Please use below files as reference

Weekly Summary 7.1

Due: Sunday, End of Module by 11:55 p.m. EST

Each week you will write and submit a brief summary of the important concepts learned during the week. The summary will include a summary of the instructor’s weekly lecture including any videos included in the lecture.

Writing Requirements

• APA format, Use the APA template located in the Student Resource Center to complete the assignment.

CO-OPERATING IN
INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS

Chapter 10

THE CHALLENGE OF CO -OPERATING IN INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS

Co-operation in international projects has to overcome
geographical, organizational, cultural, and temporal boundaries.

It is the responsibility of the project manager to lay the foundation
for effective co-operation by accomplishing the tasks outlined in
Chapter

8

.

But ALL project members have to be willing and able to co-operate
with each other.

In a nutshell, co-operation in international projects means ‘dealing
with differences’.

The following slides outline the major cultural differences with direct

impact on co-operation.

2

Individuals from hierarchy-oriented cultures tend to

collaborate openly and intensely only with people with a

similar status and job position. People from equality-

oriented cultures tend to collaborate along the given task

across ranks and files.

Equality Hierarchy

Persons from group-oriented cultures tend to spend

more efforts on maintaining harmony in the group than

people from individualistic cultures. They will feel more

motivated to work in a team than on their own compared

to people from individualistic cultures.

Individual Group

Individuals from consensus-oriented cultures tend to give

face by avoiding open and direct conflict. Individuals from

conflict-oriented cultures will openly address conflict and

try to discuss and solve it directly.

Conflict Consensus

As relationship-oriented people consider a good work

relationship as the basis for task accomplishment, they

tend to put a lot of effort in building and maintaining

smooth relations to their peers and other stakeholders.

People from task-oriented cultures tend to focus on the

task downgrading interpersonal relationship. They tend

to base trust on achievement and competence, whereas

relationship-oriented people tend to base trust on the

overall personality and emotions.

Task Relationship

CULTURAL IMPACT ON CO -OPERATING IN INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS

3

THE BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE CO -OPERATION IN INTERNATIONAL
PROJECTS: TRUST

Trust is the belief by one person that another person’s motivation
towards him or her is benevolent and ‘honest’.

Trust is fed by different sources:

 General context-related knowledge related to cultural norms and
institutional rules of the partner.

 Specific knowledge about the behaviour of the partner in
different situations.

Trust is determined by:

 Individual characteristics.

 Quality of communication.

 Broader institutional context.

4

Overcoming prejudices

Providing informal

interaction opportunities

Exploring similarities

Bonding the international project team

Providing context

1.

2.

3.

4.

5

.

Trust building activities in

international projects

5

BEHAVIOURAL ELEMENTS TO FOSTER TRUST

Trust among international stakeholders is endorsed by:

 acknowledging differences and respecting them.

 believing in the goodwill of all stakeholders to work toward a
common goal.

 establishing transparency.

 being prepared to strike compromises.

 admitting failure (in a culturally adequate way).

6

GROUND RULES FOR EFFECTIVE CO -OPERATION IN INTERNATIONAL
PROJECTS

Trust can be regarded as the playground. For playing, we need rules of
the game:

 What constitutes effective performance for us?

 How will we evaluate our performance?

 How do we communicate across geographical, organizational, and
cultural boundaries?

 How do we design and conduct our meetings?

 How do we give feedback to each other?

 Do we fully understand the responsibility matrix and adhere to it?

 How do we report project progress and communicate owner feedback?

 How do we handle new ideas and inputs?

 How do we pass conflicts up to higher management?

 How do we resolve conflicts?
7

A MAJOR SKILL FOR EFFECTIVELY CO -OPERATING IN INTERNATIONAL
PROJECTS: CONFLICT RESOLUTION

Conflict is a dissonance between two or more parties based on
incompatible goals, needs, values, attitudes and or beliefs.

Conflicts typically start with a misinterpretation or
misunderstanding.

Due to the heterogeneity of stakeholders in international projects,
conflicts are ubiquitous.

Hence, conflict resolution skills are paramount to effectively co-
operate in international projects.

8

GENERIC SOURCES OF CONFLICTS

Ambiguity of project objective.

Insufficient authority of project manager.

Manpower resources.

Equipment and facilities.

Costs.

Technical opinions.

Priorities.

Administrative procedures.

Scheduling.

Responsibilities.

Personality clashes.
9

Reasons for
conflict in

international
projects

Hidden agendas of
stakeholders

Misunderstanding
due to ambiguity of

information

Misunderstanding
due to misinter-

pretation of
communication style

Misunderstanding
due to language

issues

Different values and
norms

Perceived
discrimination

10

Why do conflicts occur in international projects?

Co-operation

C
o

n
fr

o
n

ta
ti

o
n

4. Competing

2. Accommodating

5. Collaborating

3. Compromising

1. Avoiding

ATTITUDES TOWARDS CONFLICT

11

CONFLICT RESOLUTION STRATEGIES

1. Bilateral and direct: persuasion (through experience).

2. Bilateral and direct: open and direct discussion.

3. Unilateral and direct: coercion or threat.

4. Bilateral and indirect: third-person intermediary.

12

MANAGING HETEROGENEITY

Teams with diverse stakeholders are more efficient if they
mutually acknowledge their differences

 Prerequisites:
 Knowledge about other norms and values.

 An attitude of open-mindedness and flexibility.

 The willingness to adapt or to create something new.

Adaptation

 Means that project stakeholders are flexible in their
attitudes and behaviours and adapt themselves to the
necessities of the situation in an international project. This
could be the adaptation to the cultural script of the
external customer.

Fusion

 Means that all members try to cherry pick what works best
in their traditional ways of doing things and fuse the styles.
In other words, synergies are created from diversity.

13

SUMMARY OF ELEMENTS OF EFFECTIVE CO -OPERATION

1. Project culture of strong internal integration, strong autonomy
and involvement, adaptability, fairness and trust as well as
open-mindedness towards differences.

2. Solid fundament of trust among internal and external
stakeholders.

3. Leadership style dominated by ‘leading by example’.

4. All project members are sensitized and trained towards coping
with language, communication, negotiation, and conflict
resolution style differences.

5. All project members use and adhere to common ground rules.

14

Effective co-operation
e.g. by efficient diversity

management

International project manager
• Possessing the right knowledge and skills

• Possessing the right traits

• Knowing and accomplishing his or her tasks

Building trust

• Overcoming prejudices

• Providing informal

interaction opportunities

• Exploring similarities

• Bonding the group

• Providing context

Communicating

• Overcoming language

diversity barriers

• Understanding different

communication styles

• Switching between

different negotiation styles

• Using agreed on

communication guidelines

and protocols

Using and adhering to

common ground rules

• Performance evaluation

• Task assignment

• Feedback

• Handling of new ideas

and change

Effective conflict

management

• Identifying conflict reason

• Being aware of different

views on conflict

• Conceiving different

conflict orientations

• Using different conflict

resolution styles

ALL project members

Project culture of autonomy, involvement adaptability, trust, fairness, diversity
15

LEARNING IN AND LEARNING
FROM INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS

Chapter 11

INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING (1)

Organizational learning:

 Individual learning is a prerequisite for organizational learning.
Another prerequisite is effective communication between the
individual learners embedded in the organization’s culture and
organizational structure.

Due to their time limitations, resource constraints, great complexity,
diversity, and risk propensity, international projects are a rich source
of organizational learning.

Purpose of learning from projects:

 Reduction of project risk.

 Development of project competencies.

 Creation of sustainable innovativeness and competitive
advantage.

2

KNOWLEDGE AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

Knowledge:

 We have to distinguish between data, information, and knowledge.

 By patterning them in a certain way, unstructured, isolated, context-independent data are
transformed to information.

 Knowledge is created if cognitive behavioural patterns or heuristics are applied to this
information.

Explicit knowledge:

 Can be expressed in words or figures.

 It is documented and easily accessible.

Tacit knowledge:

 Resides in an individual’s actions and experience, as well as in his values and attitudes.

Knowledge Management is about sharing and leveraging knowledge within and outside of
the organization.

To enhance organizational learning, knowledge management needs to be applied in and to
international projects.

3

INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING (2)

Categories of knowledge derived from international
projects:

 Technical knowledge regarding the product with its
components of the service, including its underlying
technologies.

 Procedural knowledge regarding manufacturing a
product or delivering a service, including the
application of a certain project management
methodology.

 Organizational knowledge regarding
communication, leadership, and co-operation.

4

‘Strong‘

knowledge,

including true

beliefs backed

up by valid

justifications,

easy to make

explicit and

transfer

throughout the

organization.

‘Weak‘ knowledge,

tacit, sticky in local

projects, difficult to

globalize or

transfer.

Discerned

elements (e.g.

number of warranty

claims, test data)

Data that is

processed and

patterned

Actionable

information

transformed into

knowledge

Knowledge

embedded into

indiv. and org.

processes adding

value to the

organiza

tion

Learning
1. Data 2. Information

4. Individual and

organizational

processes

3. Knowledge

Context
External

environment

Strategy (implemented

via international

projects)

Organizational IT

infrastructure and

systems

Organizational

culture

National culture

of workforce

Educational

background of

employees

Common corporate language

5

Knowledge management cycle in international projects

PROJECT LEARNING AND CULTURAL CONTEXT

As shown on the previous slide, learning in and from international
projects is embedded in context.

Part of this context is national or regional culture.

Tacit knowledge reflects culture and needs to be interpreted with a
cultural lens on.

In the Arab and Chinese world, individuals are socialized in
networks (wasta / guanxi) with their own rules regarding knowledge
creating and sharing.

Intercultural knowledge is not only needed to interpret tacit
knowledge, but also to turn tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge.

The following slides explore the details how culture impacts

learning

in and from international

projects.

6

People from individualistic cultures may tend to

regard knowledge as their personal possession they

can or cannot share with anybody else. People from

group-oriented cultures may tend to consider

knowledge as something belonging to and residing

in the group.

Individual Group

Individuals from universal cultures may tend to strive

for universally applicable knowledge and apply one

fits all solutions globally. Individuals from

circumstantial cultures may tend to adapt knowledge

to its specific context.

Universal
Circumstan-

tial

Individuals from task-oriented cultures often are low-

context communicators. They tend to codify

knowledge using ICT-supported knowledge mgmt

tools. Individuals from relationship-oriented cultures

may focus on tacit knowledge residing in the people

of their network and prefer high-context information

modes.

Task Relationship

Individuals from rather theory-oriented cultures will

tend to learn from abstract knowledge and focus on

cause and effect relations. Individuals from pragmatic

cultures will tend to prefer cases and easily

transferable knowledge focusing on useful results.

Theoretical Pragmatic

7

Cultural impact on learning

• Avoidance of
loss of face

• Impact of
collectivism

• Impact of multi-
disciplinarity

• Discontinuities

• Fragmentation

• Lack of time

• Lack of
transparency

• Focus on
evaluation at the
end

• Marginality of
sender

• Stereotypes of
and against the
sender

• Linguistic ability
of the sender and
the receiver

• Lack of support
by organizational
culture

• Not Invented
Here Syndrome

• Lack of
incentives and
motivation

• Lack of
discipline

• Lack of skills

Issues regarding learning in and from

international projects related to…

… cultural

diversity

… the nature of

a project

… communica-

tion

… the overall

organization

8

Impediments to project learning

Great diversity reflected in multi-culturalism, differences in language, organizational culture,

functional culture, or educational background, complicates learning in and from international

projects.

METHODS OF LEARNING IN AND FROM INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS

All approaches aiming at capturing knowledge and experience derived from
international projects need to:

 Link the knowledge with the context in which it was created.

 Span geographical and organizational boundaries.

Human-centred methods:

 Knowledge networks / Communities of practice.

 New roles dedicated to knowledge management.

 Mentor relationships.

Process-based methods:

 Project audit.

 Structured project walkthrough.

Content-based approaches:

 Micro article

 Learning history.

9

10

Name of Method Description Main Advantages Main Disadvantages

Knowledge

networks /

community of

practice (IPMs)

Individuals with the role of

international project managers

exchange experience via email

or intranet and meet to maintain

their networks personally at

regular intervals

Tacit knowledge can be shared on the

face-to-face meetings but also easily

via phone, email or intranet crossing

organizational, cultural, and geographic

boundaries

PMs of international projects

may be too heterogeneous

to create common reference

frame

New roles

dedicated to

knowledge

management

New roles such as regional

engineering managers who

collect learning from projects

and other relevant knowledge

and disseminate it in their

networks around the globe

External and internal knowledge is

collected and disseminated; due to

personal networks, tacit knowledge can

be shared across organizational,

cultural and geographic boundaries

Effectiveness of the new

roles dependent on

qualification (including

cultural intelligence) of

individuals assigned to the

new roles. Difficult to span

functional boundaries

Mentor

relationships

Experienced international

project manager is shadowed by

to-be project manager

Good tool to share tacit knowledge,

also across organizational, cultural, and

geographic boundaries

Time consuming,

effectiveness depends on

the performance of mentor

and relation between the

two

Project audit Project-external auditors sit

down with PM to check project

documentation for compliance

and deviations from plan. Most

adequate for learning if based

on issue log

Neutral view on evaluation; adequate

for fostering project management

methodology across organizational,

cultural and geographic boundaries.

Tends to focus on

compliance issues at the

expense of organizational

learning

Overview of methods of project learning (1)

11

Name of Method Description Main Advantages Main Disadvantages

Structured project

walkthrough

Method focusing on project

team, face-to-face. Project team

controls the evaluation process

determining its own evaluators

and rules

Atmosphere of trust leads to honest

reflection; crosses organizational,

cultural and geographic boundaries;

effectiveness of sharing tacit knowledge

depends on documentation of

walkthrough process

Lack of intercultural skills

may interfere with process;

cost intensive to gather

international project team at

one site

Micro article Short articles of maximum one

page comprising key experience

or lesson learnt from a project

highly visualized, written in an

entertaining way, and

disseminated digitally

Sharing of tacit knowledge possible due

to inclusion of context. Can be

disseminated also as video clips,

cartoons or other visualized forms

travelling well across organizational,

cultural and geographic boundaries

Takes time and resources to

create articles. Strict

anonymity required in case

of negative lessons learnt

due to potential loss of face

for certain cultures

Learning history Documents of 20 – 100 pages

narrating the history of the

project chronologically quoting

directly project participants

anonymously. Distributed as

hard copies at a special

workshop

Through the direct input of project

participants very authentic and through

comments of editors very context rich.

Good to turn tacit knowledge into

explicit knowledge. If workshops are

carried out in different locations,

suitable for the whole organization

Takes a lot of time and

resources. Only meaningful

for strategic and big projects

Overview of methods of project learning (2)

THE PHASE OF PROJECT COMPLETION

The process-oriented project learning methods are especially linked
to the project completion or project termination phase.

Evaluation-based learning is one of the main tasks of this phase.
The project manager or project auditor evaluates the actual project
results versus plan regarding:

 Project schedule.

 Accuracy of the resource estimates.

 Impact of resources availability of shortages on the project.

Typically, evaluation-based learning focuses solely on the hard
facts as mentioned above. The soft factors are frequently
neglected.

Another important task is the handover of the project or service to
the customer and to ensure customer satisfaction with the
deliverables.

12

• Project budgets

and actuals

• Project schedule with estimates

and actuals

• Customer’s goal

• Technical specifications

• Change requests

• Issue log

Input

• Finalized project documentation

including project acceptance

document signed by internal or

external customer

• Explicit and tacit technical,

procedural and organizational

knowledge packaged to make it as

easy to re-use as possible in form

of:

•Analysed project performance

statistics

•Stories/Analogies/Cases/Project

histories

•Re-using project team as is or

experience of project team via

communities of practice

OutputCompletio

n Phase

Controls:

Organization‘s

project mgmt

standards/

procedures

Constraints:

strategic, financial,

time, legal, cultural,

environmental,

ethical

Mechanisms:
Debriefing workshop

Project audit

Project walkthrough

etc.

13

Main inputs and outputs of the project completion phase

Integrating
project learning

into project
management
methodology

Establishing
knowledge
enablers:

Moving
towards the
ideal of a
learning

organization

• Trust

• Motivation

• Absorption

capacity
14

Fostering project learning in an international
context