Instructions

Submit your completed final project, in which you analyze Case Studies One, Two, and Three. Be sure to incorporate instructor feedback in your final submission.

For additional details, please refer to the

Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

document

Running Head:

CASE STUDY

1

CASE STUDY 4

CASE STUDY

Institution Affiliation

Student Name

Date

A. In the case, the defendant was Park who was the CEO of Acme International. The company had failed to comply with the food and drug administration to keep the condition within the warehouse sanitary. The court found that Park was liable for the unsanitary condition that his organization had created. Moreover, the court said that if an individual is in charge of the company then the individual should be willing to accept the consequences of any illegal practices that his or her organization is involved in, (Buell, 2019). Personal jurisdiction means the power of the court over the parties that are involved in the case. It is a requirement that the parties involved have a certain minimum contract before the court can exercise their power. Subject matter jurisdiction is the power of the Federal Court to listen to a certain kind of case that is related to a particular subject matter. A minimum contract is used to define when it is suitable for any Federal Court in one state-run to declare personal jurisdiction over the alternative party of another state.

B. ADR refers to the procedure that aids the gatherings decide a dispute except for a trial. The process is less stressful, confidential and less formal as compared to the traditional procedure.

C. Some of the advantages of attribution include saves time and money. Parties are more flexible in selecting the rules or laws that can be applied to the dispute. Some of the disadvantages of attribution include a limited chance for the court to review the decision of the arbitrator, (Cooper & Zywicki, 2017). Meditation is whereby another party known as the mediator helps the parties to reach an acceptable resolution. In this case, it has no benefits.

D., E., & F. The main crime that exists, in this case, is a fraud. Fraud refers to deliberate dishonesty to safe unfairly or illegal gain or to deny the victim of their rights. The other possible crime is an ingredient that is not permitted by the FDA. The use of funny faces is restricted and prohibited. According to the law, cosmetics ingredients should not include products that are harmful.

G. The ethical process of decision making involves various elements including problem type. This involves figuring out the type of problem. The right versus wrong or illegal versus illegal is considered. The final element is the type of dilemma such as individual versus community and trust versus loyalty.

Reference

Buell, S. W. (2019). Fraud. In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law (pp. 265-282). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Cooper, J. C., & Zywicki, T. J. (2017). A Chip Off the Old Block or a New Direction for Payment Card Security? Chips, Pins, and the Law and Economics of Payment Card Fraud. Chips, Pins, and the Law and Economics of Payment Card Fraud (November 29, 2017).