Draft Prospectus Iteration

This is a follow up to the assignment- https://www.homeworkmarket.com/questions/dnp-data-analysis-19511185

Part of Professor’s comments. This is a QI project and you should be using a quantitative methodology, quasi-experimental design. There should be a pre-test, intervention, and post-test. Please review and work on making these changes. All of my comments are listed in the text boxes within the rubric. 

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Draft Prospectus Iteration
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

As discussed earlier, the prospectus is an iterative process. This assignment provides the opportunity for you to incorporate feedback and improve your prospectus.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

· Locate your previous draft of the prospectus template to assist you in the completion of the prospectus.

· Synthesize into the prospectus draft all feedback provided by the instructor on the previous draft.

· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. 

· This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the

LopesWrite Technical Support articles

for assistance.

Directions:

Complete a revised draft of the prospectus according to the instructions and criteria provided in each section of the prospectus template and previous feedback from your instructor. The draft should include revised information for the following sections of the prospectus:

1. Introduction

2. Background of the Problem

3. Theoretical Foundations

4. Review of the Literature/Themes

5. Problem Statement

6. Clinical Questions and Variables

7. Significance of the Project

8. Rationale for Methodology

9. Nature of the Project Design

10. Purpose of the Project Design

11. Instrumentation or Sources of Data

12. Data Collection Procedures

13. Data Analysis Procedures

14. Ethical Considerations

15. Appendix: Include the previous version of your prospectus draft, including feedback from faculty, as an appendix.

IMPACTS OF MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION ERROR

1

IMPACTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE ERRORS
5

Impacts of Medication Administration Error on Three to Four years-old Leukemia Patients

Submitted by:

Prospectus

Doctor of Nursing Practice

Grand Canyon University

Phoenix, Arizona

February 1

2

, 2020

The Prospectus Overview and Instructions

Prospectus Instructions:

1. Read the entire Prospectus Template to understand the requirements for writing your prospectus. Each section contains a narrative overview of what should be included in the section and a table with the required criteria for each section. WRITE TO THE CRITERIA, as they will be used to assess the prospectus for the overall quality and feasibility of your proposed research study.

2. As you draft each section, delete the narrative instructions and insert your work related to that section. Use the criterion table for each section to ensure that you address the requirements for that particular section. Do not delete/remove the criterion table as this is used by you and your committee to evaluate your prospectus.

3. Prior to submitting your prospectus for review by your chair or methodologist, use the criteria table for each section to complete a realistic self-evaluation, inserting what you believe is your score for each listed criterion into the Learner Self-Evaluation column. This is an exercise in self-evaluation and critical reflection, and to ensure that you completed all sections, addressing all required criteria for that section.

4. The scoring for the criteria ranges from a 0-3, as defined below. Complete a realistic and thoughtful evaluation of your work. Your chair and methodologist will also use the criterion tables to evaluate your work.

5. Your Prospectus should be no longer than 6-10 pages when the tables are deleted.

Score

Assessment

0

Item Not Present

1

Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required: Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. All items scored at one must be addressed by learner peer reviewer comments.

2

Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May Be Required Now or in the Future. The component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leaves the reader with questions. Any item scored at two must be addressed by the learner per the reviewer’s comments.

3

Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions Required. The component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leaves the reader with questions. No changes required.

Contents

Introduction

4

Background of the Problem

6

Problem Statement

7

Purpose of the Study

9

10

Research Questions

12

Advancing Scientific Knowledge and Significance of the Study

13

Rationale for Methodology

15

Nature of the Research Design for the Study

17

Sources of Data

18

NOTE: This section elaborates on the Data Collection from the 10 Strategic Points.

18

Data Collection

21

Data Analysis Procedures

24

Ethical Considerations

26

Literature review

26

Theoretical Foundations/Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature/Themes

26

Literature Themes

27

Summary

Reference

29

Introduction

Health care firms have invested in nurses as front line staff that should recognize and report any errors pertaining to medication, although the nurse is the source of the error, a contributor of has observed the error take place (Jones, at el 2016). They depend on the nurse’s ability to detect the problem and make decisions to put forward the medication errors that have been discovered. Chemotherapy is one of the dangers that young Leukemia patients suffer when they are overexposed to the radioactive rays. The administration of chemotherapy is the main part of the clinical principals of oncology nursing. When the medication is not well prescribed to the patients, who are involved in the physical treatment rather the care that they are being given by nurses.

Through statistical numbers, it shows about in-patients who are suffering from the treatment suffer adverse impacts from the administrative decisions that should be well structured by the treating nurses. Human errors that happen among health care workers are at the rising trend mainly because of forgetfulness, inattention, poor motivation, carelessness, negligence, and recklessness. These factors are due to human actions that can be avoided by taking measures that will help resolve the problem. Some of the errors are unrealistic since they seem to be petty and minor to be committed with such high profile people who have taken their studies of making things right in the treatment of patients.

The efforts of reducing errors in health care sectors are mainly directed towards the prevention of such occurrences than at the management section when a mistake occurs. The management should drive a mechanism of making sure they have a well-laid protocol on how they should handle when they happen since young patients are delicate of suffering a lot in making changes in their health. Many institutions prescribe when errors happen for Leukemia patients to be reported through the institutional reporting system in such incidence.

Due to due to limited clinical experience, nursing students have high chances of making mistakes in handling patients, offering poor medication treatments. Students have been reported of a lack of knowledge about patients’ diagnosis, the purpose, and correct method of administration of medication that patients are supposed to be prescribed, especially to young patients who require a lot of care while dealing with them. The administration has the knowledge of nursing students having weakness in handling patients in Leukemia since they are sensitive to the type of prescription they are supposed to be subjected to.

When a mistake has happened during the treatment of Leukemia young patients, the administration should admit and report the mistake in a good time to save the lives of the Leukemia patients. There should be a proper monitoring system that should be drawn in a cross range so that patients can have an appropriate manner that they will have to settle their factors on records and to have treatment of patients. Records do not actually portray the exact situation with regard to the occurrence of medications and errors that should be handled inappropriate manner. The administration should take a close range of all activities that take place with the institution so that they can handle all errors that may happen during service delivery to patients.

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

Introduction

This section briefly overviews the research focus or problem, why this study is worth conducting, and how this study will be completed.

The recommended length for this section is two to three paragraphs.

1. A dissertation topic is introduced along with why the study is needed.

2. It provides a summary of results from prior empirical research on the topic.

3. Using results, societal needs, recommendations for further study, or needs identified in three to five research studies (primarily from the last three years), the learner identifies the stated need, called a gap.

4.

The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

NOTE: This Introduction section elaborates on the Topic from the 10 Strategic Points
. This Introduction section provides the foundation for the Introduction section in Chapter 1 of the Proposal.

Reviewer Comments:

Background of the Problem

The aim of the project is to examine crossly on impacts on administrative errors that are made on young patients who are suffering from Leukemia aged between three to four years. The main consequences of medication administration errors affect a patient’s morbidity and mortality. These errors affect families of the patients, patients, and health institutions indirectly through cost implications that would have been handled without having committed the mistakes. Patients lose their lives when they are given a wrong dose that should have been protected in the early stages. The errors also bring about psychological torture that will stretch to patients who are in the same institution about the fate of their medication on the same facility.

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

1

1

2

4. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

2

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Background of the Problem

This section uses the literature to provide the reader with a definition and statement of the research gap and problem the study will address. This section further presents a brief historical perspective of when the problem started and how it has evolved over time.

The recommended length for this section is two-three paragraphs.

1. Includes a brief discussion demonstrating how literature has established the gap and a clear statement informing the reader of the gap.

2. Discusses how the “need” or “defined gap” has evolved historically into the current problem or opportunity to be addressed by the proposed study (citing seminal and/or current research).

3. ALIGNMENT: The problem statement for the dissertation will be developed from and justified by the “need” or “defined gap” that is described in this section and supported by the empirical research literature published within the past 3-5 years.

NOTE: This Background of the Problem section uses information from the Literature Review in the 10 Strategic Points. This Background of the Problem section becomes the Background of the Study in Note; this section develops the foundation for Chapter 1 in the Proposal. It is then expanded to develop the comprehensive Background to the Problem section and Identification of the GAP sections in Chapter 2 (Literature Review) in the Proposal.

Reviewer Comments:

Problem Statement

Cases of Young children aged between three and four years have been reported several on poor medications that are offered by health institutions. This project will deeply look into suggestions on how to solve the administrative errors that have become rampant in the health section. The institutions have taken treatment of patients as a normal manner on any disease without considering the age and the kind of disease the patient is suffering from. Therefore, this project will look at ways patients age three to four suffering from Leukemia have been impacted by administrative errors.

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

1

1

1

1

2

1

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Problem Statement

This section includes the problem statement, the population affected, and how the study will contribute to solving the problem.

The recommended length for this section is one paragraph.

1. States the specific problem proposed for research with a clear declarative statement.

2. Describes the population of interest affected by the problem. The general population refers to all individuals that could be affected by the study problem.

3. Describes the unit of analysis.

For qualitative studies, this describes how the phenomenon will be studied. This can be individuals, groups, or organizations under study.

For quantitative studies, the unit of analysis needs to be defined in terms of the variable structure (conceptual, operational, and measurement).

4. Discusses the importance, scope, or opportunity for the problem and the importance of addressing the problem.

5. The problem statement is developed based on the need or gap defined in the Background to the Study section.

6. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

NOTE: This section elaborates on the Problem Statement from the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Problem Statement section in Chapter 1 and other Chapters where appropriate in the Proposal.

Reviewer Comments:

Purpose of the Study

The significant purpose of this study is the impacts that are drawn from the way administrative errors have caused a lot of harm to patients especially young patients. The qualitative description will ensure it has covered all aspects that are affecting patients, especially of medication errors that are done on leukemia patients at their young age.

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

1

1

1

Reviewer Comments:

Criteria

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This section reflects what the study is about, connecting the problem statement, methodology & research design, target population, variables/phenomena, and geographic location.

The recommended length for this section is one paragraph.

7. It begins with one sentence that identifies the research methodology and design, target population, variables (quantitative) or phenomena (qualitative) to be studied, and geographic location.

8.
Quantitative Studies
: Defines the variables and relationships of variables.

9.
Qualitative Studies: Describes the nature of the phenomena to be explored.

10. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

NOTE: This section elaborates on the information in the Purpose Statement from the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Purpose of the Study section in Chapter 1 and other Chapters where appropriate in the Proposal.

Research Questions

The study is going to be a qualitative descriptive that will be focusing on the effects of administrative errors on patients aged between three and four years (Mohammadabad at el 2015). It has created a lot of concern about how patients should handle their conditions even if they are not presented in the health facility. The research will also focus on how other parties, such as relatives and the family of the patient, get impacted.

Research questions

The following research questions will help to guide this qualitative study:

· RQ1: How does the administration handle situations on errors over Leukemia young leukemia patients?

· RQ2: How soon should the errors be handled by the health facility? Who should be accountable for the costs of errors?

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

2

2

2

Reviewer Comments:

Chair Score

(0-3)

Research Question(s) and/or Hypotheses

· The recommendation is a minimum of two research questions, along with related hypotheses and variables is required for a quantitative study.

· Also recommended is a minimum of two research questions, along with the phenomenon description is required for a qualitative study.

· Put the Research Questions in the appropriate Table in Appendix B based on whether the study is qualitative or quantitative.

The recommended length for this section is a list of research questions and associated hypotheses (quantitative)

11.
Qualitative Studies:
States the research question(s) the study will answer and describes the phenomenon to be studied.

12.
Quantitative Studies
: States the research questions the study will answer, identifies and describes the variables, and states the hypotheses (predictive statements) using the format appropriate for the specific design and statistical analysis.

13. Alignment: The research questions are based on both the Problem Statement and Theoretical Foundation model(s) or theory(s). There should be no research questions that are not clearly aligned to the Problem Statement.

14. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

NOTE: This section elaborates on the information about Research Questions) & Hypothesis/variables or Phenomena from the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Research Question(s) and/or Hypotheses section in Chapter 1 in the Proposal.

Advancing Scientific Knowledge and Significance of the Study

The study will look also look at other aspects that are affecting health facilities such as lack of types of equipment and proper technology that should be put in place. The study relates to other fiends of technology, social welfare, and an education system that should be taken in an advancing manner of having a composed aspect of having critical affairs of making patients meet their needs.

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

2

2

2

2

2

Reviewer Comments:

ADVANCING SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

This section reiterates the gap or need in the literature and states how the study will address the gap or need and how the research will contribute to the literature, practical implications to the community of interest, and alignment with the program of study.

The recommended length for this section is one to two paragraphs, providing a brief synopsis of each criterion listed below, which will be expanded in the proposal.

15. Clearly identifies the “gap” or “need” in the literature that was used to define the problem statement and develop the research questions. (citations required)

16. Describes how the study will address the “gap” or “identified need” defined in the literature and contribute to /advance the body of literature. (citations required)

17. Describes the potential practical applications from the research. (citations required)

18. Identifies and connects the theory(ies) or model(s) that provide the theoretical foundations or conceptual frameworks for the study. (citations required)

19. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

NOTE: This section builds on information about the Literature review and Theoretical Foundations sections in the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Theoretical Foundations section in Chapter 2

Rationale for Methodology

The methodology that will be used to respond to the research questions plus that will also address the problem statement is a qualitative methodology. The qualitative approach is very significant when a scenario that is being queried properly and effectively defined, and this study has distinctly put clear the impacts that patients have been suffering from, but they have no clear way of addressing them (Ravandi, at el 2015).

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

2

2

2

2

Reviewer Comments:

Rationale for Methodology

The Rationale for the Methodology section clearly justifies the methodology the researcher plans to use for conducting the study. It argues how the methodological choice (quantitative or qualitative) is the best approach to answer the research questions and address the problem statement. Finally, it contains citations from textbooks and articles on research methodology and/or articles on related studies to provide evidence to support the argument for the selected methodology.

The recommended length for this section is one paragraph.

20. Identifies the specific research methodology for the study.

21. It justifies the methodology to be used for the study by discussing why it is an appropriate approach for answering the research question(s) and addressing the problem statement.

22.
Quantitative Studies:
Justify in terms of the problem statement and the variables for which data will be collected.

23.
Qualitative Studies:
Justify in terms of problem statement and phenomenon.

24. Uses citations from seminal (authoritative) sources (textbooks and/or empirical research literature) to justify the selected methodology. Note: Introductory or survey research textbooks (such as Creswell) are not considered seminal sources.

25. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

NOTE: This section elaborates on the Methodology and Design in the 10 Strategic Points.

This section becomes the foundation for the Research Methodology in Chapter 1 of the Proposal and the basis for developing Chapter 3, Research Methodology.

Nature of the Research Design for the Study

This research will cover some health facilities that are offering services on Leukemia, specifically on young children and having administrative errors that have been rampant to handle. Qualitative-descriptive research is descriptive in nature and helps in describing a natural phenomenon. This method will help provide a clear finding of factors that have been making the condition disastrous. Despite having control measures that will help patients get relieved. The study area of this project is mainly in the health facilities despite the level and ranks of the health facility.

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

2

1

2

1

2

2

Reviewer Comments:

Criterion Score

Nature of the Research Design for the Study

This section describes the specific research design to answer the research questions and why this approach was selected. Here, the learner discusses why the selected design is the best design to address the problem statement and research questions as compared to other designs. This section contains a description of the research sample being studied, as well as the process that will be used to collect the data on the sample.

The recommended length for this section is two to three paragraphs and must address each criterion.

26. Identifies and describes the selected design for the study.

27. This justifies why the selected design addresses the problem statement and research questions.

28.
Quantitative Studies:
Justifies the selected design based on the appropriateness of the design to address the research questions and data for each variable.

29.
Qualitative Studies:
Justifies the selected design based on the appropriateness of design to address research questions and study the phenomenon.

30. Briefly describes the target population and sample for the study.

31. Identifies the sources and instruments that will be used to collect data needed to answer the research questions.

32. Briefly describes data collection procedures to collect data on the sample.

33. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

NOTE: This section also elaborates on the Design portion of the Methodology and Design section in the 10 Strategic Points
. This section provides the foundation for the Nature of the Research Design for the Study in Chapter 1.

Sources of Data

This research will obtain data from mainly from questionnaires that will be drafted and be sent through patients and other stuff who willing to give us feedback (Schmiegelow at el 2016). Additionally, there will be the use of face to face conversations with patients to have clear feedback on how the treatment is being done in the health facility. Similarly, we will conduct some interviews that will help us have more data collection and accurately on the same factors.

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

1

1

1

Reviewer Comments:

Criterion Score

RESEARCH MATERIALS, INSTRUMENTATION, OR SOURCES OF DATA

This section identifies and describes the types of data that will be collected, as well as the specific research materials, instruments, and sources used to collect those data (tests, surveys, validated instruments, questionnaires, interview protocols, databases, media, etc.).

The recommended length for this section is one to two paragraphs. Note: this section can be set up as a bulleted list.

Quantitative- Instruments/Research Materials
:

Provides a bulleted list of the instrumentation and/or materials for data collection.

Describes the survey instruments or equipment/materials used (experimental research) and specifies the type and level of data collected with each instrument.

Includes citations from original publications by instrument developers (and subsequent users as appropriate) or related studies.

Qualitative – Sources of Data:

Describes the structure of each data collection instrument and data sources (tests, questionnaires, interview protocols, observations databases, media, etc.).

The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.
NOTE: This section elaborates on the Data Collection from the 10 Strategic Points.

This information is summarized high level in Chapter 1 in the Proposal in the Nature of the Research Design for the Study section. This section provides the foundation for Research Materials, Instrumentation (quantitative), or Sources of Data (qualitative) section in Chapter 3.

Data Collection

The data will be collected through having patients who are at least in a stable condition in that they can have that freeway of having the ideas of contains the study. I will consider having one patient after another so that I will judge the information that they are providing if it’s legible for the study (Iland at el 2015). I will also use the questioners that will not involve the addition of the names of the response in order to keep the information private and protect patients from any harm from their responses.

The process will be as follows:

· Interviews will involve three respondents who have taken the therapy, and they have been subjected to errors.

· Respondents will respond in one data collection methodology if he has responded in an interview, he will not be allowed to have the questionnaires.

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

2

2

The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

2

Reviewer Comments:

DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT

This section details the data collection process and procedures so that another researcher could conduct or replicate the study. It includes authorizations and detailed steps.

The recommended length for this section is a bullet or numbered list of data collection steps that should not exceed one page.

Quantitative Studies:
Lists steps for the actual data collection that would allow replication of the study by another researcher, including how each instrument or data source was used, how and where data were collected and recorded. Includes a linear sequence of actions or step-by-step procedures used to carry out all the major steps for data collection. Includes a workflow and corresponding timeline, presenting a logical, sequential, and transparent protocol for data collection that would allow another researcher to replicate the study.

Data from different sources may have to be collected in parallel (e.g., paper-and-pen surveys for teachers, corresponding students, and their parents AND retrieval of archival data from the school district). A flow chart is ok—”linear” may not apply to all situations

Qualitative Studies:
Provides a detailed description of the data collection process, including all sources of data and methods used, such as interviews, member checking, observations, surveys, field tests, and expert panel review. Note: The collected data must be sufficient in breadth and depth to answer the research question(s) and interpreted and presented correctly, by theme, research question, and/or source of data.

Describes the procedures for obtaining participant informed consent and for protecting the rights and well-being of the study sample participants.

NOTE:
This section elaborates on the Sample and Location and Data Collection in the 10 Strategic Points
. This section provides the foundation for the Data Collection Procedures section in Chapter 3 in the Proposal. And it is summarized high level in Chapter 1 in Nature of the Research Design for the Study in the Proposal.

Data Analysis Procedures

The data will be taken through the interviews and having the questioners done appropriately (Winick at el 2017). Errors will be checked if they are in the data collection samples so that they can be answered correctly.

· Data will be collected, and analyzed feedback be drawn for the study.

· The description of data will be among the key elements that will help have clear data after collection.

· An executive summary will be drawn.

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

2

2

2

2

The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

2

DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

This section provides detailed steps for the analytic procedures to be used to conduct data analysis.

The recommended length for this section is one to two paragraphs, can also be presented in a bulleted format.

Describes in detail the relevant data collected for each stated research question and/or each variable within each hypothesis (if applicable).

Quantitative Studies: “In detail” means scales (and subscales) of specified instruments AND type of data for each variable of interest. IMPORTANT: For (quasi) experimental studies, provide a detailed description of all treatment materials per treatment condition, as part of the description of the independent variable corresponding to the experimental manipulation.

What:
Describes, in detail, statistical and non-statistical analysis to be used and procedures used to conduct the data analysis.

Quantitative Studies:
(1) describe data file preparation (descriptive statistics used to check completeness and accuracy; for files from different sources, possibly aggregating data to obtain a common unit of analysis in all files, necessarily merging files (using the key variable defining the unit of analysis); (2) computation of statistics for the sample profile; (3) computation of (subscales and) scales; (4) reliability analysis for all scales and subscales; (5) computation of descriptive statistics for all variables of interest in the study (except those already presented in the sample profile); (6) state and justify all statistical procedures (“tests”) needed to generate the information to answer all research questions; and (7) state assumptions checks for all those statistical procedures (including the tests and / or charts to be computed).

Qualitative Studies: This section begins by identifying and discussing the specific analysis approach or strategy, followed by a discussion of coding procedures to be used. Note: coding procedures may be different for Thematic Analysis, Narrative Analysis, Phenomenological Analysis, or Grounded Theory Analysis.

Why:
Provides the justification for each of the (statistical and non-statistical) data analysis procedures used in the study.

Show Steps that Support Evidence

Quantitative Analysis
– states the level of statistical significance for each test as appropriate and describes tests of assumptions for each statistical test.

Qualitative Analysis
– evidence of qualitative analysis approaches, such as coding and the theming process, must be completely described and included in the analysis /interpretation process. Clear evidence from how codes moved to themes must be presented.

NOTE: This section elaborates on the Data Analysis from the 10 Strategic Points. This section provides the foundation for the Data Analysis Procedures section in Chapter 3 in the Proposal.

Reviewer Comments:

Ethical Considerations

The data collection will be done in a Signiant manner without disclosing the names of the respondents. This project will focus on study, nor will it be used to sue any health institution. I will seek permission from the university and the head health headquarters to be enabled to seek information from patients (Duncan, at el 2015) I will also ensure the administrative heads of the health facility have understood my intentions of the study.

Criteria

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

2

2

2

2

The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

2

Reviewer Comments:

Ethical Considerations

This section discusses the potential ethical issues surrounding the research, as well as how human subjects and data will be protected. It identifies how any potential ethical issues will be addressed.

The recommended length for this section is one paragraph.

1. Describes the site authorization process, subject recruiting, and informed consent processes.

2. Describes how the identities of the participants in the study and data will be protected.

3. Discusses potential ethical concerns that might occur during the data collection process.

4. ALIGNMENT: Ethical considerations are clearly aligned with and relate directly to the specific Data Collection Procedures. This section also identifies ethical considerations related to the target population being researched and organization or location, as described in the Purpose Statement section.

NOTE: This section does not include information from any of the 10 Strategic Points.

This section provides the foundation for the Ethical Considerations section in Chapter 3 in the Proposal.

Literature review

Theoretical Foundations/Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature/Themes

It is of great importance to comprehend the impacts of committing errors, especially when it comes to the lives of people. Health care institutions should have great regard for containing patients and meeting their conditions in Leukemia as it is a killer disease complication (Ravandi at el 2015). The administration should have a clear guideline in supporting patients positively on their health conditions that should have caused a lot of pain to patients. Patients are key stakeholders in the health section on having the treatments on having the best ways of having contained people of critical conditions such as Leukemia from disastrous ways of meeting their medications.

Literature Themes

Patients safety is a factor that has arisen concern on both society and policymakers in the administrative sectors of health institutions. Health organizations have created awareness that errors have large and unacceptable effects on both costs and public confidence in health organizations. Patients’ injuries resulting from drug therapy are among the common hospital adverse patient events that should be given close checking of the institutions and the organization’s feedback.

Themes of the review of the literature review include:

· Lack of proper monitoring of nursing students: When students are newbies into the field, they should be given full supervision on sensitive precautions that have to be taken by patients. Dealing with the lives of patients, it is important to have a more concern matrix of having student nurses to handle small instances.

· The fear of reporting situations. Some administrative errors get buried because of the fear that the health facility will spoil their reputation on committing fatal mistakes on Leukemia patients since the condition is sensitive, and it needs proper care.

Summary

The research will show how young Leukemia patients have been suffering from the sharp rays of chemotherapy. The young patients should be prescribed to the dosage that does not bring a big impact on killing many body cells since they are not fully developed.

Learner Self-Evaluation Score

(0-3)

Chair or Score

(0-3)

Reviewer Score

(0-3)

1

1.5

4. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.

1

Criteria

Theoretical Foundations and/or Conceptual Framework

This section identifies the theory(s) or model(s) that provide the foundation for the research. This section should present the theory(s) or models(s) and explain how the problem under investigation relates to the theory or model. The theory(s) or models(s) guide the research questions and justify what is being measured (variables) as well as how those variables are related (quantitative) or the phenomena being investigated (qualitative).

Review of the Literature/Themes

This section provides a broad, balanced overview of the existing literature related to the proposed research topic. It describes the literature in related topic areas and its relevance to the proposed research topic findings, providing a short 3-4 sentence description of each theme and identifies its relevance to the research problem supporting it with at least two citations from the empirical literature from the past 3-5 years.

The recommended length for this section is 1 paragraph for Theoretical Foundations and a bulleted list for the Literature Themes section.

1. Theoretical Foundations section identifies the theory(s), model(s) relevant to the variables (quantitative study), or phenomenon (qualitative study). This section should explain how the study topic or problem coming out of the “need” or “defined gap” in them as described in the Background to the Problem section relates to the theory(s) or model(s) presented in this section. (One paragraph)

2. Review of the Literature Themes section: This section is a bulleted list of the major themes or topics related to the research topic. Each theme or topic should have a one-two sentence summary.

1.5

3. ALIGNMENT: The Theoretical Foundations models and theories need to be related to and support the problem statement or study topic. The sections in the Review of the Literature are topical areas needed to understand the various aspects of the phenomenon (qualitative) or variables/groups (quantitative) being studied; to select the design needed to address the Problem Statement; to select surveys or instruments to collect information on variables/groups; to define the population and sample for the study; to describe components or factors that comprise the phenomenon; to describe key topics related to the study topic, etc.

NOTE: The two parts of this section use information about the Literature Review and Theoretical Foundations/Conceptual Framework from the 10 Strategic Points.

This Theoretical Foundations section is expanded upon to become the Theoretical Foundations section in Chapter 2 (Literature Review). The Theoretical Foundations and the Literature Review sections are also used to help create the Advancing Scientific Knowledge/Review of the Literature section in Chapter 2 (Literature Review).

Reviewer Comments:

Reference

Duncan, C. N., Majhail, N. S., Brazauskas, R., Wang, Z., Cahn, J. Y., Frangoul, H. A., … & Khera, N. (2015). Long-term survival and late effects among one-year survivors of second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 21(1), 151-158.Retrieved from:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083879114006314

Iland, H. J., Collins, M., Bradstock, K., Supple, S. G., Catalano, A., Hertzberg, M., … & Hugman, A. (2015). Use of arsenic trioxide in remission induction and consolidation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia in the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) APML4 study: a non-randomized phase 2 trial. The Lancet Haematology, 2(9), e357-e366.Retrieved from:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352302615001155

Jones, A. K., Freise, K. J., Agarwal, S. K., Humerickhouse, R. A., Wong, S. L., & Salem, A. H. (2016). Clinical predictors of venetoclax pharmacokinetics in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis. The AAPS Journal, 18(5), 1192-1202.Retrieved from:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12248-016-9927-9

Mohammadi, M., Cao, Y., Glimelius, I., Bottai, M., Eloranta, S., & Smedby, K. E. (2015). The impact of comorbid disease history on all-cause and cancer-specific mortality in myeloid leukemia and myeloma–a Swedish population-based study. BMC Cancer, 15(1), 850.Retrieved from:

https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-015-1857-x

Ravandi, F., Ritchie, E. K., Sayar, H., Lancet, J. E., Craig, M. D., Vey, N., … & Pigneux, A. (2015). vosaroxin plus cytarabine versus placebo plus cytarabine in patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (VALOR): a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study. The lancet oncology, 16(9), 1025-1036.Retrieved from:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673614614033

Rubio, M. T., Savani, B. N., Labopin, M., Piemontese, S., Polge, E., Ciceri, F., … & Gülbas, Z. (2016). Impact of conditioning intensity in T-replete haploidentical stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia: a report from acute leukemia working party of the EBMT. Journal of hematology & oncology, 9(1), 25.Retrieved from:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13045-016-0248-3

Schmiegelow, K., Attarbaschi, A., Barzilai, S., Escherich, G., Frandsen, T. L., Halsey, C., … & Mikkelsen, T. S. (2016). Consensus definitions of 14 severe acute toxic effects for childhood lymphoblastic leukemia treatment: a Delphi consensus. The Lancet Oncology, 17(6), e231-e239.Retrieved from:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470204516300353

Winick, N., Devidas, M., Chen, S., Maloney, K., Larsen, E., Mattano, L., … & Willman, C. (2017). Impact of initial CSF findings on outcome among patients with National Cancer Institute standard-and high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(22), 2527.Retrieved from:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536164/

Rubic_Print_

Format

5.0%

5.0%

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

5.0%

2.96/4.00

Format

5.0%

4.00/4.00

5.0%

4.00/4.00

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
DNP-830 DNP-830-O502 Draft Prospectus 80.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
INTRODUCTION: This section briefly overviews the research focus or problem, why this study is worth conducting, and how this study will be completed. This Introduction section elaborates on Point 1(the Topic) from the 10 Strategic Points. 5.0% Introduction is not included. Introduction is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. Introduction is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.is included but lacks detail. Introduction is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. Introduction is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail Good introduction 3 4.00/4.00
BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM: The background section explains both the history and the present state of the problem and research focus. This Background of the Problem section uses information from Point 2 (Literature Review) in the 10 Strategic Points. Background of the problem is not included. Background of the problem is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. Background of the problem is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Background of the problem is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. Background of the problem is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Much too brief. Need to expand more here. 1 2.96/4.00
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND/OR CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: This section identifies the theory(s) or model(s) that provide the foundation for the research. This section should present the theory(s) or models(s) and explain how the problem under investigation relates to the theory or model. The theory(s) or models(s) guide the research questions and justify what is being measured (variables) as well as how those variables are related (quantitative) or the phenomena being investigated (qualitative). This section uses information from Point 2 (Literature Review) from the 10 Strategic Points. A description of the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual framework is not included. A description of the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual framework is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A description of the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual framework is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A description of the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual framework is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A description of the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual framework is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Good start. Please expand more here. 2 3.16/4.00
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE THEMES/TOPICS: This section lists the major themes or topics related to the research topic. It provides a short one or two sentence description of each theme/topic and identifies its relevance to the research topic supporting it with at least one citation from the literature. This section uses information from Point 2 (Literature Review) from the 10 Strategic Points. A review of the literature themes/topics is not included. A review of the literature themes/topics is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A review of the literature themes/topics is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A review of the literature themes/topics is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A review of the literature themes/topics is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Much too brief. This needs to be developed in much greater detail. You should be listing each theme and exploring it in greater detail.
PROBLEM STATEMENT: This section includes the problem statement, the population affected, and how the study will contribute to solving the problem. This section elaborates on Point 3 (Problem Statement) from the 10 Strategic Points. A problem statement is not included. A problem statement is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A problem statement is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A problem statement is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A problem statement is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Seems unclear. Please work with ThinkingStorm to better develop your writing. There are also capitalization errors. Word choice and sentence structure errors. 1
RESEARCH QUESTIONS: This section narrows the focus of the study by specifying the research questions to address the problem statement. Based on the research questions, it describes the variables and/or groups and their hypothesized relationship for a quantitative study or the phenomena under investigation for a qualitative study. Recommended minimum: (a) Two research questions along with related hypotheses and variables for a quantitative study; (b) Two research questions along with the phenomenon description for a qualitative study This section elaborates on Point 5 (Research Questions) and Point 6 (Hypothesis/Variables or Phenomena) from the 10 Strategic Points. A description of research questions addressed is not included. A description of research questions addressed is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A description of research questions addressed is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A description of research questions addressed is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A description of research questions addressed is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. This needs to be expanded upon. You need a minimum of 2 research questions and this section should be at least two full paragraphs. Please explore each question in greater depth. 1
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY: This section identifies and describes the significance of the study and the implications of the potential results based on the research questions and problem statement, hypotheses, or the investigated phenomena. It describes how the research fits within and will contribute to the current literature or body of research. It describes potential practical applications from the research. This section does not directly come from any section of the 10 Strategic Points. However it does build on the Background to the Problem, Problem Statement, and Theoretical Foundations sections that are developed from the 10 Strategic Points. A description of the significance of the Study is not included. A description of the significance of the Study is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A description of the significance of the Study is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A description of the significance of the Study is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A description of the significance of the Study is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Too brief. Please expand more here in terms of the significance. 1
RATIONALE FOR METHODOLOGY: This section clearly justifies the methodology the researcher plans to use for conducting the study. It argues how the methodological framework is the best approach to answer the research questions and address the problem statement. It uses citations from textbooks and articles on research methodology and/or articles on related studies. This section elaborates on the methodology part of Point 7 (Methodology and Design) in the 10 Strategic Points. A rationale for methodology is not included. A rationale for methodology is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A rationale for methodology is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A rationale for methodology is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A rationale for methodology is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Much too brief. Also, your project needs to use a quantitative methodology because this is a QI project and quantitative data needs to be used. Please revise. This section should be 2 paragraphs. 1 0.00/4.00
NATURE OF THE RESEARCH DESIGN FOR THE STUDY: This section describes the specific research design to answer the research questions and why this approach was selected. It describes the research sample being studied as well as the process that will be used to collect the data on the sample. This section also elaborates on the Design part of Point 7 (Methodology and Design) in the 10 Strategic Points. A description of the nature of the research design for the study is not included. A description of the nature of the research design for the study is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A description of the nature of the research design for the study is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A description of the nature of the research design for the study is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A description of the nature of the research design for the study is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. This section is somewhat vague. Most QI projects are quasi-experimental which should be your design. You need to list this design type and then explore it in greater depth. 1
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose statement section provides a reflection of the problem statement and identifies how the study will be accomplished. It explains how the proposed study will contribute to the field. This section elaborates on Point 8 (Purpose Statement) in the 10 Strategic Points. A statement of the purpose of the study is not included. A statement of the purpose of the study is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A statement of the purpose of the study is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A statement of the purpose of the study is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A statement of the purpose of the study is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Too brief 1
INSTRUMENTATION OR SOURCES OF DATA: Describes, in detail, all data collection instruments and sources (tests, questionnaires, interviews, data bases, media, etc.). Discusses the specific instrument or source to collect data for each variable or group (quantitative study). Discusses specific instrument or source to collect information to describe the phenomena being studied (qualitative study). This section elaborates on Point 9 (Data Collection) in the 10 Strategic Points. A description of instrumentation or sources of data used is not included. A description of instrumentation or sources of data used is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A description of instrumentation or sources of data used is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A description of instrumentation or sources of data used is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A description of instrumentation or sources of data used is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Please see my comments throughout. Your QI project needs to use quantitative data and should not be qualitative. 1
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES: This section details the entirety of the process used to collect the data. It describes each step of the data collection process in a way that allows another researcher to replicate the study. This section elaborates on Points 4 (Sample and Location) and Point 9 (Data Collection) in the 10 Strategic Points. Data collection procedures are not included. Data collection procedures are included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. Data collection procedures are complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Data collection procedures are complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. Data collection procedures are extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Need to explore data collection step by step. 1
DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURES: This section describes how the data was collected for each variable or group (quantitative study) or for each research question (qualitative study). It describes the type of data to be analyzed, identifying the descriptive, inferential, and/or nonstatistical analyses. It demonstrates that the research analysis is aligned to the specific research design. This section elaborates on Point #10 (Data Analysis) from the 10 Strategic Points. A description of data analysis procedures is not included. A description of data analysis procedures is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A description of data analysis procedures is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A description of data analysis procedures is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A description of data analysis procedures is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Not specific enough. Should also be utilizing quantitative methods. 1
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION: This section discusses the potential ethical issues surrounding the research as well as how human subjects and data will be protected. It identifies how any potential ethical issues will be addressed. This section does not use information from any of the 10 Strategic Points. A description of ethical considerations is not included. A description of ethical considerations is included but not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. A description of ethical considerations is complete and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. A description of ethical considerations is complete and adequate. No gaps are presents that leave the reader with questions. A description of ethical considerations is extremely thorough, no gaps are present that leave the reader with questions, and includes substantial supporting detail. Need to expand more here. You may want to review: The Belmont Report is one of the leading works concerning ethics and health care research. Its primary purpose is to protect subjects and participants in clinical trials or research studies. This report consists of 3 principles: beneficence, justice, and respect for persons. 1
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Good initial draft 4.87/5.60
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 6.40/6.40
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Please have ThinkingStorm and/or an editor to review. There are word choice, sentence structure, grammar errors throughout. Also, many areas of the paper are too brief and need to be expanded upon.
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100% 61.95/80.0

What Will You Get?

We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.

Premium Quality

Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.

Experienced Writers

Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.

On-Time Delivery

Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.

24/7 Customer Support

Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.

Complete Confidentiality

Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.

Authentic Sources

We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.

Moneyback Guarantee

Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.

Order Tracking

You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.

image

Areas of Expertise

Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.

Areas of Expertise

Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.

image

Trusted Partner of 9650+ Students for Writing

From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.

Preferred Writer

Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.

Grammar Check Report

Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.

One Page Summary

You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.

Plagiarism Report

You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.

Free Features $66FREE

  • Most Qualified Writer $10FREE
  • Plagiarism Scan Report $10FREE
  • Unlimited Revisions $08FREE
  • Paper Formatting $05FREE
  • Cover Page $05FREE
  • Referencing & Bibliography $10FREE
  • Dedicated User Area $08FREE
  • 24/7 Order Tracking $05FREE
  • Periodic Email Alerts $05FREE
image

Our Services

Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.

  • On-time Delivery
  • 24/7 Order Tracking
  • Access to Authentic Sources
Academic Writing

We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.

Professional Editing

We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.

Thorough Proofreading

We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.

image

Delegate Your Challenging Writing Tasks to Experienced Professionals

Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!

Check Out Our Sample Work

Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality

Categories
All samples
Essay (any type)
Essay (any type)
The Value of a Nursing Degree
Undergrad. (yrs 3-4)
Nursing
2
View this sample

It May Not Be Much, but It’s Honest Work!

Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.

0+

Happy Clients

0+

Words Written This Week

0+

Ongoing Orders

0%

Customer Satisfaction Rate
image

Process as Fine as Brewed Coffee

We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.

See How We Helped 9000+ Students Achieve Success

image

We Analyze Your Problem and Offer Customized Writing

We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.

  • Clear elicitation of your requirements.
  • Customized writing as per your needs.

We Mirror Your Guidelines to Deliver Quality Services

We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.

  • Proactive analysis of your writing.
  • Active communication to understand requirements.
image
image

We Handle Your Writing Tasks to Ensure Excellent Grades

We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.

  • Thorough research and analysis for every order.
  • Deliverance of reliable writing service to improve your grades.
Place an Order Start Chat Now
image

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code Happy