Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
A-SCSProj2
Just from $13/Page
Project Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Professionals in the social sciences investigate human behavior and society for the purpose of understanding why people act the way they do. This investigation can help address a wide variety of social issues, such as the role of social media in the Arab Spring protests, the impact of social skills on future success, racial factors in police violence, and how partitioned grocery carts can help shoppers purchase healthier foods. Social scientists can help address issues such as these through research and investigation.
For the second project in this course, you will build on the work completed in Project One and develop a presentation for the audience you identified in Project One. In your presentation, you will explain how social scientific thinking has affected you and discuss the impact of the issue on your audience, supporting your claims with evidence.
Project Two addresses the following course outcomes:
· Illustrate the impact of social scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences
· Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of human behavior
· Utilize evidence-based approaches in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary issues on individuals and society
Prompt
In Project Two, you will use the research investigation you wrote for Project One to create a presentation that explains how social scientific thinking has affected you and discusses the impact of your selected issue on your audience.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Provide a brief overview of the social scientific background of your issue and research question. How is the issue situated within the social sciences?
II. Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about the response to your question or the outcome of your investigation? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
III. Describe the evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
IV. Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate?
V. Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research and develop a question affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did social scientific thinking change the lens through which you viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
VI. Explain why using evidence-supported research can give you both a personal and professional advantage. In other words, what is the value of supporting your work with evidence?
VII. Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s potential current social science knowledge or lack thereof, and what is specifically important to the audience.
Project Two Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation should have approximately 5–7 slides and use Prezi, PowerPoint, or a comparable presentation tool. Make sure that you include speaker notes so that your instructor knows what you would say if you were to actually give the presentation. Note: If using Prezi, be sure to include a Word document with notes. If using PowerPoint, be sure to include speaker notes.
|
Critical Elements
|
Exemplary (100%)
|
Proficient (85%)
|
Needs Improvement (55%)
|
Not Evident (0%)
|
Value
|
|
Social Scientific
Background
|
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response expertly balances necessary detail with brevity
|
Provides brief overview of social scientific background of issue and research question and explains how issue is situated within social sciences
|
Provides brief overview of social scientific background of issue and research question and explains how issue is situated within social sciences, but with gaps in detail or clarity
|
Does not provide brief overview of social scientific background of issue and research question and does not explain how issue is situated within social sciences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Audience
|
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates sophisticated understanding of relationship between issue and audience
|
Explains how issue impacts audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation
|
Explains how issue impacts audience, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support
|
Does not explain how issue impacts audience
|
13.5
|
Evidence
|
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates strong understanding of using evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary social scientific issues
|
Describes evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issue on self and audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation
|
Describes evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issue on self and audience, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support
|
Does not describe evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issue on self and audience
|
13.5
|
Personally
|
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight into impact of social
|
Explains why issue is important personally
|
Explains why issue is important personally, but with gaps in clarity or detail
|
Does not explain why issue is important personally
|
13.5
|
sciences on personal experiences
|
|
Investigation
|
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates insight into relationship between issue and social scientific thinking
|
Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue, supporting response with examples from research investigation
|
Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support
|
Does not illustrate how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue
|
13.5
|
Evidence-Supported
Research
|
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates keen insight into impact of social sciences on personal and professional experiences
|
Explains why using evidencesupported research can give both a personal and professional advantage
|
Explains why using evidencesupported research can give both a personal and professional advantage, but with gaps in clarity or detail
|
Does not explain why using evidence-supported research can give both a personal and professional advantage
|
13.5
|
Message
|
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and presentation demonstrates understanding of effectively communicating with specific audiences by tailoring message
|
Communicates message
effectively in a way that is tailored to specific audience
|
Communicates message to audience, but communication is not effective or is not tailored to specific audience
|
Does not communicate message to audience
|
13.5
|
Articulation of Response
|
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format
|
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
|
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
|
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
|
5.5
|
|
Total
|
100%
|
1
1
1
