Anyone available to write essay by 2/23/2020 4pm EST.  Topic and Instructions attached. 

In a narrative, do the following:

1. What is the history of ‘Right to Work’ laws? Where did they come from? Who proposed them and why? Has their purpose or effect changed since original inception?

2. Accurately summarize both sides of the ‘Right to Work’ debate. What exactly is each side arguing, and what are the defenses to the claims of their opponents?

3. Articulate your own opinion on this issue. Are ‘Right to Work’ laws ethically sound? Are they good for unions? Good for employers? Good for employees? If one or more of these stakeholders are disadvantaged, how? Do the benefits of these laws outweigh the costs? Why or why not?

4. What is your prediction for ‘Right to Work’ laws in America? Currently, the country is divided more or less 50:50 in terms of states with and without such laws. Will they become the new norm? Or will they regress and be repealed in the states that have enacted them? Defend your predictions with sound reasoning.

This assignment should at a minimum contain 1,000 words of content (double spaced). Word count does not include headings, cover pages, references, or question text (if you choose to include it in your paper); I am looking for 1,000 words of substance. Your paper should be in APA format including a properly formatted cover page (abstracts are optional) and a reference page with at least three (3) NEW references (“new” here means references that you have not already used in previous assignments in this course).

Include properly formatted in-text citations within the body of your work for each of your listed references so the reader can ascertain your original thoughts or ideas as well as the portion of your work that is credited to credible sources. It is very important to identify work from other sources to ensure that proper credit is provided to researchers in the field. This assignment uses Turn It In for originality verification.

A recommended font is 12pt Times New Roman. DO NOT include discussion board answers with your formally written assignment submission.

In a narrative, do the following:

1. What is the history of ‘Right to Work’ laws? Where did they come from? Who proposed them and why? Has their purpose or effect changed since original inception?

2. Accurately summarize both sides of the ‘Right to Work’ debate. What exactly is each side arguing, and what are the defenses to the claims of their opponents?

3. Articulate your own opinion on this issue. Are ‘Right to Work’ laws ethically sound? Are they good for unions? Good for employers? Good for employees? If one or more of these stakeholders are disadvantaged, how? Do the benefits of these laws outweigh the costs? Why or why not?

4. What is your prediction for ‘Right to Work’ laws in America? Currently, the country is divided more or less 50:50 in terms of states with and without such laws. Will they become the new norm? Or will they regress and be repealed in the states that have enacted them? Defend your predictions with sound reasoning.

This assignment should at a minimum contain 1,000 words of content (double spaced). Word count does not include headings, cover pages, references, or question text (if you choose to include it in your paper); I am looking for 1,000 words of substance. Your paper should be in APA format including a properly formatted cover page (abstracts are optional) and a reference page with at least three (3) NEW references (“new” here means references that you have not already used in previous assignments in this course).

Include properly formatted in-text citations within the body of your work for each of your listed references so the reader can ascertain your original thoughts or ideas as well as the portion of your work that is credited to credible sources. It is very important to identify work from other sources to ensure that proper credit is provided to researchers in the field. This assignment uses Turn It In for originality verification.

Written Assignment Rubric
100 % Enter rubric description

Exemplary
4 pts

Satisfactory
3 pts

Beginning
2 pts

Did not attempt
0 pts

Cover Page and/or Abstract
10 %

Exemplary
Cover page:
All elements are present and properly organized.
and/or
Abstract:
Clearly states problem and question to be resolved; clearly summarizes method, results, and conclusions.

Satisfactory
Cover Page:
Page lacks one or two minor element(s).
and/or
Abstract:
Summarizes problem, method, results, and conclusions but lacks some details.

Beginning
Cover Page:
Page lacks major element(s), or is missing altogether.
and/or
Abstract:
Is vague about the problem; does not provide a summary of the whole project.

Did not attempt
Did not attempt.

Introduction
15 %

Exemplary
Provdes background research into the topic and summarizes important findings from the review of the literature; describes problem to be solved; justifies the study; explains the significance of the problem to an audience of non-specialists.

Satisfactory
Provides background research into the topic and describes the problem to be solved.

Beginning
Provides background research into the topic but does not describe the problem to be solved; gives insufficient or nonexistent explanation of details to non-specialists.

Did not attempt
Did not attempt.

Discussion
30 %

Exemplary
Addresses the topic with clarity; organizes and synthesizes information; draws conclusions.

Satisfactory
Addresses the topic; lacks substantive conclusions; sometimes digresses from topic of focus.

Beginning
Provides little to no clarity in formulating conclusions and/or organization.

Did not attempt
Did not attempt.

Summary
15 %

Exemplary
Presents a clear logical explanation for findings, recommendations and/or implications for future research and/or application.

Satisfactory
Presents a logical explanation for findings

Beginning
Does not adequately explain findings.

Did not attempt
Did not attempt.

Mechanics and Documentation
30 %

Exemplary
Is free or almost free of errors of grammar, spelling, and writing mechanics, and uses required number of sources and properly cites/references them.

Satisfactory
Has errors but they don’t represent a major distraction, and/or minor deficiencies with sources (slightly short of required quantity, or minor errors in cites/references).

Beginning
Has errors that obscure meaning of content or add confusion, and/or neglects important sources, or cites/references few to no sources.

Did not attempt
Did not attempt.