1. Starting with the environment scorning model in Table 5-3, construct an objectives hierarchy that can be used to evaluate capital development
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
assignment work(Project management process)
Just from $13/Page
and
expansion projects being considered by an electric utility company.
and
2. Referring to Exercise 6.4, combine the two hierarchies into one so that there are no more than eight subobjectives at the bottom level. Define either a quantitative or a qualitative scale for each of these subobjectives, and construct a utility function for each. Use MAUT to evaluate and rank the three alternatives.
[The assignment should be at least 400 words minimum and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced), and attached as a WORD file.
urgentimportantAPA FormatNo plagarism
Project Management: Process, Methodologies, and Economics
Third Edition
Chapter 5
Portfolio Management-Project
Screening and Selection
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
If this PowerPoint presentation contains mathematical equations, you may need to check that your computer has the following installed:
1) MathType Plugin
2) Math Player (free versions available)
3) NVDA Reader (free versions available)
Figure 5-1 Project Evaluation and Selection Process
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-1 An Example of a Checklist for Screening Projects
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-2 Multidimensional Diagram for Checklist Example
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-2 An Example of a Scoring Model for Screening Projects
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-3 Environmental Scoring Form Used by Niagara Mohawk
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-4 Input Data and Results for Incremental Analysis
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-3 Relative Effectiveness of Systems
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-5 Data for C-E Analysis
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-4 Relationship Between System Effectiveness and Cost
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-6 Some Definitions Related to Risk
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-5 Spider Chart for Sensitivity Analysis
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-6 N P V Comparisons for Risk-Adjusted M A R Rs
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-7 Data and Results for Reduction of Useful Life Example
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-7 After-Tax Parametric Analysis for Product
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-8 Systems Engineering Approach to Risk Assessment
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-9 Illustration of Risk Profile
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-10 Structure of Decision Tree
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-11 Segments of Tree
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-12 Deterministic Replacement Problem
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-8 Computational Results for Replacement Problem in Figure 5-12
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-9 Computations for Replacement Problem with 12% Interest Rate
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-13 Automation Problem Before Consideration of Technology Study
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-14 Automation Problem with Technology Study Taken into Account
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-10 Expected N P V Calculations for the Automation Problem
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-15 One-Stage F M S Replacement Problem
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-11 Computation of Posterior Probabilities Given That Investigation-Predicted Demand is High (h)
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-12 Computation of Posterior Probabilities Given That Investigation-Predicted Demand is Low (l)
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-16 Replacement Problem with Alternative of Technology Study
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-13 Expected N P V Calculations for Replacement Problem in Figure 5-13
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 5-17 Hydraulic Power Unit
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-14
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-15
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-16
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-17
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5-18
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 5A-1 Format for Applying Bayes’ Theorem
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright
Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
38
