write down 20 annotated bibliography, i have my topic and sample has been attached.

Romero 1

Romero 7

Yvette Romero

Professor Arumugam

ENG 1302-51008
10/19/18
Bibliography

Botei, Mircea. “Misinformation with Fake News.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series VII: Social Sciences. Law, vol. 10, no. 2, 2017, pp. 133-40. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. The presidential election of 2016 is the real reason why “fake news” became a thing. Manipulating people with false information is not new. Donald Trump raised awareness with his coined term, and it is labeled a threat to democracy. Tech giants contribute to this widespread phenomenon. Responsibility online should be considered, and the protection of people should be too.

Burkhardt, Joanna M. “Chapter 4: Can We save Ourselves?” Library Technology Reports., vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 22-28. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article presents ways to avoid the spread of fake news. Topics are about checking who you accept as friends online, reading news articles before sending them out to even checking the source. Skepticism and media literacy tools are emphasized.

“Chapter 1: History of Fake News.” Library Technology Reports, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 5-9. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article wants to focus on the history of fake news dating back to the printing press with the spread of competency in literacy, all the way to hoax websites when the invention of the internet came along, and the psychological appeal fake propaganda has on the masses.

“Chapter 2: How Fake News Spreads.” Library Technology Reports, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 10-13. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article centers on the history of how fake news spreads and its various forms. Including the writing of social groups, the internet being utilized to democratize information, and social media on how bots spread news no matter what type of content it is.

Dawes, Nic. “How the Press Should Cover TRUMP.” The Nation, vol. 304, no. 9, pp. 22-26. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article communicates the threat U.S Journalism has in the Trump Administration. The subject of press secretary Sean Spicer, crying over CNN News coverage by Jared Kushner and the crucial need to protect freedom of the press with a new game plan.

Galvin, Gaby. “The Globalization of ‘Fake News.'” The Report, 27 Dec. 2017, p. 11. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article gives a quick rundown on how fake news on social media such as twitter and Facebook two dominated media outlets that affect real journalism.

Jones, RonNell Andersen, and Sonja R. West. “The Fragility of the Free American Press.” Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 112, no. 3, 2017, pp. 567-95. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article discusses the attacks to the press Donald Trump has created. They believe that this type of treatment can set a precedent for significant press-protections to collapse. His strange conversation regarding the media should be acknowledged critically along with the complex system of beliefs the press upholds.

Jones, RonNell Anderson, and Lisa Grow Sun. “Enemy Construction and the Press.” Arizona State Law Journal, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1301-68. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article points out the chaotic criticism that President Donald Trump has been receiving. Donald Trump has labeled the media as “the enemy.” As a result, the press and first amendment defenders have responded in anger. Trump critics fail to understand his statement; therefore, this article tries to explain “enemy construction” by offering an inside view to the social, legal, technological, and political reality that the press creates to wage war against the other.

Kaye, Barbara K., and Thomas J. Johnson. “Across the Great Divide: How Partisanship and Perceptions of Media Bias Influence Changes in Time Spent with Media.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article cornerstones the 2012 election. Barack Obama and Mick Romney were both running to get the presidency. One thing that this focuses on is how biased both candidates’ supporters were. Obama supporters watched liberal media, while Romney supports tuned into the conservative press. Both candidates took more time to be with their party’s favorable press. This could be an example of how on all presidencies there is partisan divide with the media.

Lee, Tien-Tsung. “The Liberal Media Myth Revisited: An Examination of Factors Influencing Perceptions of Media Bias.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 43-64. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article claims that the media is hardcore liberal therefore have more nepotism towards them. To know why the media is biased they did a study. According to them the general audience ideologies and partisanships affect how the media is viewed. For example, republican distrust the media, political cynicism is a big contributor.

Marshall, Jonathan Paul. “Disinformation Society, Communication and Cosmopolitan Democracy.” Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, 2017, pp. 1-24. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article states that fake news is a disease to our society, not only to internet users. Our daily life involves communicating, categorizing social groups, formulating, and “patterns of power.” Stuff like fake news disrupt, and ruin accuracy along with effectiveness. If a “cosmopolitan society” must have good interactions, this article dives into the obstacles of communication, other sequences that assist lousy communication must be handled before they are confronted.

Massing, Michael. “Journalism in the Age of Trump.” The Nation, vol. 307, no. 4, 13 Aug. 2018, pp. 12-18. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article specifically focuses on how the Trump Administration challenges journalism in the United States. Things that are in conversation involve his attacks to the press, the dissemination of falsehoods, Trump’s damage to body politics, and the primary concern of fake news skyrocketing.

McDevitt, Michael, and Patrick Ferrucci. “Populism, Journalism, and the Limits of Reflexivity: The Case of Donald J. Trump.” Taylor and Francis Group, 21 Oct. 2017, www.researchgate.net/publication/320533962_Populism_Journalism_and_the_Limits_of_Reflexivity_The_case_of_Donald_J_Trump. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article studies how severe populism is as pressure against “intellectualism” is accepted into how journalists in the U.S think of audiences. Even scholars predicted the rise of trump as inevitable, his routines with the press and the lack journalist’s comprehension on what populism is. In this article, they target “boundaries of reflexivity” by comparing commentaries/interpretations of a journalist in the surprising 2016 election

Monzon-Palma, Tina. “Do Journalists Still Matter?” Vital Speeches of the Day, vol. 83, no. 10, Oct. 2017, pp. 293-95. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article showcases the importance of not only of journalism but journalists, the trend of fake news, and how vital it is to keep journalists around to stay truthful to their stories.

Murphy, James. “Unnoteworthy NEWS: Fake News, Once Dubbed ‘Yellow Journalism,’ Is as Old as News Itself, but Nowadays, with the Slant Given by Major Media to Most Reporting, Major Media Have Themselves to Blame.” New American, vol. 34, no. 9, 19 Feb. 2018, pp. 21-23. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article concentrates on the history and impact of fake news, and the role media must play. People that use propaganda use it to defame their enemies. Hoax news outlets spread lies to rack up views and money. Fake news blossoms because citizens do not trust mainstream media.

“A Press under Siege.” The Nation, vol. 307, no. 5, p. 3. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. Editorial. This article majority of the time focuses on the relationship Donald Trump has with the media. An overview of the rhetoric used in his tweets have been listed.

Steinmetz, Katy. “The Real Fake News Crisis.” Time, vol. 192, no. 7, 20 Aug. 2018, pp. 26-31. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article examines the psychological effects of how the authenticity of news is found. It shows studies of how people get wired in to believe anything on the internet because of how simple it is told which cause emotional and illogical thinking; hence people will believe biased information, and not understand how search engines work.

Varadkar, Leo. “Free Speech and the Necessity of Discomfort.” Vital Speeches of the Day, vol. 84, no. 4, Apr. 2018, pp. 117-21. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article does not focus on fake news. Most importantly it will shine a light on things that are being spoken about now that are serious pressing matters. Freedom of speech is something that thankfully we have in America. Gay rights, #Metoo movement, women’s suffrage are uncomfortable topics to many nevertheless they should be addressed in the media because we have that privilege. A journalist job is to report on them.

Yeste, Elena, and Pere Franch. “Trump Vs. Los Medios. Tratamiento De La Prensa Desde La Cuenta De Twitter Del Presidente De EU.” [“Trump vs. media. Treatment of the press from the US president’s Twitter account.”]. El Profesional De La Información, vol. 27, no. 5, 5 Aug. 2018, pp. 975-83. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article documented the behavior of Donald Trump during his six months in office. They analyze his twitter account in which he goes by the name of @realdonaldtrump. His tone, mentioning in media, and any related keywords are thoroughly inspected. Trump is hostile to the media that criticize him and is respectful with those who aren’t and instead praise him.

Zaharoff, Zachary N. “Defaming the Prince: Why the Media Is Entitled to Immunity from a Presidential Defamation Suit.” Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 48-41. Academic Search Complete. Accessed 12 Oct. 2018. This article talks about how the press should not have defamation suits bolted at them. Mainly when a president is aiming them since they have the immense power, it could be dangerous. Lawsuits like so go against the first amendment. In times where, fake news is way out of hand, and where the president is known to be litigious there should be a conversation and suggest if a president should be allowed to bring a case to light regarding defamation.

Jefferson 1

Dinesha Jefferson

English 1302

Professor Deva Arumugam

October 19, 2018

Annotated Bibliography

Barnard, Neal, MD, and Susan E. Berkow, PhD. “Vegetarian Diets and Weight Status.” Nutrition Reviews 64.4 (2006): 175-188. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Nov. 2010. This article discusses the health of society. It lists certain health issues that are directly related to the consumption of meat. The article explains that vegetarian diets are associated with reduced body weight and health issues. Meat was presented as one of the reasons that society is obese. According to the article health risks are increased when meat is consumed. [Pros]

Brown, Jordan. “Protein Packed Plates.” Joe Weider’s Muscle & Fitness 67.7 (2006): 194-198. Health Source: Consumer Edition. Web. 4 Nov. 2011. This book discusses that without meat you can’t access all the protein that the body needs. Different forms of protein other than meat doesn’t benefit you as much. According to the article when working out and moving around, plant-based proteins lack the amino acids your body needs. Meat proteins are needed because they contain all of the essential amino acids that your body needs to properly function. Without meat, it is said that you shut down quicker feeling tired and having less energy. Your muscles suffer when working out due to lack of protein from meat. [Cons]

Dworkin, Norine. “22 Reasons to Go Vegetarian Right Now.” Vegetarian Times 260 (1999): 90. Health Source: Consumer Edition. Web. 9 Nov. 2010. This article talks about the benefits of a vegetarian diet. Many reasons for adopting a vegetarian diet are discussed including health and environmental. Many statistics are given. Some individuals changed their diets due to the belief that vegetarians lose weight faster. More than 40% of individuals changed their diets and were said to feel more energized than before. The article explains why being a vegetarian is very beneficial for your future. [Pros]

Engelhart, Katie, and Nicholas Kohler. “Save the Planet Stop Eating Meat.” Maclean’s 123.11/‌ (2010): 56-59. Middle Search Plus. Web. 2 Nov. 2015. This is an article on the environmental effects of the meat industry. It discusses that a reduction in meat consumption can help the environment. Health benefits of consuming less meat is also discussed. The article explains that if we want to save our environment, we must stop consuming meat. The environment is in jeopardy and as human beings we must do what we can to save it. According to the article we can’t be beat if we drop the meat. Vegetarianism is needed to save the environment, according to the article. [Pros]

Evangeline, Yvonne. “Is a Vegetarian Diet for You?” American Fitness 27.3 (2009): 68-69. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Nov. 2016. This article explains what a vegetarian is. It also talks about the different reasons why individuals choose vegetarian diets. The article gives the idea that vegetarians stop eating meat not only because of health issues but also because of environmental issues. This article presents the different types of vegetarians. Sources of essential nutrients for vegetarians is also discussed. [Pros]

Koneswaran, Gowri, and Danielle Nierenberg. “Global Farm Animal Production and Global Warming: Impacting and Mitigating Climate Change.” Environmental Health Perspectives 116.5 (2008): 578-582. Health Source: Consumer Edition. Web. 2 Nov. 2010. This article discusses environmental problems that the meat industry causes. Global warming and climate changes are discussed. The link between farm animal production and green-house gas is brought up. Meat is believed to affect and harm the environment. According to the article if we don’t put a stop to the meat industry and make a change, our environment will only get worse. [Pros]

Lesica, Nicholas A. “Diets.” Conversation about Healthy Eating, UCL Press, London, 2017, pp. 169–181. JSTOR. This article explains how individuals don’t know what the real meaning of healthy is. Most individuals become vegetarians because it is assumed that its healthier. According to the article individuals don’t understand the details of what makes a healthy balanced diet. Eating meat doesn’t make you less healthy nor does it make you healthier. Eating meat makes you balanced. The article focuses on the details of healthy diets and how to live longer. [Cons]

“Lower Cancer Risk In Vegetarians.” Nutritional Health Review: The Consumer’s Medical Journal 101 (2010): 13. Health Source: Consumer Edition. Web. 9 Nov. 2013. This article is about the health of vegetarians. It says that vegetarians have a lower risk of many types of cancer. Many specific types of cancer are discussed. Vegetarians plant-based diets allow them to get a lot of nutrients that they need. The body heals from the inside out. What you put into your body matters, according to the article. [Pros]

Macdonald, Helen Bishop. “Meat and Its Place in the Diet.” Canadian Journal of Public Health / Revue Canadienne De Sante’e Publique, vol. 82, no. 5, 1991, pp. 331–334. JSTOR. This article explains the importance of meat in your diet. The article gives the idea that a salad is less or equal to a burger. While romaine lettuce makes a reasonable contribution of some nutrients, a sandwich with meat was said to contain just as much of nutrients as salads. It was said that there was no correlation between meat and colon cancer. The article gives the idea that a vegetarian diet is actually no better than a diet that contains meat. [Cons]

Mangels, Reed. “Scientific Update.” Vegetarian Journal 29.2 (2010): 12-13. Current Issues: Environment. Web. 6 Oct. 2011. This article talks about the effect a vegetarian diet can have on cholesterol levels. A reduction of 10-15 percent in cholesterol levels can be achieved by eating a vegetarian diet. This is higher than the conventional dietary therapy for high cholesterol, which reduces levels by only 5-10 percent. Vegetarians also had better blood pressure compared to non-vegetarians. In the article it was explained that vegetarians were less likely to get Type 2 diabetes compared non-vegetarians. [Pros]

McCormick, Holly. “Going Vegetarian.” Prevention Nov. 2003: 68-69. Current Issues: Environment. Web. 6 Oct. 2017. This article talks about how the American Dietetic Association (ADA) endorsed a vegetarian diet in one of their journals. It goes on to list many diseases and health issues that a vegetarian diet can help prevent. This article gives the idea that if you want to live a disease free and healthy life, going vegetarian is the way to go. It also talks about where to get essential vitamins and minerals while on a vegetarian diet. According to the article, plant base foods are loaded with nutrients to protect our health. [Pros]

Miller, Debra. Factory Farming. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. N. pag. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 2 Nov. 2010. This is a book in opposition to the need of vegetarianism to better the environment. It lists beef, lamb, and pork as the meats that are the cause of problems for the environment. This book explains that being a vegetarian is unnecessary to save the environment. It states that fish and chicken are perfectly safe for the environment. According to the book being a vegetarian won’t make a difference to the environment. Some meats are harmful but not all of them are, so why suffer and cut out all meat? [Cons]

Nestle, Marion. “Animal vs. Plant Food in the Human Diets and Health: Is the Historical Record Unequivocal?” Proceedings of the Nutritional Society 58.2 (2007): 211-218. Google Scholar. Web. 26 Oct. 2014. This article talks about the health benefits of a vegetarian diet. It talks about certain diseases that can be prevented by eliminating meat from your diet. This article explains how vegetarianism affects society’s health. Vegetarianism is believed to be nutritionally superior compared to other ways of eating. The health of populations of certain regions in the world that consume little meat is also discussed. [Pros]

Nordgren, Anders. “Meat and Global Warming: Impact Models, Mitigation Approaches and Ethical Aspects.” Environmental Values, vol. 21, no. 4, 2012, pp. 437–457. This article views nature and the impact meat has on it. The article gives the idea that its animal production that contributes to the climate change, so how could meat possibly harm the environment. The article focuses on how meat actually helps globalize rather than harm the environment. Meat is not as harmful as individuals describe it to be. According to the article, meat has more benefits than individuals fail to realize. [Cons]

Relay Health. “Vegetarian Diets (Adults).” CRS – Senior Health Advisor July 2009: 1. Health Source: Consumer Edition. Web. 9 Nov. 2014. This article questions the values of a vegetarian diet. It was stated that vegetarians have a higher risk of dying due to lack of protein. According to this article meat is necessary to survive. Studies showed that older individuals who don’t consume meat have less energy than those who do. The article explains the reason why being a vegetarian doesn’t benefit your health when you’re an adult as much as eating meat does. [Cons]

Sapontzis, Steve F. “The Debate Over Eating Meat.” Journal of Animal Ethics, vol. 2, no. 2, 2012, pp. 121–125. JSTOR. This article explores the myths that most vegetarians have about meat. Through the article it is understood that individuals who eat meat are not less healthy than vegetarians. When meat is consumed you are more likely to be stronger. Questions such as when people eat meat are they considered killers and are meat eaters more likely to live longer, were asked. The article also explains why vegetarianism is overrated. [Cons]

Schroeder, Jon. “Phosphorus Impacts from Meat-, Dairy-, and Plant-Based Diets.” Consilience, no. 19, 2018, pp. 17–35. JSTOR. This article explores the impact of plant -based and dietary foods. More than 40% of individuals who ate meat were stronger than those who didn’t eat meat. While meat does have hormones the estrogen in soy meat is just as harmful. The estrogen in the soy meat caused risks to women’s pregnancies, by affecting their ovaries. While vegetarians did have health benefits, meat had just as much. The article focuses on how the body is impacted by each diet. [Con]

Smil, Vaclav. “Eating Meat: Evolution, Patterns, and Consequences.” Population and Development Review, vol. 28, no. 4, 2002, pp. 599–639. JSTOR. This article explains how eating meat is a part of our revolutionary heritage. Meat doesn’t cause any more harm than vegetarian diets do. Meat is the largest source of protein in most countries. In the article, questions were asked such as how much longer meat eaters live compared to vegetarians and how safe is it to not eat meat. According to the article we were born to eat meat, it’s our nature. In the nutritional world the word meat is actually a misnomer, according to the article. [Cons]

Wadyka, Sally. “Don’t Have a Cow.” Runner’s World Dec. 2006: 51-2. Current Issues: Environment. Web. 13 Oct. 2010. This article talks about a study that was done on runners who ate meat and runners who did not consume meat. The nutritional need for protein that endurance athletes was discussed. Individuals who didn’t eat meat seemed to maintain their stamina and stay in good shape. It also lists a number of health benefits of vegetarianism, including a longer life expectancy. The article explains how athletes who were vegetarian seemed to have more energy and lasted longer during the races. Vegetarians were portrayed to have more endurance compared to meat eaters. [Pros]

Yates-Doerr, Emily. “Meeting the Demand for Meat?” Anthropology Today, vol. 28, no. 1, 2012, pp. 11–15. This article explains the demand for meat and its value. Meat is very rich in nutrients. The article explains why humans should eat meat. It was sated that there is no evidence that suggest that vegetarians receive more health benefits than non- vegetarians. In the article it says that we shouldn’t stop eating meat because of fear of hurting animals. Where do you believe weave comes from? Either way we all take things from animals and its apart of life, according to the article. We need meat to survive. [Cons]

Topic proposal :Does drone Warfare do more harm than good?

Unmanned aerial vehicle which are commonly known as drone is currently the center of focus in the united States counter terror operations. In the contemporary world, the frequency of drone attacks has drastically increased. The increased rate on the other hand increased the violence frequency and the states of instability across the world. This has resulted to the number of consequences which need to be addressed. The introduction of drone has helped the U.S military but also it has in the wrong side during warfare. For example, the introductions of the drones has provoked attacks from the Pakistanis, forcing the US military to formulate better and stronger policies to contain the situation.

Although the drones seem to be efficient in terms of task they are designed to execute, a number of issue have emerged pertaining to the death of civilians involved in the wars. It is evidence that most drones have emerged to be victims towards the destructions infrastructures and death of the innocent civilians. This is an implications that is results to more harm than it does good towards the United States innocent civilians, making an topic controversial and area to be researched on. Utilization of drone can be seen as poor strategy of hunting the high level of terrorists, which in turns results to emergence of unwanted technological arms that negatively impact the host country.

The rationale behind researching this topic is to narrow down the emerging controversies pertaining to the morality of foreign civilians. The major reason for the heavy utilization of drones in the war is to minimize the number of casualties involved in a given war. However, this cannot be justified since the saving of the lives involves taking other lives. This results to the killing of innocent people whom are supposed to be protected. An example is the death of sic military officers in Afghanistan when the drone pilot directed a missile towards the attack target. This is one of the major reasons while research on predator drones need to be looked at even deeper, to analyze ways through which such lives can be saved .

Second reason for researching on the topic is the risks which the drones technology is posing on the other countries. Currently, more than 40 countries are researching on a technology that will aid the development of drones or fire arms utilizing the similar technology. This implies that in few years, the manner in which wars will be conducted will be far different, and might results to the severe effects to the countries which are not fully developed with this technology. The fact that drones can be used in performing any type of destruction is a clear indication that well attacked can suffer from economic problems due to the mass destruction of the infrastructure in a given country. In the coming years, man combat will be a long gone thing, disadvantaging the countries which will be making the use of traditional methods of wars.

Therefore, my research will be about the reason as why the Americans need to consider the utilization of drones in war fare. This is because of the cases which have been recorded of losing the lives of the civilians. leaving a dirty taste in the mouths of individual \s who have seen how this has been taking away the lives of civilians. The paper will also try formulating various policies which will be used in consuming that drones are used in the rights and required manner so as to record the least number of civilians death.

Topic proposal :Does drone Warfare do more harm than good?

Unmanned aerial vehicle which are commonly known as drone is currently the center of focus in the united States counter terror operations. In the contemporary world, the frequency of drone attacks has drastically increased. The increased rate on the other hand increased the violence frequency and the states of instability across the world. This has resulted to the number of consequences which need to be addressed. The introduction of drone has helped the U.S military but also it has in the wrong side during warfare. For example, the introductions of the drones has provoked attacks from the Pakistanis, forcing the US military to formulate better and stronger policies to contain the situation.

Although the drones seem to be efficient in terms of task they are designed to execute, a number of issue have emerged pertaining to the death of civilians involved in the wars. It is evidence that most drones have emerged to be victims towards the destructions infrastructures and death of the innocent civilians. This is an implications that is results to more harm than it does good towards the United States innocent civilians, making an topic controversial and area to be researched on. Utilization of drone can be seen as poor strategy of hunting the high level of terrorists, which in turns results to emergence of unwanted technological arms that negatively impact the host country.

The rationale behind researching this topic is to narrow down the emerging controversies pertaining to the morality of foreign civilians. The major reason for the heavy utilization of drones in the war is to minimize the number of casualties involved in a given war. However, this cannot be justified since the saving of the lives involves taking other lives. This results to the killing of innocent people whom are supposed to be protected. An example is the death of sic military officers in Afghanistan when the drone pilot directed a missile towards the attack target. This is one of the major reasons while research on predator drones need to be looked at even deeper, to analyze ways through which such lives can be saved .

Second reason for researching on the topic is the risks which the drones technology is posing on the other countries. Currently, more than 40 countries are researching on a technology that will aid the development of drones or fire arms utilizing the similar technology. This implies that in few years, the manner in which wars will be conducted will be far different, and might results to the severe effects to the countries which are not fully developed with this technology. The fact that drones can be used in performing any type of destruction is a clear indication that well attacked can suffer from economic problems due to the mass destruction of the infrastructure in a given country. In the coming years, man combat will be a long gone thing, disadvantaging the countries which will be making the use of traditional methods of wars.

Therefore, my research will be about the reason as why the Americans need to consider the utilization of drones in war fare. This is because of the cases which have been recorded of losing the lives of the civilians. leaving a dirty taste in the mouths of individual \s who have seen how this has been taking away the lives of civilians. The paper will also try formulating various policies which will be used in consuming that drones are used in the rights and required manner so as to record the least number of civilians death.

Topic proposal :Does drone Warfare do more harm than good?

Unmanned aerial vehicle which are commonly known as drone is currently the center of focus in the united States counter terror operations. In the contemporary world, the frequency of drone attacks has drastically increased. The increased rate on the other hand increased the violence frequency and the states of instability across the world. This has resulted to the number of consequences which need to be addressed. The introduction of drone has helped the U.S military but also it has in the wrong side during warfare. For example, the introductions of the drones has provoked attacks from the Pakistanis, forcing the US military to formulate better and stronger policies to contain the situation.

Although the drones seem to be efficient in terms of task they are designed to execute, a number of issue have emerged pertaining to the death of civilians involved in the wars. It is evidence that most drones have emerged to be victims towards the destructions infrastructures and death of the innocent civilians. This is an implications that is results to more harm than it does good towards the United States innocent civilians, making an topic controversial and area to be researched on. Utilization of drone can be seen as poor strategy of hunting the high level of terrorists, which in turns results to emergence of unwanted technological arms that negatively impact the host country.

The rationale behind researching this topic is to narrow down the emerging controversies pertaining to the morality of foreign civilians. The major reason for the heavy utilization of drones in the war is to minimize the number of casualties involved in a given war. However, this cannot be justified since the saving of the lives involves taking other lives. This results to the killing of innocent people whom are supposed to be protected. An example is the death of sic military officers in Afghanistan when the drone pilot directed a missile towards the attack target. This is one of the major reasons while research on predator drones need to be looked at even deeper, to analyze ways through which such lives can be saved .

Second reason for researching on the topic is the risks which the drones technology is posing on the other countries. Currently, more than 40 countries are researching on a technology that will aid the development of drones or fire arms utilizing the similar technology. This implies that in few years, the manner in which wars will be conducted will be far different, and might results to the severe effects to the countries which are not fully developed with this technology. The fact that drones can be used in performing any type of destruction is a clear indication that well attacked can suffer from economic problems due to the mass destruction of the infrastructure in a given country. In the coming years, man combat will be a long gone thing, disadvantaging the countries which will be making the use of traditional methods of wars.

Therefore, my research will be about the reason as why the Americans need to consider the utilization of drones in war fare. This is because of the cases which have been recorded of losing the lives of the civilians. leaving a dirty taste in the mouths of individual \s who have seen how this has been taking away the lives of civilians. The paper will also try formulating various policies which will be used in consuming that drones are used in the rights and required manner so as to record the least number of civilians death.