See attached. Thanks
WK5Assignment: Patient Education for Children and Adolescents
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
wk5Assgn
Just from $13/Page
Patient education is an effective tool in supporting compliance and treatment for a diagnosis. It is important to consider effective ways to educate patients and their families about a diagnosis—such as coaching, brochures, or videos—and to recognize that the efficacy of any materials may differ based on the needs and learning preferences of a particular patient. Because patients or their families may be overwhelmed with a new diagnosis, it is important that materials provided by the practitioner clearly outline the information that patients need to know.
The Assignment
**TOPIC: Week 5 topic is Premenstrual Dysphoric disorder.
· For this Assignment, you will pretend that you are a contributing writer to a health blog.
· You are tasked with explaining important information about an assigned mental health disorder in language appropriate for child/adolescent patients and/or their caregivers.
To Prepare
· By Day 1, your Instructor will assign a mood or anxiety disorder diagnosis for you to use for this Assignment.
· Research signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.
The Assignment (detailed rubric at the end of this doc.)
· In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience,
· explain signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments,
· and appropriate community resources and referrals.
Submit your Assignment.
Required Readings
Hilt, R. J., & Nussbaum, A. M. (2016). DSM-5 pocket guide for child and adolescent mental health. American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
· Chapter 3, “Common Clinical Concerns”
· Chapter 7, “A Brief Version of DSM-5″
· Chapter 8, “A stepwise approach to Differential Diagnosis”
· Chapter 10, “Selected DSM-5 Assessment Measures”
· Chapter 11, “Rating Scales and Alternative Diagnostic Systems”
Shoemaker, S. J., Wolf, M. S., & Brach, C. (2014). The patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT) and user’s guide. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/pemat_guide
Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
· Chapter 60, “Anxiety Disorders”
· Chapter 61, “Obsessive Compulsive Disorder”
· Chapter 62, “Bipolar Disorder in Childhood”
· Chapter 63, “Depressive Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence”
Medication Review
Review the FDA-approved use of the following medicines related to treating mood and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.
|
Bipolar depression
|
Bipolar disorder
|
|
lurasidone (age 10–17)
olanzapine-fluoxetine combination (age 10–17)
|
aripiprazole (age 10–17)
asenapine (for mania or mixed episodes, age 10–17)
lithium (for mania, age 12–17)
olanzapine (age 13–17)
quetiapine (age 10–17)
risperidone (age 10–17)
|
|
Generalized anxiety disorder
|
Depression
|
|
duloxetine (age 7–17)
|
escitalopram (age 12–17)
fluoxetine (age 8–17)
|
DETAILED RUBRIC
|
|
Novice
|
Competent
|
Proficient
|
New Column4
|
|
In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience:
• Explain signs and symptoms for the assigned diagnosis in children and adolescents.
|
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response accurately and concisely explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response accurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.
|
|
· Explain pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with the diagnosis.
|
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response accurately and concisely explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response accurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.
|
|
· Explain appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis.
|
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and concisely explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response accurately explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.
|
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
|
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.
|
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
|
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.
|
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains one or two APA format errors
|
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
Name: NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
