I need an assignment completed can you assist me with this one?
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||||||||||||
Benchmark – Language Disabilities and Assistive Technology Unit Plan | |||||||||||||||||||
Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |||||||||||
100.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
Part 1: Student Goal [CEC 5.3; ICSI.5.K2, ICSI.5.K3, ICSI.5.S15, ICSI.5.S19, ICSI.5.S20; IGC.5.K1, IGC.5.S7, IGC.5.S21; InTASC 3(h), 8(g); MC1, MC4; COE 5.3] | 10.0% | Not addressed. | IEP goal is not measurable and/or does not use, or inappropriately uses, alternative and augmentative communication systems and assistive technology to facilitate communication with peers and aid in comprehension of content. | IEP goal is somewhat measurable. Goal superficially involves alternative and augmentative communication systems and assistive technology to facilitate communication with peers and aid in comprehension of content. | IEP goal is clear, measurable, and appropriately incorporates alternative and augmentative communication systems and assistive technology to facilitate communication with peers and aid in comprehension of content. | IEP goal is specific, measurable, ideal for measuring reading comprehension, and skillfully incorporates the use of alternative and augmentative communication systems to support her communication and learning. | |||||||||||||
Part 2: Mini-Unit Sections A, B, C, and D | Information in Sections, A, B, C, and D are incomplete. Objectives are not measurable and do not align to listed learning standards. Vocabulary/Academic Language do not reflect the text and are not suited to the class grade level. Materials and resources do not support each lesson’s content and are not integrated into each lesson’s activities. | Information in Sections A, B, C, and D are somewhat appropriate. Objectives are marginally measurable, but align to listed learning standards. Vocabulary/Academic Language weakly reflect the text and are not well suited to the class grade level. Materials and resources are inappropriate for each lesson’s content and are superficially integrated into each lesson’s activities. | Information in Sections A, B, C, and D are clear and appropriate. Objectives are measurable and align to listed learning standards. Vocabulary/Academic Language reflect the text and are developmentally appropriate to the class grade level. Materials and resources described are suitable for each lesson’s content and are integrated appropriately into each lesson’s activities. | Information in Sections A, B, C, and D are skillfully detailed. Objectives are measurable and align to listed learning standards. Vocabulary/Academic Language reflect the text and are well suited to the class grade level. Materials and resources described are ideal for each lesson’s content and are skillfully integrated into each lesson’s activities. | |||||||||||||||
Part 2: Mini-Unit Sections E and F (Instructional Strategies and Activities) | 1 | 5.0% | Mini-unit strategies to enhance language development and communication skills of the student with disabilities are ineffective for the content and/or student being taught. | Mini-unit strategies to enhance the language development and communication skills of the student with disabilities are not ideal for the content and/or student being taught. | Mini-unit sufficiently uses strategies to enhance the language development and communication skills of the student with disabilities. | Mini-unit adeptly teaches literacy content and skills by using well-planned strategies and activities that are ideal for the developmental level of the class. Unit thoughtfully incorporates a mix of collaborative and individual activities. | |||||||||||||
Part 2: Mini-Unit Section G (Differentiation) COE: 5.4 [CEC 5.4 ICSI.5.K2, ICSI.5.S19, IGC.5.S13, IGC.5.S14, IGC.5.S16, IGC.5.S17, IGC.5.S18, IGC.5.S19, IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 2(e); MC1, MC4] | 20.0% | Mini-unit poorly identifies the content being taught and is irrelevant to the needs of the student. Instructional activities are not developmentally appropriate in meeting the needs of the student, and inadequately address the identified content. Instructional activities include differentiation that is ineffective in meeting the needs of the student. | Mini-unit marginally identifies the content being taught and is ambiguous to the needs of the student. Instructional activities are unclearly developmentally appropriate to meet the needs of the student, and vaguely teach the identified content. Instructional activities include differentiation that only partially meets the needs of the student. | Mini-unit appropriately identifies the content being taught and is relevant to the needs of the student. Instructional activities are developmentally appropriate to meet the needs of the student, and clearly teach the identified content. Instructional activities include differentiation that is suitable for meeting the needs of the student. | Instructional activities are developmentally appropriate to meet the needs of the student, and skillfully teach the identified content, standards and objectives. Differentiation is exceptionally responsive to the needs of the student, allowing her to access the curriculum. | ||||||||||||||
Part 2: Mini-Unit Section H (Assessment) COE: 5.2 [CEC 5.2, ICSI.5.K2, ICSI.5.K3, ICSI.5.S7, ICSI.5.S14, IGC.5.K1, IGC.5.K3, IGC.5.S1, IGC.5.S7, IGC.5.S23-25, IGC.5.S29; InTASC 6(g), 6(i), 6(r), 8(b); ISTE-T 2a, 2d, 2c; MC1, MC4] | Mini-unit pre- and post-assessment items and accommodations for the student, fail to evaluate the learning, and are not aligned to the predetermined IEP goal. | Mini-unit pre- and post-assessment items and accommodations are inappropriate for the student, weakly evaluate the learning, and are not fully aligned to the predetermined IEP goal. | Mini-unit pre- and post-assessment items and accommodations are appropriate for the student, evaluate the learning, and are aligned to the predetermined IEP goal. | Pre- and post-assessments are ideal for the class grade level and objectives being learned. Planned low- or high-tech accommodations are well suited for the student, and comprehensively evaluate her progress toward achieving the predetermined IEP goal. | |||||||||||||||
Rationale: Instructional Choices and Accommodations COE: 3.3 [CEC 3.3, ICSI.1.K3, ICSI.3.K2, ICSI.3.K3, ICSI.5.S15, ICSI.5.S21, IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 3(a); MC1, MC2, MC4, MC5; COE 3.3] | Rationale does not explain how instructional choices are developmentally appropriate for teaching the content standards. Does not detail how the differentiated activities and assessments allow the student to meet her goal and access the curriculum. | Rationale weakly explains how instructional choices are developmentally appropriate for teaching the content standards. Partially details how the differentiated activities and assessments allow the student to meet her goal and access the curriculum. | Rationale appropriately explains how instructional choices are developmentally appropriate for teaching the content standards. Sufficiently details how the differentiated activities and assessments allow the student to meet her goal and access the curriculum. | Rationale convincingly explains how instructional choices are developmentally appropriate for teaching the content standards. Insightfully details how the differentiated activities and assessments allow the student to meet her goal and fully access the curriculum. | |||||||||||||||
Rationale: Supportive Learning Environment COE: 2.4 [CEC 2.1 ICSI.2.K1-K4, ICSI.2.S1, ICSI.2.S3, ICSI.2.S4, ICSI.2.S8, ICSI.2.S9, IGC.2.K2, IGC.2.K3, IGC.2.S2; InTASC 9(f); ISTE-T 4a, 4b, 4c; MC4, MC5] | Information on how the accommodations and differentiation will encourage self-advocacy, increase independence, and emphasize the safe and ethical use of information and technology is missing or is insufficient. | Although it is mentioned, detail is lacking on how the accommodations and differentiation will encourage self-advocacy, increase independence, and emphasize the safe and ethical use of information and technology | Sufficiently describes how the accommodations and differentiation will encourage self-advocacy, increase independence, and emphasize the safe and ethical use of information and technology. | ||||||||||||||||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Submission contains frequent mechanical and conventional errors or non-relevant language that affects meaning and clarity. | Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. Word choice reflects basic, consistent, appropriate use of practice and topic-related language. | Rationale skillfully describes how the accommodations and differentiation create a supportive learning environment that encourages self-advocacy, increases independence, and emphasizes the safe and ethical use of information and technology. | |||||||||||||||
Research and Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources provided do not support the claims of the presentation or are not credible. Citations may include several formatting errors or not follow APA conventions at all. | Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources do not fully support claims, or sources are not all credible. Citations may include several formatting errors. | Research is timely and relevant, and generally supports the information presented. All the criteria stated in the assignment are addressed. Citations may include minor errors in format. | Submission is nearly/ completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and topic-related language. | |||||||||||||||
Total Weightage | 100% |
Benchmark – Language Disabilities and Assistive Technology Unit Plan
Understanding the development and individual differences of students with disabilities allows special education teachers to respond appropriately during instruction, utilizing supportive instructional strategies and technologies to meet student needs. Using assistive technologies, such as alternative and augmentative communication systems, to support instructional assessment, planning, and delivery, is essential to the language development and communication of students with disabilities.
Read the case study below to inform the assignment.
Case Study: Stephanie
Grade: 5th
Age: 10
Stephanie is a fifth grade student who is intellectually disabled and also has a severe language disorder. She is 10‐years‐old and spends a great portion of her day in self‐contained settings. She receives speech therapy from a speech pathologist for a minimum of 30 minutes, four days a week. The rest of the time her language needs are supported by the special education teacher. She does attend a general education fifth grade classroom daily for 60 minutes for English language arts instruction, per her parent’s request. An instructional assistant accompanies her to class.
Stephanie’s oral expression skills are in the below average range. She struggles with oral expression speech, expressive language, and meanings of words. Her speech is limited and she usually has poor decoding and reading comprehension skills. Her reading level is at a low first grade level, reading simple stories with a Lexile level of 275‐400. Her favorite book is If You Give a Mouse a Cookie by Laura Numeroff. Stephanie writes very little and relies on the Picture Exchange System as her primary form of communication.
Stephanie attends the fifth grade English language arts class for exposure to more appropriate grade level content and socialization. She requires frequent breaks and one‐on‐one support from an assistant when participating in the general education setting. The special education teacher and assistant work with the general education teacher and follow the modified curriculum from the state department of education.
For standardized grade‐level testing, Stephanie participates in the yearly Alternate Assessment. The assessment is administered orally by the teacher and a proctor is present. The assessment is multiple choice and the administrator can accept eye gazing, finger pointing, and verbal responses to answer questions. The assessment is not timed and the teacher can apply the 10 response rule: If the student does not respond after 10 questions, the teacher can end the assessment.
Assignment:
Use the “ELA Mini‐Unit Template” to complete this assignment.
Part 1: Student Goal
Write a measurable reading comprehension goal for Stephanie’s IEP. Within the goal, incorporate an alternative and augmentative communication system to support her communication and learning.
Part 2: Mini‐Unit
Compose a mini‐unit of three ELA lesson plans for the general education classroom that incorporates your ELA standards for teaching reading comprehension to fifth graders.
For each lesson plan include differentiated activities and assessments for Stephanie that use the AAC system identified in Part 1 to allow her to access the curriculum and address her measurable IEP goal.
Part 3: Rationale
Provide a 250‐500 word rationale that explains how your mini‐unit instructional choices are developmentally appropriate for teaching the content standards, and how the differentiated activities and assessment will allow Stephanie to meet her goal and fully access the curriculum. Address how your accommodations and differentiation create a supportive learning environment that encourages self‐advocacy, increases independence, and emphasizes safe and ethical use of information and technology for Stephanie.
Support your rationale with 2‐3 scholarly resources on best practices regarding semantics/language disorders and the use of assistive technology.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
ELA Mini-Unit Template
Part 1: Student Goal
Part 2: Mini Unit
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
A. Lesson Title, Objectives, and Brief Summary
B. National/State Learning Standards
C. Vocabulary and Academic Language
D. Materials and Resources
E. Instructional Strategy/Strategies
F. Summary of Instruction and Activities for the Lesson
G. Lesson Differentiation
for Stephanie Using AAC
H. Pre- and Post- Assessments
I. Assessment Accommodation for Stephanie Using AAC
Part 3: Rationale
References
© 2019 Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.