Protocol x
Materials and Methods (15 marks) This should be a summary of the experimental procedures, written in your own words in the past tense and third person passive. You should always write in paragraphs and you must not use bullet points. Under no circumstances should you ever just reproduce the text in the Workshop manual.
Introduction
In
terms of total production tonnages used for food, wheat is currently second to rice as the main human food crop and is the leading source of vegetable protein in human nutrition (Nutrient Data Laboratory). Aphids (Order Hemiptera) are major insect pests of world agriculture, damaging crops by removing photoassimilates and vectoring numerous plant viruses (Smith and Boyko,
200
7
). The grain aphid (Sitobion avenae) is considered a serious pest of commercial wheat in the UK. Many aphid species can develop resistance to insecticides (Devonshire and Field, 1991), and restrictions on the availability of active ingredients for insecticide production in Europe (European Directives 91/
4
14/EEC) has prioritized research on crop varieties with resistance to aphid pests in UK agriculture (Painter, 19
5
1; Panda and Kush, 1995; Smith, 2005).
Most commercial wheat varieties have very little resistance to aphid pests (Lee, 1984; Dedryver and Di Pietro, 1984; Di Pietro and Dedryver, 1986; Migui, 2002; Migui and Lamb, 2003), with at best partial antibiosis, antixenosis and tolerance in some winter varieties (Lowe, 1984a; Lowe, 1984b; Havlícková, 1993). Wheat genetics are more complicated than that of most other crop species. Some wheat species are diploid, with two sets of chromosomes, but many are stable polyploids, with four sets of chromosomes (tetraploid) or six (hexaploid). Modern wheat varieties grown in the U.K. are hexaploid and have low genetic diversity for insect resistance traits (Ferry et al, 20
11
; Ogbonnaya et al, 20
13
; niab.com).
Diploid wheat (T. monococcum) lines have been observed to exhibit high levels of resistance against S. avenae (Migui and Lamb, 2003; 2004; Ferry et al, 2011). However, no previous studies have been carried out in these lines to investigate differentially expressed genes in response to aphid infestation. Therefore, differential proteomic analysis is being employed to identify putative defence responses in diploid wheat lines (Triticum monococcum L.) when subjected to grain aphid (S. avenae) feeding in order to better understand the basis of this observed resistance/tolerance.
In this lab you will conduct a 2D-electrophoresis separation of the wheat leaf proteome.
Methods
It is essential that you retrieve the full lab manual produced by GE healthcare for 2D electrophoresis:
Step 1 – Sample Solubilization
This has been done for you.
In this experiment 200mg of wheat leaf was ground in liquid nitrogen to a fine powder. The protein pellets available to you have been incubated in 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid/ acetone with 0.07% v/v 2-mercaptoethanol at -20 °C for 16 hours and then centrifuged at 35 000 x g for 20 mins.
> The pellets were washed with ice-cold acetone (0.07% 2-mercaptoethanol) 4-6 times and finally incubated at -20 °C for 1 h, and centrifuged at 12 000 x g for 15 min.
>>An acetone wash using 1 part sample: 3 parts acetone (w/v) was performed, the sample was vortexed to disperse pellet in acetone, and centrifuged at 13000 x g for 5 mins and this was repeated four to six times. This removes contaminating pigments. After the final wash the sample was transferred to the -20 °C freezer for 1 h, before retrieving and centrifuging.
You can read more about sample preparation for 2D-gel electrophoresis in Chapter 1 of 2-D Electrophoresis – Principles and
Methods
(GE Healthcare)
To solubilize the proteins, we use a conventional solubilization mixture that contains 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4 % (w/v) CHAPS, 20 mM DTT and 0.5 % IPG buffer. Urea and thiourea are used to unfold the proteins; DTT is added to reduce
Table 1
The volume range of the assay is 1–50 μl and the linear range for quantification is 0–50 μg. This corresponds well with typical volumes and concentrations of samples prepared for 2-D electrophoresis.
Preliminary Preparation
Prior to performing the assay, prepare an appropriate volume of working colour reagent by mixing 100 parts of colour reagent A with 1 part colour reagent B. Each individual assay requires 1 ml of working colour reagent.
So how much will you need? Calculate now! Remember to count your sample!
Standard Procedure
1. Prepare a standard curve (in duplicate) according to the table below using the 2 mg/ml Bovine serum albumin (BSA) standard solution provided with the kit. Set up six tubes and add standard solution according to the table. Tube 1 is the assay blank, which contains no protein.
Tube number
1 2 3 4 5 6
Vol. of BSA St (μl) 0 5 10 15 20 25
Protein quantity (μg) 0 10 20 30 40 50
2. Prepare additional tubes containing 5, 10 or 50 μl of the sample to be assayed. Duplicates are recommended. The useful range of the assay is 0.5–50 μg and it is also recommended that more than one sample volume or dilution be assayed for each sample to ensure that the assay falls within this range.
3. Add 500 μl precipitant to each tube (including the standard curve tubes). Vortex briefly and incubate the tubes 2–3 min at room temperature.
4. Add 500 μl co-precipitant to each tube and mix briefly by vortexing or inversion.
5. Centrifuge the tubes at a minimum of 10 000 × g for 5 min. This sediments the protein.
6. Remove the tubes from the centrifuge as soon as centrifugation is complete. A small pellet should be visible. Decant the supernatants. Proceed rapidly to the next step to avoid resuspension or dispersion of the pellets.
7. Carefully reposition the tubes in the microcentrifuge as before, with the cap-hinge and pellet facing outward. Centrifuge the tubes again to bring any remaining liquid to the bottom of the tube. A brief pulse is sufficient. Use a micropipette to remove the remaining supernatant. There should be no visible liquid remaining in the tubes.
8. Add 100 μl of copper solution and 400 μl of distilled water to each tube. Vortex briefly to dissolve the precipitated protein.
9. Add 1 ml of working colour reagent to each tube (See “Preliminary preparations” for preparing the working colour reagent). Ensure instantaneous mixing by introducing the reagent as rapidly as possible. Mix by inversion.
10. Incubate at room temperature for 15–20 min.
11. Read the absorbance of each sample and standard at 480 nm using water as the reference. The absorbance should be read within 40 min of the addition of working colour reagent
Note:
Unlike most protein assays, the absorbance of the assay solution decreases with increasing protein concentration. Do not subtract the blank reading from the sample reading or use the assay blank as the reference.
12. Generate a standard curve by plotting the absorbance of the standards against the quantity of protein. Use this standard curve to determine the protein concentration of the samples.
For full protocol see:
https://www.gelifesciences.com/gehcls_images/GELS/Related%20Content/Files/1314729545976/litdoc28954714AE_20110830215136
Lab 1b – Cleaning up samples using 2-D Clean-Up Kit
The 2-D Clean-Up Kit is designed to prepare samples that would otherwise produce poor 2-D results due to high conductivity, high levels of interfering substances, or low concentration of protein.
Current methods of protein precipitation suffer from several significant disadvantages:
· Precipitation can be incomplete, resulting in the loss of proteins from the sample and introduction of bias into the 2-D result.
· The precipitated protein can be difficult to resuspend and often cannot be fully recovered.
· The precipitation procedure can itself introduce ions that interfere with first-dimension IEF.
· Precipitation can be time-consuming, requiring overnight incubation of the sample.
A 2-D Clean-Up Kit circumvents these disadvantages by providing a method for selectively precipitating protein for 2-D electrophoresis. Protein can be quantitatively precipitated from a variety of sources without interference from detergents, chaotropes, and other common reagents used to solubilize protein. Recovery is generally greater than 90%. The procedure does not result in spot gain or loss, or changes in spot position relative to untreated samples. The precipitated proteins are easily resuspended in 2-D sample solution. The procedure can be completed in less than one hour.
The overall quality of protein separation using 2-D Clean-Up Kit has been shown to be superior to that of samples prepared by precipitation with acetone. Preparation of protein samples with the kit reduces horizontal streaking, improves spot resolution, and increases the number of spots detected compared with samples treated by other means
Protocol:
1. Transfer 1–100 μl of protein sample (containing 60 μg protein) into a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube (you need the quantification result to know volume required).
2. Add 300 μl of precipitant. Mix well by vortexing or inversion. Incubate the tube on ice (4–5 °C) for 15 min.
3. Add 300 μl of co-precipitant to the mixture of protein and precipitant. Mix by vortexing briefly.
4. Position the tubes in a microcentrifuge with cap-hinges facing outward. Centrifuge at maximum speed (at least 12 000 × g) for 5 min. Remove the tubes from the microcentrifuge as soon as centrifugation has finished.
A small pellet should be visible.
Proceed rapidly to the next step to avoid resuspension or dispersion of the pellet.
5. Remove as much of the supernatant as possible by decanting or careful pipetting. Do not disturb the pellet.
6. Carefully reposition the tubes in the microcentrifuge with the cap-hinges and pellets facing outward. Centrifuge the tubes briefly to bring any remaining liquid to the bottom of the tubes. Use a pipette to remove the remaining supernatant. There should be no visible liquid remaining in the tubes.
7. Without disturbing the pellet, layer 40 μl of co-precipitant on top of each pellet. Incubate the tubes on ice for 5 min.
8. Carefully reposition the tubes in the centrifuge with the cap-hinges facing outward. Centrifuge for 5 min. Use a pipette to remove the supernatant.
9. Pipette 25 μl of distilled or deionized water on top of each pellet. Vortex each tube for 5–10 s. The pellet should disperse, but not dissolve in the water.
10. Add 1 ml of wash buffer (prechilled for at least 1 h at -20 oC) and 5 μl of wash additive to each tube. Vortex until the pellets are fully dispersed.
Note: The protein pellet will not dissolve in the wash buffer.
11. Incubate the tubes at -20 °C for at least 30 min. Vortex for 20–30 s once every 10 min. At this stage, the tubes can be stored at -20 oC for up to one week with minimal protein degradation or modification.
12. Centrifuge the tubes at maximum speed (at least 12 000 × g) for 5 min.
13. Carefully remove and discard the supernatant. A white pellet should be visible. Allow the pellet to air dry briefly (no more than 5 min).
Do not over-dry the pellet. If it becomes too dry, it will be difficult to resuspend.
14. Resuspend each pellet in an appropriate volume of rehydration or IEF sample loading solution for first-dimension IEF (see Table 2). Vortex the tubes for at least 30 s. Incubate at room temperature. Vortex or aspirate and dispense using a pipette to fully dissolve.
15. Centrifuge the tubes at maximum speed (at least 12 000 × g) for 5 min to remove any insoluble material and to reduce any foam. The supernatant may be loaded directly onto first-dimension IEF or transferred to another tube and stored at
-80oC for later analysis.
Sample resuspension volumes
16. Table.2..Sample volumes for different Immobiline DryStrip gel lengths.
Immobiline DryStrip length (cm) |
Sample volume applied (μl) |
7 |
125 |
11 | 200 |
13 |
250 |
18 |
340 |
24 |
450 |
The optimal quantity of protein to load varies widely depending on factors such as sample complexity, the length and pH range of the Immobiline DryStrip gel, and the method of visualizing the 2-D gel separation.
Lab 1c – Loading the Sample
Six samples can be loaded at a time; it will take about 10 mins each to load your strip. Arrange with Dr Ferry and Nanda Puspita to do this as each set of samples run overnight and will be collected and frozen ready for lab 2.
Protocol:
Load the sample along the length of the strip holder and remove any air bubbles. Remove the plastic film from the IPG strip, starting at the acidic (+) end (because the basic (-) end is soft and sensitive). Note: the IPG strip should be taken out of the freezer just a few minutes before use to prevent that it takes up water from the environment. |
Place the IPG strip gel-side down on top of the sample, beginning with the acidic end, which should be towards the pointed end of the strip holder. Make sure that the strip does not stick to the bottom of the strip holder by gently lowering/lifting and sliding the strip back and forth while applying it to the holder. Finally lower the basic end into the holder and make sure that the strip contact areas are in contact with the holder electrodes. Cover the strip carefully with 1.5 ml mineral oil to prevent the strip from drying out during the IEF run. Do not drop any oil onto the top of the strip holder. The strip holder is now ready for the IEF. Note the sample ID and the now corresponding strip ID (can be found at the acidic end of the strip) in a table. You can read more details about rehydration loading and strip application on pages 41 and onwards of 2-D Electrophoresis – Principles and Methods (GE Healthcare) |
Starting the IEF
Make sure that the IPGphor is levelled out and place the strip holder onto the electrodes as shown in the picture below. Place the plastic cover correctly over the strips and close the lid; turn on the IPGphor, and call up program 1 that contains the parameters for the isoelectric focusing run. Enter the number of strips and start the run. |
Program 1
Passive rehydration 16:00 h at rt
Step 1 : 100 V for 0:40 h
Step 2 : 200 V for 0:20 h
step 3 : 450 V for 0:15 h
step 4 : 750 V for 0:15 h
step 5 : 2000 V for 0:10 h
step 6 : gradient for a total of 4000 Vh
The entire IEF takes approx. 24 h to finish. At the end of an IEF run strips will be stored at -80 C for lab 3.
You can read more about recommended IEF protocols for different IPG strip lengths and types in 2-D Electrophoresis – Principles and Methods (GE Healthcare).
Lab 2 – Second Dimension – SDS-PAGE
SDS-PAGE gels should be prepared as detailed in Appendix 1.
Equilibration of the Strips
The equilibration fulfils two functions: the disulfide bridges are reduced and the cysteine residues alkylated with iodoacetamide and the proteins are equilibrated with SDS so that they become negatively charged for the electrophoresis.
Prepare one plastic tube with lid that is filled with 10 ml fresh (or just thawed from the freezer) equilibration solution containing 65 mM DTT (add 100 mg DTT to 10 ml equilibration solution and invert the tube until it is dissolved) and one tube with 10 ml equilibration solution containing 135 mM iodoacetamide (250 mg iodoacetamide per 10 ml).
Equilibrate the IPG strips with gentle agitation first for 15 min in equilibration solution containing 65 mM DTT and then for 15 min in equilibration solution containing 135 mM iodoacetamide. Finally briefly rinse the strips with a few ml SDS-running buffer.
Risk Assessment and Precaution
Iodoacetamide is a strong alkylating agent and toxic. Please, protect yourself by wearing laboratory coats. Although iodoacetamide is toxic wearing gloves can be a disadvantage because of static electricity that can cause this chemical to spread over the bench. However, if you handle this chemical without gloves, be careful to avoid any skin contact and wash your hands afterwards. When you weigh up solid iodoacetamide, make sure that you do not contaminate the balance and the bench and expose other people to health risks. Spilled iodoacetmide can be wiped up with a humid paper tissue that then is sealed in a plastic bag. The group leader will take care of the final disposal.
Used equilibration solution that comprises iodoacetamide can be disposed of easily as follows. Dissolve excess solid cysteine in the equilibration solution to alkylate the iodoacetamide. Wait for about an hour until the bromophenolblue has turned from blue to green/yellow and discard the solution into the sink.
Cutting the Strips (optional)
You may find it easier to apply the equilibrated strips to the second dimension gel if approximately 1 cm plastic is cut off either the anodic or cathodic ends of the strips.
Loading a Strip onto the Polyacrylamide gel
Anodic (+) end |
Cathodic (-) end |
Using two small spatulae the cut IPG strips are carefully placed on top of the polyacrylamide gels. This can be done easily when the gel cassettes are placed horizontally on the bench. Place the acidic end at the top right corner of the gel. |
Marker proteins can be adsorbed on a piece of filter paper and loaded next to the strip on the gel. |
The strips are sealed with warm 0.5% (w/v) agarose dissolved in running buffer containing a trace of bromphenolblue and the gel cassettes are assembled into the electrophoresis unit. |
SDS electrophoresis
The SDS electrophoresis is started at a constant current of 10 mA per gel for 1 h followed by a constant current of 40 mA per gel (maximum power 13 W/gel) for 4-5 h. After the SDS-electrophoresis the gels are fixed for at least one hour with 30% (v/v) ethanol in 10% (v/v) acetic acid.
Staining with Coomassie blue
Protein spots are stained with colloidal Coomassie blue G-250 (Sigma) and de-stained in water.
Scanned gels may be collected the following day.
Instructions and Marking Scheme for your Workshop write-up: GREEN BIOTECHNOLOGY 2017
Lab Portfolio
This will be written as a single document and will cover all the laboratory work that you do this semester.
1. Protein Quantitation (1 session)
2. Analysis of the plant proteome (1 session)
Workshop Report (portfolio)
Marking Scheme
Your report should contain:
1.
Title and Objectives of the workshop
(5 marks)
2.
Introduction
(25 marks)
The introduction should give the reader some background information on the subject in the report. You should carry out a brief literature review (1 – 2 pages) on analysis of plant proteomes and of wheat-aphid interactions and plant stress, adding appropriate references to your text. You should end the introduction by describing what you are going to do in the experiments.
3.
Materials and Methods
(15 marks)
This should be a summary of the experimental procedures, written in your own words in the past tense and third person passive. You should always write in paragraphs and you must not use bullet points. Under no circumstances should you ever just reproduce the text in the Workshop manual.
4.
Results and Discussion
(40 marks)
In the Results section you should describe the results you obtained.
Some examples
would include: did you recover protein from the extraction? Was the quantification accurate? Is your 2D gel clearly resolved? Answer these questions in sentences as part of your Results section and do not repeat the questions! The gel picture must be properly labelled on both the horizontal and vertical axes. In the Discussion, you should expand on the results you obtained, basing your discussion on the published literature.
Some examples
would include: Did the experiment work, how could it be improved? Did your gel look similar to published images of plant leaf proteomes? Did you recover all plant leaf proteins? How could you analyse the total leaf proteome? What are the uses of proteome profiling? You should make some informed suggestions, using the literature, about the results you have obtained. It does not matter if your comments are correct, just that you provide evidence that you have understood the theory behind the experimental study.
5.
Conclusion
(5 marks)
End the write-up with a statement summarizing the conclusions that may be drawn from the results obtained.
6.
References
(10 marks)
Compile a reference list using the Harvard system. References should also be quoted in the appropriate place in your text.
Marking criteria Lab Portfolio
Excellent |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Mark |
|||||
Title/ Objectives (5 marks) |
5 | 4 |
2-3 |
0-1 |
/5 |
||||
Excellent, succinct summary of the report objectives |
Good statement of objectives but either too long or not enough information provided. |
Fair summary giving some details of the objectives but unbalanced favouring a particular aspect of the report. |
(1) Poor summary of objectives, either very short with little useful information. |
||||||
Introduction (25 marks) |
19-25 |
15-18 |
13-15 |
0-12 |
/25 |
||||
Comprehensive introduction, focusing on relevant background knowledge and understanding; Evidence of significant searching for information. |
Good introduction with a significant number of relevant publications consulted. Tending to give information in blocks rather than trying to link viewpoints together. Good coverage of key information but some aspects may be superficial or omitted. |
Fair introduction. Reliance on a relatively small number of key papers. May be disjointed with some points/ arguments not well linked. |
Only a few publications consulted, often review articles or web sites. Little evidence of a real search for information. Often superficial and important areas not covered. |
||||||
Methods (15 marks) |
12-15 |
9-11 |
7-8 |
0-6 |
/15 |
||||
Excellent-explaining why and how each aspect was carried out. Written in prose form with appropriate units; in past tense and in third person. |
Good, logical presentation of materials and methods. Some techniques etc may be given in point format. Could be some ambiguity relating to one or two aspects of the study. |
Methods/techniques provided to some extent but may not be fully explained. Reasons for method may not be given. Some procedures difficult to follow. Methods may be in point format in present tense. Could contain errors. Inappropriate units may be used. |
Minimal methods. Several omissions. Could be considerable confusion. May have significant miscalculations in dilutions etc. or inappropriate procedures/statistical tests |
||||||
Results and Discussion (40 marks) |
29-40 |
25-28 |
20-24 |
0-19 |
/40 |
||||
All tables, figs etc. accompanied by a self-explanatory legend. Data presented in a logical format. Appropriate graphs used with correct labelling, scales and sizes. Graphs, figs etc interspersed by text highlighting the important features. Appropriate statistical analysis clearly presented. Excellent understanding of the subject area. Results critically evaluated with respect to published work. Clear evidence of independent thought. Appropriate conclusions drawn from results obtained. Good suggestions for further investigation. Good awareness of the potential limitations of the investigation |
Results generally well presented in appropriate sized figures with adequate legends. Graphs etc may be present as blocks of figures followed by relevant text interpreting figures/tables. One or two tables/graphs etc may not be well presented. Appropriate statistical analysis evident. Appropriate conclusions drawn from the results obtained. Good attempt to relate these results to other published work. Showing general understanding of the research area but generally lacking significant depth and original thinking |
Figures/graphs may be poorly labelled. Errors in the types of graph used (line/histogram etc) Inappropriate scales or lack of statistical analysis. Ambiguity in statements relating to results. Fair conclusions drawn from the results but may be superficial or over simplified. Occasionally too strong a conclusion made from limited data available. Generally unaware of the limitations of the study and very simplistic approach to suggesting further work. Uncertainty over the significance of results with reference to published work. |
Figures, tables etc presented without appropriate legends. Often lacking descriptive text. Some figures may contain errors in construction. Some results may not be presented. Few significant conclusions drawn from the results obtained. Very simplistic interpretation. Weakness in arguments/interpretations. Poor attempt to relate the current study with published work. Poor approach to further work |
||||||
Conclusion (5 marks) |
/5 |
||||||||
Excellent conclusion that states the experimental results in relation to the original aims and objectives, results are not overstated or over interpreted |
Good conclusion that states the experimental results in relation to the original aims and objectives, however results may be overstated or over interpreted |
Satisfactory conclusion that does not necessarily link back to the experimental results in relation to the original aims and objectives, results may be overstated or over interpreted |
Poor or no conclusion that does not relate the experimental results in relation to the original aims and objectives. Results are overstated or over interpreted. |
||||||
Referencing (10 marks) |
Excellent use of references to support points. Substantial evidence of independent research. References/ bibliography presented correctly according to the Harvard system. Well-structured report that is clear and easy to read. Appropriate use of species names etc. Effective use of English Negligible errors |
Good use of key references to support arguments generally. Appropriate presentation of references via the Harvard system Acceptable standard. Reasonably well structured but may not flow well. Key points generally well made. Negligible errors |
Moderate use of references to support arguments but based on relatively few references. May have some errors in presentation style in the text and/or the bibliography Generally satisfactory but disjointed in places. Some errors in spelling or scientific nomenclature. |
Poor use of references and little or no bibliography presented. Poor structuring of report. Some parts contain poor use of English and grammatical /scientific errors. |
/10 |
||||
Appendix 1
SDS-PAGE gel preparation
Second Dimension – SDS-PAGE
This is a continuous gel system and requires no stacking gel
1. Assemble 1x gel casting cassette and place it in the gel casting rig with the shaped glass plate towards the back making sure the plate is flush at the top and bottom of the rig before you tighten the plastic screws to secure them.
2. Now, place the assembled rig onto the base plate and while pressing down, turn the thumb screws to lock the two together forming a seal. Test the seal by pipetting approximately 4ml of distilled water into the cassette, if there is a leak, empty and repeat the procedure until you are confident there is no leak, then empty the water again.
3. Prepare the continuous resolving gel as indicated in Table 1 (p 3) and mix the solution by slowly pipetting up and down using a 1ml pipette,
Note:
Acrylamide is a neurotoxin so handle with care
4. Using the same pipette, load the solution into the gel cassette leaving a space of 5mm from the top of the glass back plate. Now, tap the rig slightly to remove any air bubbles.
5. Immediately overlay each gel with n-butanol (50/50 (v/v) with dH2O).
6. Leave the gel to polymerise (about 30 min- the remainder of the gel solution left in your beaker will serve as an indicator for setting). When the gel has polymerised, pour off the n-Butanol and rinse 3-4 times with ddH2O using a 1ml pipette.
7. Invert the gel rig and leave to drain off on some blue roll for a few minutes.
8. While the gel cassette is placed horizontally on the bench, use two small spatulae to place the cut IPG strip carefully on top of the polyacrylamide gel leaving enough room to load the small piece of filter paper which has been pre-soaked with the Marker proteins (Figures 1 & 2).
9. The strip is sealed with warm 0.5% (w/v) agarose dissolved in running buffer containing a trace of bromphenol blue.
10. Carefully, detach the gel rig from the base and insert the gel rig/cassette into the electrophoresis tank.
11. Fill the void between the two cassettes to the top with running buffer (0.025 mM Tris, 0.192 M glycine, 0.1% SDS, pH 8.3).
12. Place the lid onto the tank making sure the electrodes on the lid correspond to those on the rig.
13. Plug the electrode leads into the power source and run at 100V for approximately 1 – 1½ hours, or when the leading dye is nearing the bottom of your gel.
14. Switch the power off and disconnect the electrode leads, take the gel rig out of the tank and carefully loosen the screws to free your gel cassette.
15. Pour the InstantBlue stain solution into a small white tray and carefully dismantle the gel cassette. Place the gel into the stain and leave to incubate on a rocking platform set at slow speed for 5-15 minutes until protein spots become visible.
You should take a picture of the stained gel to put in your lab report.
Table 1. 12% Polyacrylamide Resolving Gel
Reagent |
Resolving gel (12%) |
Deionised H2O |
6.7 ml |
1.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.8 |
5.0 ml |
30% Acrylamide solution (acryl:bis, 37.5:1, pH 8.8) |
8.0 ml |
Sodium dodecyl sulphate (10% w/v) |
200 µl |
Ammonium persulfate (10% w/v) |
100 µl |
TEMED (N,N,N,N –Tetramethyl-ethylenediamine) |
10 µl |
Total volume 20 ml |
Diagrams 1
Diagrams 2
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.