Grading
Rubric 60 total possible points

Power Point Presentation
Exceptional Acceptable Fair Poor

1. Content (50%)

Score: ______
Out of 40 pts.

(37-40pts)
Abundance of points
presented. Content
relevant & excellent.
Emphasis appropriate
for target audience.
Convincing for
audience. Evidence of
critical thinking.

(35-36 pts)
Sufficient info
given, many good
points, but not in-
depth. Somewhat
convincing argument
for stakeholders.
Good amt of insight.
Uses some critical
thinking.

(22-34 pts)
Adequate info
given. Couple
good points
addressed. Avg.
insight. Only
fairly convincing.
May lack some
required elements.
Uses little critical
thinking.

(21 pts. or less)
Inadequate amount
of info. No
additional points
made. No insight
given. Not
convincing for
stakeholders. Lacks
required elements of
content.

2. Creativity/Style
(20%)

Score: ______
Out of 8 pts.

(8 pts)
Highly interesting &
engaging. Excellent
use of color & style.
Appropriate for
target audience.

(7 pts)
Interesting &
engaging. Some use
of color & style.
Appropriate for
target audience.

(6 pts)
Adequately
interesting &
engaging. Mostly
appropriate for
target audience.

(5 pts. or less)
Lacks creative focus.
Not entirely
appropriate for target
audience.

3. APA Format and
Organization
(15%)

Score: _______
Out of 6 pts.

(6 pts)
Proper APA
throughout. Required
length (15 slides
minimum). Title
slide & reference
slide included.
Unified, focused,
organized. Flows
logically.

(5 pts)
1-3 APA errors in
citation or reference
list. Required length
(15 min.). Title slide
& reference slide
included. Mostly
organized & flows
logically.

(4 pts)
APA format, but
with > 3 errors;
Required length
(15 min.) & title &
reference slide
might have
problems. Some
organization &
flow issues.

(3 pts. or less)
APA format not used
or > 5 errors. Under
length required; no
title &/or reference
slide; Poor
organization & flow.
Not unified.

4. Overall
Impression
(15%)

Score: ______
Out of 6 pts.

(6 pts)
True reflection of
project. All directions
followed.

(5 pts)
Some reflection of
project, with some
degree of
problems. Most or
all directions
followed.

(4 pts)
Limited
reflection of
project. Some
directions
followed.

(3 pts. or less)
No reflection of
project. Many
directions not
followed.

TOTAL SCORE: ______/40

Ryan Ebisi

Healthiest Weight’s Stakeholders

Indiana State University

There are two types of stakeholders for the Healthiest Weight Organization:

A.
Primary Stakeholders
:

– Center for Disease and Prevention (CDC)- CDC is one of the major operating components of the Department of Health and Human Services. CDC not only gather data to help search for ways to prevent/control diseases but also they provide support for other organizations for the cause of improving/maintaining the people of the community’s health. CDC provided funds and training to HWO because HWO main focus is to reduce obesity in children which goal is similar to CDC which goal is to reduce obesity in the U.S all together. CDC helping smaller organizations like HWO will bring more awareness to the people and promote adults and children to healthier lifestyles which will reduce the rate of obesity.

B.
Secondary Stakeholders
:

– Early Care and Education (ECE) – This is an organization which which its primary goal is to help children in both their education and their health related issues. ECE is being helped by other organizations (like CDC) through funding, training, and technical assistance to carry out various activities to promote obesity prevention efforts. Healthiest Weight Florida (HWF) promotes physical activity and nutrition best practices in Early Care and Education (ECE) centers across the state. Most young children spend time in care outside of their home before attending elementary school, making the ECE setting a vital place to start obesity prevention efforts. Through the help of HWO, ECE can improve their practices that can help impact children and help them develop a foundation of healthy habits.

– Florida State University College of Medicine’s Center for Child Stress and Health- Toxic stress is a response that can occur when a child experiences strong, frequent, and/or prolonged adversity–such as physical or emotional abuse, chronic neglect, caregiver substance abuse or mental illness, exposure to violence, and/or the accumulated burdens of family economic hardship–without adequate adult support. This kind of prolonged activation of the stress response systems can disrupt the development of brain architecture and other organ systems, and increase the risk for developing chronic disease and cognitive impairment. Healthiest Weight Florida (HWF) is working with Florida State University College of Medicine’s Center for Child Stress and Health to raise awareness and provide resources to health care providers about toxic stress among school-aged children.

C.
Excluded Stakeholders
:

– Children- These are the primary targets for the Healthiest Weight Organization to reduce the rate of obesity in Florida. The children, after the programs, will take what they learned and bring awareness to other children and also promote healthy lifestyles practices.

– Communities in Florida- The people of Florida will be more aware of obesity in children and will take action to promote healthier eating and activities in school. They will also attempt to persuade children to continue these healthy practices in their homes.

HealthDisparity, Target Population, and Justification

I decided to do Obesity among the age group 10 – 18 in Orlando, Florida (or Florida in general if possible). Looking at the data form a valuable source, Florida is rank the 8th place in 2018 for the state with obese children and teens between the age group of 10 – 18. The obese rate went from 12.6% in 2016 to 17.8% in 2018 which is a 5.2% increase.

Need for Health Promotion Program

· Obesity is a avoidable disorder

· The number of children and teens visiting doctors because of obesity can be reduced

· Obesity can lead to other diseases/disorders like diabetes and CVD

· Lack of physical programs could be part of the caused for the increase obese rate

Goal

By implementing a health program, our goal is to reduce the obesity rate among the age group of 10 – 18 in Florida and to promote a healthier lifestyle for this particular age group.

Community Organization to Interview

Healthiest Weight – Florida Health http://www.healthiestweightflorida.com/

Rationale for the Organization
 

The Healthiest Weight community purpose is to make the people of Florida aware of any obesity issues and alarm the people what will happen if nothing is done about it. The community also promote different obesity/weight loss programs to help promote children, teens, and adults to change their lifestyle for a healthier one.