Please read the instructions in the document carefully.
Research Paper
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
research paper 2
Just from $13/Page
TOPIC: NORTH YEMEN CIVIL WAR of 1962-1970
FIRSTLY, please give me an outline of the research paper.
Outline must include:
Primary and secondary resources, narrowed research questions, sections of research paper, etc.
The research paper must include:
1- Finalized Research Questions
2- Primary and secondary sources
3- 4500 word research paper. Times new roman, 12 point, 1.5 spacing, chicago citation.
4- Sections of the paper must include:
a. Introduction,
b. Research Questions,
c. Methodology,
d. Literature review
e. Research analysis
f. Conclusion
Rubrics: Research Paper and Presentation
Rubric for the final project (paper and presentation) assignment:
Students will choose a specific research problem and work to find answers .
The length of the paper is 10-12 pages for 200 levels classes , and 4500-6000 word counts for 300 and 400 level classes- as text without the title page and the list of content and references. All work is to be done in accordance with only writing style: Chicago Manual Style of writing .
Each text will be checked for plagiarism through Safe Assign
The paper will be graded through the rubric marking sheet as listed below:
|
Expert
|
|
Proficient
|
|
Apprentice
|
|
Novice
|
|
|
Integration of Knowledge
|
|
The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
|
|
The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
|
|
The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
|
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.
|
|
|
Topic focus
|
|
The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.
|
|
The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.
|
|
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
|
The topic is not clearly defined.
|
|
|
Depth of discussion
|
|
In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper.
|
|
In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper.
|
|
The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.
|
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.
|
|
|
Cohesiveness
|
|
Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
|
|
For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
|
|
Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow – disjointedness is apparent. Author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
|
Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships
|
|
|
Spelling and grammar
|
|
No spelling &/or grammar mistakes.
|
|
Minimal spelling &/or grammar mistakes.
|
|
Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes.
|
Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
|
|
|
Sources
|
|
More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
|
|
5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
|
|
Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible.
|
Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.
|
|
|
Citations
|
|
Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.
|
|
Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.
|
|
Cites some data obtained from other sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect.
|
Does not cite sources.
|
|
Expert
|
Proficient
Apprentice
Novice
Integration of Knowledge
The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
Topic focus
The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.
The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
Depth of discussion
In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper.
In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper.
The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.
Cohesiveness
Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow – disjointedness is apparent. Author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
Spelling and grammar
No spelling &/or grammar mistakes.
Minimal spelling &/or grammar mistakes.
Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes.
Sources
More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible.
Citations
Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.
Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.
Cites some data obtained from other sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect.
|
|
CRITERIA
|
Excellent
4
|
Good
|
Acceptable
|
Does not meet
Expectations
|
|
Score
|
|
Structure
|
Structure is clear and enhances readability; titles and paragraphs used convincingly to support the structure of the text
|
Structure is mostly clear; titles and paragraphs used appropriately
|
Structure mostly clear but less convincing; some titles and paragraphs used
|
Unclear structure; little or no use of titles and paragraphs
|
|
Sources
|
Excellent and varied use of appropriate materials and sources including other sources than the textbook
|
Appropriate materials and sources used; less creativity in selection of materials and sources
|
Less use of materials and sources; concerns about quality of sources used
|
Little or insecure use of materials and sources; use of inappropriate materials and sources
|
|
Writing
|
Well written and organized; clear; easy to follow
|
Writing is mostly clear and understandable; reasonably easy to follow
|
Adequately written and organized but less secure; less easy to follow
|
Poorly written and organized; unclear; hard to follow
|
|
|
Content
|
Answers all aspects of assignment given in a convincing manner; topic adequately covered in depth; convincing arguments made and innovative conclusions drawn
|
Adequately answers all aspects of assignment given; good arguments presented and conclusions drawn
|
Adequate answers to some but not all aspects of the assignment; less secure argumentation and less convincing conclusions made
|
Superficial treatment of one or more aspects of the assignment; incorrect information presented
|
|
Style and presentation
|
Reasonable length (between 1,000-1,500 words); fluently written throughout; adequate punctuation and spelling; correct in-text referencing and citation style followed
|
Reasonable length (between 1,000-1,500 words); fluently written overall; adequate punctuation and spelling; secure in-text referencing and citation style
|
Reasonable length (between 1,000-1,500 words); less fluently written; some mistakes in punctuation and spelling; some mistakes in-text referencing and citation style
|
Too short (<1,000 words) or too long (>1,500 words); difficult to read, incorrect punctuation and spelling; no references or incorrect in-text referencing and citation style
|
|
TOTAL POINTS (OUT OF 10):
|
Oral Presentation
Based on the groups of students established – and the work conducted, students will be asked to give a short oral presentation (10 minutes). Each student will be asked a question following the presentation. The presentation will be graded through the marking sheet as listed below:
CRITERIA
|
Excellent
(4 points)
|
Good
(3 points)
|
Acceptable
(2 points)
|
Does not meet expectations
(1 point)
|
Score
Content
|
An abundance of material clearly related to subject area; points are clearly made, innovative and supported by evidence; varied use of materials and sources including other sources than the textbook
|
Sufficient information that relates to subject area; many good points made; evidence of some variation in choice of materials and sources
|
Acceptable points made but there is insufficient information presented; less secure mastery of theory/concepts; little variation in use of materials and sources
|
Points unclear, insufficiently understood and/or with little relation to subject area; content is narrow and does not cover all aspects of subject area; insufficient use of materials and sources
|
|
Creativity
|
Very original presentation of material; uses the unexpected to full advantage; points made in a very convincing manner
|
Original presentation; creative use of materials/media
|
Some originality apparent; good variety and blending of materials/media
|
Little or no variation; material presented with little originality or interpretation
|
|
Speaking skills and group participation
|
Clear articulation; proper volume; steady rate; good posture and eye contact; enthusiasm; confidence; all group members equally involved in presentation
|
Clear articulation; acceptable volume and rate, posture and eye contact; less enthusiastic and/or confident; all group members involved in presentation
|
Some mumbling; varying volume or rate; insecure posture and/or eye contact; less enthusiastic and/or confident; most but not all group members involved in presentation
|
More mumbling; too hasty or too slow volume; insecure posture; little eye contact; insecure enthusiasm and confidence; unequal involvement of group members in presentation
|
|
Interaction with audience
|
Involved the audience in the presentation; held the audience’s attention throughout; convincing answers to all questions
|
Less involvement of the audience in the presentation; held the audience’s attention most of the time; good response to questions
|
Little involvement of the audience in the presentation; audience lost attention a few times during presentation; acceptable answers to some but not all questions
|
Little involvement of audience; audience lost attention several times during presentation; insecure or wrong answers to questions
|
|
Length of Presentation
|
Within the allotted time
|
Within a few minutes of allotted time +/-
|
Within several minutes of allotted time +/-
|
More than 5 minutes above or below the allotted time
|
|
TOTAL POINTS (OUT OF 5):
|
