DataAnalysis2 xDataAnalysis xMilestone111 xProgramFrequenciesData x
Research TOPIC: DBT Intervention on Substance Abuse Population USING THE UPLOADED TABLES AND GRAPHS, RESPOND TO THE QUESTION BELOW I. Results (1–2 pages A. Using desсrіptive statistics, describe the demographic characteristics of your sample, e.g., age, race, sex, and so forth. B. Using at least one or more statistical tests you think appropriate, describe the results of your data analysis to answer your evaluation question(s). II. Discussion of Results (2–3 pages) A. What do these findings mean? What could account for these findings other than the intervention? B. How do the limitations of the study (the design, instrument, sample, reliability, validity) influence findings?
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
|
Freq |
Col % |
||||||||||||||||
Age Group |
< 20 |
309 |
20.6% |
|||||||||||||||
20-29 |
189 |
12.6% |
||||||||||||||||
30-39 |
176 |
11.7% |
||||||||||||||||
40-64 |
390 |
26.0% |
||||||||||||||||
65+ |
436 |
29.1% |
||||||||||||||||
Gender |
Male |
7 69 |
51.3% |
|||||||||||||||
Female |
731 |
48.7% |
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age Group
< 20 309 20.6% 20-29 189 12.6% 30-39 176 11.7% 40-64 390 26.0% 65+ 436 29.1% Gender Male 769 51.3% Female 731 48.7% From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM All data in table included - no filtering Freq Col % Age Group < 20 309 20.6% 20-29 189 12.6% 30-39 176 11.7% 40-64 390 26.0% 65+ 436 29.1% Gender Male 769 51.3% Female 731 48.7%
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:41 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Country |
|||||||||||
Japan |
Italy |
Germany |
TOTAL |
||||||||
63 |
13.5% |
141 |
27.8% |
105 |
19.9% |
||||||
66 |
14.2% |
54 |
10.7% |
69 |
13.1% |
||||||
53 |
10.5% |
60 |
11.4% |
||||||||
116 |
24.9% |
135 |
26.6% |
139 |
26.4% |
||||||
158 |
33.9% |
124 |
24.5% |
154 |
29.2% |
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:44 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Results of Pearson’s Chi Square Test of Association Between “Age Group” and “Country”
p value: < 0.001 (1.359e-5)
1
Pearson’s Chi Square statistic: 36.606
Degrees of Freedom (df): 8
Obs |
Exp |
||||||
96.0 |
104.4 |
108.6 |
309.0 |
||||
58.7 |
63.9 |
66.4 |
189.0 |
||||
54.7 |
59.5 |
61.8 |
176.0 |
||||
121.2 |
131.8 |
137.0 |
390.0 |
||||
135.5 |
147.4 |
153.2 |
436.0 |
||||
466 |
466.0 |
507 |
507.0 |
527 |
527.0 |
1500 |
1500.0 |
Minimum expected cell count: 54.677
% cells with expected count < 5: 0.0
1 If p is small, e.g. less than 0.01, or 0.001, you can assume the result is statistically significant i.e. there is a relationship. Note: a statistically significant difference may not necessarily be of any practical significance.
|
Freq |
Col % |
|||||||||
Age Group |
< 20 |
309 |
20.6% |
||||||||
20-29 |
189 |
12.6% |
|||||||||
30-39 |
176 |
11.7% |
|||||||||
40-64 |
390 |
26.0% |
|||||||||
65+ |
436 |
29.1% |
|||||||||
Gender |
Male |
769 |
51.3% |
||||||||
Female |
731 |
48.7% |
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age Group
< 20 309 20.6% 20-29 189 12.6% 30-39 176 11.7% 40-64 390 26.0% 65+ 436 29.1% Gender Male 769 51.3% Female 731 48.7%
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on
0
3
/0
6
/
2
0
1
8
at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age Group
<
20
309
20.6%
20-29
18
9
12.6%
30-39
176
11.7%
4
0-64
390
2
6.0
%
6
5
+
436
29.1%
Gender
Male
7
69
51.3%
Female
731
4
8.7%
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age Group
< 20 309 20.6% 20-29 189 12.6% 30-39 176 11.7% 40-64 390 2
6.0%
65+
436
29.1%
Gender
Male
769
51.3%
Female
731
48.7%
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age Group
< 20 309 20.6% 20-29 189 12.6% 30-39 176 11.7% 40-64 390
26
.0%
65+
436
29.1%
Gender
Male
769
51.3%
Female
731
48.7%
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:41 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Country
Japan
Italy
Germany
TOTAL
Freq
Col %
Freq
Col %
Freq
Col %
Freq
Col %
Age Group
< 20
63
13.5%
14
1
27.8%
10
5
19.9%
309
20.6%
20-29
66
14.2%
54
1
0.7
%
13.1%
189
12.6%
30-39
63
13.5%
53
10.5%
60
1
1.4
%
176
11.7%
40-64
116
24
.9%
135
26.6%
139
2
6.4
%
390
26.0
%
65+
158
33.9%
124
24.5%
154
2
9.2
%
436
29.1%
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:44 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Results of Pearson’s Chi Square Test of Association Between “Age Group” and “Country”
p value: <
0.0
01 (1.359e-5)
1
Pearson’s Chi Square statistic: 36.606
Degrees of Freedom (df): 8
TOTAL |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Obs |
Exp |
||||||||||||||||||||
96.0 |
104.4 |
108.6 |
309.0 |
||||||||||||||||||
58.7 |
63.9 |
66.4 |
189.0 |
||||||||||||||||||
54.7 |
59.5 |
6 1.8 |
176.0 |
||||||||||||||||||
12 1.2 |
131.8 |
13 7.0 |
390.0 |
||||||||||||||||||
135.5 |
147.4 |
153.2 |
436.0 |
||||||||||||||||||
46 6 |
466.0 |
50 7 |
507.0 |
527 |
5 27.0 |
1500 |
1500.0 |
Minimum expected cell count: 54.677
% cells with expected count < 5: 0.0
1 If p is small, e.g. less than 0.01, or 0.001, you can assume the result is statistically significant i.e. there is a relationship. Note: a statistically significant difference may not necessarily be of any practical significance.
Interpreting the Proportions chart – look at the “All combined” category – the more different the other Age Group categories look from this the more likely the Chi Square test will detect a difference. Within each Age Group category the Country values add up to 1 i.e.
100
%. This is not the same way of displaying data as a clustered bar chart although the similarity can be confusing.
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:18 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Age |
2 1.0 |
20 |
2
0.0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 2.0 |
18 |
18.0 % |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 3.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 4.0 |
14 |
1 4.0% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 .0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26.0 | 6 | 6.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27.0 | 2 |
2.0% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30.0 |
4 | 4.0% |
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:19 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age
21.0
20
20.0
%
22.0
18
18.0%
23.0
18
18.0%
24.0
14
14.0%
25.0
14
14.0%
26.0
6
6.0%
27.0
2
2.0%
28.0
2
2.0%
29.0
2
2.0%
30.0
4
4.0%
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:19 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age
21.0
20
20.0%
22.0
18
18.0%
23.0
18
18.0%
24.0
14
14.0%
25.0
14
14.0%
26.0
6
6.0%
27.0
2
2.0%
28.0
2
2.0%
29.0
2
2.0%
30.0
4
4.0%
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:24 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Racethn |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30.0% |
10 |
21.7% |
11.8% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
10.0% |
8 |
17.4% |
23.5% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.0 % |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.9% |
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:30 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Results of Pearson’s Chi Square Test of Association Between “Age” and “Racethn”
p value: 0.01772
1
Pearson’s Chi Square statistic:
32
.785
Degrees of Freedom (df): 18
2.0 | |||||||||
4.0 | 9.2 |
6.8 |
20.0 | ||||||
3.6 |
8.3 |
6.1 |
18.0 | ||||||
2.8 |
6.4 |
4.8 |
14.0 | ||||||
1.2 | 6.0 | ||||||||
0.4 |
0.9 |
0.7 | |||||||
0.8 |
1.8 | 1.4 | |||||||
46 |
46.0 |
34 |
34.0 |
100 |
100.0 |
Minimum expected cell count: 0.4
% cells with expected count < 5: 73.3
1 If p is small, e.g. less than 0.01, or 0.001, you can assume the result is statistically significant i.e. there is a relationship. Note: a statistically significant difference may not necessarily be of any practical significance.
Interpreting the Proportions chart – look at the “All combined” category – the more different the other Age categories look from this the more likely the Chi Square test will detect a difference. Within each Age category the Racethn values add up to 1 i.e. 100%. This is not the same way of displaying data as a clustered bar chart although the similarity can be confusing.
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:38 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Results of Pearson’s Chi Square Test of Association Between “Uscreen” and “Group”
p value: < 0.001 (1.984e-8) 1
Pearson’s Chi Square statistic: 4
1.5
38
Degrees of Freedom (df): 4
Group |
|||||
Uscreen |
0.0 |
12.5 |
5 | 25 | |
24 |
16.0 |
32 |
32.0 |
||
13.0 | 26 | ||||
7.0 | |||||
1.5 | 3 | ||||
50 |
50.0 |
Minimum expected cell count: 1.5
% cells with expected count < 5: 20.0
1 If p is small, e.g. less than 0.01, or 0.001, you can assume the result is statistically significant i.e. there is a relationship. Note: a statistically significant difference may not necessarily be of any practical significance.
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/0
6
/
2
0
18
at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age Group
<
20
309
20.6%
20-29
189
12.6%
30-39
176
11.7%
4
0-64
390
26.0
%
65+
436
29.1%
Gender
Male
7
69
51.3%
Female
731
48.7%
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:33 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age Group
< 20 309 20.6% 20-29 189 12.6% 30-39 176 11.7% 40-64 390 26.0% 65+ 436 29.1% Gender Male 769 51.3% Female 731 48.7%
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:41 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Country |
|||||||||||
Japan |
Italy |
Germany |
TOTAL |
||||||||
63 |
13.5% |
14 1 |
27.8% |
105 |
19.9% |
||||||
66 |
14.2% |
54 |
10.7% |
69 |
13.1% |
||||||
53 |
10.5% |
60 |
11.4% |
||||||||
116 |
24.9% |
135 |
26.6% |
139 |
26.4% |
||||||
158 |
33.9% |
124 |
24.5% |
154 |
29.2% |
From sofa_db.demo_tbl on 03/06/2018 at 03:44 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Results of Pearson’s Chi Square Test of Association Between “Age Group” and “Country”
p value: < 0.001 (1.359e-5)
1
Pearson’s Chi Square statistic: 36.606
Degrees of Freedom (df): 8
Obs |
Exp |
||||||
96.0 |
104.4 |
108.6 |
309.0 |
||||
58.7 |
63.9 |
66.4 |
189.0 |
||||
54.7 |
59.5 |
61.8 |
176.0 |
||||
121.2 |
131.8 |
137.0 |
390.0 |
||||
135.5 |
147.4 |
153.2 |
436.0 |
||||
466 |
466.0 |
507 |
507.0 |
527 |
5 27.0 |
1500 |
1500.0 |
Minimum expected cell count: 54.677
% cells with expected count < 5: 0.0
1 If p is small, e.g. less than 0.01, or 0.001, you can assume the result is statistically significant i.e. there is a relationship. Note: a statistically significant difference may not necessarily be of any practical significance.
Interpreting the Proportions chart – look at the “All combined” category – the more different the other Age Group categories look from this the more likely the Chi Square test will detect a difference. Within each Age Group category the Country values add up to 1 i.e. 100%. This is not the same way of displaying data as a clustered bar chart although the similarity can be confusing.
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:18 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Age |
21.0 |
20 |
20.0% |
|||||||||||||||||
22.0 |
18 |
18.0% |
||||||||||||||||||
23.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
24.0 |
14 |
1 4.0% |
||||||||||||||||||
25.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
26.0 | 6 | 6.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
27.0 | 2 |
2.0% |
||||||||||||||||||
28.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
29.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
30.0 |
4 | 4.0% |
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:19 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age
21.0
20
20.0%
22.0
18
18.0%
23.0
18
18.0%
24.0
14
14.0%
25.0
14
14.0%
26.0
6
6.0%
27.0
2
2.0%
28.0
2
2.0%
29.0
2
2.0%
30.0
4
4.0%
From sofa_db.Copy_of_sawcompgrp on 03/06/2018 at 04:19 PM
All data in table included – no filtering
Freq
Col %
Age
21.0
20
20.0%
22.0
18
18.0%
23.0
18
18.0%
24.0
14
14.0%
25.0
14
14.0%
26.0
6
6.0%
27.0
2
2.0%
28.0
2
2.0%
29.0
2
2.0%
30.0
4
4.0%
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.